|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
mudesi
![]() |
Wed Nov-05-08 04:08 PM Original message |
Contact Nancy Pelosi right now and demand impeachment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mike_c
![]() |
Wed Nov-05-08 04:11 PM Response to Original message |
1. hear hear! We cannot rest until the war criminals are brought to justice! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oldtime dfl_er
![]() |
Wed Nov-05-08 04:11 PM Response to Original message |
2. I agree with this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kashka-Kat
![]() |
Wed Nov-05-08 04:13 PM Response to Original message |
3. IS IT TRUE that if Bush pre-emptively pardons everyone they can't be prosecuted later? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Countdown_3_2_1
![]() |
Wed Nov-05-08 05:25 PM Response to Reply #3 |
29. Its Happened Before. The precedent is set. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Independent_Liberal
![]() |
Wed Nov-05-08 06:00 PM Response to Reply #3 |
34. From what I understand, pardons can be challenged in court. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dems_rightnow
![]() |
Wed Nov-05-08 06:50 PM Response to Reply #34 |
42. You're quite wrong there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Independent_Liberal
![]() |
Wed Nov-05-08 07:07 PM Response to Reply #42 |
43. I heard differently from a few experts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dems_rightnow
![]() |
Wed Nov-05-08 07:25 PM Response to Reply #43 |
46. Please do. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yodermon
![]() |
Thu Nov-06-08 11:50 AM Response to Reply #3 |
55. Bush can pardon at the stroke of a pen so impeachment can't prevent that unless |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
amdezurik
![]() |
Wed Nov-05-08 04:19 PM Response to Original message |
4. I don't give a damm what photo's they have of her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat
![]() |
Wed Nov-05-08 04:52 PM Response to Reply #4 |
20. How can you accuse Nancy of such selfishness that she'd sell out her country for her own reputation? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
amdezurik
![]() |
Wed Nov-05-08 06:25 PM Original message |
valid point... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat
![]() |
Wed Nov-05-08 06:43 PM Response to Original message |
40. "About that favorite nephew of yours who wants to get into Harvard Law...." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ixion
![]() |
Wed Nov-05-08 04:22 PM Response to Original message |
5. agreed... Pelosi needs to grow a spine and do her freakin' job |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote
![]() |
Wed Nov-05-08 04:26 PM Response to Reply #5 |
10. actually, she has been doing her job |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ixion
![]() |
Wed Nov-05-08 04:42 PM Response to Reply #10 |
18. the job of every elected official: UPHOLD THE CONSTITUTION |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote
![]() |
Wed Nov-05-08 04:23 PM Response to Original message |
6. not going to happen. and most people don't care |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bdamomma
![]() |
Wed Nov-05-08 04:26 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. it's not water under the bridge |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arikara
![]() |
Wed Nov-05-08 04:28 PM Response to Reply #6 |
12. Unfortunately you are probably half right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound
![]() |
Wed Nov-05-08 04:38 PM Response to Reply #6 |
17. To our international embarrassment and historic shame, thank you very much. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat
![]() |
Wed Nov-05-08 04:54 PM Response to Reply #6 |
22. "most people don't care about the constitution and neither do i" is a low-road position. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote
![]() |
Wed Nov-05-08 05:55 PM Response to Reply #22 |
32. Sorry. But I'm just telling it as it is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat
![]() |
Wed Nov-05-08 06:24 PM Response to Reply #32 |
36. I am ashamed of a nation that won't repudiate in the strongest terms the international thuggery |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME
![]() |
Wed Nov-05-08 04:24 PM Response to Original message |
7. No Way. It Is An Absurd Notion. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RobertSeattle
![]() |
Wed Nov-05-08 04:27 PM Response to Reply #7 |
11. Agreed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cynatnite
![]() |
Wed Nov-05-08 04:53 PM Response to Reply #7 |
21. Absolutely right. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annarbor
![]() |
Wed Nov-05-08 08:07 PM Response to Reply #7 |
50. thank you.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mudesi
![]() |
Fri Nov-07-08 12:41 PM Response to Reply #7 |
60. Good vibes? Who cares? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat
![]() |
Fri Nov-07-08 02:49 PM Response to Reply #7 |
61. There's nothing partisan about defending the Constitution from Bush's imperial precedents. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nichomachus
![]() |
Wed Nov-05-08 04:25 PM Response to Original message |
8. Whatever you do |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bowens43
![]() |
Wed Nov-05-08 04:29 PM Response to Original message |
13. It's not going to happen and it would be a very bad move. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat
![]() |
Wed Nov-05-08 04:59 PM Response to Reply #13 |
23. It's not over. Bush has established the precedents of Imperial executive powers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftofthedial
![]() |
Wed Nov-05-08 04:29 PM Response to Original message |
14. Hear! Hear! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bvar22
![]() |
Wed Nov-05-08 04:30 PM Response to Original message |
15. Don't waIit for Nancy to do anything. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Atman
![]() |
Wed Nov-05-08 04:33 PM Response to Original message |
16. You are not a strategic thinker |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrightKnight
![]() |
Wed Nov-05-08 04:45 PM Response to Original message |
19. The political price would be very high and by the time you did he would be out anyway. - n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat
![]() |
Wed Nov-05-08 05:04 PM Response to Reply #19 |
26. The country must repudiate Bush's crimes through impeachment and criminal proceedings. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mudesi
![]() |
Wed Nov-05-08 08:17 PM Response to Reply #19 |
52. What price? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Why Syzygy
![]() |
Wed Nov-05-08 05:02 PM Response to Original message |
24. What's more, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan
![]() |
Wed Nov-05-08 05:02 PM Response to Original message |
25. Yes Yes Yes a million times Yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Irish Girl
![]() |
Wed Nov-05-08 05:11 PM Response to Original message |
27. In a just world, criminals are held accountable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bake
![]() |
Wed Nov-05-08 05:17 PM Response to Original message |
28. Hmmm ... impeachment = incarceration? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat
![]() |
Wed Nov-05-08 06:33 PM Response to Reply #28 |
38. Is that what you tell your kids? "Sorry, there are bullies in the world, and nothing can be done"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bake
![]() |
Thu Nov-06-08 11:03 AM Response to Reply #38 |
54. No, I'm pointing out that impeachment does not lead to incarceration, ever. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat
![]() |
Fri Nov-07-08 12:15 PM Response to Reply #54 |
56. Bush will not be gone in two months. All the imperial powers he usurped will remain in the toolbox |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
crickets
![]() |
Wed Nov-05-08 05:32 PM Response to Original message |
30. Impeachment, International War Crimes Trials, *something*. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fireweed247
![]() |
Wed Nov-05-08 05:52 PM Response to Original message |
31. We cannot afford Bush...if we do not impeach him... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Independent_Liberal
![]() |
Wed Nov-05-08 05:56 PM Response to Original message |
33. A little message to the "not gonna happen" crowd: Yesterday proved anything is possible. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mudesi
![]() |
Wed Nov-05-08 06:25 PM Response to Reply #33 |
37. Unbelievable, isn't it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pastiche423
![]() |
Wed Nov-05-08 06:24 PM Response to Original message |
35. Her contact page: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat
![]() |
Wed Nov-05-08 06:40 PM Response to Reply #35 |
39. That's for her SF constituents. Citizens-at-large must comment at the Speaker's page. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pastiche423
![]() |
Wed Nov-05-08 06:47 PM Response to Reply #39 |
41. Thanks for the info! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote
![]() |
Wed Nov-05-08 07:10 PM Response to Reply #35 |
45. she just was overwhelmingly re-elected |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RobertDevereaux
![]() |
Wed Nov-05-08 07:09 PM Response to Original message |
44. k&r, god dammit! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
El Fuego
![]() |
Wed Nov-05-08 07:26 PM Response to Original message |
47. YES! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
muriel_volestrangler
![]() |
Wed Nov-05-08 07:54 PM Response to Original message |
48. It needs 17 Republican (inc. Lieberman in that) senators to vote to convict |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf
![]() |
Wed Nov-05-08 07:58 PM Response to Original message |
49. Why is she likely to listen right now, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mudesi
![]() |
Wed Nov-05-08 08:15 PM Response to Reply #49 |
51. Because Obama has won the election |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf
![]() |
Thu Nov-06-08 09:24 AM Response to Reply #51 |
53. I don't see the difference, myself. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mudesi
![]() |
Fri Nov-07-08 12:40 PM Response to Reply #53 |
59. I'm suggesting he be held accountable for his criminal actions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf
![]() |
Fri Nov-07-08 08:08 PM Response to Reply #59 |
63. I've been suggesting it since '03. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mari333
![]() |
Fri Nov-07-08 12:21 PM Response to Original message |
57. out of sight, out of mind |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trayfoot
![]() |
Fri Nov-07-08 12:33 PM Response to Original message |
58. This ship sailed a long time ago. Sad, but true. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
historian
![]() |
Fri Nov-07-08 02:57 PM Response to Original message |
62. been there done that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Jun 22nd 2024, 06:11 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC