|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
wndycty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-19-10 12:25 PM Original message |
Arizona threatens to cut off Los Angeles electricity due to boycott |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
havocmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-19-10 12:28 PM Response to Original message |
1. Somebody posted about CA owning a whole lotta shares of that nuclear plant in AZ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thelordofhell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-19-10 12:46 PM Response to Reply #1 |
9. Here's the breakdown of ownership |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
havocmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-19-10 12:51 PM Response to Reply #9 |
12. So, CA concerns/companies have combined 27.4%? Thank you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thelordofhell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-19-10 01:27 PM Response to Reply #12 |
33. And Arizona concerns have a combined 46.6% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
montanto (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-19-10 01:51 PM Response to Reply #12 |
35. Hilarious. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
abelenkpe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-19-10 12:34 PM Response to Original message |
2. O puleeze! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snooper2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-19-10 12:48 PM Response to Reply #2 |
10. They are not teapartiers, they are teabaggers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madinmaryland (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-19-10 12:55 PM Response to Reply #10 |
14. Thanks! I say that everytime I hear someone on TV say "tea partier" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Juneboarder (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-19-10 01:20 PM Response to Reply #14 |
29. How does a teabagger |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
havocmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-19-10 06:21 PM Response to Reply #29 |
44. probably with little or no trouble |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
4_TN_TITANS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-20-10 11:43 AM Response to Reply #29 |
48. "That's a lotta nuts!" lol |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-19-10 12:37 PM Response to Original message |
3. Sounds like what Russia did to Georgia, Poland |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xchrom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-19-10 12:40 PM Response to Original message |
4. Oh this is getting good. And no one is turning the lights out in L.A. Nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Purveyor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-19-10 12:41 PM Response to Original message |
5. Good way to wake up some morning and find that the "Arizona Corporation" has been Nationalized due |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Better Today (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-19-10 12:43 PM Response to Original message |
6. He's got a point, dammit. And the above comment about shareholders |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-19-10 01:14 PM Response to Reply #6 |
24. Who's Got A Point? The Commissioner? He's Out Of His Fucking Mind And Would Certainly Be In Breach |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Better Today (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-19-10 01:18 PM Response to Reply #24 |
26. Unless the boycott involves breaching contracts which I am unclear about. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-19-10 01:22 PM Response to Reply #26 |
30. Nothing To Be Unclear About, He's Got No Point ,There's No Way A Boycott Can Breach The Contracts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveProfessor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-19-10 12:43 PM Response to Original message |
7. There was a lot of indignation about this on LA television this AM |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Commie Pinko Dirtbag (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-19-10 12:57 PM Response to Reply #7 |
15. Yeah, yeah. "Both sides" this, "either side" that, yadda yadda yadda. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveProfessor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-19-10 01:02 PM Response to Reply #15 |
18. So you think that both sets of pols are not posturing for local consumption? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Commie Pinko Dirtbag (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-19-10 01:08 PM Response to Reply #18 |
20. So formulaic. Again. -nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eleny (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-19-10 12:44 PM Response to Original message |
8. That's hilarious |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no_hypocrisy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-19-10 12:50 PM Response to Original message |
11. Boycott is the discretion of the consumer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveProfessor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-19-10 12:54 PM Response to Reply #11 |
13. Read what as actually sent. Its quite snarky |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no_hypocrisy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-19-10 01:14 PM Response to Reply #13 |
23. New cause of action: Tortious Interference With a Contract |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveProfessor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-19-10 01:25 PM Response to Reply #23 |
32. Against LA? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no_hypocrisy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-19-10 03:27 PM Response to Reply #32 |
42. Against Commissioner Gary Pierce. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveProfessor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-19-10 06:23 PM Response to Reply #42 |
45. Did you actually read the source docs? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tumbulu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-19-10 01:03 PM Response to Reply #11 |
19. Good point !!!!(nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
havocmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-19-10 06:24 PM Response to Reply #11 |
47. dunno, ENRON and it's cronies seemed to get away with it for fun and profit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nicholas D Wolfwood (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-19-10 12:59 PM Response to Original message |
16. Nice try, but I'm quite certain that the AZ utilities like their money. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raineyb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-19-10 12:59 PM Response to Original message |
17. And where exactly does AZ get the water that it wastes on golf courses and pools? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Abq_Sarah (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-19-10 01:16 PM Response to Reply #17 |
25. I'm not sure how California |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Juneboarder (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-19-10 01:19 PM Response to Reply #25 |
28. LOL; I was thinking the same thing... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raineyb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-19-10 02:27 PM Response to Reply #25 |
39. My point is, AZ gets its water because it's routed through other states. It would behoove them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Abq_Sarah (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-19-10 02:37 PM Response to Reply #39 |
40. I doubt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thelordofhell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-19-10 01:23 PM Response to Reply #17 |
31. Same place California does |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-19-10 01:12 PM Response to Original message |
21. Sounds Like It Would Be A Very Serious Breach Of Contract |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wiggs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-19-10 01:13 PM Response to Original message |
22. Great. More polarization, more distraction, more resentment, more fear, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Juneboarder (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-19-10 01:18 PM Response to Original message |
27. Arizona might as well... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AngryAmish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-19-10 01:29 PM Response to Original message |
34. Now this actually violates the Dormant Commerce Clause |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Abq_Sarah (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-19-10 01:53 PM Response to Reply #34 |
36. The state/city/municipality is acting as a consumer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Initech (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-19-10 01:54 PM Response to Original message |
37. Oh yeah? We'll build our own power plant with blackjack and hookers! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheKentuckian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-19-10 01:56 PM Response to Original message |
38. Wouldn't that result in a rather serious drop in the coffer levels? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SargeUNN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-19-10 02:42 PM Response to Original message |
41. How many threads are there on this. I have replied on 3 now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveProfessor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-19-10 06:19 PM Response to Reply #41 |
43. At least |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L0oniX (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-19-10 06:23 PM Response to Original message |
46. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat Jun 08th 2024, 03:30 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC