TIFWIW...Per Radar Online....Another Woman comes forward - Weinergate

[Laura PourMeADrink]

http://www.radaronline.com/exclusives/2011/06/weinergate-grows-another-woman-provides-sex-messages-his-account

By Dylan Howard
Senior Executive Editor, Star

Weinergate is getting bigger and bigger.

Another woman has come forward to RadarOnline.com and Star magazine and provided a sexting exchange with embattled New York Representative Anthony Weiner.

The woman says she has 200 sexually explicit messages from Weiner from a Facebook account the Democratic politician no longer uses.

RadarOnline.com and Star magazine verified that the account where the messages originated does belong to Weiner (see below).

He told the woman he had a "ridiculous bulge" in his shorts and asked if she "wanna see" it -- almost three months before a photo of an erect penis in tight fitting briefs appeared in the pol’s Twitter stream.

It’s a sensational twist to the scandal plaguing the embattled New York congressman. This new woman is middle-aged and from Nevada.

<clip>

[itsrobert]

1. And her name is Sharron Angle

ewwwwwwwwwwwwwwww

[Laura PourMeADrink]

3. hahahaha

you know to me, the randomness of who is getting these things does sound like a hack

[RandomThoughts]

2. heh, that is expected.

Do you see the pattern.

And how it is not real Internet posts.

The Donald said things that were correct, then the day it is said he says somethings correct, they drop the 'killing of bin laden' in metaphor, if you know that anyone against the status quo, they call a terrorist, and that Bin Laden was not involved in 9/11 it makes sense.

(although he was baited to fight on wrong battlefield about birther issue.)


Do you know who they think 'The Database' is. Anything spiritual in anything, becuase they only see the nightmares. The war on terror, is the scorching of the sky to try to stop anything kind from being seen by many people. Why they want to control information systems, and make movies and music about money first.


When making a supporting comment of someone, if they can't get to you, they then make a negative comment about that someone, to try by attachment to get someone to look bad.


So that nobody will want to be around you, becuase they can't get to you, but will go after anyone that has the same ideas as you, after you make a positive post about them. To try and create a view of lack of credibility from made up news stories.


Hows that working out for you?

It is not anything new, and shows what they fear, that the truth in many things is trying to correct the way they think by helping them learn, and that they need to send the beer and travel money that is due to me, not make up stuff on internet and smear people for a game that is not real.

[Laura PourMeADrink]

5. I have no idea what you are talking about....sorry. I must be

dense.

[RandomThoughts]

7. LOL.

The war on 'the database' is a war on anything spiritual that goes after the status quo by talking about helping poverty, and making society better. That is why there is media control, and censorship.

If they want to stop violence, all they have to do is fix the system, and send me the beer and travel money of coarse, but they don't want to fix the system.

They like it unjust and worse then anarchy reverse justice, becuase that system helps a few and hurts many people. And they like being that few that are helped.

You solve all terrorism by solving the problems of distribution and consolidations. They don't want to fix that, so go after those that talk about those things, and a few of them regrettably become violent when attacked.

But the violence is no different then the violence used in the current economic and distribution system, and the wrongful failure of not sending the beer and travel money that is due to me.


They don't want to correct the system becuase they think some should have billions, while others are poor, and that is what causes the problems.

They don't want to move to distributed energy systems, becuase central controlled things like Oil allow for control and consolidation of monies. They don't want people to learn to think and feel, becuase they then try to correct things.

And those that try to correct things, they call terrorist if they do not support money first above everything else.

[Thumper79]

40. Wow, talk about random thoughts....

[Dreamer Tatum]

12. Most Appropriate DU Handle Ever. nt

[Ian David]

29. Sometimes, I think "Random Thoughts" should change his name to "Random Typing."

Everything you write needs to be decoded and carefully examined to try and determine wtf you're trying to say.

[aquart]

4. FACEBOOK?

Onion?

[guruoo]

6. Too convenient. nt

[KittyWampus]

8. Facebook account he no longer uses... so someone hacks his computer and his facebook?

[hobbit709]

9. Anything coming from the goat-raper is worth less than zero.

[Horse with no Name]

10. Seriously? Political scandal? On Facebook?

I'm not even famous and my Facebook has been hacked.

If this were a REAL story...a REAL news source would be all over it.

Perhaps the New York Times??

The thing is...there is a bunch of flimsy, non-supportable evidence and a whole helluvalotta hype on this thing.

There was a DIRECT and CONCERTED effort to attack this LIBERAL Congressman.

His Twitter was hacked.

republicans are nasty, slimy, belligerent, horrid little schoolboys. Attacks like this are what nasty, slimy, belligerent, horrid little schoolboys do.

Until I see a LEGITIMATE news source with this story and REAL proof--I'm going to assume that the nasty, slimy, belligerent, horrid little schoolboys are just making noise.

[Fleshdancer]

11. Rep Weiner's FB was hacked on May 27th

Just a reminder:

Anthony Weiner
@RepWeiner Anthony Weiner

Tivo shot. FB hacked. Is my blender gonna attack me next? #TheToasterIsVeryLoyal

27 May via TweetDeck Favorite Retweet Reply

[TheWraith]

14. Uh, these messages were date stamped three months earlier.

Seriously folks, I know the desire not to believe anything bad, I was through that myself with Eric Massa. But this is approaching freeper-style rewriting of reality here. Either he did something wrong, or he didn't.

[Fleshdancer]

16. Well I'm sure Breitbart didn't alter ANY of this FB stuff...

because he was SOOO honest with the Acorn videos and the Sharrod videos so of course we would be viewing untouched, unaltered screen caps from the hacked FB page of the one politician going after Clarence Thomas right now.

This time it must be true.

[TheWraith]

58. What a lovely strawman you have there.

I'm sure it's occurred to you that Facebook date stamps cannot be altered, even if you have complete control of the user's account.

But keep on waving Breitbart around like a boogeyman, anything to wish away the increasingly obvious probability that one of our guys misbehaved even slightly.

[KittyWampus]

13. Wait- I thought he sent that picture to that other young lady. LOL. Breitbart's smear falls apart.

[FBaggins]

45. Yes, it looks like they may have hacked his twitter account and posted real photos

that they acquired from this other source.

That's why Weiner could say that he didn't sent this tweet but couldn't say that the photo wasn't of him.

This appears to be breitbart's M.O. - many of the particulars of the original story are fabricated, but what's left still burns the target.

[gauguin57]

15. Is this photo on Slate a pic of Weiner w/o his shirt (w/pic of Bill Clinton in background)?

Who knows. The whole thing gives me a massive migraine.

http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/weigel/archive/2011/06/06/anthony-weiner-without-a-shirt.aspx

[Laura PourMeADrink]

32. well - can't they zoom in on those pics? if it's a legit office pic

background, supply the real pic that was photoshopped. geez.

[Lex]

17. And we know for a fact HE sent those messages?

[Melinda]

18. What a complete load of shit... look at what Rep Weiner posted on his OLD FB acct...

dated May 10, 2011:

"... if you've gotten any odd emails, chats or notices from here recently, drop me a note. And thanks for supporting me at our fully jazzed page linked above."

When did this supposed exchange take place again?

Hacking abounds on the net.... hackers have taken down government websites, over government websites, personal identities, etc, and yet propaganda grazing right wing sheep consume this astro-turfing BS as if it were manna from heaven.

Is it any wonder public education is in the GOP's cross hairs?

:myheadhurts:

And just as a friendly reminder: http://www.alternet.org/media/149197/are_right-wing_libertarian_internet_trolls_getting_paid_to_dumb_down_online_conversations/?page=1

***edited to correct date above.

[mzmolly]

20. If his facebook and his phone were hacked

that could explain the situation to a degree. If they were not hacked, he's a fool for trusting an anonymous online fan, with pictures of his junk. :(

[Melinda]

33. Presumption of innocence and all that...

He said he was hacked, and Brietbart is a proven liar. Look at the cast of characters involved and couple that with the right wings agenda to destroy our leadership and party.

I also don't care if he took pictures of himself buck naked and at full attention. If he sent them out, there will be a trail. And then just maybe I'll care. Just maybe.

[mzmolly]

37. I'm with you. Though, I don't think sexting would involve a trial if it involves another

consensual adult.

My concern (aside from his poor wife) is more about his ability to be taken seriously after this.

[former9thward]

19. People are falling all over themselves defending Weiner.

Yet why is he dropping out of speaking engagements? He dropped out of at least two last week. He also dropped out of the Israel parade in NYC yesterday and he is all Israel. It sounds like all those who defended Edwards and said he never cheated it was just made up stuff from the tabloids.

[mzmolly]

22. Or, like those who defended Shirly Sherrod and Juan Carlos Vera.

Breitbart didn't break the Edwards story.

[former9thward]

25. No the Enquirer did. And everyone said it was a lie and fake.

[mzmolly]

28. And "everyone" said that Juan Vera and Shirley Sherrod deserved

their fate, in spite of being lied about.

[former9thward]

48. Maybe in your crowd but not on DU

[mzmolly]

49. Wrong.

On DU.

[former9thward]

52. Maybe you took a vacation from DU during that period.

There were plenty of people defending Sherrod.

[mzmolly]

57. And

some who did not.

[former9thward]

51. Delete - wrong spot.

[RandomThoughts]

24. It is possible Edwards never cheated.

Because you see it on the news does not mean it happened.

If you followed the stories about Hunter.

She changed her name 3 times, was reported.

She made campaign videos.

And a few others, all pointing to a metaphor about scorching of the sky, not about an affair.


Maybe he did have an affair, maybe not, but that really doesn't have much to do with anything.

[sufrommich]

26. He admits the kid is his! nt

[RandomThoughts]

31. Your missing the point.

How do you know that, or better how do I know that.

It was on the news.

The news has lied before.

So unless I talked to him, I would not make that assumption becuase it was on the news. Although it could be true, it might not be true, but it is not that relevant anyways.

That is how you fight blind, knowing that they are lying about many things on the news.


I support his stated views on poverty issues, I don't think it is wise to have affairs while running for office. That has nothing to do with him, or what is reported on him. Although if he believes those things, then it does have to do with him, not becuase I hear him say it, but becuase that is also what he feels about poverty issues.


But that does not have anything to do with Edwards, becuase he might not really support those poverty issues, since I only know that from seeing it on the news, and he might not have had an affair.


My point is, why do you believe the news, when they have lied to you.


If he says something that is credible, like policy comments on many topics, then I can believe the concept of an argument, but even that does not mean I think he said it, becuase that would be assuming that what is on the TV or the Internet is accurate.

And that has been shown to not be the case.

Because I am due beer and travel money.

Can you understand it is about what people support, not about the people that support those issues. When you support what it is reported that he says, you are working for the same goals, not for him, in the same way, he is working for those goals, if he feels that way, not working for you.

It is the entire concept of supporting ideas, not people.

Can't you understand that. And that is why the entire concept of not worshiping people is in many texts.

[former9thward]

27. You may be the only one left in the U.S. who holds that view.

Edwards certainly doesn't.

[Melinda]

30. Defending one's reputation might take precedence, wouldn't ya think?

This is the kind of crap the right-wing thrives on... remember what they did to the Big Dog? And wasn't Newt shtooking his girlfriend on the side at the same time he was going for Clinton's throat? Gosh, what to do? Speak at a previously scheduled engagment or get to the bottom of an obvious right wing attempt to destroy his reputation... (Insert obviously sarcastic :shrug: here).

Vitter
Ensign
Henry Hyde
Newt

Feel free to add to the list... there are countless GOPers who I just don't give a rat's ass about and consequently have forgotten to name.

[former9thward]

50. Interesting he "wants to get the bottom" of a smear but refused to call in law enforcement.

BTW news flash. It is not just the right wing. The left wing thrives on gossip and smear also. That is what our politics have become now. People don't debate or criticize political positions, it is who they are sleeping with. I see it here all over all day. No one is clean.

[Melinda]

55. Neither you, I, nor anyone other than Rep Weiner knows if he's contacted the FBI or other...

law enforcement. I don't know about you, but I've been told by LE to NOT discuss my contact with them over past investigations. I just don't think it's SOP to do so.

Now, about the left wings gossip and smears...

Can you point me to our equivalents of Rush, Lucianne, Breitbart, Drudge, Malkin, Coulter, Hannity, et al? I seem to have missed our "gossipy" provocateurs. TIA!

[former9thward]

56. He said he has not contacted Law enforcement.

So you don't believe him when he says that but you do believe him otherwise. Interesting. See various internet postings on Kos, DU, etc on any given day to see gossip as opposed to political discussion. Interesting you have had so many contacts with the FBI.

[VWolf]

21. The only way this would matter to me

is if Weiner ran on a platform of "conservative" family values.

Last I checked, he didn't.

Ergo, I don't care.

[Laura PourMeADrink]

34. really? I agree - hate hypocrisy - but if they were true to me

it isn't a question of morality - it's a sign to me that the person is too stupid.

[marmar]

23. "Embattled"?

:eyes:

[Laura PourMeADrink]

35. think that happens when you don't have a swift cogent defense of

yourself. If I was his PR guy I'd be getting to the bottom of this asap and show more
outrage and adamant denial.

[kelly1mm]

36. Not that he should, but I think Weiner will resign within 10 days. nt

[mzmolly]

38. Or, enter rehab.

;)

[Broderick]

41. No way

Let's see what his private security firm comes up with and not be so hasty in condemning him.

[kelly1mm]

44. Is his private security firm going to look into the 200+ text messages

he allegedly sent to the new woman in NV? Oh, and those shirtless pictures he sent to yet another woman allegedly? Can't really deny that those shirtless pictures are of him. He is married and this does not go over to well with large parts of the public. I don't really care as I think it is between him and his wife. I just think it is a shame really as he has/had some great points to share.

[Broderick]

53. If this is related to the hacking

then he needs to get in front of it, and turn this over to the proper authorities rather than his own private security firm. Seems to be getting out of hand and the only way is to get law enforcement involved at this point. The delay could be disastrous.

[Laura PourMeADrink]

42. interesting. it's that old adage "where there's smoke, there's fire."

probably true more than it's not.

[kelly1mm]

46. Unfortunately, when he couldn't say that the bulge picture was not of

him, I kind of had a hunch where this was going. Sad.

[Rex]

39. More bullshit, the GOP will never stop with the paid operatives.

They are a sick bunch of fucks that like to win by cheating.

[Vanje]

43. I think Anthony Weiner owes his wife an apology. nt

[seabeyond]

47. +1. what? less than a year. dont want to be married? dont get married. nt

[Cerridwen]

54. "a Democratic campaign worker" Anyone else notice that?

Someone please explain to me why a "Democratic campaign worker" voluntarily comes forward with this crap.

Money? To bring down a Democrat?

Fame? More like infamy.

Does she really think she'll remain anonymous? Is she really a Democrat?

We'll find out soon enough if he did this; but what's up with her?