|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
whistle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 02:58 PM Original message |
1 minute ago: Bush orders Miers not to testify |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 02:59 PM Response to Original message |
1. Isn't that criminal conspiracy? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 03:00 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Yeah. But then, it always was. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 03:01 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. I'm serious. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Perky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 03:07 PM Response to Reply #4 |
12. NO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 03:08 PM Response to Reply #12 |
15. Why? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Perky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 03:14 PM Response to Reply #15 |
23. No because it is congress asking the question not a court. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 03:18 PM Response to Reply #23 |
26. And? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 03:25 PM Response to Reply #26 |
32. yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 03:25 PM Response to Reply #32 |
33. Is it legal or illegal to defy a congressional subpoena? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 03:30 PM Response to Reply #33 |
39. it depends |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 03:32 PM Response to Reply #39 |
41. Really? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 03:34 PM Response to Reply #41 |
44. If the subpoena |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 03:35 PM Response to Reply #44 |
45. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 03:38 PM Response to Reply #45 |
47. laugh all you want |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 03:39 PM Response to Reply #47 |
49. Sure, sure. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 03:44 PM Response to Reply #49 |
54. nope |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 03:47 PM Response to Reply #54 |
56. Nonsense. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 03:51 PM Response to Reply #56 |
58. well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 03:56 PM Response to Reply #58 |
60. You explained reality? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 04:23 PM Response to Reply #60 |
65. my point is simply |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fleshdancer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 03:49 PM Response to Reply #44 |
57. How often does a judge decide that a Congressional subpoena is illegal? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RaleighNCDUer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 03:38 PM Original message |
Where, exactly, does "executive priviledge" exist in the constitution? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 03:40 PM Response to Original message |
50. it doesn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Perky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 06:13 PM Response to Reply #26 |
66. Not when it a is a non-judicial branch and the rules of compulsion are different |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Toots (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 03:20 PM Response to Reply #12 |
27. Why would it be different |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 03:31 PM Response to Reply #12 |
40. That's not separation, that's abrogation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 03:30 PM Response to Reply #4 |
38. Fred Fielding, the lawyer, says not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 03:33 PM Response to Reply #38 |
42. Certainly not Fred Fielding. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whistle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 03:09 PM Response to Reply #1 |
16. It is really beginning to smell like a conspiracy as well as |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 02:59 PM Response to Original message |
2. After seeing Sara yak her head off? Miers can't even show up now? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ljm2002 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 03:05 PM Response to Reply #2 |
11. He's afraid... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 03:11 PM Response to Reply #11 |
19. Yes, indeedy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 03:23 PM Response to Reply #2 |
31. Bingo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truebrit71 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 03:01 PM Response to Original message |
5. Time to issue the Contempt Citations.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
riderinthestorm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 03:02 PM Response to Original message |
6. Ooooh, so as pissed off as we are about ST's overusage of the Fielding letter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oreo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 03:04 PM Response to Original message |
7. She'd do anything for George |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truebrit71 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 03:05 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. ROFL!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mandate My Ass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 03:07 PM Response to Reply #7 |
13. that's hilarious |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whistle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 03:28 PM Response to Reply #7 |
36. Under her name she might write in HoHoHo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 03:33 PM Response to Reply #7 |
43. Sadly her heartfelt conveyance went unanswered as her would be suitor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fryguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 03:05 PM Response to Original message |
8. high crime?!? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beaverhausen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 03:05 PM Response to Original message |
9. She doesn't work for him anymore but he can still 'order' her to do or not do something? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Perky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 03:08 PM Response to Reply #9 |
14. It will be an intersting case in about two years when scotus hears it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whistle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 03:13 PM Response to Reply #9 |
22. If this is an act of criminal conspiracy there can be no end to her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wiley50 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 03:10 PM Response to Original message |
17. After watching Miss Sara this morning |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fleshdancer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 03:10 PM Response to Original message |
18. This is seriously f*cked up, even for Bush |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 03:12 PM Response to Original message |
20. Supreme Court here we come -- !!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
me b zola (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 03:13 PM Response to Original message |
21. So who has granted Miers "absolute" immunity? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richard Steele (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 03:27 PM Original message |
Yes. Yes they do. nm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AndyA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 03:15 PM Response to Original message |
24. There is one way to put a stop to all this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SammyWinstonJack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 03:27 PM Response to Reply #24 |
35. It's off the table and pResident** isn't worth it and we don't have the votes and the Senate would |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AndyA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 04:12 PM Response to Reply #35 |
63. OK, Blue State...I'm worried about you. Put the glass of Kool-Aid down |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosemary2205 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 03:15 PM Response to Original message |
25. This is just part of their sex games. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosa Luxemburg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 03:21 PM Response to Original message |
28. Wow just think that woman could have been chosen as Attorney General! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 03:27 PM Response to Reply #28 |
34. worse |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosa Luxemburg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 03:38 PM Response to Reply #34 |
48. yes you are right it was the SC not the AG |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wicket (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 03:21 PM Response to Original message |
29. K & R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 03:21 PM Response to Original message |
30. Well that would be because little Ms Taylor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dogday (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 03:29 PM Response to Original message |
37. On to the Greatest Page for you!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whistle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 03:38 PM Response to Reply #37 |
46. I think we need some constitutional attorney input here on DU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 03:41 PM Response to Reply #46 |
52. Go to http://www.TPMmuckraker.com |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 03:42 PM Response to Reply #46 |
53. "What did the President know and when did he know it?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beaverhausen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 03:41 PM Response to Original message |
51. John Dean on Randi Rhodes right now talking about it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 03:45 PM Response to Original message |
55. 30 seconds ago moron* said that no one in America is allowed to testify... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whistle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 04:04 PM Response to Reply #55 |
61. Jesus, are you serious? Shrub* siad that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
B Calm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 03:54 PM Response to Original message |
59. IMPEACH THE BASTARD!!!!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 04:06 PM Response to Original message |
62. F R O G M A R C H |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigwillq (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 04:14 PM Response to Original message |
64. Can't we impeach already??!?!?! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Contrary1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 06:22 PM Response to Original message |
67. What about this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alfredo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 06:24 PM Response to Original message |
68. From Talking Points Memo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
deacon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 06:32 PM Response to Original message |
69. Bush orders miers to break the law n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 30th 2024, 06:47 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC