|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
cosmik debris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-24-07 12:42 PM Original message |
Are we really the lesser of two evils? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-24-07 12:46 PM Response to Original message |
1. Did the poll on Congress differentiate betwen Repos and Dems in that body? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Virginia Dare (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-24-07 12:56 PM Response to Reply #1 |
7. Yes, and the Dems polled higher... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-24-07 02:31 PM Response to Reply #7 |
22. Thanks for the info. It puts things into perspective |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BridgeTheGap (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-24-07 12:47 PM Response to Original message |
2. How much of the 89% are hardcore Dems pissed at the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hondadriver (41 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-24-07 12:48 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. My guess |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Perry Logan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-24-07 12:50 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. That would be sad, since Congress was anything but inactive. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unpossibles (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-24-07 12:48 PM Response to Original message |
3. congressional approval has never been high has it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BridgeTheGap (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-24-07 12:56 PM Original message |
I don't think it has. But a paradox here is incumbancy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unpossibles (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-24-07 01:03 PM Response to Original message |
9. exactly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeFree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-24-07 01:04 PM Response to Original message |
10. Why? Possible answer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
2rth2pwr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-24-07 01:19 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. Stolen elections and a Dem majority |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeFree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-24-07 01:36 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. Seems, eh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
2rth2pwr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-24-07 01:44 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. Why aren't Clinton, Obama, Edwards et al |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeFree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-24-07 01:53 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. Smart? Nah |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
2rth2pwr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-24-07 02:08 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. Oh, they are in on it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Virginia Dare (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-24-07 12:56 PM Response to Original message |
6. The 11% is Congress overall.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nightrider767 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-24-07 12:57 PM Response to Original message |
8. Congress is also under attack |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Didereaux (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-24-07 01:15 PM Response to Original message |
11. ah but the difference is....... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-24-07 01:37 PM Response to Original message |
14. Lesser. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Horse with no Name (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-24-07 02:11 PM Response to Original message |
18. It is very simple WHY the numbers look like this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-24-07 02:20 PM Response to Original message |
19. The reason for the low numbers is that republicans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iamthebandfanman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-24-07 02:23 PM Response to Original message |
20. well if it upsets u then |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WI_DEM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-24-07 02:25 PM Response to Original message |
21. but Congress as an institution has both Dems and Reps |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon Jun 03rd 2024, 04:03 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC