Poll: Hey you lazy pot users? How much pot do you actually use?

[devilgrrl]

Poll question: Poll: Hey you lazy pot users? How much pot do you actually use?

Huh? Stoners...

Losers.

:sarcasm:

[OPERATIONMINDCRIME]

1. Can't...Answer....Poll. Too....Damn....Lazy...

[grytpype]

2. An ounze a dizzle my nizzle...

[devilgrrl]

5. Snoop Dog posts to DU?

Bonus!

[SmellsLikeDeanSpirit]

9. Someone photoshop Mike Gravel in this pic.

[devilgrrl]

3. Need to know how it's possible to enjoy smoking over a 1/4 ounce a day

Unless that person is suffering from illness.

Care to explain that for us?

[grytpype]

6. It's only 50 joints or so

that's two an hour...



thug 4 life

[Ganja Ninja]

4. I don't get to smoke it as much as I'd like to.

Too hard to find, too expensive and poor quality to boot. God I wish it were legal.

[Uben]

7. Okay, what was the question?

Oh yeah, no.

[evlbstrd]

8. On the cancer thing.

Probably not true:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/20...

Study Finds No Cancer-Marijuana Connection

By Marc Kaufman
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, May 26, 2006; A03



The largest study of its kind has unexpectedly concluded that smoking
marijuana, even regularly and heavily, does not lead to lung cancer.

The new findings "were against our expectations," said Donald Tashkin
of the University of California at Los Angeles, a pulmonologist who
has studied marijuana for 30 years.

"We hypothesized that there would be a positive association between
marijuana use and lung cancer, and that the association would be more
positive with heavier use," he said. "What we found instead was no
association at all, and even a suggestion of some protective effect."

Federal health and drug enforcement officials have widely used
Tashkin's previous work on marijuana to make the case that the drug is
dangerous. Tashkin said that while he still believes marijuana is
potentially harmful, its cancer-causing effects appear to be of less
concern than previously thought.

Earlier work established that marijuana does contain cancer-causing
chemicals as potentially harmful as those in tobacco, he said.
However, marijuana also contains the chemical THC, which he said may
kill aging cells and keep them from becoming cancerous.

Tashkin's study, funded by the National Institutes of Health's
National Institute on Drug Abuse, involved 1,200 people in Los Angeles
who had lung, neck or head cancer and an additional 1,040 people
without cancer matched by age, sex and neighborhood.

[Torn_Scorned_Ignored]

10. devilgrrl -

how much is your usage?

[devilgrrl]

11. Option 3

I'm evil and lazy!!!!!

:sarcasm:

[devilgrrl]

12. WOW!!!!! WHAT A BUNCH OF STONERS!!!!!!! PUT DOWN THE BONG!!!!!!

:sarcasm::sarcasm::sarcasm::sarcasm::sarcasm::sarcasm::sarcasm::sarcasm::sarcasm:
:sarcasm::sarcasm::sarcasm::sarcasm::sarcasm::sarcasm::sarcasm::sarcasm::sarcasm:
:sarcasm::sarcasm::sarcasm::sarcasm::sarcasm::sarcasm::sarcasm::sarcasm::sarcasm:
:sarcasm::sarcasm::sarcasm::sarcasm::sarcasm::sarcasm::sarcasm::sarcasm::sarcasm:
:sarcasm::sarcasm::sarcasm::sarcasm::sarcasm::sarcasm::sarcasm::sarcasm::sarcasm:
:sarcasm::sarcasm::sarcasm::sarcasm::sarcasm::sarcasm::sarcasm::sarcasm::sarcasm:
:sarcasm::sarcasm::sarcasm::sarcasm::sarcasm::sarcasm::sarcasm::sarcasm::sarcasm:
:sarcasm::sarcasm::sarcasm::sarcasm::sarcasm::sarcasm::sarcasm::sarcasm::sarcasm:

[Hutzpa]

13. You seem obssessed with pot,

what are you trying to accomplish?

Your second post in less than 5 min about pot, thats all you have,
are you some kind of cyber police? sniffing for
pot, you'll get high doing that.




:smoke:

[devilgrrl]

14. I'm sick of everyone acting as if it's a threat to humanity

because it's not.