|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Rick Myers
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 07:17 PM Original message |
Nukes Over Amerika (Weekend Edition) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ian David
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 07:43 PM Response to Original message |
1. I know this is probably a dumb question, but... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rick Myers
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 07:55 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Not a dumb question at all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ian David
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 08:00 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. And we don't have something like that which can be launched from a silo or submarine? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 08:13 PM Response to Reply #5 |
11. The short answer is... NO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ian David
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 08:21 PM Response to Reply #11 |
13. Ahh... then this makes much more sense now. We're all going to die. Thanks! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 08:34 PM Response to Reply #13 |
17. That has been long standing doctrine |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nevernose
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 11:21 PM Response to Reply #17 |
44. A small point of disagreement: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 11:26 PM Response to Reply #44 |
46. I agree, it has nothing to do with the fall of the USSR |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ian David
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 08:44 AM Response to Reply #46 |
97. Rome also collapsed because they poisoned their whole population (with lead)... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cascadiance
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 11:59 AM Response to Reply #97 |
117. And also "privatized their military too!" (aka Blackwater!) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NeoGreen
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 09:08 PM Response to Reply #11 |
21. If I may interject... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EnricoFermi
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 04:47 PM Response to Reply #21 |
152. I'd like to add to your first point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hootinholler
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 09:12 PM Response to Reply #5 |
22. The somewhat longer answer is that those warheads make too big of a boom. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rick Myers
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 09:38 PM Response to Reply #22 |
26. OK, I'm gonna step into 'tin-foil' land for a minute... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hootinholler
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 10:02 PM Response to Reply #26 |
28. Well, a false flag op doesn't fit well with moving them to Barksdale... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rick Myers
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 11:15 PM Response to Reply #28 |
41. Hoping to remove a warhead while the plane sat unguarded??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glitch
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 12:51 AM Response to Reply #41 |
70. Cheney said all they needed was one bomb. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krispos42
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 10:54 PM Response to Reply #70 |
164. Maybe the B-52 dropped on in flight and that's why we're looking for Fossett |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 10:35 PM Response to Reply #26 |
35. and that was my tin foil when this broke |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
me b zola
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 12:45 AM Response to Reply #26 |
65. My theory: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
backscatter712
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 10:32 PM Response to Reply #22 |
33. Another thing about the W-80 warheads |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wiley50
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 11:04 PM Response to Reply #33 |
39. I know this question would need a physicist to answer ( and I readily admit not being one) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hootinholler
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 11:18 PM Response to Reply #39 |
42. Nuclear explosions are hard to produce. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rick Myers
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 11:18 PM Response to Reply #39 |
43. Plutonium would be a fusion reaction (H-Bomb) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krispos42
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 11:39 PM Response to Reply #43 |
48. No, both plutonium and uranium are fission material |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krispos42
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 11:24 PM Response to Reply #39 |
45. They are fusion weapons |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rick Myers
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 11:29 PM Response to Reply #45 |
47. I should have known that. My mistake, too late for me!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wiley50
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 12:07 AM Response to Reply #45 |
52. And Thanks For The Nuclear Physics Lesson n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wiley50
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 12:33 AM Response to Reply #45 |
61. Pardon Me, But this Begs another Question ( although related to my original premise) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hootinholler
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 01:03 AM Response to Reply #61 |
77. Fusion is harder to sustain than fission |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillyT
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 12:09 PM Response to Reply #77 |
119. I Remember That Too, And It Has Always Amazed\Bothered Me !!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krispos42
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 01:38 AM Response to Reply #61 |
86. It's an area that exists for only a tiny fragment of a second |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pavulon
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 09:08 AM Response to Reply #61 |
103. Dial a yield and the teller-ulam design |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
backscatter712
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 10:10 AM Response to Reply #103 |
104. A quick Wikipedia article for you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DUlover2909
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 03:13 PM Response to Reply #45 |
143. I think the hydrogen isotope is used to increase neutron flux |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
drm604
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 02:32 PM Response to Reply #39 |
135. Dial-a-Yield |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DUlover2909
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 03:11 PM Response to Reply #39 |
142. I can stab at a guess |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 10:34 PM Response to Reply #22 |
34. Oh com'on there were a couple systems that were |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hootinholler
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 10:38 PM Response to Reply #34 |
36. I especially liked the artillery shells that did get produced. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rick Myers
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 01:25 AM Response to Reply #36 |
81. Atomic Annie!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hootinholler
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 01:34 PM Response to Reply #81 |
132. It was tractor transportable... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Flabbergasted
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 07:55 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. One theory is actually to raise suspicion. Iran's. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 08:10 PM Response to Reply #1 |
9. self delete |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kenfrequed
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 09:28 PM Response to Reply #1 |
24. uhm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jollyreaper2112
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 07:00 PM Response to Reply #1 |
158. reason for bombers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ancient_nomad
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 07:51 PM Response to Original message |
2. Kick and Recommend! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
femrap
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 08:07 PM Response to Reply #2 |
8. These neoconic devils are going to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
motocicleta
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 08:04 PM Response to Original message |
6. Thanks for keeping on this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richard Steele
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 08:06 PM Response to Original message |
7. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kineneb
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 08:12 PM Response to Original message |
10. do I need to "duck and cover"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 08:19 PM Response to Original message |
12. I can add my own tinfoil scenario to this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rick Myers
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 08:30 PM Response to Reply #12 |
15. This story is so 'Strangelove' it's hard to get your head around it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 08:36 PM Response to Reply #15 |
18. At this pont I don't even expect a public |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluescribbler
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 07:19 PM Response to Reply #15 |
159. I would love to see |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 09:41 PM Response to Reply #159 |
161. you would need to go to the dungeon for that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jimshoes
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 08:28 PM Response to Original message |
14. Thanks for keeping us up to date |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hissyspit
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 08:34 PM Response to Original message |
16. Which one required further research? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rick Myers
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 09:23 PM Response to Reply #16 |
23. There are 2 theories worth investigating... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hissyspit
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 10:07 PM Response to Reply #23 |
29. Well, I wasn't sure whether you were aware of the hypothesis that I posted earlier |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rick Myers
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 01:35 AM Response to Reply #29 |
84. Some of that info is really interesting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 08:38 PM Response to Original message |
19. Thanks buddy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rick Myers
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 08:48 PM Response to Original message |
20. Armeggedon baby!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hootinholler
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 09:37 PM Response to Reply #20 |
25. That fits into one of the theories. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sce56
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 11:17 AM Response to Reply #20 |
111. Hey Rick did I point you at that picture? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hootinholler
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 09:59 PM Response to Original message |
27. For those who don't know, here's an AF fact sheet on this missile: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 10:14 PM Response to Reply #27 |
30. Is it kinda like this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hootinholler
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 10:31 PM Response to Reply #30 |
32. I've never seen one in flight. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rick Myers
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 11:45 PM Response to Reply #32 |
49. These weapons would dig in before exploding, and... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 11:38 AM Response to Reply #32 |
112. What is this fascination with blowing up things -- ???!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 10:29 PM Response to Original message |
31. equipped to carry laser-guided conventional and nuclear weapons, is a giant crucifix |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
warren pease
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 11:54 PM Response to Reply #31 |
50. If I'm reading your posts correctly... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hootinholler
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 12:09 AM Response to Reply #50 |
53. Check out the Tikkun interview on the MRFF website. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
warren pease
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 12:45 AM Response to Reply #53 |
66. Jesus fucking christ, so to speak... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hootinholler
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 12:51 AM Response to Reply #66 |
69. I kinda like to call them the Talibornagain. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 12:25 AM Response to Reply #50 |
57. We need to keep digging this stuff up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
warren pease
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 12:51 AM Response to Reply #57 |
71. Oh, why bother...? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wiley50
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 12:52 AM Response to Reply #57 |
72. It's Boykin. He retired this summer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
warren pease
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 01:41 AM Response to Reply #72 |
87. This Boykin?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dickbearton
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 11:47 AM Response to Reply #57 |
115. Not a matter of either/or... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rick Myers
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 01:03 AM Response to Reply #50 |
76. Considering how automated the process seems, it could be true... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kineneb
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 01:47 AM Response to Reply #31 |
88. check Yurica Report for good explaination of Dominionists |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 02:23 AM Response to Reply #88 |
91. Nuclear Armageddon? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kineneb
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 03:06 AM Response to Reply #91 |
93. yup, nutcases galore |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Fields
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 10:38 PM Response to Reply #31 |
163. Can't speak for anyone else, but that scares the shit out of me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 10:53 PM Response to Original message |
37. Crosshairs Iran |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chill_wind
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 11:02 PM Response to Original message |
38. Rick, just want to applaud and thank you for your vigilence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 11:13 PM Response to Original message |
40. Christian Embassy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hootinholler
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 12:05 AM Response to Reply #40 |
51. From the Tikkun interview: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 12:17 AM Response to Reply #51 |
54. We are facing an absolute fundamentalist Christianization—a Talibanization—of the U.S. Marine Corps, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 12:37 AM Response to Reply #54 |
63. And he just made the case for the draft |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hootinholler
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 12:46 AM Response to Reply #54 |
68. Yeah, I think I'll be picking up his book tomorrow. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 12:25 AM Response to Reply #51 |
58. And we have seen this evolving |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 12:28 AM Response to Reply #58 |
60. mega-evangelical church has opened up in our country every 48 hours. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tom_paine
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 02:24 AM Response to Reply #51 |
92. Oh God, I have been saying that for years now, and have advanced the years from '33-'37 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Baby Snooks
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 12:23 AM Response to Original message |
55. 5 or 6? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rick Myers
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 12:57 AM Response to Reply #55 |
75. The current info says 6. Six from Minot to Barksdale. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
warren pease
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 01:48 AM Response to Reply #75 |
89. Where are they now? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hootinholler
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 01:20 PM Response to Reply #89 |
129. That's the question I've been mulling over for a couple of days now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
warren pease
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 03:04 PM Response to Reply #129 |
139. That's my assumption too, ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrScorpio
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 12:24 AM Response to Original message |
56. This was no accident |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 12:26 AM Response to Reply #56 |
59. The Dominionists must be outed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rick Myers
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 12:52 AM Response to Reply #56 |
73. Glad to have you aboard, my friend!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrScorpio
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 01:29 AM Response to Reply #73 |
83. I refuse to believe that this was a such a collosal fuck up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
doublethink
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 12:35 AM Response to Original message |
62. Ha ha ha I knew it ....... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 12:39 AM Response to Reply #62 |
64. I will go and look but maybe you know about that time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
doublethink
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 01:13 AM Response to Reply #64 |
78. Heck I have no idea of the time frame, few days ago ...... sorry ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wiley50
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 01:20 AM Response to Reply #64 |
79. Don't Forget that the "10 Hours" story is only the word of an AF press release. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
doublethink
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 01:27 AM Response to Reply #79 |
82. Thanks Wiely50 ...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Venus Dog
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 08:45 AM Response to Reply #79 |
99. As well as the date Aug 30 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 12:45 AM Response to Original message |
67. UNBELIEVABLE. I’m not sure where to begin. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 12:53 AM Response to Reply #67 |
74. This little fairy tale doesn't hold up to the slightest scrutiny. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rick Myers
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 01:22 AM Response to Reply #74 |
80. Thank you so much for mining this information!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hootinholler
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 01:36 AM Response to Reply #80 |
85. Dude, I took the same oath as you when I enlisted. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RainDog
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 03:54 AM Response to Reply #80 |
94. Military v. Cheney Strangelove |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemReadingDU
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 07:03 AM Response to Reply #80 |
95. Thanks for all your information! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stalwart
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 03:17 PM Response to Reply #74 |
144. Nuclear Security |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 02:16 AM Response to Original message |
90. Dominionist Christianity which welcomes an Apocalyptic confrontation between the USA and Islam |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
acmavm
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 08:26 AM Response to Original message |
96. Does not this scenario just scream out for some of the dems on any of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 11:47 AM Response to Reply #96 |
114. Are the press asking Repugs/Dems -- prez candidates about this "incident" -- ????? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ian David
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 08:44 AM Response to Original message |
98. Could the target for these nukes be Eretrea? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pavulon
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 09:01 AM Response to Reply #98 |
102. No Stealth Jets Dropping B61mod11 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pavulon
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 08:56 AM Response to Original message |
100. Alcoa Loves you. Here is an alternate point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hootinholler
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 12:41 PM Response to Reply #100 |
126. Um check out the data sheet above. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pavulon
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 05:10 PM Response to Reply #126 |
153. B61mod11 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Venus Dog
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 08:58 AM Response to Original message |
101. Anybody figured out yet how long it would take a B-52 with this payload |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bonzotex
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 10:21 AM Response to Reply #101 |
105. pretty normal flight time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rick Myers
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 01:02 PM Response to Reply #101 |
128. I checked the distance and flight time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IDemo
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 10:42 AM Response to Original message |
106. One other aspect of this affair |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pavulon
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 10:47 AM Response to Reply #106 |
108. Pretty sure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IDemo
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 11:01 AM Response to Reply #108 |
110. Thanks for pointing that out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bonzotex
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 10:47 AM Response to Original message |
107. Thanks for keeping this story alive |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wiley50
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 12:36 PM Response to Reply #107 |
124. I Think, Maybe, You Have Overlooked Something Important Here, Bonzotex |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pavulon
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 05:16 PM Response to Reply #124 |
154. There are nukes there now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bonzotex
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 05:34 PM Response to Reply #124 |
155. not overlooking that part completely.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spazito
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 11:00 AM Response to Original message |
109. In an article regarding the Sept 14 stand-down, I found this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillyT
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 12:36 PM Response to Reply #109 |
123. Did Your Link Get Scrubbed, Or Moved ??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spazito
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 10:33 PM Response to Reply #123 |
162. Hmmm, very strange... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smoogatz
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 11:41 AM Response to Original message |
113. I smell Cheney. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
doublethink
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 12:35 PM Response to Reply #113 |
122. Did you catch this synopsis ....... ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 11:52 AM Response to Original message |
116. Thanks for sticking with the story, Rick-!! Can we be sure this is the first time this happened--?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
freedomfries
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 12:04 PM Response to Original message |
118. thanks for this thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
warren pease
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 12:16 PM Response to Original message |
120. Question re Dominionist doctrine vs US support for Israel... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hootinholler
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 01:55 PM Response to Reply #120 |
133. Not that it makes sense, but... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hotler
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 02:26 PM Response to Reply #133 |
134. So the neocons are just playing nice with the dominionist... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hootinholler
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 02:55 PM Response to Reply #134 |
138. They are not playing nice... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
warren pease
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 12:19 PM Response to Original message |
121. Repost -- lost in the threads above: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jimshoes
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 01:34 PM Response to Reply #121 |
131. One question looms large and I |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
warren pease
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 02:55 PM Response to Reply #131 |
137. Drawing a possibly incorrect conclusion... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hootinholler
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 03:04 PM Response to Reply #137 |
140. Portland is my choice for a false flag nuke attack if one is in the works. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
warren pease
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 03:54 PM Response to Reply #140 |
148. Playing nice with DHS... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wiley50
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 09:38 PM Response to Reply #148 |
160. I See You've Been Reading My Stuff, Warren. i'm Flattered |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
warren pease
![]() |
Mon Sep-10-07 12:00 AM Response to Reply #160 |
165. Thinking like me can be hazardous to your mental stability... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PATRICK
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 06:31 PM Response to Reply #137 |
156. One other recent addition |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 06:44 PM Response to Reply #131 |
157. 12 missiles left 6 of them were nukes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 12:36 PM Response to Original message |
125. i agree it cannot be an accident. there are to many redundancies for it too happen. IMHO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillyT
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 12:51 PM Response to Original message |
127. Ya Gotta Love THIS: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IDemo
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 01:30 PM Response to Reply #127 |
130. "Our enemies" and "peaceniks" are one and the same?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Holly_Hobby
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 02:49 PM Response to Original message |
136. Ok, try this one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jimshoes
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 03:25 PM Response to Reply #136 |
145. Things that make you go |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 03:33 PM Response to Reply #145 |
146. 40 years nothing like this has ever happened |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hootinholler
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 03:09 PM Response to Original message |
141. New article from this AM: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peacetheonlyway
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 03:50 PM Response to Original message |
147. we appreciate these updates and come to depend on them.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 04:23 PM Response to Original message |
149. Christian Fascists - georgie is just not radical enough |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 04:30 PM Response to Original message |
150. Chris Hedges: America’s Holy Warriors |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 04:46 PM Response to Original message |
151. ANYONE HERE WANT TO GOOGLE BOMB THIS STORY? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Diclotican
![]() |
Mon Sep-10-07 12:48 AM Response to Original message |
166. Rick Myers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
earth mom
![]() |
Mon Sep-10-07 09:00 AM Response to Original message |
167. Kick nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Fri Jun 21st 2024, 01:43 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC