|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
donco6 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-24-10 10:19 AM Original message |
The Onshore Ken Salazar - and the Offshore Ken Salazar |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
midnight (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-24-10 10:23 AM Response to Original message |
1. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-24-10 10:48 AM Response to Original message |
2. Looking more and more like the sacrificial lamb every day.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dgibby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-24-10 10:52 AM Response to Reply #2 |
3. Replace him with Erin Brockovitch! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-24-10 10:53 AM Response to Reply #2 |
4. Sacrificial lamb? Hardly. That implies innocence.He deserves to go .Now, if not sooner. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-24-10 10:55 AM Response to Reply #4 |
5. Replace him with RFK Jr., Al Gore, someone who gives a damn. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-24-10 11:24 AM Response to Reply #4 |
7. It's a figure of speech implying that a top level official will "need to go" in order to quell |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-24-10 11:54 AM Response to Reply #7 |
10. You may be correct but I usually assume it to be a lower level official |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
amborin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-24-10 12:40 PM Response to Reply #4 |
12. +1000 Salazar had a pro-industry, anti-environment track record long befor this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donco6 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-24-10 01:38 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. Yes, we saw that here in Colorado. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donco6 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-24-10 10:57 AM Response to Reply #2 |
6. That's what I see, too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-24-10 11:27 AM Response to Reply #6 |
8. Hard to know- the administration seems to have a prediliction for policital figures |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donco6 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-24-10 11:54 AM Response to Reply #8 |
9. What if he goes for an industry insider? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-24-10 12:19 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. I think the vetting rules would prohibit that choice, too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun May 26th 2024, 08:56 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC