|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Quixote1818 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 12:06 AM Original message |
Poll question: What is the root of most of the Hillary hating on DU? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 12:07 AM Response to Original message |
1. She's a strong woman? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 12:10 AM Response to Reply #1 |
4. She's over the top in exuding bluster and threatening military action? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
killbotfactory (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 12:11 AM Response to Reply #1 |
7. Sure she's strong! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 12:12 AM Response to Reply #7 |
10. I think we've had enough of that kind of strength already this century |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 12:13 AM Response to Reply #1 |
11. Deleted sub-thread |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 11:33 AM Response to Reply #1 |
89. Yeah, you get what you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShaneGR (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 12:04 PM Response to Reply #1 |
92. Former first lady & 2 Term United States Senator |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 12:38 PM Response to Reply #92 |
96. Former first lady proves nothing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
abq e streeter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 12:40 PM Response to Reply #96 |
97. Being former first lady is all the qualification you need. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 12:41 PM Response to Reply #97 |
98. If only Jackie O were still alive! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurovski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 02:04 PM Response to Reply #98 |
121. I'm mad for Dolly Madison! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HCE SuiGeneris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 12:08 AM Response to Original message |
2. The MSM choosing her for us. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emilyg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 12:10 AM Response to Reply #2 |
3. Unless I'm mistaken - you get to vote. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HCE SuiGeneris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 12:15 AM Response to Reply #3 |
13. You've read the threads here marginalizing a vote for Kucinich, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emilyg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 12:21 AM Response to Reply #13 |
19. Reporting poll numbers is not touting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HCE SuiGeneris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 12:37 AM Response to Reply #19 |
34. Believing in the validity of the polls is optional. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SIMPLYB1980 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 09:10 AM Response to Reply #34 |
74. So you don't belive the polls that say |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 02:24 AM Response to Reply #13 |
54. So you hate Hillary because she's a threat to Kucinich???? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burythehatchet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 06:57 AM Response to Reply #3 |
67. Actually, you are mistaken. We get to pretend that we vote. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Quixote1818 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 12:10 AM Response to Reply #2 |
5. Good suggestion. I added that to the poll. Thanks. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blonndee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 12:10 AM Response to Original message |
6. Um, because she SUCKS as a candidate and doesn't represent me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rusty quoin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 12:11 AM Response to Original message |
8. I don't hate her and I voted other. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
daninthemoon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 12:11 AM Original message |
It's the WAR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Her hands are dipped in it's blood, and now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Quixote1818 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 12:16 AM Response to Original message |
14. Good point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
daninthemoon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 12:19 AM Response to Reply #14 |
17. If she gets the nomination we will have to. We'll also have to hope |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 02:14 AM Response to Original message |
50. The number of candidates not dripping blood would be....? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
daninthemoon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 11:05 AM Response to Reply #50 |
78. She's the only one who fervently spoke out in favor of the Iraq war, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 11:14 AM Response to Reply #78 |
82. Edwards voted for the war. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
daninthemoon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 11:24 AM Response to Reply #82 |
86. I stand corrected, Brain fart. He did renounce the war vote, but i sure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 12:53 PM Response to Reply #50 |
105. 3 and a half. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 12:52 PM Response to Original message |
104. Yep. That's the dealbreaker for me, as well. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 12:11 AM Response to Original message |
9. I'll support her if she's our nominee but in the primary in my state will be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
immoderate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 12:27 AM Response to Reply #9 |
25. LOL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 12:33 AM Response to Reply #25 |
30. LOL! Keyes' entry into the GOP field has been less than momentous, not to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EST (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 02:13 AM Response to Reply #30 |
48. With the current publicker field, Keyes might actually stand |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 09:07 AM Response to Reply #48 |
72. Dear god I wish that was just a good line, but the modern-day GOP is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
daninthemoon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 11:11 AM Response to Reply #72 |
79. Now that you mention it, if Ghouiliani gets the nod, and the "Christian" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WCGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 12:14 AM Response to Original message |
12. I'm disappointed with both of the Clinton's... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Quixote1818 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 12:19 AM Response to Reply #12 |
16. Good for you in being consistent! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 04:13 PM Response to Reply #16 |
129. probably because when you look back at clinton times they were great times compared with now. there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ieoeja (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 12:30 PM Response to Reply #12 |
94. Everyone thought President Betrayus was going to reverse Reagan. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 12:43 PM Response to Reply #94 |
99. Pretty good scam they've got goin, huh? The rightists and the corporate Dems? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 12:16 AM Response to Original message |
15. Voting record |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 12:19 AM Response to Original message |
18. I think you've nailed it. People feel it's a way to help their candidate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
napi21 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 12:38 AM Response to Reply #18 |
35. Show me a candidate in either party who's not a corporatist. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richard Steele (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 01:08 AM Response to Reply #35 |
43. Looks like you answered your own question- Dennis Kucinich. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 02:18 AM Response to Reply #35 |
51. I agree -- she will know how to fight back against |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ieoeja (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 12:34 PM Response to Reply #35 |
95. But did WE come out the winner? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sendero (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 06:39 AM Response to Reply #18 |
60. That's a great theory... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lastliberalintexas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 12:55 PM Response to Reply #60 |
106. Amen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenArrow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 02:43 PM Response to Reply #60 |
127. Actually, I might suggest |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Colorado Progressive (980 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 12:22 AM Response to Original message |
20. She is a corporate whore. Period. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cynatnite (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 12:26 AM Response to Reply #20 |
23. She's not a whore... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 12:35 AM Response to Reply #23 |
33. "The best candidate money can buy." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EST (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 02:26 AM Response to Reply #33 |
55. You should know, Tahiti, that there is a HUGE difference... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 10:06 AM Response to Reply #55 |
76. As in many of life's questions of ethics ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 12:45 PM Response to Reply #55 |
100. Incorrect... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 01:39 PM Response to Reply #100 |
113. That reminds me of an old joke. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BoneDaddy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 06:45 AM Response to Reply #23 |
62. If it walks like a duck |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 02:19 AM Response to Reply #20 |
52. So is Nader, in his own way. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Virginia Dare (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 09:39 AM Response to Reply #52 |
75. This is the same phenomenon that keeps abortion legal.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cynatnite (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 12:25 AM Response to Original message |
21. I voted for 'strong woman'... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Quixote1818 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 12:29 AM Response to Reply #21 |
26. I don't know if that bulk of anger toward her is from people not liking a "strong woman" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cynatnite (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 12:31 AM Response to Reply #26 |
29. Wouldn't it be nice? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beausoir (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 12:59 AM Response to Reply #26 |
40. I believe your numbers are in the ballpark. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hydra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 02:43 PM Response to Reply #26 |
126. I call bulls*** |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Annces (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 06:59 AM Response to Reply #21 |
68. I agree n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lastliberalintexas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 12:57 PM Response to Reply #21 |
107. If I might channel Designing Women for a moment* |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chovexani (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 01:04 PM Response to Reply #21 |
110. No raking here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
illinoisprogressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 12:26 AM Response to Original message |
22. I hate her republican ideas and her war mongering. also, dynasties are not democratic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emilyg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 12:31 AM Response to Reply #22 |
27. Your agenda has been transparent from the beginning. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 02:22 AM Response to Reply #27 |
53. How true. Why can't supporters of other candidates just push their |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beausoir (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 12:27 AM Response to Original message |
24. The hatred is astonishing. Pure flat-out hatred for this woman. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DFW (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 12:50 AM Response to Reply #24 |
37. I find it surprising, too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beausoir (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 12:53 AM Response to Reply #37 |
38. Wow. A rational response. You are right about the hate game. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 12:31 AM Response to Original message |
28. Your "prediction" will appear to come true even if it doesn't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lastliberalintexas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 01:01 PM Response to Reply #28 |
109. Yeppers, I certainly didn't become a Kerry fan |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lerkfish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 12:33 AM Response to Original message |
31. LEAVE HILLARY ALONE! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beausoir (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 12:44 AM Response to Reply #31 |
36. Ahh..yeah...we've seen that...done that. Get a new schtick. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lerkfish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 12:56 AM Response to Reply #36 |
39. um, sure, when you do. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 09:09 AM Response to Reply #36 |
73. Yeah! Sniff Sniff |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 11:11 AM Response to Reply #36 |
80. "we've"??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Quixote1818 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 01:03 AM Response to Reply #31 |
42. I was afraid I was setting myself up for this! LOL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lerkfish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 06:25 AM Response to Reply #42 |
58. points to you for being able to laugh at yourself. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherine Vincent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 12:49 PM Response to Reply #31 |
102. You are so bad! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tyedyeto (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 12:35 AM Response to Original message |
32. She is fine as a Senator (except for her war votes)but not as Presidential material |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 02:27 AM Response to Reply #32 |
56. Interesting how only one person is affected by that meme: Hillary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 01:00 AM Response to Original message |
41. Hillary is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hardrada (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 01:28 AM Response to Original message |
44. I guess she is a kinder gentler Margaret Thatcher |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 01:30 AM Response to Original message |
45. Just want to say that it is possible to be critical of her without hating her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AllyCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 01:33 AM Response to Original message |
46. I will not support any candidate, even in the GE if he or she is not anti-war |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nolabels (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 01:46 AM Response to Original message |
47. I voted for the first choice but think the bottom choice is also valid |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 02:13 AM Response to Original message |
49. Nothing worst than a sexist woman, either. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kiouni (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 03:57 AM Response to Original message |
57. I don't think she can win. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
timtom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 06:33 AM Response to Original message |
59. Umm.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 06:44 AM Response to Original message |
61. There is very little hillary "hate" at DU. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 11:23 AM Response to Reply #61 |
85. Problem is that we have no real "great" candidates running. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Individualist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 11:55 AM Response to Reply #61 |
90. Thank you for stating that fact! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 07:49 PM Response to Reply #90 |
130. As do I, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cobalt Violet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 06:47 AM Response to Original message |
63. She's too much like a republican for me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stuckinthebush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 06:53 AM Response to Original message |
64. Ugh. Please stop this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
daninthemoon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 11:20 AM Response to Reply #64 |
84. Well put. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Annces (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 06:56 AM Response to Original message |
65. I think any candidate will be dragged through the mud |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tesha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 06:56 AM Response to Original message |
66. You forgot to include: "Genuine belief that she will lose the General Election" (NT) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
waiting for hope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 07:06 AM Response to Original message |
69. What really drives me crazy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 07:07 AM Response to Original message |
70. "Other" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JNelson6563 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 07:17 AM Response to Original message |
71. Easy question. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MilesColtrane (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 10:18 AM Response to Original message |
77. Her refusal to acknowledge that her vote on the IWR was a mistake, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MH1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 11:13 AM Response to Original message |
81. Because of the complete lack of class she showed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sniffa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 11:15 AM Response to Reply #81 |
83. anyone in the path to power |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 12:08 PM Response to Reply #81 |
93. That was all in days work to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Elspeth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 11:26 AM Response to Original message |
87. How about that her husband is WAY too close to the Bushes? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lumberjack_jeff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 11:26 AM Response to Original message |
88. Everyone here who is refusing to support her "because she is a strong woman" raise your hand. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
abq e streeter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 12:00 PM Response to Original message |
91. I must be one of those alleged 25%... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lastliberalintexas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 12:49 PM Response to Original message |
101. I don't have a candidate this time around |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Breeze54 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 12:50 PM Response to Original message |
103. First you say 'hate' and then you say 'anger'. Which is it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackRiddler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 12:57 PM Response to Original message |
108. Your framing of this as "hate" is telling... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mikelgb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 01:06 PM Response to Original message |
111. Hillary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EVDebs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 01:32 PM Response to Original message |
112. As someone who's job was outsourced, just say TATA to your job if HRC is nominated. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chulanowa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 01:44 PM Response to Original message |
114. I like how Hillary supporters are making her the new Clarence Thomas |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burythehatchet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 01:47 PM Response to Original message |
115. At THIS point, Hillary fans on DU. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftCoast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 01:49 PM Response to Original message |
116. You don't think 20+ years of anti-Hillary RW propaganda has anything to do with it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KaptBunnyPants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 01:54 PM Response to Original message |
117. Her alliance with the center-right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheDoorbellRang (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 01:56 PM Response to Original message |
118. I certainly don't hate her, but anyone who finds it politically expedient |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
porphyrian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 02:01 PM Response to Original message |
119. Continuing the status quo against our will can never be awesome. - n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Totally Committed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 02:02 PM Response to Original message |
120. Other. She's DLC. She's Corporate-favored. The MSM wants her. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ian_rd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 02:24 PM Response to Original message |
122. How about a mix of 1 and 6 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kolesar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 02:25 PM Response to Original message |
123. She played dumb when voting for the war, and now she laughs at us... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Generator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 02:27 PM Response to Original message |
124. It's not hate, it's facing the truth |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kolesar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 02:36 PM Response to Reply #124 |
125. Her first term is going to be bleak |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Froward69 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 02:49 PM Response to Original message |
128. You missed the obvous |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mistertrickster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-05-07 09:21 AM Response to Original message |
131. "Hillary's politics," hehehe, good one, Quixote, good one! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enrique (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-05-07 09:26 AM Response to Original message |
132. Hillary is "the man" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MedleyMisty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-05-07 09:34 AM Response to Original message |
133. It's all sorts of gray |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kwyjibo (612 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-05-07 09:37 AM Response to Original message |
134. people here hate Hillary because she's a strong woman? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue Jun 04th 2024, 09:31 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC