|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-30-05 12:10 AM Original message |
Poll question: Hillary Clinton as the Democratic Nominee in 2008? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
waiting for hope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-30-05 12:13 AM Response to Original message |
1. No way.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-30-05 12:17 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. As the OP I will maintain my carefully guarded facade of neutrality |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
waiting for hope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-30-05 12:19 AM Response to Reply #2 |
4. Are they thong or |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-30-05 12:20 AM Response to Reply #4 |
5. Yeah, things are gettin' weird around my house |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Erika (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-30-05 12:17 AM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Yeah, She & Lieberman could run as Republican lites |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpgray (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-30-05 12:20 AM Response to Original message |
6. We can and should do better |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
countmyvote4real (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-30-05 12:40 AM Response to Original message |
7. We can find a better progessive Dem NY Senator, too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IDemo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-30-05 12:48 AM Response to Original message |
8. Now here's an entirely original topic on DU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-30-05 12:01 PM Response to Reply #8 |
17. Well, people who criticize Hillary are constantly being hectored |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Media_Lies_Daily (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-31-05 12:13 AM Response to Reply #8 |
31. Don't like it? Too bad. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oasis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-30-05 01:15 AM Response to Original message |
9. Many DUers will reject Hill even after she's elected president. Holy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-30-05 12:02 PM Response to Reply #9 |
18. She's gonna have to, because most of the Democratic Party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-30-05 07:44 PM Response to Reply #9 |
19. You're assuming she actually has a chance of being elected. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oasis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-30-05 11:23 PM Response to Reply #19 |
26. As things stand at present, Hill has more of a chance than any Dem. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-30-05 11:37 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. Um, sez who? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oasis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-31-05 12:43 AM Response to Reply #27 |
33. How would you have answered post #19? I happen to think Hill has |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-31-05 02:23 AM Response to Reply #33 |
36. Here's what I think: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oasis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-31-05 03:12 AM Response to Reply #36 |
39. "serious bridge building". She knows there is hard work ahead and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-31-05 04:51 PM Response to Reply #39 |
52. As a Loyal Democrat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-01-06 12:06 AM Response to Reply #26 |
76. I have so ventured. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fhqwhgads (165 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-31-05 02:00 PM Response to Reply #19 |
48. word... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Douglas Carpenter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-30-05 01:33 AM Response to Original message |
10. I voted No because I don't want her to be the nominee |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paineinthearse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-30-05 02:15 AM Response to Reply #10 |
13. Why is her voting records being compared with rethugs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Douglas Carpenter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-30-05 11:58 PM Response to Reply #13 |
28. if she becomes the nominee -- she won't be running against Kennedy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Snotcicles (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-31-05 05:11 PM Response to Reply #10 |
54. I will support whoever the Dems pick. But if I had my druthers it would be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-01-06 12:09 AM Response to Reply #54 |
77. Why not Feingold/Gore? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flaminbats (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-30-05 01:47 AM Response to Original message |
11. no..because she won't run |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crazy Guggenheim (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-31-05 10:26 PM Response to Reply #11 |
72. THANK YOU!! She's not going to run!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OneBlueSky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-30-05 02:05 AM Response to Original message |
12. so much for "she has the left in her back pocket" . . . n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hardrada (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-30-05 02:26 AM Response to Original message |
14. I don't want her, you can have her. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fujiyama (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-30-05 02:59 AM Response to Original message |
15. Running her is a bad idea for several reasons: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
deacon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-30-05 04:25 AM Response to Original message |
16. no way n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrSlayer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-30-05 07:53 PM Response to Original message |
20. No, no, a thousand times no. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemGirl7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-30-05 08:19 PM Response to Original message |
21. I'm not really a Hillary fan |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigwillq (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-30-05 08:23 PM Response to Original message |
22. No (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-30-05 08:28 PM Response to Original message |
23. You're not going to get any pulse of the DU Community |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-30-05 09:33 PM Response to Reply #23 |
25. robble robble robble. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-30-05 08:30 PM Response to Original message |
24. Yeah, let's lose 2008...great idea! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
XOKCowboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-31-05 03:39 AM Response to Reply #24 |
41. You forgot banning guns.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-31-05 09:53 AM Response to Reply #41 |
42. Ah yes...the Repug formula for Bringing Out The Ignorant Vote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud patriot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-31-05 12:01 AM Response to Original message |
29. I will vote for someone else in the primary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Media_Lies_Daily (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-31-05 12:12 AM Response to Original message |
30. Not until she admits that going into Iraq was illegal and immoral.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Senator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-31-05 12:17 AM Response to Original message |
32. Senator Boxer stood ALONE on January 6th -- nuff said n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-31-05 02:25 AM Response to Reply #32 |
37. I would LOVE to see Boxer's name on the ticket, in either slot. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquaman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-31-05 12:46 AM Response to Original message |
34. If our goal in 2008 is to get the shit kicked out of us...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fhqwhgads (165 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-31-05 02:04 PM Response to Reply #34 |
49. i agree, but.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-31-05 05:27 PM Response to Reply #49 |
59. And your proposal is...? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goforit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-31-05 12:47 AM Response to Original message |
35. An absolute NO!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
raysr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-31-05 03:03 AM Response to Original message |
38. Here's a thought from |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-31-05 07:43 PM Response to Reply #38 |
69. well, actually trying to ELECT a "liberal-progressive" Democratic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
politicasista (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-31-05 03:13 AM Response to Original message |
40. 2006, 2006. Then I will support the Dem nominee for 08 n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShadesOfGrey (646 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-31-05 12:07 PM Response to Original message |
43. No! I will never hold my nose and vote again... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oasis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-31-05 12:44 PM Response to Reply #43 |
45. Why not start working for the Greens now and avoid the rush? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShadesOfGrey (646 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-31-05 01:21 PM Response to Reply #45 |
46. Yep, I'm definitely leaning that way... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beam Me Up (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-31-05 02:11 PM Response to Reply #46 |
50. Who "we" nominate? Same voting machines used in primaries as elections. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShadesOfGrey (646 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-31-05 03:01 PM Response to Reply #50 |
51. I DO agree! Arghhh! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-31-05 05:21 PM Response to Reply #45 |
57. Because there's still a good chance that OUR party won't nominate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oasis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-31-05 06:06 PM Response to Reply #57 |
64. "Positions most of us find noxious". There may be more than a few moms |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-31-05 11:45 PM Response to Reply #64 |
74. Uh, I was talking about Iraq. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oasis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-01-06 02:45 AM Response to Reply #74 |
79. Flags and videos are the LEAST important to me. In your post #36 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-01-06 11:39 AM Response to Reply #79 |
80. I think the crowd whose positions depend on these kinds of craven |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-31-05 12:27 PM Response to Original message |
44. NO. Hell NO. NO freakin' way. Ain't NO way. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevietheman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-31-05 01:30 PM Response to Original message |
47. Substitute Barbara Boxer if you want a great female leader. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Number9Dream (574 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-31-05 05:05 PM Response to Original message |
53. Thinking Clark, Edwards, & others have better chance... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-31-05 05:15 PM Response to Original message |
55. I voted! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-31-05 05:16 PM Response to Original message |
56. Hillary would mobilize the Conservatives and demoralize Liberals |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-31-05 05:22 PM Response to Reply #56 |
58. Hey! What's wrong with that-- it sounds Grrrrrrrrrrreat! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tactical Progressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-31-05 05:38 PM Response to Reply #56 |
61. Hillary will mobilize Democrats, demoralize Republicans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShadesOfGrey (646 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-31-05 06:24 PM Response to Reply #61 |
66. Uncompromising liberals? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-31-05 06:32 PM Response to Reply #61 |
67. Conservatives don't compromise. Why the hell should we? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-31-05 11:51 PM Response to Reply #61 |
75. Yeah. She's gonna go over like a lead balloon in the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-31-05 05:30 PM Response to Original message |
60. Pretty significant, I'd say. Now the question is; "How representative |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hiley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-31-05 05:56 PM Response to Original message |
62. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
election_2004 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-31-05 06:06 PM Response to Original message |
63. I vote NO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
drdtroit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-31-05 06:07 PM Response to Original message |
65. Nope, she's the GOP's candidate of choice. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeHereNow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-31-05 09:26 PM Response to Reply #65 |
71. EXACTLY! Wanna see Jeb or some other BFEE puppet take over? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue-Jay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-31-05 06:41 PM Response to Original message |
68. Here's a note to lurking conservatives: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-31-05 09:12 PM Response to Original message |
70. So far, 90% of DU says no. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meisje (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-31-05 10:30 PM Response to Reply #70 |
73. and DU speaks for about .001% of the population |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-01-06 12:14 AM Response to Reply #73 |
78. I don't know about that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-01-06 11:46 AM Response to Reply #73 |
81. DU represents WAY more folks than the Freepers... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pinkpops (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-01-06 11:48 AM Response to Original message |
82. Her aim is off - shooting for the center but hit to the Right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmmmSweetOmmm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-01-06 11:52 AM Response to Original message |
83. We cannot let the Media select our candidate for us and it seems that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-01-06 11:55 AM Response to Reply #83 |
84. Well, at least as far back as Nixon, Republicans knew... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmmmSweetOmmm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-01-06 03:16 PM Response to Reply #84 |
85. Bingo! eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-01-06 07:04 PM Response to Reply #85 |
86. Here's the funny part... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue May 28th 2024, 09:34 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC