|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-30-11 09:33 PM Original message |
So Nader is calling for someone to challenge Obama in the primaries. How come Nader doesn't call |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scheming daemons (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-30-11 09:34 PM Response to Original message |
1. Because Nader is a dick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamingdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-30-11 09:47 PM Response to Reply #1 |
10. He rears his vote dividing head every time nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Riftaxe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-30-11 10:22 PM Response to Reply #10 |
25. Easy to avoid, just have the Democratic candidate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DJ13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-30-11 09:35 PM Response to Original message |
2. Because he doesnt expect that any of those idiots will win? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
adhd_what_huh (368 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-30-11 09:36 PM Response to Original message |
3. Nadar can suck my ass! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
digitaln3rd (533 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-30-11 09:39 PM Response to Original message |
4. Because they're already having primaries? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HappyMe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-30-11 09:41 PM Response to Original message |
5. Well, we should all hold our breath.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chan790 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-30-11 09:42 PM Response to Original message |
6. Because Nader sold his values for his ego. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beac (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-30-11 09:45 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. I say he wrestles both Ron AND Rand Paul and then |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elocs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-30-11 09:47 PM Response to Reply #6 |
11. If Nader were to win the to-the-death wrestling match the Grand Canyon |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HappyMe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-30-11 09:52 PM Response to Reply #6 |
18. So if he can raise plenty of repiglican $$$ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
loyalsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-30-11 09:43 PM Response to Original message |
7. He's deeply entrenched in his own absolutism |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FLAprogressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-30-11 09:47 PM Response to Original message |
9. What a lame post. There are 10+ primary challengers in the GOP primary. Are you really this dense? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-30-11 10:03 PM Response to Reply #9 |
20. and they all preach the same message. I think it is time for Nader to help the repuke primaries for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
derby378 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-30-11 09:48 PM Response to Original message |
12. Aren't there enough Republican primary candidates already? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FLAprogressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-30-11 09:49 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. Apparently you're only allowed to criticize Dems from the left if you criticize the GOP too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
City Lights (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-30-11 09:50 PM Response to Original message |
14. How many more GOP candidates do you think Nader should call for? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FLAprogressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-30-11 09:53 PM Response to Reply #14 |
19. Nader could run in the GOP primary himself and people here would still bitch and moan. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scheming daemons (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-30-11 10:20 PM Response to Reply #19 |
23. At least in that case, he'd be honest about his motives. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Heavy Metal Dude (8 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-30-11 09:51 PM Response to Original message |
15. Many voted for Nader in 2000 and ended up getting at least three terms of Shrub. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
digitaln3rd (533 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-30-11 10:10 PM Response to Reply #15 |
21. Don't blame Nader. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HappyMe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-30-11 10:23 PM Response to Reply #21 |
26. lol! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
white_wolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-30-11 09:51 PM Response to Original message |
16. Good for Nader. I'm glad someone is doing it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-30-11 09:52 PM Response to Original message |
17. Because that doesn't serve his purpose of electing Republican presidents. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HappyMe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-30-11 10:19 PM Response to Reply #17 |
22. I agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mfcorey1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-30-11 10:21 PM Response to Original message |
24. In every election he always comes in as a spoiler. He has as much credibility as Sarah Palin. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HappyMe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-30-11 10:43 PM Response to Reply #24 |
28. You have won a lovely kewpie dol! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bonobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-30-11 10:24 PM Response to Original message |
27. Huh? That's a really dumb question. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OHdem10 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-30-11 11:00 PM Response to Original message |
29. The Media may select us a Candidate: They keep talking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-31-11 01:30 AM Response to Reply #29 |
30. A lot of that polarization we can blame on that corporate media /nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-31-11 04:27 AM Response to Original message |
31. Nader wanted W., because it would mobilize the left. Now he wants Perry because it will mobilize the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon Jun 03rd 2024, 04:33 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC