|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 02:51 PM Original message |
*** Official Mukasey testimony before Senate Judiciary Committee #5 **** |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 02:52 PM Response to Original message |
1. Leahy pressing him on the "recusal" issue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 02:52 PM Response to Original message |
2. All I have to say is "is this guy mentally disabled?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 02:53 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. crazy like a B*shy tailed fox! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 02:54 PM Response to Reply #4 |
7. I know, it's despicable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 02:53 PM Response to Original message |
3. recusal for Durham... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 02:54 PM Response to Original message |
5. Who has viewed these tapes? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 02:54 PM Response to Original message |
6. I don't know.. and if I did I wouldn't tell you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 02:55 PM Response to Original message |
8. If they HAD viewed them, there was a reason.. then Who said to destroy?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solly Mack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 02:55 PM Response to Original message |
9. Who's got the Rolaids? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 02:55 PM Response to Original message |
10. Was anyone ASKED about the advisability of destroying them? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 02:55 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. "I haven't seen any evidence of that" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 02:56 PM Response to Original message |
12. Aw shit.. Muk says he saw it in the Washington Post. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 02:57 PM Response to Original message |
13. VIDEOS of the Mukasey Hearing: CIA Tapes Investigation May Cover Interrogation Techniques |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 02:57 PM Response to Original message |
14. Muk.. "maybe I forgot" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
buzzard (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 02:57 PM Response to Original message |
15. I feel like jumping through my MacBook Pro and strangling this POS in many ways |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
canoeist52 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 02:57 PM Response to Original message |
16. reminds me of "I dont recall"--Nixon |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 02:57 PM Response to Original message |
17. Were there communications between you & the WH about the destruction? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 02:58 PM Response to Original message |
18. Will you have a problem with Durham testifying here?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 02:58 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. Muk (short version) yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 02:59 PM Response to Original message |
20. Now about those missing emails... did you see that in the paper? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 02:59 PM Response to Reply #20 |
22. You know they were using RNC addys? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solly Mack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 02:59 PM Response to Original message |
21. "I don't understand the question" LMAO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 03:00 PM Response to Original message |
23. If they have broken those laws will you look into it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 03:00 PM Response to Reply #23 |
24. "I would want to know more about it" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 03:00 PM Response to Original message |
25. Stunning in his evasiveness. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 03:06 PM Response to Reply #25 |
34. He should be impeached based on that alone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 03:00 PM Response to Original message |
26. Grassley back up now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 03:02 PM Response to Original message |
27. about the FBI needin arabic speakers in management positions.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 03:02 PM Response to Reply #27 |
28. (issue during confirmation - he said he'd look into it) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 03:03 PM Response to Original message |
29. "It's in litigation" so he can't talk about it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
buzzard (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 03:04 PM Response to Reply #29 |
32. He hasn't answered a GD question at all, this is a waste of time until Congress starts doing their |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solly Mack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 03:06 PM Original message |
He can't talk about it if...it happened in the past, it's no longer done, he |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 03:04 PM Response to Original message |
30. So w're under threat of attack and we have to wait for answers? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 03:04 PM Response to Original message |
31. This guy is acting like the last one - like he's Bush's personal lawyer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Duer 157099 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 03:07 PM Response to Reply #31 |
36. Yeah. That anyone expected otherwise (Shumer) is what is shocking. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solly Mack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 03:08 PM Response to Reply #31 |
37. That's why Bush nominated him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 03:04 PM Response to Original message |
33. Grassely is bringin up legit concerns... but is off topic. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 03:06 PM Response to Original message |
35. now he's on illegal immigration |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 03:09 PM Response to Original message |
38. Whitehouse up again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 03:10 PM Response to Original message |
39. back to the process of determining if waterboarding is or is not torture |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 03:11 PM Response to Original message |
40. If you are waiting for Durhams investigation..? Or is there a policy detemination? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 03:12 PM Response to Original message |
41. "facts come to the attention to the department" . so far they haven't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 03:12 PM Response to Original message |
42. Could we not have this discussion in closed session? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solly Mack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 03:12 PM Response to Original message |
43. in 3 days I'll have a birthday...would someone please smack |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 03:13 PM Response to Original message |
44. He said that is would still be just a discussion.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 03:13 PM Response to Original message |
45. It's not fair to say there is no basis to determine if "facts have been brought |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 03:14 PM Response to Original message |
46. Anyone who watches TV would know ther was at least the basis |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solly Mack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 03:14 PM Response to Original message |
47. It's NOT a muthfucking IF now. I am SICK OF THE IFS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 03:15 PM Response to Original message |
48. WH: there is no exemption.. no Nuremberg defense.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 03:15 PM Response to Original message |
49. You say the certification alone keeps you from going forward...? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 03:16 PM Response to Original message |
50. "there's an ongoing investigation and I won't comment" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
countryjake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 03:16 PM Response to Original message |
51. "permissibly relied on"?? WTF? This dude is one good spinner! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
buzzard (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 03:17 PM Response to Reply #51 |
53. He is slimier than Gonzales. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 03:16 PM Response to Original message |
52. Muk just clammed up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 03:17 PM Response to Original message |
54. WH thanks him for reestablishing the firewall between the admin & the DOJ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Duer 157099 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 03:18 PM Response to Original message |
55. Did Whitehouse just blow kisses to Mukasey? wtf???? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solly Mack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 03:18 PM Response to Original message |
56. Thank him? for what? His lies? His non-answers? His complicity? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 03:18 PM Response to Original message |
57. Leahy: DOJ trying to take over the FOIA from "archives" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 03:19 PM Response to Reply #57 |
58. He tells Muk to look over that... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 03:19 PM Response to Original message |
59. Cardin (D_ Md) up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 03:20 PM Response to Original message |
60. Another "ongoing investigation" cop out. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Duer 157099 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 03:23 PM Response to Reply #60 |
65. I think before Gonzo left, he wrote Mukasey a memo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 03:24 PM Response to Reply #65 |
67. And the note has since been destroyed of course. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThomWV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 03:21 PM Response to Original message |
61. I am simply dumbstruck by all of this. That this man is the Attorney General of my country |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
canadianbeaver (929 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 03:41 PM Response to Reply #61 |
100. Your country no longer exists.......its "Their Country" now.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 03:21 PM Response to Original message |
62. Cardins's observation: from any standard, you cannot justify waterboarding |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 03:22 PM Response to Original message |
63. also.. retroactive immunity is prone to abuses... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solly Mack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 03:23 PM Response to Original message |
64. and that's 3 months too long |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 03:23 PM Response to Original message |
66. supports sunset provisions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 03:25 PM Response to Original message |
68. Also wants to bring up voter suppression issues- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
countryjake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 03:26 PM Response to Original message |
69. ooh ooh ooh , attempts to suppress minority voting during this election |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 03:26 PM Response to Original message |
70. Muk claims he'll be on top of that. . . snort |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
countryjake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 03:27 PM Response to Reply #70 |
71. yeah right...we can be sure of that, eh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 03:28 PM Response to Original message |
72. Give your personal attention to the civil rights division.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 03:29 PM Response to Original message |
73. Muk says "sure" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 03:30 PM Response to Original message |
74. Whitehouse has another question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 03:30 PM Response to Reply #74 |
76. He's going to write to him re: Office of Legal Counsel |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 03:31 PM Response to Reply #76 |
77. It's become a hot house of rougue ideological opinion. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
countryjake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 03:33 PM Response to Reply #77 |
80. behind a shield of "classification" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
countryjake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 03:41 PM Response to Reply #76 |
101. memo would be source of shame if made public |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
countryjake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 03:30 PM Response to Original message |
75. return civil rights division to its historic role |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solly Mack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 03:32 PM Response to Original message |
78. The idea that anything Mukasey says on any subject can be trusted is laughable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 03:32 PM Response to Original message |
79. nobody in that unit thought they were violating the law, nor intended to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 03:33 PM Response to Original message |
81. Leahy again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 03:34 PM Response to Reply #81 |
82. pushing for an independent prosecutor... (Durham isn't) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 03:35 PM Response to Original message |
83. Muk is gobstopped.... He says you only appoint an independent prosecutror |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
countryjake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 03:35 PM Response to Reply #83 |
85. he'd hate to destroy faith in the system |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 03:35 PM Response to Original message |
84. If there's no conflict.. why the recusal? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 03:35 PM Response to Original message |
86. Durbin up now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solly Mack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 03:36 PM Response to Original message |
87. Gee, why weren't they just charged with war crimes? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 03:36 PM Response to Original message |
88. Do you know Comey? yes.. Your opinion of him? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 03:37 PM Response to Original message |
89. He is a sound, able person. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 03:37 PM Response to Original message |
90. Do youi know Bradbury?.. He's been involved with most controversial issues |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
buzzard (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 03:39 PM Response to Reply #90 |
93. How do you type this so fast it is barely out of his mouth and I see it on my screen. Are you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 03:45 PM Response to Reply #93 |
107. lol - no I've got the TV on behind me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
buzzard (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 03:39 PM Response to Reply #90 |
94. How do you type this so fast it is barely out of his mouth and I see it on my screen. Are you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
countryjake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 03:45 PM Response to Reply #94 |
106. she's damn good, eh? steno is practically a forgotten skill |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 03:38 PM Response to Original message |
91. Comey didn't like Bradbury.... "ashamed" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 03:39 PM Response to Original message |
92. Muk doesn't always agree with Comey. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solly Mack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 03:39 PM Response to Original message |
95. I'm going to get mean and nasty any minute now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 03:39 PM Response to Original message |
96. re" torture & wiretapping".. Have you reviewed Bradbury's opinions? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 03:40 PM Response to Original message |
97. He agrees with Bradbury. . (multiple abusive techniques) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 03:40 PM Response to Original message |
98. Comey objected.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 03:41 PM Response to Original message |
99. Please review and get back to me. . Muk says ok |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
buzzard (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 03:42 PM Response to Reply #99 |
102. It is apparent he has no intention of reviewing anything, I am sure he knows the answers anyways.n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Subdivisions (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 03:43 PM Response to Original message |
103. I sure do like Durbin right now! Kapow! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solly Mack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 03:43 PM Response to Original message |
104. Ashcroft covered up the "spirit of the law" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solly Mack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 03:54 PM Response to Reply #104 |
108. Here's my summation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 04:24 PM Response to Reply #108 |
110. i agree with you one hundred percent...shame on my country |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wiggs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 04:38 PM Response to Reply #108 |
111. Question for those who are watching |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 03:44 PM Response to Original message |
105. new thread (short one I guess) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
countryjake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 04:22 PM Response to Reply #105 |
109. Much thanks annabanana...that was a job well done! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed Jun 12th 2024, 10:36 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC