Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Don't most churches operate following a socialist model?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-22-09 04:07 PM
Original message
Don't most churches operate following a socialist model?
Not the prosperity gospel ones, but the ones that collect money from all their parishioners to donate to a charity or some community project.

It sounds socialistic to me.

Just asking.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cbdo2007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-22-09 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. you're reaching on this one my friend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-22-09 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Thank you, friend. And welcome to DU! Oh one question ...
... how am I reaching?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cbdo2007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-22-09 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
14. Oh sorry about that...forgot to give any reasons.
Well, socialism would be striving for economic equality while most churches only request a very small percentage of their parishioners income go to the church and in turn to charity, usually about 10%. This is in no way striving for equality, but just to give a little bit to those people who don't have as much.

Charity is not Socialism, and if we define it and apply it incorrectly like the Repubes do, they'll have greater success incorrectly labeling Democrats/Liberals as Socialists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-22-09 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Hmm. So, to make sure I understand you correctly ...
Edited on Fri May-22-09 04:52 PM by ColbertWatcher
... anything that strives for economic equality would be socialistic. Anything that merely helps someone isn't.

That makes single-payer healthcare not socialistic.

Right?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cbdo2007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-22-09 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #16
23. I'm just going by the definition of socialism for my explanation...
because most churches don't want you living in a smaller house, going down from two cars to one, etc. so that you can give the rest of it to the church or charity. That's NOT socialism based on my understanding.

And No, I don't believe having a single-payer healthcare system is Socialism. It seems to me that a Government having Single-Payer is itself not Socialism because Socialism means for the government to own and run all services, not just one. Meaning it's no more socialist than say Social Security is or the military, other services that are run entirely by the Govt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-22-09 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. I meant only to say that charity is similar to the idea behind socialism. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-22-09 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. Sharing = socialism to RW. They don't want to share anything. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorax7844 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-22-09 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. charity is totally socialist
why are you expecting their arguments to make sense? They don't. That's how we know that they are completely wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-22-09 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. "Socialist" is meaningless rightist rhetoric. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-22-09 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. The GOP-controlled media is using it that way.
But, I'm asking about the real meaning of the word.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-22-09 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
5. Uh, maybe more feudal than "social."
There were levies for big projects.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-22-09 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
8. I think we need a new term akin to truthiness
how about socialish?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-22-09 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. LOL! Perhaps today's churches need a truthy term for charity!? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-22-09 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
9. They only raise money for 'the poor,' not their own members
Aside from salaries for their leaders, I don't think their donations benefit their members.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-22-09 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
10. I don't really see Charity as "socialism". But, the early Christians, without a doubt, were
socialist. They had "a common purse".

Charity is at the whim of the giver.

And very often, if not mostly, humiliating.

Socialism is a different animal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-22-09 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. I don't mean is charity socialism, but socialisTIC. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalmuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-22-09 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
12. Early Christianity was Socialism, period.
And what is wrong with Socialism, anyway? I think the 'pubs have been confusing a socialist dictatorship with true Socialism for decades. Either that, or they're just fucking stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
safeinOhio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-22-09 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. I'd say so
-There was no needy person among them, for those who owned property or houses would sell them, bring the proceeds of the sale, and put them at the feet of the apostles, and they were distributed to each according to need. (ACTS 4:34-35
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-22-09 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. Can't they be both? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thunder rising Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-22-09 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
13. modern christian churches are dictatorships ... I say that god says that you should do ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-22-09 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
15. Eh. They rely on donations, yes. But it is a choice for the parishioners.
Gov't socialism, however you may feel about it, is dependent on taxes, thus it usually takes a lot of that choice out of the equation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-22-09 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. So, charity is socialism AND choice?
LOL!

No wonder Dumbass started his faith-based pyramid schemes.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-22-09 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. You don't have to give to a charity. But you do have to pay taxes.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mamaleah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-22-09 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
21. It's voluntary
With the exception of the LDS church, it's not mandatory. And it's only mandatory for Mormons if they want to remain in good enough standing to actually enter a Mormon temple.

Most mainstream Christian religions ask for donations of around 10%. That's voluntary, and quite a small amount.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-22-09 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
22. Once a long time ago (in the Book of Acts) there was a short period
of time when they did live in a socialist type of community but greed got in the way and they ended it. Acts does not condemn socialism but it does show that greed can destroy any type of lifestyle. It seems we never learn that lesson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-22-09 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
26. Yep, even when I was in high school at the height of the cold war
and McCarthy hearings, the nuns who taught me pointed to the communism of the religious life (nuns and monks) and the social programs advocated by the Church such as the Catholic hospitals of that time who took in any one who needed care regardless of their ability to pay. They always had rich patrons they solicited and ran fund raisers to pay for those indigenous folks who couldn't pay. Somewhere around the late sixties all that changed because how health care was delivered changed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scrinmaster Donating Member (563 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-22-09 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
27. Voluntary vs compulsary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Oct 31st 2024, 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC