|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
![]() |
Warren Stupidity
![]() |
Sat Jan-06-07 10:50 PM Original message |
Not really nukes? I call BULLSHIT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer
![]() |
Sat Jan-06-07 10:52 PM Response to Original message |
1. I haven't seen any of these posts... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynnTheDem
![]() |
Sat Jan-06-07 10:52 PM Response to Original message |
2. DUers? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity
![]() |
Sat Jan-06-07 10:56 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. Sorry I should have posted links. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynnTheDem
![]() |
Sat Jan-06-07 11:09 PM Response to Reply #3 |
11. Response from a US military officer who is an NBC expert. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lone_Star_Dem
![]() |
Sat Jan-06-07 11:13 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. Exactly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bananas
![]() |
Sat Jan-06-07 11:33 PM Response to Reply #3 |
20. Those posts were within ten minutes of each other. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Joad
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 01:10 AM Response to Reply #3 |
29. Our deluded friends are still among us. Regrettably. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richard Steele
![]() |
Sat Jan-06-07 10:58 PM Response to Original message |
4. Ground-penetrating nukes are much worse, even at lower yields. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity
![]() |
Sat Jan-06-07 11:03 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. Yes indeed. I didn't have time to look up the rest of the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bananas
![]() |
Sat Jan-06-07 11:30 PM Response to Reply #5 |
18. Any idea where this "not really nukes" BS started? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity
![]() |
Sat Jan-06-07 11:56 PM Response to Reply #18 |
25. Good question. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut
![]() |
Sat Jan-06-07 11:04 PM Response to Original message |
6. Why start yet another thread? Why not respond in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity
![]() |
Sat Jan-06-07 11:07 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. Thanks for sharing. nt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madrchsod
![]() |
Sat Jan-06-07 11:05 PM Response to Original message |
7. now this is what i call a nuke |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnaries
![]() |
Sat Jan-06-07 11:06 PM Response to Original message |
8. Thanks, Waren! I missed that first thread, but I posted to the second. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nutmegger
![]() |
Sat Jan-06-07 11:09 PM Response to Original message |
10. Thank you for this post Warren. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frogcycle
![]() |
Sat Jan-06-07 11:22 PM Response to Original message |
13. ok, you have a point, but be accurate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity
![]() |
Sat Jan-06-07 11:26 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. uh here is the title |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frogcycle
![]() |
Sat Jan-06-07 11:39 PM Response to Reply #15 |
21. yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity
![]() |
Sat Jan-06-07 11:27 PM Response to Reply #13 |
16. And 340Kt is a good deal larger. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frogcycle
![]() |
Sat Jan-06-07 11:42 PM Response to Reply #16 |
22. that the assertion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity
![]() |
Sat Jan-06-07 11:45 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. Actually that is unfair as well. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frogcycle
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 12:08 AM Response to Reply #23 |
27. ok, now i'm nitpicking, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karlrschneider
![]() |
Sat Jan-06-07 11:24 PM Response to Original message |
14. The OP on that thread never replied to any responses that I saw. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Canuckistanian
![]() |
Sat Jan-06-07 11:27 PM Response to Original message |
17. Even the smallest Nuke would be a disaster |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stillcool
![]() |
Sat Jan-06-07 11:32 PM Response to Original message |
19. I did not dare click on any of those.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WiseButAngrySara
![]() |
Sat Jan-06-07 11:51 PM Response to Original message |
24. THANK YOU! These posts represent insanity to me. Crap is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
reprehensor
![]() |
Sat Jan-06-07 11:59 PM Response to Original message |
26. Thank you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Joad
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 01:08 AM Response to Original message |
28. See this flash animation from Union of Concerned Scientist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PA Democrat
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 01:15 AM Response to Reply #28 |
30. Very disturbing video |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Joad
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 01:43 AM Response to Reply #30 |
31. And the other kind of fallout... what about the wrath this will engender across the globe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnaries
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 01:54 AM Response to Reply #28 |
33. Great minds think alike! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Joad
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 01:45 AM Response to Original message |
32. We have guided missiles and misguided men. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 08:32 AM Response to Original message |
34. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FogerRox
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 05:31 PM Response to Original message |
35. Nothing like a little science, eh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Morgana LaFey
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 09:31 PM Response to Original message |
36. Ashamed of themselves? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
walldude
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 09:38 PM Response to Original message |
37. Goddammit, you have to quit letting little things like FACTS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Jun 22nd 2024, 07:34 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC