|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
charlesg (311 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-25-10 01:34 PM Original message |
Obama administration is not proposing to change $75 million limit on BP spill |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrDan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-25-10 01:39 PM Response to Original message |
1. and if they don't cover it . . . there are always the taxpayers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chulanowa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-25-10 01:39 PM Response to Original message |
2. Honest, officer, I'll pay the bank back! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madrchsod (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-25-10 01:39 PM Response to Original message |
3. we will see how many congress critters BP can buy.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chill_wind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-25-10 01:46 PM Response to Original message |
4. "We are focused on the future." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
QC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-25-10 01:47 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. Yeah, that and the bit about "tired old debates" that we must "move beyond/" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laughingliberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-25-10 02:41 PM Response to Reply #5 |
22. Yes. Seems we're always moving beyond 'tired, old debates' about standing up for the people. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-25-10 01:49 PM Response to Reply #4 |
8. GMTA? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chill_wind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-25-10 01:58 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. Sadly, we've been somewhat preconditioned. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hell Hath No Fury (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-25-10 01:48 PM Response to Original message |
6. Jesus fucking christ. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glitch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-25-10 01:55 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. Focusing on the Future means Ignoring the Present too. It's not just the Past that gets a Free Pass. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CountAllVotes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-25-10 02:00 PM Response to Reply #6 |
11. he forgets the past |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lorien (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-25-10 02:23 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. And much of the present. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-25-10 01:48 PM Response to Original message |
7. "We are focused on the future" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CountAllVotes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-25-10 02:01 PM Response to Reply #7 |
12. sounds real familiar alright |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lorien (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-25-10 02:22 PM Response to Reply #7 |
13. Are there any wealthy crooks that he WON'T protect?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Individualist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-25-10 02:31 PM Response to Reply #13 |
17. No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laughingliberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-25-10 02:39 PM Response to Reply #13 |
20. Welcome to the government of the Corparation, by the Corporation, and for the Corporation! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Better Today (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-25-10 02:25 PM Response to Original message |
15. I'm a bit confused as to the problem, the AAG says it could/should be raised thru |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-25-10 02:41 PM Response to Reply #15 |
21. It's not at present, but it will be the AG's bailiwick once BP reneges on it's "promise" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Better Today (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-25-10 02:56 PM Response to Reply #21 |
25. So we're jumping on him before he's even in a position to do anything about anything? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-10 02:34 AM Response to Reply #25 |
33. I didn't see it as jumping on him so much as why it is imperative that this limit be removed. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-25-10 02:27 PM Response to Original message |
16. It gets worse every day |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dgibby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-25-10 05:48 PM Response to Reply #16 |
30. And who gets to define "legitimate"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeybee12 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-25-10 02:34 PM Response to Original message |
18. But, but, but...it's a brilliant chess move! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laughingliberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-25-10 02:36 PM Response to Original message |
19. Looking forward, again!! Who'da thought? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eyerish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-25-10 02:52 PM Response to Original message |
23. "...company has pledged to pay all legitimate claims." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
katandmoon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-25-10 02:52 PM Response to Original message |
24. Obamadmin: Never missing a chance to yell SUCKERS!!! at us |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShamelessHussy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-25-10 02:59 PM Response to Original message |
26. why is there a cap? because we socialize the losses, and privatize the profits - ain't it grand! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-25-10 03:01 PM Response to Original message |
27. I agree with him. There should be no cap on liability. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Individualist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-25-10 03:08 PM Response to Original message |
28. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tkmorris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-25-10 03:19 PM Response to Original message |
29. They couldn't enforce a raised cap on this event anyway |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chill_wind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-25-10 06:03 PM Response to Original message |
31. kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Individualist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-25-10 06:34 PM Response to Original message |
32. kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon Sep 23rd 2024, 02:40 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC