|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
WillyT
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 01:13 PM Original message |
Loose Nukes Looming Near - by Captain Eric H. May |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 01:25 PM Response to Original message |
1. the Air Force, which just violated 40 years of policy without explanation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillyT
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 01:30 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. And There's This (with a DU mention): |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillyT
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 01:35 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. And This, Which I Found In That, By Larry Johnson |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lovuian
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 02:53 PM Response to Reply #3 |
9. Nukes are not a deterrent... our troops are down wind |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rick Myers
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 04:42 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. The weapons on the B-52 are not big city-busting bombs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
backscatter712
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 04:47 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. The W-80 warhead has variable "Dial-A-Yield" capability. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richard Steele
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 05:55 PM Response to Reply #10 |
17. You're wrong about the fallout. "Bunker busters" generate much more of it, not less. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rick Myers
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 06:08 PM Response to Reply #17 |
21. The Fed of Am Scientists site claims |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rene
![]() |
Mon Sep-10-07 04:41 AM Response to Reply #21 |
53. What about the discrepancy in press reports that 6 nukes were loaded and only 5 arrived ???? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lazyriver
![]() |
Mon Sep-10-07 01:31 PM Response to Reply #9 |
60. Hmmm. I wonder what would happen to the price of crude |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
azygous
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 09:22 PM Response to Reply #3 |
35. An awful thought has occurred to me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudDad
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 10:05 PM Response to Reply #3 |
40. Most postal workers don't carry nukes... (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zywiec
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 07:49 PM Response to Reply #1 |
25. "To take a single M-16 rifle from the arms room |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rick Myers
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 07:58 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. The point is that even such a simple task requires paperwork. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zywiec
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 08:01 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. What paperwork does it take |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rick Myers
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 08:13 PM Response to Reply #27 |
28. That's simple theft. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zywiec
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 08:26 PM Response to Reply #28 |
29. I was originally commenting on the ridiculous assertion in the OP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rick Myers
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 08:45 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. I have similar experience, but we NEVER loaded nuke on a combat aircraft 'by accident!' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zywiec
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 08:55 PM Response to Reply #30 |
32. Did you even read the OP? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rick Myers
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 09:06 PM Response to Reply #32 |
33. Yes. I read the OP. I'm not trying to play expert... I'm trying to keep the story alive. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sce56
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 10:25 PM Response to Reply #32 |
42. I can tell you that losing an M16 is serious buisness and many a unit has been held in the field for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Salviati
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 01:51 PM Response to Original message |
4. A "false flag" attack: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillyT
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 01:53 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. Thank You !!! - I Remember Reading About Operation Northwoods |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jhain
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 02:27 PM Response to Original message |
6. I want to buy this man a beer! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftchick
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 02:45 PM Response to Original message |
7. there are only THREE news stories on this at google! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rick Myers
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 04:54 PM Response to Reply #7 |
15. Yet there are at least 15 mentions of this news story!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftchick
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 06:12 PM Response to Reply #15 |
22. yes, I think the US government is suppressing this story |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
backscatter712
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 02:51 PM Response to Original message |
8. This scares the hell out of me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 04:48 PM Response to Original message |
12. Great article |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richard Steele
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 05:51 PM Response to Reply #12 |
16. In a society with a free press, it would be. nm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 05:58 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. I guess n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
warren pease
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 06:02 PM Response to Reply #12 |
19. "Shouldn't this story be receiving non-stop news coverage?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rick Myers
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 04:48 PM Response to Original message |
13. Big K and R and thanks to WillyT for starting this thread... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Venus Dog
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 04:52 PM Response to Original message |
14. Check out these "predictions" by FEMA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Garbo 2004
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 06:25 PM Response to Reply #14 |
23. 1. NYC 1993 attack & subsequent convictions. 2. NOLA for yrs a known concern re: hurricance hit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rick Myers
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 06:03 PM Response to Original message |
20. “Nuclear Weapons and Me” (or ‘How I Spent my Summer Vacation’) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemReadingDU
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 07:40 PM Response to Reply #20 |
24. evening kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue Fire
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 09:34 PM Response to Reply #20 |
37. Yes, we have seen what nuclear weapons can do. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orleans
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 08:52 PM Response to Original message |
31. from wiki: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chill_wind
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 09:16 PM Response to Original message |
34. So did he or didn't he give the orders? Will not ANY Dem in Congress demand to know?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WileEcoyote
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 09:32 PM Response to Reply #34 |
36. It was an intentional leak |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rick Myers
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 09:46 PM Response to Reply #36 |
38. The information was 'leaked' to the Military Times, owned by Gannett |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WileEcoyote
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 09:59 PM Response to Reply #38 |
39. A warning to Iran |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rick Myers
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 10:24 PM Response to Reply #39 |
41. This is NOT about IRAN |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WileEcoyote
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 11:19 PM Response to Reply #41 |
45. Well I'm just speculating |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cheap_Trick
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 10:27 PM Response to Original message |
43. if this had happened on Clinton's watch |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rick Myers
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 10:33 PM Response to Reply #43 |
44. Heck, you KNOW this is Clinton's fault!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hootinholler
![]() |
Mon Sep-10-07 12:07 AM Response to Reply #44 |
46. That bunker has a name: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
earth mom
![]() |
Mon Sep-10-07 12:08 AM Response to Original message |
47. K & R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hootinholler
![]() |
Mon Sep-10-07 12:30 AM Response to Original message |
48. Another dot... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HuffleClaw
![]() |
Mon Sep-10-07 01:04 AM Response to Original message |
49. whatever happened it is downright scary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sam Ervin jret
![]() |
Mon Sep-10-07 02:21 AM Response to Original message |
50. Does anyone remember that break-in by the government of China into US "non-vital"intel? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
colorado_ufo
![]() |
Mon Sep-10-07 03:39 AM Response to Original message |
51. Super post! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eridani
![]() |
Mon Sep-10-07 03:58 AM Response to Original message |
52. Eric May is the Ghost Troop guy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Don1
![]() |
Mon Sep-10-07 07:44 AM Response to Original message |
54. Here is What I Think |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Peggy Day
![]() |
Mon Sep-10-07 09:29 AM Response to Original message |
55. Doesn't anyone remember the animated film about how the bunker busters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emmadoggy
![]() |
Mon Sep-10-07 10:01 AM Response to Original message |
56. Please forgive my complete and utter ignorance of all things military... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snappyturtle
![]() |
Mon Sep-10-07 12:01 PM Response to Original message |
57. Kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KaptBunnyPants
![]() |
Mon Sep-10-07 12:18 PM Response to Original message |
58. I wonder if they were going to hit an American city or just Iran. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ooglymoogly
![]() |
Mon Sep-10-07 01:14 PM Response to Original message |
59. USAirforce...now run by born agin zealots praying for the rapture....nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chill_wind
![]() |
Tue Sep-11-07 12:48 PM Response to Original message |
61. Is this story fallin off DU's radar already? big KICK. Today. Tomorrow. The next day. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Fri Jun 21st 2024, 11:17 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC