|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 11:56 AM Original message |
Kucinich to work with Norquist to dismantle the Obama Administration - Are We Going to Applaud This? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rudy23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 11:58 AM Response to Original message |
1. It's just an investigation---If Rahm did nothing shady, he should be fine. Besides-- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 11:58 AM Response to Reply #1 |
3. So was Whitewater. So was Lewinsky. Both were orchestrated by the likes of Norquist. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MNDemNY (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:07 PM Response to Reply #3 |
28. Bill "orchestrated" lewinsky. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tonysam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:09 PM Response to Reply #28 |
36. Doesn't matter. It was a private matter. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:09 PM Original message |
Not the investigation. 25 million dollars wasted by Repukes investigating Bill's sex life. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:56 PM Response to Reply #28 |
144. Well, he at least wrote the flute part. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MNDemNY (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 01:29 PM Response to Reply #144 |
154. Wrote? No that was free-form. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tblue37 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:03 PM Response to Reply #1 |
15. That's what was said about the Whitewater investigation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tonysam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:06 PM Response to Reply #15 |
25. That's why you NEVER team up with Norquist--EVER |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stopbush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:04 PM Response to Reply #1 |
19. Be very skeptical whenever you hear the word "just" uttered by an R or a Xian. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AllentownJake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:07 PM Response to Reply #19 |
30. Democrats are incapable of doing shitty things? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MNDemNY (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:11 PM Response to Reply #30 |
43. If "we" do it, it's not "shitty". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stopbush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:12 PM Response to Reply #30 |
49. Sorry, but I will always make the assumption that the involvement of Norquist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AllentownJake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:15 PM Response to Reply #49 |
58. First your comparison to White Water |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stopbush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:20 PM Response to Reply #58 |
79. WTF? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AllentownJake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:21 PM Original message |
Dennis is looking into the Christmas Eve decision to provide more money |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:39 PM Response to Original message |
129. He's investigating the Treasury, not FM. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stopbush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 02:05 PM Original message |
So DK is launching an investigation into something that happened LESS THAN A WEEK AGO. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AllentownJake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 04:49 PM Response to Original message |
203. 200 billion dollars was just allocated to a private entity under government control |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laughingliberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 01:33 PM Response to Reply #49 |
157. And was it a witch hunt when Norquist said this about Bush' violation of FISA laws: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spoony (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 07:42 PM Response to Reply #19 |
216. Nice how you blurred all "Xians" into one conspiratorial group |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:13 PM Response to Reply #1 |
51. Freddie Mac was already investigated. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AllentownJake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:17 PM Original message |
Well the OP is misrepresenting the nature of the inquiry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:54 PM Response to Original message |
142. Okay, I googled it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MNDemNY (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:25 PM Response to Reply #51 |
96. This is concerning the Christmas eve bailout of fannie-Freddie. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoPasaran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 11:58 AM Response to Original message |
2. I won't be applauding |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wtmusic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 11:59 AM Response to Original message |
4. Yes, we've come full circle. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stopbush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:15 PM Response to Reply #4 |
62. I liked that line, too. It rings true. Dennis will never be more than a sideshow in DC. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leeroysphitz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 02:09 PM Response to Reply #4 |
174. Yes, thank god we will never know the truth. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 11:59 AM Response to Original message |
5. Did DK expressly join with Norquist? I can't believe he is that stupid. Li'l context here? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
el_bryanto (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 11:59 AM Response to Original message |
6. Actually I think an investigation is warrented |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:09 PM Response to Reply #6 |
35. Sorry, that dog won't hunt. It's already been investigated. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
el_bryanto (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:16 PM Response to Reply #35 |
66. Fair enough - i still the administration would be better of without Rahm Emmanual. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 11:59 AM Response to Original message |
7. Kucinich is an attention seeking piece of shit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
G_j (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:04 PM Response to Reply #7 |
17. nice language |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MNDemNY (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:05 PM Response to Reply #7 |
21. Rahm sucks ass. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:06 PM Response to Reply #21 |
27. Deleted message |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:10 PM Response to Reply #27 |
39. Deleted message |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:14 PM Response to Reply #39 |
53. You dislike one man |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MNDemNY (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:18 PM Original message |
No, just toss Rahm to the curb, the rest will be better for it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:21 PM Original message |
You want to destroy Obama to get at Rahm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MNDemNY (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:26 PM Response to Original message |
102. Your nutz! IMO dumping Rahm would be a plus for Obama. Your logic is faulty. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:35 PM Response to Reply #102 |
121. You aren't using logic at all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MNDemNY (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 01:27 PM Response to Reply #121 |
151. Ok, Rahm.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 02:05 PM Response to Reply #151 |
171. You bet, Ralph |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MNDemNY (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:21 PM Response to Reply #53 |
84. Yes the whitewater investigation was kept alive by a Republican congress.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vidar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 02:15 PM Response to Reply #27 |
178. So does Rahm. Therein lies the problem. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:07 PM Response to Reply #21 |
29. They have already investigated it /nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MNDemNY (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:28 PM Response to Reply #29 |
106. The Christmas eve bail-out??? Really??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seeinfweggos (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:33 PM Response to Reply #7 |
117. +10,000 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Octafish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:37 PM Response to Reply #7 |
124. That's what Karl Rove said. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MNDemNY (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 01:57 PM Response to Reply #124 |
168. it's rahm. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 02:19 PM Response to Reply #7 |
179. He's a Democratic Congressman who does his job.Your |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spoony (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 07:51 PM Response to Reply #7 |
217. Said the attention-seeking... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
earth mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 11:59 AM Response to Original message |
8. Rahm needs to go. I don't give a flying fuck who does the job. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:07 PM Response to Reply #8 |
31. That is Obama decision, not yours /nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
earth mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:09 PM Response to Reply #31 |
37. Wake up! I'm not the only one who wants Rahm gone. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CakeGrrl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:01 PM Response to Original message |
9. Nice to know the Repubs can still use divide and conquer to their advantage |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Overseas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:42 PM Response to Reply #9 |
134. It worked with Van Jones. He was gone in a heartbeat. //nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:01 PM Response to Original message |
10. I'll be throwing tomatoes with you, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:02 PM Response to Reply #10 |
13. +1. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dave29 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:03 PM Response to Reply #10 |
16. yes, link it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:06 PM Response to Reply #10 |
24. Not surprising that you're willling to blindly follow the lemmings when they jump |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:12 PM Original message |
Get stuffed. I asked for a link for confirmation. Too bad you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MNDemNY (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:14 PM Response to Original message |
56. You have opinions? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:15 PM Response to Original message |
61. Nah, I won't put you on ignore, you're too entertaining |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rudy23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:09 PM Response to Reply #10 |
34. I think the "link" is their attempt at association. They will tie anything to Kuch, Nader, ponies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:13 PM Response to Reply #10 |
52. FDL has it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 02:57 PM Response to Reply #52 |
183. No he's not. This is something entirely different. Did you even |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FLAprogressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:01 PM Response to Original message |
11. Another day, another smear thread. I know you prefer 'em corporate but this is just ridiculous. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
G_j (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:02 PM Response to Original message |
12. garbage |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:03 PM Response to Original message |
14. More intellectual dishonesty on your part, not surprising. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AllentownJake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:04 PM Response to Original message |
18. If the administration is above board on this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stopbush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:08 PM Response to Reply #18 |
33. Wow. That's naive. Just like Clinton had nothing to fear from Whitewater, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AllentownJake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:12 PM Response to Reply #33 |
47. This is not a special prosecuter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MNDemNY (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 02:00 PM Response to Reply #33 |
169. Not familiar with the "special prosecuter" law at the time, are you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:04 PM Response to Original message |
20. "Kucinich to work with Norquist" Link? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
StarfarerBill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:08 PM Response to Reply #20 |
32. Yes: proof, please. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:12 PM Response to Reply #20 |
45. At FDL: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:14 PM Response to Reply #45 |
54. Just as I thought: Complete Slander. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:15 PM Response to Reply #54 |
59. Who Requested the Investigation? Oh yeah... Hamsher/Norquist. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 03:02 PM Response to Reply #59 |
185. There is no connection to what Hansher was asking for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rudy23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:17 PM Response to Reply #45 |
67. There's a link where you can donate to Dennis through Act Blue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:18 PM Response to Reply #67 |
71. Done. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:17 PM Response to Reply #45 |
69. Norquist is nowhere on that page |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:18 PM Response to Reply #69 |
74. WHO Requested the Investigation? Oh yeah... Hamsher/Norquist. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:21 PM Response to Reply #74 |
82. so you're against anyone else investigating? That's the bottom line of your complaints |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:40 PM Response to Reply #82 |
131. Dude, he's not investigating FM... he's going after the Treasury. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tonysam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:05 PM Response to Original message |
22. If this is the case, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:05 PM Response to Original message |
23. Where is the link that Kucinich is working with norquist? Don't get me wrong this fannie/freedie |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Libertas1776 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:06 PM Response to Original message |
26. Linky please |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
G_j (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:09 PM Response to Original message |
38. inappropriate post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:10 PM Response to Reply #38 |
41. Kucinich announced it himself and it was posted on FDL. Google it friend. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
G_j (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:12 PM Response to Reply #41 |
46. it's not my OP nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
QC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:13 PM Response to Reply #41 |
50. The person who makes an assertion bears the burden of proving it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:14 PM Response to Reply #50 |
55. Link here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
StarfarerBill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:19 PM Response to Reply #55 |
76. And where in all that is one word, one implication that Dennis is joining forces with Norquist? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:22 PM Response to Reply #76 |
86. WHO Requested the Investigation? Oh yeah... Hamsher/Norquist. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
StarfarerBill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:26 PM Response to Reply #86 |
100. So? Let make Norquist play his political games; that's what he *does*. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:28 PM Response to Reply #100 |
108. Just like whitewater eh? He's using Kucinich. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
StarfarerBill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:33 PM Response to Reply #108 |
115. Or Dennis recognizes corruption when he sees it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:41 PM Response to Reply #115 |
133. Timing and placement of the announcement are definitely suspect here. And he's not investigating FM |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
StarfarerBill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:45 PM Response to Reply #133 |
138. See Allentown Jake's OP on this subject: he's nutshelled it better than I ever could. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bjorn Against (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:15 PM Response to Reply #41 |
63. Here is Kucinich's full statement, please show me where he says he is working with Grover Norquist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:16 PM Response to Reply #63 |
65. WHO Requested the Investigation? Oh yeah... Hamsher/Norquist. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bjorn Against (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:18 PM Response to Reply #65 |
75. Just because Norquist wanted an investigation does not mean Kucinich is working with Norquist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:21 PM Response to Reply #75 |
83. You're right. He's Being a TOOL for Norquist. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bjorn Against (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:26 PM Response to Reply #83 |
99. This has nothing to do with Norquist, stop playing guilt by a very flimsy association |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:33 PM Response to Reply #99 |
116. Rrrriiiiggghhhhtttt.... a week ago Hamsher/Norquist team up to send a letter to the AG |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bjorn Against (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:38 PM Response to Reply #116 |
127. Pat Buchanan opposed the Iraq War... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
G_j (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:43 PM Response to Reply #127 |
136. and he opposed NAFTA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msongs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:10 PM Response to Original message |
40. Obama shook W's hand. does that make him a traitor as well? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sellitman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:11 PM Response to Original message |
42. I guess Grover and I are partners too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:11 PM Response to Original message |
44. lie much? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:12 PM Response to Reply #44 |
48. Already posted link above. Read it and weep. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:19 PM Response to Reply #48 |
77. Norquist isn't mentioned at all on the page you linked to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:21 PM Response to Reply #77 |
81. WHO Requested the Investigation? Oh yeah... Hamsher/Norquist. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:23 PM Response to Reply #81 |
90. so an investigation of Fannie/ Freddie is really an investigation of the Obama administration iyo? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:38 PM Response to Reply #90 |
126. It's not an investigation of FM... it's of the Treasury Department. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:14 PM Original message |
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are the Obama administration? You may be on to something. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FLAprogressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:15 PM Response to Original message |
60. haha, +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftstreet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:28 PM Response to Original message |
107. +1 LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:29 PM Response to Original message |
110. Like Whitewater was about the Clinton Administration too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:34 PM Response to Reply #110 |
118. So, protecting corporations from investigation is now "progressive"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:38 PM Response to Reply #118 |
128. It's not a corporation he's planning to investigate. It's the Treasury. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 02:56 PM Response to Reply #128 |
182. So? Is the treasury immune from investigation? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:14 PM Response to Original message |
57. "To dismantle the Obama administration." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:18 PM Response to Reply #57 |
70. What do you think Norquist's agenda is? And what exactly do you think will get done |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 01:01 PM Response to Reply #70 |
147. Norquist's agenda |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Don Caballero (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:16 PM Response to Original message |
64. Kucinich is so jealous of our President |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rudy23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:21 PM Response to Reply #64 |
80. Or maybe he wants to stop another TARP from happening, for our benefit. It's not all that emo. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Don Caballero (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:31 PM Response to Reply #80 |
113. Only one original member of Don Cab |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rudy23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 01:26 PM Response to Reply #113 |
149. I knew their tour manager, I'll bet you a vegan dinner on that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:17 PM Response to Original message |
68. Link to the words of the Arrogant Elf himself |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rudy23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:22 PM Response to Reply #68 |
87. This is what I was talking about when I was talking about word association. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
StarfarerBill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:23 PM Response to Reply #68 |
91. Nope; still nothing about Norquist. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:25 PM Response to Reply #91 |
94. WHO Requested the Investigation? Oh yeah... Hamsher/Norquist. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
StarfarerBill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:27 PM Response to Reply #94 |
104. See reply #100. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:30 PM Response to Reply #104 |
112. There isn't one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
StarfarerBill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:35 PM Response to Reply #112 |
120. In your defense, this thread is getting crowded: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:30 PM Response to Reply #94 |
111. So Rick Davis and McCain are off the hook for their associations and involvement w/ F/FMac? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:29 PM Response to Reply #91 |
109. Norquist and Hamsher requested an investigation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:32 PM Response to Reply #109 |
114. so have many Democratic legislators |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:35 PM Response to Reply #114 |
119. Bullshit. This is a witch hunt against Emanuel and you know it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raineyb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 01:36 PM Response to Reply #119 |
159. The only witch hunt I see is YOURS against anything that Jane Hamsher may like. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
StarfarerBill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:40 PM Response to Reply #109 |
130. So? If they're right, the corruption should be investigated and punished. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:50 PM Response to Reply #130 |
140. What corruption? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sebastian Doyle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 01:01 PM Response to Reply #68 |
146. No, Geithner is the Elf |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MNDemNY (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 02:09 PM Response to Reply #68 |
172. Nothing in there to link this to anyone other then Dennis. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 03:36 PM Response to Reply #68 |
194. Have YOU read Kucinich's words yourself? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RetroLounge (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:18 PM Original message |
unrec for the BS factor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grahamhgreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:18 PM Response to Original message |
72. All Obama has to do is get on TV and say any HC reform MUST have a public option... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Echo In Light (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:18 PM Response to Original message |
73. Is Firedoglake a lib/lefty site? The 'comments' section are generally favorable to DK's efforts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FLAprogressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:21 PM Response to Reply #73 |
85. Yep, they are. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Echo In Light (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:22 PM Response to Reply #85 |
88. Cool!...figured as much by all the + feedback in the comments |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:24 PM Response to Reply #85 |
92. They WERE. Until Hamsher went on a Jihad against Obama and decided to work with Norquist and enlist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
G_j (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:19 PM Response to Original message |
78. I don't think I remember |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rudy23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:26 PM Response to Reply #78 |
98. Let's just say Afghanistan is not the only place where there's been a surge of troops, recently. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
QC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:26 PM Original message |
+1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:23 PM Response to Original message |
89. Oh noes!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OregonBlue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:24 PM Response to Original message |
93. Did anyone read the article? Hamsher may be crowing but in fact Kucinich seems more interested in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:25 PM Response to Reply #93 |
95. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SemiCharmedQuark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:26 PM Response to Reply #93 |
101. Yes, I just read through the link and that was my conclusion as well. Hamsher seems to be trying to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:37 PM Response to Reply #101 |
123. If that is all it is, then Kucinich better come out and verbally distance himself from them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:41 PM Response to Reply #123 |
132. Or what, you'll call him mean names some more? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:42 PM Response to Reply #132 |
135. No, that's what I expect of you. Oh, you deleted it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:45 PM Response to Reply #135 |
137. HAHAHAHAH! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Individualist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:25 PM Response to Original message |
97. Another failed attempt to smear DK |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:27 PM Response to Reply #97 |
103. It's a failed attempt by FDL to smear Emanuel. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MNDemNY (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 02:10 PM Response to Reply #103 |
175. He's plenty "smeared" already. shit-smeared. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tailormyst (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:27 PM Response to Original message |
105. Stop, drop and roll, Your pants are on fire ! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zenlitened (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 01:32 PM Response to Reply #105 |
155. LOL! - n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mike_c (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:36 PM Response to Original message |
122. kucinich speaks truth to power and he speaks for me.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:37 PM Response to Original message |
125. This appears to just be more Kucinich's grandstanding |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stinky The Clown (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:48 PM Response to Original message |
139. Let me start by saying unequivocally that I have NO IDEA what the fuck you're hair's on fire about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Karmadillo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:50 PM Response to Original message |
141. Good for DK. It's not like he's asking us to "look forward" past the crimes of Bush/Cheney. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Echo In Light (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 01:27 PM Response to Reply #141 |
150. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 01:28 PM Response to Reply #141 |
152. Yeah, Kucinich did so well with that impeachment stuff. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 01:34 PM Response to Reply #152 |
158. Maybe he'd have been more successful if Senator Fierce Advocate had helped a bit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 01:37 PM Response to Reply #158 |
160. Right because Impeachment begins in the Senate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 01:42 PM Response to Reply #160 |
161. Well, I won't fuck up basic English, if that's what you mean. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 01:45 PM Response to Reply #161 |
162. Simple: He got elected. If you think Bush/Cheney would have stopped with Bush/Cheney |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 01:50 PM Response to Reply #162 |
166. Wow, someone's had an extra glass of Carnation Instant Hysteria this morning. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 02:30 PM Response to Reply #166 |
180. * cricket noise * cricket noise * cricket noise * cricket noise * cricket noise * |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 03:48 PM Response to Reply #166 |
199. Right because Obama did nothing to get elected. Your such epic fail. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 07:17 PM Response to Reply #199 |
214. You are = you're. Learn it. Love it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
enlightenment (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 01:48 PM Response to Reply #160 |
163. Impeachment 'begins' in the House, berni. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
G_j (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 01:56 PM Response to Reply #163 |
167. correct |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 03:44 PM Response to Reply #163 |
195. You missed the sarcasm. The person I was responding to felt it was Obama's responsibility. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 03:18 PM Response to Reply #160 |
192. impeachment begins in the house. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 03:45 PM Response to Reply #192 |
196. Sarcasm fail. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 03:50 PM Response to Reply #196 |
200. oh. right. 'sarcasm'. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OHdem10 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:55 PM Response to Original message |
143. Since we have apparently accepted the fact that this is a Center |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 01:00 PM Response to Original message |
145. Berni, I'd consider limiting it to 2 cups of coffee in the morning |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Edweird (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 01:10 PM Response to Original message |
148. Kucinich is one of the politicians I distrust the least. If he thinks there is something to look |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laughingliberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 01:29 PM Response to Original message |
153. Wow, there must be some kinda powerful crap coming out to dismantle the whole administration nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 01:33 PM Response to Reply #153 |
156. No shit. Obama is powerless before people like Harry Reid and Dennis Kucinich. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 01:49 PM Response to Original message |
164. Translation: "OMG Freddie and Fannie are going to be investigated... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MNDemNY (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 02:10 PM Response to Reply #164 |
176. We can only hope it reaches rahm! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluenorthwest (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 01:49 PM Response to Original message |
165. Baseless McCarthyite smears of Democrats |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
G_j (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 02:09 PM Response to Reply #165 |
173. +100 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 03:07 PM Response to Reply #165 |
188. Like Hamsher is doing with Rahm? That's what this is about. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 03:14 PM Response to Reply #188 |
191. This is NOT about Rahm Emanuel, unless you think |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Thickasabrick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 02:03 PM Response to Original message |
170. .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
freddie mertz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 02:12 PM Response to Original message |
177. I don't see any need for hysterics here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 02:33 PM Response to Original message |
181. I've read your link and have concluded that your headline to say |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Thickasabrick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 03:51 PM Response to Reply #181 |
201. Excellent analysis and the headline is indeed misleading. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
varelse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 03:00 PM Response to Original message |
184. Actual title of Kucinich's announcment:Treasury's Assistance to Fannie and Freddie |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laughingliberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 03:05 PM Response to Reply #184 |
186. Bastard! Seeking to ensure the money is used for homeowner and not Wall Street! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ddeclue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 03:06 PM Response to Original message |
187. YES - stop exaggerating. Rahm needs to go. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 03:46 PM Response to Reply #187 |
198. Witch Hunt It IS! WOOHOO! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 03:08 PM Response to Original message |
189. Another let's smear Kucinich thread. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Echo In Light (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 03:52 PM Response to Reply #189 |
202. Never any shortage of em at DU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 03:12 PM Response to Original message |
190. WHO Didn't See This BS Thead Coming? Oh yeah... LOL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 03:33 PM Response to Original message |
193. So are you against transparency or against Congressional oversight? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 03:45 PM Response to Original message |
197. The soiled laundry over at FireDogLake should probably not be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 05:51 PM Response to Original message |
204. Mods are locking flamefests...Good thing this fine example of truth... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
G_j (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 05:53 PM Response to Reply #204 |
205. + |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 06:15 PM Response to Reply #205 |
206. I see it brings a tear to your eye too... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
G_j (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 06:35 PM Response to Reply #206 |
208. perhaps a good sign |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 06:38 PM Response to Reply #204 |
209. Posts you don't agree with become flamefests because you intentionally turn them into one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flvegan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 06:28 PM Response to Original message |
207. More breathless wheezing in attempt to keep any tarnish off the Obama admin. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
557188 (494 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 06:42 PM Response to Original message |
210. Hypocrite |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 06:43 PM Response to Reply #210 |
211. You wouldn't know a hypocrite if they came up and bit you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
557188 (494 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 07:07 PM Response to Reply #211 |
213. Back on campaign promises? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JNelson6563 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 06:49 PM Response to Original message |
212. Kucinich. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mcablue (625 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 07:39 PM Response to Original message |
215. OP doesn't say what Kucinich wants to do. What's up with that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed Sep 25th 2024, 11:38 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC