But only beat Obama by 3% last night!
Less than 3 months ago, she was predicted to blow out her competition in New Hampshire. As example this AP story (10/13/07):
By The Associated Press
Hillary Rodham Clinton is holding a commanding lead over Barack Obama for the Democratic presidential nomination in New Hampshire, a poll released Sunday found.
Clinton had the support of 40 percent of those surveyed compared to 20 percent for Obama, Marist College Institute for Public Opinion said.
John Edwards was third (12 percent) and Bill Richardson fourth (7 percent).
On the Republican side, Mitt Romney held a slight edge over Rudy Giuliani (25 percent to 21 percent). John McCain was third (18 percent) and Fred Thompson fourth (10 percent).
Clinton was the overwhelming choice among those polled who want a strong leader or someone who will bring about change -- 44 percent chose her compared with 20 percent for Obama and 11 percent for Edward
http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/2007-10-14-815443729_x.htmIn fact, a huge Clinton victory was predicted all the way up to 5 days before the NH primary. I don't see Obama's 3% loss in NH has a crushing defeat, nor do I see Hillary's victory as an amazing comeback. In reality (that's REALITY) folks, it had probably been closer all along.
The M$M spin suggests some kind of amazing Hillary comeback, yet where are the stories saying
Obama came back from 20% down to almost catch Clinton last night? Same pundits, same polls, same M$M ---- different spin.
Obama (and maybe Edwards) have plenty of surprises left in the tank! 48 more states to go...
Don't listen to the belt way pundits!
peace~:)