Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

First Murtha, now Feingold...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
BillZBubb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 08:04 PM
Original message
First Murtha, now Feingold...
First Murtha makes a devastating attack on the idiotic Iraq war. Then the rest of the Democrats run for cover. When asked about his proposal most said "Murtha who?".

Now, Feingold says let's do the right thing and censure Busholini. Where are the other Democrats? So far, they've pulled a total disappearing act. This should be a no brainer for any Democrat. They should be screaming from the roof of the capitol about the rule of law, the fourth amendment, and executive crimes.

When will we have a real opposition party?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Greeby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yanno, I don't have much time for all the 08 talk
But perhaps those Feingold for President people were on to something :think:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
erpowers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Yes
Yes they were on to something. On most issues Feingold has been willing to risk political disaster in order to take a stand against Bush. On the Patroit Act, Iraq War and other issues Feingold has been willing to stand for the opinion said to be unpopular when he thought it was right. I think he should have run as Vice President in 2000. He should have run as Vice President or President in 2004. Now he should run for President in 2008.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. We won't if we leave it totally up to them.
We have to call/write/email our Dem Senators and Representatives and keep after them, let them know we are paying attention to them, watching what they do, and we will not continue to support them if the don't learn to stand up. I think especially right now, with this being an election year and so many of them are up for re-election, they might start paying attention to us. So we play a big part in what they do. Perhaps if they each feel a few thousand boots in their butts, they just might find their spines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. But the truth is...and they know this...
is that we WILL support them, even if we have to plug our noses from the stench because the alternative is worse.
THAT is the problem.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. The general public canceled the Ports deal. With 85% of the
people polled today being in favor of the resolution, we may be able to turn this as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. Republicans are the party of corruption. Democrats are the
party of cowardice, which makes them only somewhat better than the Pubs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Actually I don't think they are cowards
Enablers maybe, apologists possibly, but definitely not cowards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
7. When they stop operating by getting "the goods" on each other,
or political IOUs, or blackmail . . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
9. I think yoour sequence of events is wrong.
First Feingold voted against the Patriot Act.
Then Feingold called for a definite withdrawal date.
Then Murtha did.
Then Feingold called for censure.

Feingold's out in front most of the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 10th 2024, 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC