|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Bluebear
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 01:18 PM Original message |
Bill Clinton: "Lower the rhetoric. Goldman Sachs did nothing illegal." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donnachaidh
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 01:20 PM Response to Original message |
1. F--- You Bill. How much did they contribute to Hillary's campaign? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glitch
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 03:19 PM Original message |
Raise the rhetoric and broaden the focus to include EVERYBODY RESPONSIBLE. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool
![]() |
Sat May-15-10 11:20 PM Response to Reply #1 |
137. Far less than they contributed to Obama's campaign. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 01:20 PM Response to Original message |
2. That's cool that he is not afraid to stand up for what he thinks is right despite popular opinion. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 01:21 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. DLC sucks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 01:23 PM Response to Reply #4 |
7. President Clinton is a lawyer. Should he lie and say he sees law breaking if he doesn't? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 01:26 PM Response to Reply #7 |
11. As a side note, I saw this unfinished painting of Dr. House yesterday that someone is working on... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dflprincess
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 01:29 PM Response to Reply #7 |
16. Depends on what the definition of "should" is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whatchamacallit
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 02:58 PM Response to Reply #16 |
52. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Buns_of_Fire
![]() |
Sat May-15-10 01:19 PM Response to Reply #16 |
133. I did not have a fiduciary relationship with that man, Mr. Blankfein... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kenny blankenship
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 01:42 PM Response to Reply #7 |
27. He lied well enough to stay in political office - but not well enough to keep his law license. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 02:20 PM Response to Reply #7 |
40. It's because he's a lawyer that he can say something like this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 03:00 PM Response to Reply #7 |
55. I have always loved Bill but he WAS disbarred for lying. So your point is moot. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bvar22
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 03:38 PM Response to Reply #7 |
76. Correction: Clinton USED to be a lawyer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MajorChode
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 03:55 PM Response to Reply #76 |
89. Hardly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 04:27 PM Response to Reply #89 |
102. Clinton Disbarred by Supreme Court |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sebastian Doyle
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 01:55 PM Response to Reply #2 |
35. But what he "thinks is right" is often wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glitch
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 03:21 PM Response to Reply #35 |
73. How dare you? HOW DARE YOU? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
formercia
![]() |
Sat May-15-10 12:42 PM Response to Reply #35 |
120. I bet Junior is jealous. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marmar
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 03:20 PM Response to Reply #2 |
72. If he thinks he's "right" on this issue, it makes him a recalcitrant asshat. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mod mom
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 03:42 PM Response to Reply #2 |
81. He backed an oppressive tyrant to head an international election monitoring organization |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackRiddler
![]() |
Sat May-15-10 01:00 PM Response to Reply #2 |
124. Strictly coincidental that he was financially in bed with them, right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MattBaggins
![]() |
Sat May-15-10 01:04 PM Response to Reply #2 |
128. Standing up for his golfing buddies and biggest contributors |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richard Steele
![]() |
Sat May-15-10 11:31 PM Response to Reply #2 |
139. Pfft. Not even worth replying to. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jim Sagle
![]() |
Sat May-15-10 11:36 PM Response to Reply #2 |
140. It made him an unashamed sellout. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hedgehog
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 01:20 PM Response to Original message |
3. Sometimes something can be perfectly legal, and absolutely wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maxsolomon
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 01:22 PM Response to Original message |
5. because our representatives legalized it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 02:46 PM Response to Reply #5 |
49. And Clinton was the president who helped legalize it. So |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 01:23 PM Response to Original message |
6. Ah, yes: Ethics (the spirit) vs. Law (the letter). Bill C. ought not to tread thereon. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mod mom
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 01:24 PM Response to Original message |
8. from the man who signed the repeal of Glass Steagall |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smirkymonkey
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 03:37 PM Response to Reply #8 |
75. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Octafish
![]() |
Sat May-15-10 12:58 PM Response to Reply #8 |
123. +2 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MattBaggins
![]() |
Sat May-15-10 01:00 PM Response to Reply #8 |
125. Boy did you hit the nail on the head |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot
![]() |
Sat May-15-10 01:08 PM Response to Reply #8 |
130. +10 And signed NAFTA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 01:24 PM Response to Original message |
9. Deleted message |
BeyondGeography
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 01:25 PM Response to Original message |
10. Sometimes, you're too close to the action to have any credibility at all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 01:26 PM Response to Reply #10 |
13. Oh for heaven's sake, that explains one piece of the puzzle. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 01:45 PM Response to Reply #10 |
29. & gore's daughter married a Kuhn, Loeb heir. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 03:40 PM Response to Reply #29 |
78. That says NOTHING about Karenna, her husband or Al Gore |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 03:54 PM Response to Reply #78 |
88. The other poster noted Clinton's impending marriage to a Goldman hire; |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 04:03 PM Response to Reply #88 |
93. Sorry - didn't catch that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 04:09 PM Response to Reply #93 |
95. thanks for the cordial response. rare thing here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 04:19 PM Response to Reply #95 |
97. thank you pointing out my error |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bvar22
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 04:33 PM Response to Reply #10 |
105. ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fishwax
![]() |
Sat May-15-10 12:54 PM Response to Reply #10 |
121. ah, that makes sense |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackRiddler
![]() |
Sat May-15-10 01:25 PM Response to Reply #10 |
134. Oh for fuck's sake, HIS DAUGHTER is marrying to a Goldman Sachs trader! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
enki23
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 01:26 PM Response to Original message |
12. Fuck you, Bill. Fuck you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tridim
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 01:27 PM Response to Original message |
14. Hey Bill, lets lower the bullshit okay? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raineyb
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 01:28 PM Response to Original message |
15. Clinton needs to STFU as he certainly had a part in WHY what Goldman Sachs did is no longer illegal. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kenny blankenship
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 01:30 PM Response to Original message |
17. Can we stop pretending that Bill Clinton represents anything about Democratic values? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
End Of The Road
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 04:17 PM Response to Reply #17 |
96. All these bash Clinton posts make me feel like I'm in Freeperville. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mdmc
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 07:41 PM Response to Reply #96 |
112. well he said that no laws were broken |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spoony
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 05:12 PM Response to Reply #17 |
108. Hear hear. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marr
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 01:30 PM Response to Original message |
18. Right. And they purchased politicians like Mr. Clinton specifically to *make* those schemes legal. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeybee12
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 01:32 PM Response to Original message |
19. Bill and most of the Dems in Congress today have become very rich |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 01:36 PM Response to Original message |
20. He's not going to stop defending his "legacy" of punishing the poor to benefit the parasites. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 01:37 PM Response to Original message |
21. "Big Dawg" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boston bean
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 01:37 PM Response to Original message |
22. me thinks the whole ball-o-wax is unraveling. Send the big dawg out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 02:24 PM Response to Reply #22 |
42. The Big Dawg's been neutered ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 02:36 PM Response to Reply #42 |
46. Crying shame. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 02:38 PM Response to Reply #46 |
47. Yes, all that intelligence and personality crossing over to the dark side. :( eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 02:55 PM Response to Reply #47 |
51. I was a true believer of him too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 03:00 PM Response to Reply #51 |
56. " How disgusting to find out that people you admired turn out to be corporatist shills." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boston bean
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 03:04 PM Response to Reply #56 |
59. I think he's including Obama in that. How bout you??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 03:10 PM Response to Reply #59 |
62. Um, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boston bean
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 03:17 PM Response to Reply #62 |
66. I can tell, more exploratory drills, and giving waivers. The regulation is breathtaking! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 07:37 PM Response to Reply #66 |
110. + |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 03:10 PM Response to Reply #59 |
63. Whatever ignore said, yes, you are correct. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OHdem10
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 01:39 PM Response to Original message |
23. DLC and Wall Street especially Goldman-sachs are joined at the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Newest Reality
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 01:39 PM Response to Original message |
24. The history of Goldman Sachs says otherwise, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nykym
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 01:41 PM Response to Original message |
25. And now this from the man that said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aramchek
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 01:42 PM Response to Original message |
26. We'll let the DOJ be the judge of that, Billy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lib2DaBone
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 01:43 PM Response to Original message |
28. ..So says the man that signed NAFTA and "Welfare Reform"... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tularetom
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 01:48 PM Response to Original message |
30. He's afraid somebody may look back at who let Wall Street get so fucked up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gin
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 01:54 PM Response to Reply #30 |
32. they admit they didn't do anything illegal....just like the BP president |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 02:39 PM Response to Reply #32 |
48. + |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hell Hath No Fury
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 01:51 PM Response to Original message |
31. Dear Bil Clinton -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deep13
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 01:54 PM Response to Original message |
33. The outrage is because it wasn't illegal. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1776Forever
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 01:55 PM Response to Original message |
34. Marc Mezvinsky, Chelsea's finance, works for Goldman Sachs- hmmmmmmm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ipaint
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 02:09 PM Response to Reply #34 |
38. +1 bingo. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
notesdev
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 03:52 PM Response to Reply #34 |
86. Surprising! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
izquierdista
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 01:55 PM Response to Original message |
36. He said while wearing a blindfold |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 01:57 PM Response to Original message |
37. Sez the man who signed the law that enabled the crisis. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Toucano
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 04:26 PM Response to Reply #37 |
101. +1 Ding! Ding! Ding! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 02:13 PM Response to Original message |
39. Good ol' Billl. Still triangulating (aka kissing up to) to the right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glitch
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 03:28 PM Response to Reply #39 |
74. Triangulating is just another word for collaborating. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RandomThoughts
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 02:22 PM Response to Original message |
41. Well if they did nothing illegal, what does that say? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marylanddem
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 02:25 PM Response to Original message |
43. Bill Clinton is a corporate asshat. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kelvin Mace
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 02:31 PM Response to Original message |
44. Reason # 5,115 of why Bill Clinton was NEVER a liberal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greencharlie
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 02:32 PM Response to Original message |
45. mmmm hmmmm... yup. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blueworld
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 02:49 PM Response to Original message |
50. Was it illegal before all the regulation gyrations? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skeptical cynic
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 02:58 PM Response to Original message |
53. Doesn't mean much |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 02:59 PM Response to Original message |
54. Geez Bill stepped in this one. The man does love "technicalities." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rex
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 03:00 PM Response to Original message |
57. Well then I guess he is looking at faulty intelligence, because |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DonCoquixote
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 03:03 PM Response to Original message |
58. Bill, S.T.F.U. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laughingliberal
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 07:47 PM Response to Reply #58 |
113. +1000 nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Downtown Hound
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 03:05 PM Response to Original message |
60. "Sit Bill, sit. Bark. Howl. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ljm2002
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 03:06 PM Response to Original message |
61. Hey, Bill... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lerkfish
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 03:16 PM Response to Original message |
64. "LEAVE GOLDMAN SACHS ALONE!" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 03:16 PM Response to Reply #64 |
65. --- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boston bean
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 03:19 PM Response to Reply #65 |
69. ,,, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ignis
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 03:47 PM Response to Reply #64 |
83. Oh, you got me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bullwinkle428
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 03:48 PM Response to Reply #64 |
84. That picture is CRYING OUT for a photoshop job!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fishwax
![]() |
Sat May-15-10 12:56 PM Response to Reply #64 |
122. lol |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marmar
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 03:18 PM Response to Original message |
67. Surprised? He aided and abetted this mess........ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Better Believe It
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 03:18 PM Response to Original message |
68. President Clinton's support enabled the de-regulation of the banks and financial services industry. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 03:19 PM Response to Original message |
70. Maybe they didn't... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phleshdef
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 03:19 PM Response to Original message |
71. I agree with him only as far as there MIGHT be enough legal LOOPHOLES in place... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mitchum
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 03:39 PM Response to Original message |
77. Lap Dawg |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 03:40 PM Response to Reply #77 |
79. First Lady BlahBlah, now this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Odin2005
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 03:42 PM Response to Original message |
80. FUCK YOU, you DLCer and protege of a defender of the Elites. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bvar22
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 03:42 PM Response to Original message |
82. Well of course he did. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lib2DaBone
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 03:49 PM Response to Original message |
85. Hey Big Dawg.. the FBI Called and left a message... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobbolink
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 03:53 PM Response to Original message |
87. Gotta love that cuddly "Big Dog" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 03:58 PM Response to Reply #87 |
90. realized he was a phoney when he demagogued the sister souljah thing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobbolink
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 04:01 PM Response to Reply #90 |
91. You gotta admit... he has a very good "aw shucks" act. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 04:02 PM Response to Reply #91 |
92. good act if one likes smarm. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starry Messenger
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 04:07 PM Response to Original message |
94. He's always driven me up the wall. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vinca
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 04:20 PM Response to Original message |
98. Bill Clinton is a self described "new Democrat." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bvar22
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 04:58 PM Response to Reply #98 |
106. So is Barack Obama. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JanMichael
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 07:58 PM Response to Reply #106 |
116. I love that shot of Wellstone. He looks like he's ready to do the ground and pound... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 04:22 PM Response to Original message |
99. Bill "Calvin Coolidge" Clinton. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 04:24 PM Response to Reply #99 |
100. ;>) cool clinton! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fascisthunter
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 04:29 PM Response to Original message |
103. fricking shill |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
amborin
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 04:30 PM Response to Original message |
104. k&r perhaps b/c the paper trail leads back |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sendero
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 05:03 PM Response to Original message |
107. Fuck you .. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alarimer
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 05:31 PM Response to Original message |
109. The fact that what they did is legal IS the problem. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mdmc
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 07:38 PM Response to Original message |
111. Just a good ol boy.. never meanin no harm.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Synicus Maximus
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 07:52 PM Response to Original message |
114. One must ask exactly what did Goldman Sachs do that was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear
![]() |
Sat May-15-10 01:08 AM Response to Reply #114 |
118. We don't have to ask, Bill Clinton has assured us. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackRiddler
![]() |
Sat May-15-10 01:15 PM Response to Reply #114 |
132. Engage in a vast conspiracy to commit fraud... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laughingliberal
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 07:53 PM Response to Original message |
115. K & R for exposure of DLC agenda. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
amborin
![]() |
Sat May-15-10 12:47 AM Response to Original message |
117. kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krispos42
![]() |
Sat May-15-10 01:08 AM Response to Original message |
119. Neither did Hitler, until he invaded Poland. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Swamp Rat
![]() |
Sat May-15-10 01:04 PM Response to Reply #119 |
127. Correctamundo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackRiddler
![]() |
Sat May-15-10 01:02 PM Response to Original message |
126. Translation: "I did my part in repealing the laws against the crimes that GS committed." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
timtom
![]() |
Sat May-15-10 01:07 PM Response to Original message |
129. Tsk! Tsk! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot
![]() |
Sat May-15-10 01:09 PM Response to Original message |
131. Big Dawg took another shit in the nest did he. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm
![]() |
Sat May-15-10 01:50 PM Response to Reply #131 |
135. 'Big Dawg' my ass...'Lap Dawg' has always been more accurate. Really tough work enabling BushInc |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot
![]() |
Sat May-15-10 08:24 PM Response to Reply #135 |
136. Harsh, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool
![]() |
Sat May-15-10 11:26 PM Response to Original message |
138. Oh goodie, one more anti-Clinton thread. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marmar
![]() |
Sat May-15-10 11:39 PM Response to Reply #138 |
141. Sorry, but it's deserved in this case.....and Obama deserves the criticism too..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool
![]() |
Sun May-16-10 05:53 PM Response to Reply #141 |
146. The difference is that Obama portrayed himself to be a "change" factor and he's more of the same. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ichingcarpenter
![]() |
Sun May-16-10 03:04 AM Response to Reply #138 |
143. A Goldman Sachs supporter .... What a surprise |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool
![]() |
Sun May-16-10 05:51 PM Response to Reply #143 |
145. Not a GS supporter, just sick and tired ot the Clinton hate on this board. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JI7
![]() |
Sun May-16-10 03:26 AM Response to Reply #138 |
144. you think the OP doesn't post criticisms of Obama ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool
![]() |
Sun May-16-10 05:54 PM Response to Reply #144 |
147. I don't know. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear
![]() |
Sun May-16-10 09:32 PM Response to Reply #144 |
149. I can't win. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ichingcarpenter
![]() |
Sun May-16-10 02:37 AM Response to Original message |
142. Goldman Sachs made the Greek crisis possible fuck you bill |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Individualist
![]() |
Sun May-16-10 05:59 PM Response to Original message |
148. Damn the corporate loving DLC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sun Jun 16th 2024, 07:49 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC