Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How can we get rid of the USA's that replaced the fired prosecutors??

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-01-07 02:27 PM
Original message
How can we get rid of the USA's that replaced the fired prosecutors??
How can the damage be undone? We all know that they are party hacks that have been placed in strategic positions to shut down and get information on investigations.

Do we have to prove malfeasance or obstruction first??

How can we fix this problem?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hardrada Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-01-07 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. Elect Edwards/Obama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-01-07 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. The most efficient way is to elect a Dem President in 2008.
That will naturally time-limit the problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-01-07 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. simplest way is to elect a president....
All USAs are expected to tender their resignations to the new administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-01-07 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. Since the section of the Patriot Act was repealed that would have
let these folkstake office without Senate Confirmation, why couldn't the Dem Senators demand that they ALL appear for comfirmation hearings? Then of course if they don't pass muster, Shrub would have to pick some other ones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-01-07 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. now THIS is the answer I was looking for!!
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-01-07 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. Yeah me too.
Too much damage can be done in the next 20 months.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-01-07 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. But it hasn't been repealed yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-01-07 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. s I understand it, the repeal has been passed by the House & the Senate,
so the only thing left to do is for Shrub to sign the bill. If he hasn't signed it YET, it most likely will or has become law because he only has 10 days to either sign or veto. Besides, he said he wouldn't have a problem with signing it.

The only thing I don't know is, since it was repealed AFTER these USA's were "put in place", can the Senate apply the new regulation, or do these * still fall under thelaw as it was when they were appointed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-01-07 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Probably depends on the language
I would venture to say that either the interims have a total of 120 days or they have 120 days from the signing otherwise the District Court would appoint a temporary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-01-07 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. This might be the intent
The legislation would also terminate existing interim appointments 120 days from enactment, or upon confirmation of a successor, whichever comes first. Similarly, if at the end of the 120 days no successor is in place, the district court would be authorized to appoint an interim U.S. Attorney to serve until the vacancy is filled.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-01-07 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. exactly -- 120 days from enactment they must be confirmed or they're out
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-01-07 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
18. Wouldn't they claim they were grandfathered in? I would suggest making
their lives a living hell until they resign. Protest them. Scrutinize everything they do. Ostracize them for past deeds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-01-07 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
6. Those USA's are interim under the Patriot Act
Prior to the Patriot Act they were appointed by the Attorney General and had interim status for 120 days. If the vacancy was not filled after 120 days the District Court appoints a USA to serve until the vacancy is filled.

Now they are appointed by the Attorney General and have interim status until bushwad nominates and the Senate confirms the appointment. Interim status can last as long as 1/20/2009.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-01-07 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
8. apparently no one here has read the new legislation -- it deals with this
So many posts, so little information.

The legislation that repeals the provision of the Patriot Act giving the AG the authority to appoint an interim US Attorney for an indefinite period not only reinstates the previous provision, under which interim appointments are only good for 120 days, it also expressly makes it applicable to anyone appointed under the repealed provision.

In other words, anyone appointed by the AG as an interim US Atty under the repealed provision can only serve until the earlier of senate confirmation or 120 days after enactment of the repeal provision.

And, yes, I realize that Congress hasn't finalized action on this bill yet; but it will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-01-07 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
9. I get the feeling people in this thread don't understand the nature of the replacements....
Edited on Sun Apr-01-07 03:12 PM by BlooInBloo
Everyone is saying "Get a new President" - which is literally correct, BUT IS NEVERTHELESS 100% UNHELPFUL.

The entire reason for the replacements was to affect the upcoming election. Everyone knows they'll presumably be replaced at the start of another POTUS' term.

It's about eroding voter rights in THIS 2008 ELECTION - to talk about how we fix it in terms of what happens AFTER the next election completely misses the point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-01-07 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. like it or not, that's the way the system works.
november 2008 is the timeframe you'll have to live with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-01-07 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
11. THis is the question! What do we
Edited on Sun Apr-01-07 03:42 PM by zidzi
do about it NOW?!

THe bushits got them in there to screw with 2008 elections and to punish those who were going after criminals too well who just happened to be repukes(aren't they all?).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-01-07 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
16. elect a democratic president in 2008.
nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Jun 21st 2024, 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC