|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Playinghardball (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-23-11 03:42 PM Original message |
Rahm Emanuel loses his temper with a reporter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taverner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-23-11 03:44 PM Response to Original message |
1. Did he send him a dead fish in the mail? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
roguevalley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-24-11 02:41 AM Response to Reply #1 |
60. no wonder obama is indifferent to the suffering his going to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kenny blankenship (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-23-11 03:46 PM Response to Original message |
2. "I don’t care about you" I think we all knew this, but it's good now&then for them to repeat it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Schema Thing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-23-11 03:51 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kenny blankenship (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-23-11 03:55 PM Response to Reply #4 |
7. I think his words are unintentionally revealing and characteristic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wait Wut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-23-11 05:08 PM Response to Reply #4 |
23. Agreed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dameocrat67 (442 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-24-11 02:47 AM Response to Reply #23 |
62. rahm does bitch about taxes for public schools |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-25-11 12:05 AM Response to Reply #4 |
83. The press represents the people. He was asked a very pertinent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
StarsInHerHair (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-24-11 03:01 AM Response to Reply #2 |
68. & THAT is the hallmark of a follower, a LEADER cares about people unrelated |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-23-11 03:47 PM Response to Original message |
3. Rahm did the right thing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fumesucker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-23-11 03:58 PM Original message |
Rahm is making choices that effect other people's children.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-23-11 04:28 PM Response to Original message |
12. That's absurd. He's a public figure who makes a good wage. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fumesucker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-23-11 04:55 PM Response to Reply #12 |
19. It wasn't about his kids but rather his decisions.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-23-11 05:17 PM Response to Reply #19 |
25. His decisions should be analyzed on their own merits. His kids should not be dragged into the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arkana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-23-11 06:17 PM Response to Reply #19 |
34. Almost every political figure with any kind of money |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LanternWaste (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-26-11 11:20 AM Response to Reply #19 |
106. I imagine to maintain moral consistency |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-26-11 12:14 PM Response to Reply #106 |
109. Delete--wrong place, sorry. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Remember Me (730 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-23-11 07:55 PM Response to Reply #12 |
36. Asking where they'll go to school isn't bothering them at all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-23-11 09:29 PM Response to Reply #36 |
39. Yes it is, because you know full well the press will not leave it at that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dameocrat67 (442 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-24-11 02:53 AM Response to Reply #39 |
65. there is no indication that their are more armed guards |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-24-11 11:27 PM Response to Reply #65 |
75. OK, you try going to a play at Sidwell Friends and tell me how easy it is to get in. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LooseWilly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-25-11 03:12 AM Response to Reply #75 |
95. Keep up with the snooty details, please! We, the Hoi Polloi are just DYING to hear... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-26-11 04:01 AM Response to Reply #95 |
99. Now, that's just a silly little whine. You're getting personal with me because you don't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LooseWilly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-26-11 04:44 AM Response to Reply #99 |
101. Heh, you're right... I'm employing sarcasm to illustrate my dislike of what you're saying. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-26-11 12:39 PM Response to Reply #101 |
110. No, you're not employing sarcasm--you are making shit up and getting personal with me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LooseWilly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-27-11 05:53 AM Response to Reply #110 |
115. Apparently you are not very well versed in the true dimensions of sarcasm... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-27-11 12:07 PM Response to Reply #115 |
116. You not only fail to understand the meaning of sarcasm, you also can't argue your points |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LooseWilly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-28-11 04:24 AM Response to Reply #116 |
120. "You not only fail to understand the meaning of sarcasm, you also can't argue..."? My point is made |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-28-11 03:55 PM Response to Reply #120 |
122. Your point is decidedly not made. You and Rush are two of a kind. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LooseWilly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-29-11 02:31 AM Response to Reply #122 |
123. "You and Rush are two of a kind."?... resorting to ad hominems, while telling ME I'm not grown up? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
indurancevile (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-24-11 03:15 AM Response to Reply #39 |
72. For heavens sake, Jimmy Carter was asked about sending his kids to public school. It's not like |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-24-11 11:36 PM Response to Reply #72 |
77. And look at the mess it got him in. Rahm learned from that debacle. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skittles (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-23-11 07:59 PM Response to Reply #12 |
37. so why doesn't he just answer the fucking question? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-23-11 09:36 PM Response to Reply #37 |
40. It is NOT germane to his decision making process. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
coalition_unwilling (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-24-11 02:46 AM Response to Reply #40 |
61. Rahm is a fucking rich prick hypocrite who called progressives like |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-24-11 11:39 PM Response to Reply #61 |
78. You just proved his point. How could someone feel that their |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
coalition_unwilling (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-25-11 12:59 AM Response to Reply #78 |
88. speaking of 'shrieking,' you're shriekingly creating straw men, the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-25-11 01:21 AM Response to Reply #88 |
89. Now, don't "invent" straw men in your own head to try to rebut. That's not on. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
coalition_unwilling (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-25-11 01:24 AM Response to Reply #89 |
90. Your original post insinuated that my 'shrieking' was somehow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-25-11 01:40 AM Response to Reply #90 |
91. No it didn't, but nice distraction. See ya. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-26-11 04:48 AM Response to Reply #40 |
102. It's regularly asked of every mayor and councilperson in every city |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-26-11 12:48 PM Response to Reply #102 |
111. And he, like the Clintons, Bushes, and Obamas, do not have to justify their decisions. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-23-11 10:43 PM Response to Reply #37 |
50. Sorry, because it's none of the press' business |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fishwax (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-23-11 11:55 PM Response to Reply #12 |
55. as others have said, questioning the decision to enroll his kids in private school isn't invading |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-24-11 12:04 AM Response to Reply #55 |
56. I disagree. And the reporter had no "right" to an answer either. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fishwax (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-24-11 12:06 AM Response to Reply #56 |
57. I don't know what politicians don't, but that doesn't make the question out of line |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-24-11 12:14 AM Response to Reply #57 |
58. About the only time I think it is "fair" to ask public figures about where and how |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dameocrat67 (442 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-24-11 02:50 AM Response to Reply #12 |
64. jimmy carter sent his kids to public schools and criticized clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-24-11 11:55 PM Response to Reply #64 |
79. Amy Carter was lonely, miserable and isolated. Her school years were |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nailzberg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-23-11 09:48 PM Response to Original message |
42. I'd be worried that they'd get grades they didn't earn in public school. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-23-11 10:41 PM Response to Original message |
49. It's none of the press' business |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Remember Me (730 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-24-11 10:25 AM Response to Reply #49 |
73. If someone has a role OVER the school system, it for darned sure IS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-24-11 11:58 PM Response to Reply #73 |
80. When his CHILDREN are in charge of the school system, then, you'd have a point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Remember Me (730 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-25-11 04:47 PM Response to Reply #80 |
97. Hah! You wish. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-26-11 04:06 AM Response to Reply #97 |
100. "Just getting INFORMATION about them"....eh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Remember Me (730 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-26-11 11:08 AM Response to Reply #100 |
105. Well, now you've gone abusive on me, haven't you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-26-11 01:01 PM Response to Reply #105 |
112. How is it abusive to state the obvious? Who, except someone who wants to piss a guy off, would |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ejpoeta (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-23-11 03:58 PM Response to Reply #3 |
8. not sure why if he is dismantling public schools. i think where he is sending his kids may be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-23-11 05:21 PM Response to Reply #3 |
27. Deleted message |
Jack Sprat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-23-11 10:54 PM Response to Reply #3 |
51. Not in the least. Rahm just showed what |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dameocrat67 (442 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-24-11 02:49 AM Response to Reply #3 |
63. not so since Rahm is openly hostile to public schools. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-26-11 11:24 AM Response to Reply #3 |
108. Deleted message |
marmar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-23-11 03:51 PM Response to Original message |
5. “You are wrong and a bully." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Divernan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-23-11 03:53 PM Response to Original message |
6. Being called a bully is high praise coming from a bully like Rahm. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kenny blankenship (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-23-11 03:59 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. "praise from Caesar!" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-23-11 04:20 PM Response to Original message |
10. I don't really see anything wrong with aggressively sheltering one's children from public glare |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jackpine Radical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-23-11 04:27 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. I see something wrong with sheltering your children from |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-23-11 04:33 PM Response to Reply #11 |
16. For the sake of argument, let's say RE enacts policies that are HORRIBLE for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
booley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-23-11 04:40 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. I can se a flaw there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-23-11 04:50 PM Original message |
The children still suffer. Their privacy is violated. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fumesucker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-23-11 04:58 PM Response to Original message |
20. But Rahm does have children.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-23-11 05:11 PM Response to Reply #20 |
24. And his children are INNOCENT. Your argument is that it's OK to screw with the kids because Dad is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fumesucker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-23-11 05:32 PM Response to Reply #24 |
31. Who said anything about "screwing with the kids"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-23-11 09:25 PM Response to Reply #31 |
38. If you expose the children to public scrutiny because of the actions of the parents, you are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Big Vetolski (436 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-23-11 05:18 PM Response to Reply #16 |
26. Sorry, Rahm's children are fair game. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-23-11 05:23 PM Response to Reply #26 |
28. Other children of wealthy parents don't have to deal with the scrutiny, so why make his kids suffer? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dameocrat67 (442 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-24-11 03:02 AM Response to Reply #28 |
69. if the wealthy people are elected officials who |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-24-11 11:20 PM Response to Reply #69 |
74. Obama "fessed up?" Please. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tammywammy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-23-11 10:27 PM Response to Reply #26 |
46. I completely disagree. Children should always be off limits. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dameocrat67 (442 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-24-11 02:59 AM Response to Reply #16 |
67. a simple question over whether someone sends their kids |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-25-11 12:11 AM Response to Reply #67 |
85. But that wasn't the question, now, was it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Remember Me (730 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-26-11 06:17 PM Response to Reply #16 |
114. Here's the problem -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-27-11 12:26 PM Response to Reply #114 |
118. How weak--question my "motives" because you have no rebuttal. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Remember Me (730 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-27-11 03:05 PM Response to Reply #118 |
119. This is getting bizarre |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-28-11 03:50 PM Response to Reply #119 |
121. You're wrong, still.....but I thought you were "out" a post ago. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fearless (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-23-11 05:24 PM Response to Reply #11 |
29. +10000 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jackpine Radical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-23-11 07:10 PM Response to Reply #10 |
35. What public glare? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-23-11 10:09 PM Response to Reply #35 |
44. The minute he engages the press on matters concerning his children, they become |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dameocrat67 (442 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-24-11 03:05 AM Response to Reply #44 |
70. They did not bother obama or clintons kids and everyone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-25-11 12:14 AM Response to Reply #70 |
86. Yes, they did. Both the Obamas and the Clintons "caught shit" for sending their |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dameocrat67 (442 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-25-11 02:02 AM Response to Reply #86 |
92. That happened because she was the presidents daughter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-25-11 03:09 AM Response to Reply #92 |
94. Yes, she was singled out ONLY because she was the child of a politician. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
riderinthestorm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-23-11 09:44 PM Response to Reply #10 |
41. Sarah Palin's children attend public school nt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-23-11 10:21 PM Response to Reply #41 |
45. They also sell books about virtue after getting knocked up, they |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
riderinthestorm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-23-11 10:32 PM Response to Reply #45 |
48. Sarah's kids have been in public school all along, even when she was governor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-23-11 11:18 PM Response to Reply #48 |
53. Sarah's kids were in "Distance Learning" programs--not classrooms. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dameocrat67 (442 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-24-11 02:57 AM Response to Reply #10 |
66. he is not agressively sheltering them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-25-11 12:03 AM Response to Reply #66 |
82. No--he's keeping them on PRIVATE PROPERTY, where the press can't mess with them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kaleva (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-23-11 04:32 PM Response to Original message |
13. I think this would be newsworthy if he was reported to be calm. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-23-11 04:32 PM Response to Original message |
14. Koch Bros DLC Rahm calling someone else a "bully" -- ???? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FLAprogressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-24-11 11:28 PM Response to Reply #14 |
76. Projection |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluenorthwest (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-23-11 04:33 PM Response to Original message |
15. Obviously they are in an absudly luxurious private school. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-25-11 12:23 AM Response to Reply #15 |
87. The interviewer named the school. He objected to her getting into the personal lives of his kids. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dionysus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-23-11 04:50 PM Response to Original message |
18. thats pretty tame for rahm, isn't it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThomWV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-23-11 05:00 PM Response to Original message |
21. Good for him. I don't see a single thing wrong with that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NuttyFluffers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-23-11 05:05 PM Response to Original message |
22. how telling... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JanMichael (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-23-11 05:25 PM Response to Original message |
30. "You are wrong and a bully." sounds SOOOO right wing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Larkspur (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-23-11 05:37 PM Response to Original message |
32. Rahm is just another wealthy a-hole who likes beating the peasants |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MouseFitzgerald (208 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-23-11 05:53 PM Response to Original message |
33. Straight up Chris Christy style |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jack Sprat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-23-11 11:01 PM Response to Reply #33 |
52. The odd couple, Rahm and Christie. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
riderinthestorm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-23-11 09:51 PM Response to Original message |
43. He's wrong on this. He should send his children to public school |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-23-11 11:32 PM Response to Reply #43 |
54. Ted Kennedy didn't. Barack Obama didn't. Bill Clinton didn't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dameocrat67 (442 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-24-11 03:09 AM Response to Reply #54 |
71. well Carter did send each and everyone of his children to public schools |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-25-11 12:07 AM Response to Reply #71 |
84. The only one who went to crappy DC schools was Amy, and she suffered for it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dameocrat67 (442 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-25-11 02:04 AM Response to Reply #84 |
93. They are crappy largely because of crappy elite politicians who |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-25-11 03:21 AM Response to Reply #93 |
96. The President of the United States is not the National Superintendent of Schools |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unkachuck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-23-11 10:27 PM Response to Original message |
47. "...I’m making this decision as a father." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yurbud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-24-11 12:35 AM Response to Original message |
59. Rahm is a fucking crybaby who hates being called on his corruption and hyprocrisy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-24-11 11:58 PM Response to Original message |
81. Whatever-- politicians know they can blow up over questions like that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Autumn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-25-11 04:51 PM Response to Original message |
98. That's one hell of a campaign snippet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scottybeamer70 (844 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-26-11 05:19 AM Response to Original message |
103. "I don't care about you.".............. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bodhi BloodWave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-26-11 05:46 AM Response to Reply #103 |
104. The fact that some people even here on DU seems to think his kids are a valid target |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-27-11 12:16 PM Response to Reply #104 |
117. I'm astounded, myself. I always thought those who tended towards the liberal end of the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-26-11 11:22 AM Response to Original message |
107. Deleted message |
and-justice-for-all (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-26-11 01:04 PM Response to Original message |
113. That is a irrelevant question and I would be pissed too..nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 30th 2024, 06:06 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC