|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
kpete
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 03:52 PM Original message |
CREW WRITES PATRICK FITZGERALD ASKING TO RE-OPEN ROVE CASE IN LIGHT OF MISSING EMAILS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benld74
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 03:53 PM Response to Original message |
1. I MEAN HELL YEAH!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
soothsayer
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 03:54 PM Response to Original message |
2. well, good. Fitzy already should have thought of this himself, tho. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dogday
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 03:55 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. He said if any evidence came to light |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 04:03 PM Response to Reply #4 |
9. Nope. Not to be a downer, but no. Just because there are missing emails does not mean |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dogday
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 04:09 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. How about a spark? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 04:27 PM Response to Reply #13 |
18. Some lazy, cheetoh eating slob may have left one on his laptop... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lovuian
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 06:19 PM Response to Reply #9 |
22. An investigator investigates he was given the right to search |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem
![]() |
Sat Apr-14-07 12:33 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. It may not be a dilemma. I read somewhere that WH workers had LAPTOPS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 04:00 PM Response to Reply #2 |
7. As I said downthread, "could have" ain't "evidence." NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merh
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 04:17 PM Response to Reply #2 |
16. maybe because his bosses didn't give him the go ahead to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChairmanAgnostic
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 03:55 PM Response to Original message |
3. I wonder how an untalented unsuccessful prosecutor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ghost in the Machine
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 04:08 PM Response to Reply #3 |
12. Everyone expected Fitzmas... and got Fizzlemas instead... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChairmanAgnostic
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 04:14 PM Response to Reply #12 |
15. I agree w/50% of what you say. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ghost in the Machine
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 04:48 PM Response to Reply #15 |
19. We can only *hope* he reopens the case... I'm about done holding on to hope.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SharonRB
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 03:56 PM Response to Original message |
5. You go, Melanie! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 03:58 PM Response to Original message |
6. The dog that didn't bark??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 04:00 PM Response to Original message |
8. Damn. I read it another way. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pastiche423
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 04:14 PM Response to Reply #8 |
14. Another damn |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Snotcicles
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 04:07 PM Response to Original message |
10. Melanie Sloan / Henry Waxman. OH MY |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SlowDownFast
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 04:08 PM Response to Original message |
11. Schweet. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
librechik
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 04:21 PM Response to Original message |
17. heh--that'll put Fitzgerald on the spot |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blackhatjack
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 04:58 PM Response to Original message |
20. There is nothing to re-open, Fitz has been observing and listening.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PDJane
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 06:10 PM Response to Original message |
21. The Bush Bunch have made a fine art |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Fri Jun 21st 2024, 07:16 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC