|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
usregimechange
![]() |
Mon Nov-08-10 03:01 PM Original message |
The judges on the 5th Circuit that ruled that children must cheer for their rapists |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
derby378
![]() |
Mon Nov-08-10 03:11 PM Response to Original message |
1. Seems like I remember some tried to block Owen from the 5th Circuit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
usregimechange
![]() |
Mon Nov-08-10 03:12 PM Response to Original message |
2. Link |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Better Today
![]() |
Mon Nov-08-10 04:00 PM Response to Original message |
3. I have a tough time with this one, as the rape charge was not indicted, and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
usregimechange
![]() |
Mon Nov-08-10 05:01 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. "They were later indicted on sexual assault charges..." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jancantor
![]() |
Mon Nov-08-10 11:43 PM Response to Reply #6 |
57. read the decision |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scout
![]() |
Mon Nov-08-10 04:04 PM Response to Original message |
4. you can't stay on the cheer team and NOT cheer for one person |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
usregimechange
![]() |
Mon Nov-08-10 05:05 PM Response to Reply #4 |
8. Is this DU? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpgray
![]() |
Mon Nov-08-10 05:07 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. It's a bit appalling. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast
![]() |
Mon Nov-08-10 05:35 PM Response to Reply #8 |
25. I'm beginning to seriously wonder. I'm barely into this thread and already appalled |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
usregimechange
![]() |
Mon Nov-08-10 05:10 PM Response to Reply #4 |
11. The bad choice here was the boy who assaulted/raped her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson
![]() |
Mon Nov-08-10 05:18 PM Response to Reply #4 |
15. In this instance, what does "life is full of bad choices" mean? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cid_B
![]() |
Mon Nov-08-10 05:21 PM Response to Reply #4 |
18. Rah Rah.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gormy Cuss
![]() |
Mon Nov-08-10 05:22 PM Response to Reply #4 |
19. Sure you can. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson
![]() |
Mon Nov-08-10 05:25 PM Response to Reply #19 |
21. Seems so to me also. It was easily enough worked around. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast
![]() |
Mon Nov-08-10 05:36 PM Response to Reply #19 |
26. "Reasonable accomadation" could and should cover crime victims as well, IMHO. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpgray
![]() |
Mon Nov-08-10 05:41 PM Response to Reply #19 |
27. Or, those guilty of sexual assault could be banned from school sports |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tammywammy
![]() |
Mon Nov-08-10 06:27 PM Response to Reply #27 |
53. When she was kicked off, he wasn't charged with anything n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity
![]() |
Mon Nov-08-10 06:17 PM Response to Reply #4 |
47. why is that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kelly1mm
![]() |
Mon Nov-08-10 05:00 PM Response to Original message |
5. You mean alleged, not convicted, not even indited rapist, right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
usregimechange
![]() |
Mon Nov-08-10 05:05 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. "Bolton ended up getting off without serving any jail time by pleading guilty to a lesser assault " |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kelly1mm
![]() |
Mon Nov-08-10 05:10 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. And? he was not convicted of rape, right?nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
usregimechange
![]() |
Mon Nov-08-10 05:14 PM Response to Reply #10 |
13. Did you change your argument? He wasn't indicted, wasn't convicted, now he wasn't convicted of rape |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kelly1mm
![]() |
Mon Nov-08-10 05:44 PM Response to Reply #13 |
31. No, I am not changing my argument. Indictments come from Grand |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
usregimechange
![]() |
Mon Nov-08-10 06:02 PM Response to Reply #31 |
38. "They were later indicted on sexual assault charges..." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kelly1mm
![]() |
Mon Nov-08-10 06:26 PM Response to Reply #38 |
52. Read the link and you were right - he was indicted. Not of rape, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NashVegas
![]() |
Mon Nov-08-10 05:15 PM Response to Reply #10 |
14. How Good Of You To Stand Up For the Rights of High School Athletes Who Commit Assault |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kelly1mm
![]() |
Mon Nov-08-10 05:46 PM Response to Reply #14 |
32. I stood up for someone who the OP claimed was a rapist before he |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
usregimechange
![]() |
Mon Nov-08-10 06:03 PM Response to Reply #32 |
39. He pled down but guilty to sexual assault |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kelly1mm
![]() |
Mon Nov-08-10 06:05 PM Response to Reply #39 |
41. so he was not convicted of rape, as I ponted out above, right? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
usregimechange
![]() |
Mon Nov-08-10 06:14 PM Response to Reply #41 |
46. You are right, the rapist pled down to assault but was indicted and was convicted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson
![]() |
Tue Nov-09-10 01:00 AM Response to Reply #32 |
59. Are you SERIOUSLY saying you can't be a rapist until you are convicted of rape? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson
![]() |
Mon Nov-08-10 05:28 PM Response to Reply #10 |
22. Just sexual assault. And your point is? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kelly1mm
![]() |
Mon Nov-08-10 05:53 PM Response to Reply #22 |
36. That the OP title was hyperbole, unlike the two other threads on this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
usregimechange
![]() |
Mon Nov-08-10 06:04 PM Response to Reply #36 |
40. It isn't alleged, he pled guilty and was convicted and sentenced |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kelly1mm
![]() |
Mon Nov-08-10 06:11 PM Response to Reply #40 |
45. Of rape? No, he was not convicted of rape. Two other threads on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
usregimechange
![]() |
Mon Nov-08-10 06:17 PM Response to Reply #45 |
48. It is too late for me to change the OP but frankly it doesn't matter, children shouldn't be asked to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kelly1mm
![]() |
Mon Nov-08-10 06:23 PM Response to Reply #48 |
51. On tht we actually agree. I think it was tragic what happened to her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
usregimechange
![]() |
Mon Nov-08-10 06:28 PM Response to Reply #51 |
54. I guess in a strict legal sense he is a convicted abuser and an alleged rapist? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kelly1mm
![]() |
Mon Nov-08-10 06:30 PM Response to Reply #54 |
55. I am actually trying to confirm that they let this "kid" plead to simple |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NashVegas
![]() |
Mon Nov-08-10 06:07 PM Response to Reply #36 |
43. There's a Little Check For You To Ignore An Article You Don't Like |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson
![]() |
Mon Nov-08-10 05:14 PM Response to Reply #5 |
12. How about Sexual Assault then? What he was indicted and pled to. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
usregimechange
![]() |
Mon Nov-08-10 05:19 PM Response to Reply #12 |
17. Rape and sexual assault seem fairly similar to me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson
![]() |
Mon Nov-08-10 05:23 PM Response to Reply #17 |
20. you can be sexually assaulted without being raped, but I agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kelly1mm
![]() |
Mon Nov-08-10 05:51 PM Response to Reply #12 |
35. self delete - He was indicted of sexual assault, not rape, and pled |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NashVegas
![]() |
Mon Nov-08-10 05:18 PM Response to Original message |
16. Unfortunately, The School IS Acting Within Its Rights |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
usregimechange
![]() |
Mon Nov-08-10 05:29 PM Response to Reply #16 |
23. "Silsbee school officials had two responses to the incident. First, they urged (the victim)... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NashVegas
![]() |
Mon Nov-08-10 06:06 PM Response to Reply #23 |
42. Morally, Their Behavior Is Reprehensible |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
muriel_volestrangler
![]() |
Mon Nov-08-10 06:07 PM Response to Reply #23 |
44. There's a timeline needed here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TorchTheWitch
![]() |
Mon Nov-08-10 05:32 PM Response to Original message |
24. I can't understand why she's still going to the same school with him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bighart
![]() |
Mon Nov-08-10 05:42 PM Response to Reply #24 |
30. Couldn't agree more. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast
![]() |
Mon Nov-08-10 05:47 PM Response to Reply #24 |
33. Edit: replied to wrong post. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JustABozoOnThisBus
![]() |
Mon Nov-08-10 05:54 PM Response to Reply #24 |
37. If she changes schools, she may not make the cheer squad |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
usregimechange
![]() |
Mon Nov-08-10 06:19 PM Response to Reply #24 |
49. Why in the hell are you not asking why he is still attending that school or playing on the team? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TorchTheWitch
![]() |
Wed Nov-10-10 02:45 AM Response to Reply #49 |
60. it should be obvious |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar
![]() |
Mon Nov-08-10 05:41 PM Response to Original message |
28. The 5th Circuit is horrible |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laughingliberal
![]() |
Mon Nov-08-10 05:42 PM Response to Original message |
29. Out-fucking-rageous! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast
![]() |
Mon Nov-08-10 05:48 PM Response to Original message |
34. Have I got this correct, fellow liberals? Let the victim of an assault work it out for herself, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
usregimechange
![]() |
Mon Nov-08-10 06:21 PM Response to Reply #34 |
50. My head has almost exploded several times |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jancantor
![]() |
Mon Nov-08-10 11:39 PM Response to Original message |
56. I judge the decision based on the decision |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver
![]() |
Tue Nov-09-10 12:00 AM Response to Original message |
58. The 5th Circuit is a Who's Who of Wack-a-doos. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thu Jun 20th 2024, 06:49 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC