|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
FredScuttle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 01:24 AM Original message |
I will never, EVER apologize for defending a rape victim |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kiahzero (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 01:26 AM Response to Original message |
1. What if the person wasn't a victim at all? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FredScuttle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 01:26 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Has there been a trial yet that I'm unaware of? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 01:28 AM Response to Reply #2 |
7. That's what we're asking. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kiahzero (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 01:30 AM Response to Reply #2 |
11. Do you think all accusations merit a trial? (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FredScuttle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 01:32 AM Response to Reply #11 |
13. do you think only certain people are entitled to justice? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kiahzero (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 01:38 AM Response to Reply #13 |
16. I think it should take more than a bare accusation to get to trial. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FredScuttle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 01:44 AM Response to Reply #16 |
21. I agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kiahzero (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 01:45 AM Response to Reply #21 |
22. I think there was severe prosecutorial misconduct. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 02:09 AM Response to Reply #21 |
32. Of course she didn't engineer a false rape case "all on her own." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RB TexLa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 01:27 AM Response to Reply #1 |
5. remember as NancyGrace said on SNL tonight |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alittlelark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 01:28 AM Response to Reply #1 |
6. In those 1-3% of cases, I guess I would apologise |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kiahzero (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 01:32 AM Response to Reply #6 |
14. It appears that the Duke Lacrosse case is one of those cases. (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alittlelark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 01:40 AM Response to Reply #14 |
18. I know little to nothing about it...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 02:11 AM Response to Reply #18 |
33. The reason you should waste your brain cells on it (you're not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kiahzero (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 02:12 AM Response to Reply #33 |
34. Fortunately, they don't seem to be that typical |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
last1standing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 01:27 AM Response to Original message |
3. Glad to hear it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FredScuttle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 01:28 AM Response to Reply #3 |
8. Duke lacrosse case |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
last1standing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 01:35 AM Response to Reply #8 |
15. Ahhh! A textbook case on why not to try alleged criminals in the press. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 01:56 AM Response to Reply #15 |
24. This is a textbook case on why some cases SHOULD be tried in the press. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kiahzero (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 01:59 AM Response to Reply #24 |
26. But she made the accusation, isn't that enough for you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
last1standing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 02:07 AM Response to Reply #26 |
31. Delete |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FredScuttle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 02:02 AM Response to Reply #24 |
28. It is undisputed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 02:13 AM Response to Reply #28 |
35. No. Some of us will read the primary documents, which the prosecutor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
last1standing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 02:06 AM Response to Reply #24 |
30. ummm.....ok. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 02:18 AM Response to Reply #30 |
39. The prosecutor used the excuse of privacy to try to convince |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
last1standing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 02:27 AM Response to Reply #39 |
43. Then, for the second time, the courts should sort it out. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 01:27 AM Response to Original message |
4. Ummmm, Ok. Yayyyyy For You! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FredScuttle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 01:29 AM Response to Reply #4 |
9. Duke lacrosse case |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 01:38 AM Response to Reply #9 |
17. That Doesn't Mean Anything To Anybody. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FredScuttle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 01:42 AM Response to Reply #17 |
20. Didn't feel like posting in 15 separate threads |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 01:55 AM Response to Reply #20 |
23. Why Would It Be? You Still Didn't Provide Anything. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FredScuttle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 01:58 AM Response to Reply #23 |
25. Yet you keep digging |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kiahzero (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 02:00 AM Response to Reply #25 |
27. Who was it directed at? (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FredScuttle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 02:03 AM Response to Reply #27 |
29. They know who they are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 02:17 AM Response to Reply #25 |
38. Here's A Newsflash Back: If Your Thread Was For One Or Two Posters, You Should've Posted It Either |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FredScuttle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 02:22 AM Response to Reply #38 |
40. I should "provide the info necessary to warrant this thread meaningful"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 02:28 AM Response to Reply #40 |
45. Ummm, Yes. You Should. Makes Pretty Logical Sense Don't It? I Mean, It's Not Too Much To Ask, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 02:15 AM Response to Reply #23 |
36. Deleted message |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 02:24 AM Response to Reply #36 |
41. What In The Friggin World Are You Talking About? Holy Delusional Batman. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JetCityLiberal (706 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 02:27 AM Response to Reply #41 |
44. Right back at ya |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 01:29 AM Response to Original message |
10. Yes, I will never forget the exact words you used. Last spring yet. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aikoaiko (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 01:32 AM Response to Original message |
12. Don't worry I dont remember a word you said this past spring. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Montauk6 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 01:41 AM Response to Original message |
19. To quote from my avatar... What's Going On? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JetCityLiberal (706 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 02:17 AM Response to Original message |
37. Strongly Agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 02:27 AM Response to Original message |
42. Deleted message |
Broken_Hero (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 02:29 AM Response to Original message |
46. Locking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 30th 2024, 06:51 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC