|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 10:11 AM Original message |
supreme court just ruled that anti-abortionists can blockade |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dinger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 10:12 AM Response to Original message |
1. Boy, This Shit Is Going Fast, Isn't It? (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 10:13 AM Response to Original message |
2. Link? A little more detail on the case please? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 10:14 AM Response to Reply #2 |
4. I saw it on the bloomberg news scroll |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 10:26 AM Response to Reply #2 |
23. The ruling |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 10:29 AM Response to Reply #23 |
29. The link |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cessna Invesco Palin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 10:41 AM Response to Reply #23 |
42. Before we all go off half-cocked. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 10:43 AM Response to Reply #42 |
45. too late for that. nt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mattclearing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 01:40 PM Response to Reply #42 |
84. That's great news for ALL protesters. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Texacrat (286 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 01:05 PM Response to Reply #23 |
75. I made this comment before on a totally different thread and I'll make it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
immoderate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 10:14 AM Response to Original message |
3. Wondering what you can legally do to someone that blocks your way. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
acmejack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 10:16 AM Response to Reply #3 |
6. Nothing they have the right of free speech to block your way. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mongo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 01:33 PM Response to Reply #6 |
83. If this ruling had gone the other way |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
acmejack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 01:50 PM Response to Reply #83 |
86. Upon further reading I understand the ruling now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MountainLaurel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 10:18 AM Response to Reply #3 |
8. How about those "shoot first" laws? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenPartyVoter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 12:46 PM Response to Reply #8 |
70. That was my first thought too. "How will this work in Jebbie country"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MountainLaurel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-01-06 09:36 AM Response to Reply #70 |
92. I can't wait to find out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poll_Blind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 10:27 AM Response to Reply #3 |
26. The appropriate way to handle that situation is to ask what they will do.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
librechik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 11:02 AM Response to Reply #26 |
51. thanks, PB--good advice n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RaleighNCDUer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 12:07 PM Response to Reply #26 |
60. Which requires the facility to provide 2 escorts for the woman. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTLawGuy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 01:33 PM Response to Reply #3 |
82. things you might sue the protestors for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 10:15 AM Response to Original message |
5. So anyone can blockade a lawful establishment? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orrex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 10:19 AM Response to Reply #5 |
11. What if I want to blockade the entrance to a church, for example? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xchrom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 10:22 AM Response to Reply #11 |
16. ding! ding! ding! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PaganPreacher (653 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 10:44 PM Response to Reply #11 |
89. Block access to a church- go to prison. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demosincebirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 10:27 AM Response to Reply #5 |
24. I guess that it also means that striking workers can blockcade |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 10:29 AM Response to Reply #24 |
30. THERE you go. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orangepeel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 10:36 AM Response to Reply #24 |
37. Yep. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lorien (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 01:44 PM Response to Reply #24 |
85. So can environmentalists who want to stop corporate destruction |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Burning Water (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 11:12 AM Response to Reply #5 |
54. NOPE!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnester (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 11:21 AM Response to Reply #54 |
58. Why, just because someone said you could not? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Burning Water (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 11:35 AM Response to Reply #58 |
59. Well, we'll see |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stepnw1f (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 12:44 PM Response to Reply #54 |
67. And The Thread Says What Exactly? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AllegroRondo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 10:17 AM Response to Original message |
7. So we can legally blockade local Repug campaign HQ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AngryAmish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 10:18 AM Response to Reply #7 |
9. I'd rather brick up the entrance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richard Steele (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 10:23 AM Response to Reply #9 |
18. "Yes, Poppy....for the love of GOD." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RaleighNCDUer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 12:34 PM Response to Reply #9 |
64. Are you providing the Cask of Amantillado? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SongOfTheRayne (248 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 12:57 PM Response to Reply #64 |
72. Best story ever |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SledDriver (699 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 10:19 AM Response to Reply #7 |
10. Can we blockade churches? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 10:20 AM Response to Reply #10 |
13. That was one of my first thoughts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AllegroRondo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 10:24 AM Response to Reply #13 |
20. SOA would be near impossible to blockade |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xchrom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 10:21 AM Response to Reply #10 |
14. ding! ding! ding! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AllegroRondo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 10:22 AM Response to Reply #10 |
17. Only the ones that pass out campaign literature |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SammyWinstonJack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 10:25 AM Response to Reply #10 |
21. I'll help with that. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merbex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 10:51 AM Response to Reply #10 |
48. You can protest at churches; it was certainly done here in Boston |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Burning Water (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 11:11 AM Response to Reply #10 |
53. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
myrna minx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 10:20 AM Response to Original message |
12. So can we legally block a Walmart then? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dysfunctional press (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 10:27 AM Response to Reply #12 |
27. private property laws would probably apply- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 10:32 AM Response to Reply #27 |
33. The entrance to the parking lot is right next to public land. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bill McBlueState (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 10:21 AM Response to Original message |
15. please post a link as soon as you find one! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 10:30 AM Response to Reply #15 |
31. I will |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
htuttle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 10:23 AM Response to Original message |
19. Wasn't that the same rulling that initially created First Amendment Zones? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CornField (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 12:45 PM Response to Reply #19 |
69. That's what I was wondering |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 10:25 AM Response to Original message |
22. Do you have a link or any other information? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 10:31 AM Response to Reply #22 |
32. Ah the usual hysteria it seems. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 10:33 AM Response to Reply #22 |
34. the exact quote from the bloomberg news crawel is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 10:34 AM Response to Reply #34 |
36. Bloomberg's scrawl monkey should be whipped. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bunkerbuster1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 10:55 AM Response to Reply #36 |
49. Ultra-controversial decisions aren't usually 8-0. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 10:59 AM Response to Reply #36 |
50. That is why I put it in general disscussion instead of breaking news |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ilsa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 10:27 AM Response to Original message |
25. Will they push down a pregnant woman and cause a miscarriage? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 10:49 AM Response to Reply #25 |
47. That would be assault and battery |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poll_Blind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 10:28 AM Response to Original message |
28. Funny thing because that's defined as "Economic Terrorism". n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnester (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 10:33 AM Response to Original message |
35. There is a LBN article with a Yahoo News link now..n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jim Warren (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 10:36 AM Response to Original message |
38. Fuck 'em |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftchick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 10:36 AM Response to Original message |
39. Link.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 01:29 PM Response to Reply #39 |
79. I wonder what this says about "First Amendment Zones" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hamlette (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 10:38 AM Response to Original message |
40. link |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yupster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 10:46 AM Response to Reply #40 |
46. 8-0 ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dysfunctional press (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 11:15 AM Response to Reply #46 |
55. scalito was absent. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NaturalHigh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 01:20 PM Response to Reply #55 |
76. He hadn't been confirmed yet... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jsamuel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 10:39 AM Response to Original message |
41. note that this ruling also backs AFL-CIO unions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
superconnected (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 10:41 AM Response to Original message |
43. One more step in the direction of raping women of their rights. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 10:43 AM Response to Reply #43 |
44. Read the decision. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
superconnected (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 11:16 AM Response to Reply #44 |
56. Thanks for the link! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NaturalHigh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 01:24 PM Response to Reply #44 |
78. Exactly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yavin4 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 11:05 AM Response to Original message |
52. You Can Protest Abortion Clinics, But You Cannot Protest Bush |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iconoclastNYC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 11:18 AM Response to Original message |
57. Not really an abortion case. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftofthedial (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 12:10 PM Response to Original message |
61. here comes some serious violence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leeroysphitz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 12:18 PM Response to Original message |
62. It's a good thing our democratic reps in D.C. did everything they |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 12:26 PM Response to Original message |
63. Please change your main thread headline or ask a mod to... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stepnw1f (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 12:40 PM Response to Original message |
65. This Will Make Things Quite Violent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
genieroze (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 12:43 PM Response to Original message |
66. What's next, they can physically detain pregnant women until they give |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skidmore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 12:45 PM Response to Original message |
68. So what does this do to free-speech zones? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevietheman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 12:47 PM Response to Original message |
71. Obviously, now there will have to be counter-demonstrations to... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rpgamerd00d (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 01:02 PM Response to Original message |
73. Two Words : Fire. Hazard. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Texacrat (286 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 01:02 PM Response to Original message |
74. I need a link |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beelzebud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 01:21 PM Response to Original message |
77. Get ready for more abortion clinic bombings. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nikki Stone 1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-01-06 12:31 AM Response to Reply #77 |
91. Or maybe they haven't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
noonwitch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 01:32 PM Response to Original message |
80. Does that mean we can run them down with our cars if they won't move? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 01:33 PM Response to Original message |
81. Boy, it's a good thing they filibustered Roberts and Alito...oh, wait. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nye Bevan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 01:52 PM Response to Reply #81 |
87. The ruling was unanimous (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluestateguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 05:23 PM Response to Original message |
88. These clinics need armed security |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nikki Stone 1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 11:33 PM Response to Original message |
90. kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Toots (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-01-06 09:52 AM Response to Original message |
93. That throws out the "Free Speech Zones" then. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue Sep 24th 2024, 11:06 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC