|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
still_one
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 10:46 AM Original message |
Obama has to choose someone like Wes Clark for VP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donco
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 10:49 AM Response to Original message |
1. I’ll be proud to be the one to second that. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 10:54 AM Response to Original message |
2. No he doesn't. He has to choose someone he's comfortable with. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 11:02 AM Response to Reply #2 |
6. Of course he needs to be comfortable with that person, but I believe he will be at a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 11:19 AM Response to Reply #6 |
12. The jury's out on whether someone with a military background is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalFighter
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 11:42 AM Response to Reply #12 |
18. Exactly what military qualifications did the following have that was pertinent? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 12:01 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. Obama's opinion is at post #17: he doesn't see the need to hire |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 10:59 AM Response to Original message |
3. No he doesn't have to appoint anyone in particular |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 11:05 AM Response to Reply #3 |
8. It isn't a deal break for US, however, I believe it would bolster his campaign |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 11:11 AM Response to Reply #8 |
11. I don't buy it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warpy
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 11:01 AM Response to Original message |
4. Word has it that he's concentrating his search |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 11:06 AM Response to Reply #4 |
9. Doesn't have to be Clark, but someone to go against the argument |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vickers
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 11:01 AM Response to Original message |
5. He ain't gotta do jack shit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truebrit71
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 11:03 AM Response to Original message |
7. That would be a brilliant choice....top military credentials and an outside the beltway guy to boot. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 11:07 AM Response to Reply #7 |
10. That was my point, someone with top military credentials /nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Veronica.Franco
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 11:20 AM Response to Original message |
13. Looking down the road eight years ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
newmajority
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 12:14 PM Response to Reply #13 |
20. Who cares what the DLC thinks? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Strelnikov_
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 11:22 AM Response to Original message |
14. Juan Coles take on this meme |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crabby Appleton
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 11:24 AM Response to Original message |
15. Ex-mil would be good, not sure Clark is the one though. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
napoleon_in_rags
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 11:25 AM Response to Original message |
16. IT probably won't happen, as Clark plays hardball with the right. Expect somebody more centrist. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 11:26 AM Response to Original message |
17. This is how Obama looks at picking someone in the military... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MiniMe
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 12:28 PM Response to Original message |
21. Wes Clark would have been a good choice. Until the right totally twisted his |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sun Jun 16th 2024, 10:18 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC