|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
The Hope Mobile
![]() |
Thu Mar-11-10 05:40 PM Original message |
Durbin Whipping Against Public Option |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alexander
![]() |
Thu Mar-11-10 05:41 PM Response to Original message |
1. WTF? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DesertFlower
![]() |
Thu Mar-11-10 05:44 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. so did i. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nite Owl
![]() |
Thu Mar-11-10 05:45 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. And he's looking to replace Reid |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlinPA
![]() |
Thu Mar-11-10 08:18 PM Response to Reply #3 |
27. I'm for Boxer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Hope Mobile
![]() |
Thu Mar-11-10 05:50 PM Response to Reply #1 |
5. It was an email from www.boldprogressives.org nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
angelicwoman
![]() |
Thu Mar-11-10 05:51 PM Response to Reply #1 |
6. It's all over the internet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tx4obama
![]() |
Thu Mar-11-10 07:39 PM Response to Reply #1 |
22. Grayson's Public Option Medicare Buy-In BILL is a separate BILL, not an amendent. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thotzRthingz
![]() |
Thu Mar-11-10 09:39 PM Response to Reply #1 |
33. re: WTF? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick
![]() |
Thu Mar-11-10 05:47 PM Response to Original message |
4. Isn't Durbin very close to the prez? Is this a WH directive? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yuugal
![]() |
Thu Mar-11-10 06:03 PM Response to Reply #4 |
8. I smell Rahm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NCarolinawoman
![]() |
Thu Mar-11-10 06:36 PM Response to Reply #4 |
12. I'm sure this is coming from the top down. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick
![]() |
Thu Mar-11-10 06:58 PM Response to Reply #12 |
15. Yeah, reminds me of the drug importation deal too. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AllentownJake
![]() |
Thu Mar-11-10 05:55 PM Response to Original message |
7. Well at least the veil is off |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mari333
![]() |
Thu Mar-11-10 06:04 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. good point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tx4obama
![]() |
Thu Mar-11-10 07:38 PM Response to Reply #7 |
21. Grayson's Public Option Medicare Buy-In BILL is a separate BILL, not an amendent. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillyT
![]() |
Thu Mar-11-10 08:26 PM Response to Reply #7 |
29. Exactly !!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
coti
![]() |
Thu Mar-11-10 08:58 PM Response to Reply #7 |
32. The veil's been gone for awhile but the more pressure we can put on them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
samurai7
![]() |
Thu Mar-11-10 06:16 PM Response to Original message |
10. What a blatant, dirty stab in the back |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Thu Mar-11-10 06:20 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. Deleted message |
truthisfreedom
![]() |
Thu Mar-11-10 06:40 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. 3 posts and I bet they're all spam. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calimary
![]() |
Thu Mar-11-10 06:38 PM Response to Original message |
13. TOLL FREE Capitol Hill switchboard numbers here: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Thu Mar-11-10 07:07 PM Response to Original message |
16. I never cheered those 40+ signatures. I was waiting to see if it was kabuki. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tx4obama
![]() |
Thu Mar-11-10 07:37 PM Response to Reply #16 |
20. Grayson's Public Option Medicare Buy-In BILL is a separate BILL, not an amendent. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Fri Mar-12-10 06:00 AM Response to Reply #20 |
36. ? I never said anything about Grayson's bill. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tx4obama
![]() |
Thu Mar-11-10 07:26 PM Response to Original message |
17. Grayson's Public Option Medicare Buy-In BILL is a separate BILL, not an amendent. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tkmorris
![]() |
Thu Mar-11-10 08:24 PM Response to Reply #17 |
28. Yeah Tx. We get that Grayson's bill is separate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tx4obama
![]() |
Thu Mar-11-10 08:31 PM Response to Reply #28 |
30. Because... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Fri Mar-12-10 06:06 AM Response to Reply #30 |
37. I would not draw any conclusions from Durbin's silence about Grayson's bill. It's way |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Canuckistanian
![]() |
Thu Mar-11-10 09:43 PM Response to Reply #17 |
34. And Grayson's bill can't be passed by reconciliation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EndElectoral
![]() |
Thu Mar-11-10 07:26 PM Response to Original message |
18. Aw C'mon Durbin. Don't do this. This is the one thing people across America want. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
warm regards
![]() |
Thu Mar-11-10 07:37 PM Response to Original message |
19. This thing has turned out to be a big joke. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tx4obama
![]() |
Thu Mar-11-10 07:40 PM Response to Reply #19 |
23. Grayson's Public Option Medicare Buy-In BILL is a separate BILL, not an amendent. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yodermon
![]() |
Thu Mar-11-10 07:47 PM Response to Reply #23 |
24. why are you spamming the thread with that line? This has nothing to do with grayson's bill. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tx4obama
![]() |
Thu Mar-11-10 08:01 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. Yes, it does Grayson's Medicare Bill is the current Public Option bill in the House n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tx4obama
![]() |
Thu Mar-11-10 08:15 PM Response to Reply #24 |
26. Info regarding the NEW Public Option BILL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JerseygirlCT
![]() |
Thu Mar-11-10 08:55 PM Response to Reply #26 |
31. This makes more sense to me. Thanks. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Fri Mar-12-10 06:13 AM Response to Reply #26 |
38. That's wishful thinking. Nothing would prevent passing Grayson's bill anyway. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Brundle_Fly
![]() |
Fri Mar-12-10 12:14 AM Response to Original message |
35. If they tie in the PO with this bill |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Fri Mar-12-10 06:18 AM Response to Reply #35 |
39. Yes, just about everyone is on the record as wanting the PO. Yet, it gets shafted at every turn. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rpannier
![]() |
Fri Mar-12-10 06:34 AM Response to Original message |
40. He's my Senator |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sun Jun 16th 2024, 12:49 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC