|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Hissyspit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 12:56 PM Original message |
Snow Responds To Potentially Illegal Use Of RNC Accounts: Clinton Did It Too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 12:58 PM Response to Original message |
1. Riiight. With a republican Congress that never uttered a word about it. Riiight. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burythehatchet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 12:58 PM Response to Original message |
2. it would be cheaper and just as useful to hire this guy as press secretary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zodiak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 01:29 PM Response to Reply #2 |
15. Minus the bode hair |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blogslut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 12:59 PM Original message |
yep |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MNDemNY (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 12:59 PM Response to Original message |
3. Wow, Clinton used RNC e-mail accounts? Weird. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AndyA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 01:08 PM Response to Reply #3 |
8. That's what I thought as well! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 01:29 PM Response to Reply #3 |
14. Please don't get the anti-DLC crowd started |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thoughtanarchist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 01:35 PM Response to Reply #3 |
16. I guess that explains NAFTA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tridim (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 01:01 PM Response to Original message |
4. Ahh, you just have to love it when "The adults" are using the same argument.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberal N proud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 01:01 PM Response to Original message |
5. When will someone tell them this is getting old and worn out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kestrel91316 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 01:08 PM Response to Original message |
6. Hey, Tony? PATHOLOGICAL LYING is not a side effect of chemo. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madinmaryland (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 01:08 PM Response to Original message |
7. Didn't the repubs have a thousand or so investigations of Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
razorman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 01:36 PM Response to Reply #7 |
18. Of course, email was still in its infancy then. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xultar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 01:09 PM Response to Original message |
9. Clinton also got a BJ in the OO. Bush gonna do that too? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
razorman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 01:38 PM Response to Reply #9 |
19. If that trend gets started, then the first thing every president |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peace13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 01:24 PM Response to Original message |
10. Hey Tony at some point our government must start telling |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
razorman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 01:25 PM Response to Original message |
11. Maybe true, Tony. But so what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
librechik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 01:35 PM Response to Reply #11 |
17. not even true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
razorman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 01:41 PM Response to Reply #17 |
20. Whatever the truth of the matter, the fact remains that anyone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
librechik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 01:42 PM Response to Reply #20 |
21. Thank goodness--we can go find their emails anyway! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 01:44 PM Response to Reply #17 |
22. Was Podesta's policy continued by his successors? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
librechik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 01:49 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. They were supposed to, yes. But there was a specific email from somebody on Rove's staff |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
razorman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 01:50 PM Response to Reply #22 |
24. It wouldn't surprise me. As long as the behavior is not caught and punished, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hubert Flottz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 01:27 PM Response to Original message |
12. HEY TONY...saint Peter is watching you Very Closely... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 01:28 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. Nah. That ship sailed a loooong time ago. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 02:55 PM Response to Original message |
25. Of COURSE he did, but he's not in office. What's your excuse? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TrogL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 03:00 PM Response to Original message |
26. 'et tu' is a logical fallacy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Norquist Nemesis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 03:00 PM Response to Original message |
27. Alrighty then! We can Impeach him under the same reasoning! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon Sep 23rd 2024, 05:50 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC