|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
![]() |
TahitiNut
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 07:33 PM Original message |
Poll: Americans Favor Bush's Impeachment If He Lied about Iraq |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fooj
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 07:35 PM Response to Original message |
1. "IF" he lied? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ixion
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 07:36 PM Original message |
yeah, right? if? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hamlette
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 07:41 PM Response to Original message |
11. how do you prove it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 08:18 PM Response to Reply #11 |
63. He had contrary data. He suppressed it. Q.E.D. He lied. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cui bono
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 11:18 PM Response to Reply #63 |
95. Yes, and it's already documented and will come out when the Dems |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Gauger
![]() |
Fri Nov-10-06 09:11 AM Response to Reply #63 |
118. Exactly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
civildisoBDence
![]() |
Fri Nov-10-06 09:56 AM Response to Reply #118 |
127. Did he lie, or did he "disassemble"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ringo84
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 07:37 PM Response to Reply #1 |
5. Yeah. Really! [end] |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
porphyrian
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 07:35 PM Response to Original message |
2. The numbers would be greater if people understood impeachment. - n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cool user name
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 07:45 PM Response to Reply #2 |
17. No shit ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
porphyrian
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 07:47 PM Response to Reply #17 |
23. I've been on and off here all day trying, and I'm running out of energy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cool user name
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 08:00 PM Response to Reply #23 |
45. LOL ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
magellan
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 11:16 PM Response to Reply #17 |
94. Me too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
porphyrian
![]() |
Fri Nov-10-06 11:15 AM Response to Reply #94 |
129. Well, see you on the battlefield... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut
![]() |
Fri Nov-10-06 11:53 AM Response to Reply #17 |
132. It's not only annoying, it's intellectually dishonest, imho. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 11:11 PM Response to Reply #2 |
93. Or all the crimes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mom cat
![]() |
Fri Nov-10-06 03:24 AM Response to Reply #2 |
110. They will once John Conyers starts his hearings. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gwerlain
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 07:36 PM Response to Original message |
3. Excellent! K&R... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boolean
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 07:36 PM Response to Original message |
4. Hopefully, the Dems are listening |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 07:43 PM Response to Reply #4 |
12. The coverup wing of the Dem party sure was quick to spin against the anti-corruption |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 07:46 PM Response to Reply #12 |
19. DU is thick with the 'concern trolls' today ... cockroaches coming out. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 07:50 PM Response to Reply #19 |
31. I've never seen so many establishment partyline DUers in five years here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ReadTomPaine
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 10:03 PM Response to Reply #31 |
84. Ditto, and I'm no newbie either. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pecwae
![]() |
Fri Nov-10-06 08:41 AM Response to Reply #19 |
116. Why would any DU'er be against impeachment? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stepnw1f
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 07:57 PM Response to Reply #12 |
40. I've Noticed That Too... It Boils My Blood |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Old and In the Way
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 07:58 PM Response to Reply #12 |
41. I noticed that too, blm...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 09:16 PM Response to Reply #41 |
75. Well, I'm going at them fullbore. I didn't work all this time so coverup Dems could |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dchill
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 07:39 PM Response to Original message |
6. Kick... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Individualist
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 07:39 PM Response to Original message |
7. Thank you for posting this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
speedoo
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 07:39 PM Response to Original message |
8. So that would imply even more would want Cheney impeached for the same reason. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 08:08 PM Response to Reply #8 |
54. Agnew went before Nixon and Cheney will go before Smirk |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 07:39 PM Response to Original message |
9. Nominated! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNN0LHI
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 07:47 PM Response to Reply #9 |
22. I will kick this thread until doomsday if need be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 07:48 PM Response to Reply #22 |
28. Great point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 07:55 PM Response to Reply #9 |
39. You, sir, are both a gentleman and scholar. Truly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 08:01 PM Response to Reply #39 |
46. Proud to be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
myrna minx
![]() |
Fri Nov-10-06 09:43 AM Response to Reply #9 |
123. Done and Done. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SammyWinstonJack
![]() |
Fri Nov-10-06 09:46 AM Response to Reply #9 |
125. knr |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tiggeroshii
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 07:40 PM Response to Original message |
10. That's kind of ridiculous. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 07:43 PM Response to Reply #10 |
13. That's a year ago when the 'approval' was higher.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dchill
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 07:44 PM Response to Reply #13 |
16. Isn't that "THE MATH"... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cool user name
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 07:59 PM Response to Reply #13 |
43. Put me down for impeachment at 150% n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dchill
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 07:43 PM Response to Original message |
14. AND Recommend. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNN0LHI
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 07:44 PM Response to Original message |
15. Impeachment is what they were voting for Tuesday |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Generic Other
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 07:46 PM Response to Reply #15 |
20. That's what I was voting for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 07:47 PM Response to Reply #15 |
26. Quislings, and Vichy and Concern Trolls |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Individualist
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 07:51 PM Response to Reply #26 |
34. Hear, hear!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
happydreams
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 07:46 PM Response to Original message |
18. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueStater
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 07:47 PM Response to Original message |
21. Thank you! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laelth
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 07:47 PM Response to Original message |
24. Nicely done, TahitiNut! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 07:51 PM Response to Reply #24 |
33. Thanks. The frustration popped my eardrums. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laelth
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 07:52 PM Response to Reply #33 |
37. Agreed! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mvd
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 07:47 PM Response to Original message |
25. Recommended |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AntiFascist
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 07:48 PM Response to Original message |
27. Very cool, this is why the House of Representatives is given the power.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hubert Flottz
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 07:49 PM Response to Original message |
29. I agree! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skip Intro
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 07:50 PM Response to Original message |
30. It would seem repukes would even support it, as a cleansing of their party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftchick
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 07:50 PM Response to Original message |
32. thank you! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 07:52 PM Response to Reply #32 |
35. !! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftchick
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 09:02 PM Response to Reply #35 |
71. you too baby! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 09:58 PM Response to Reply #71 |
82. Oh, really? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftchick
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 10:11 PM Response to Reply #82 |
88. that poem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Swamp Rat
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 07:52 PM Response to Original message |
36. k&r |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stepnw1f
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 07:53 PM Response to Original message |
38. Kick and Nominated!!! (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hubert Flottz
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 07:58 PM Response to Original message |
42. This issue is a GREAT troll trap! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 08:12 PM Response to Reply #42 |
58. I know the pain ... I really do. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Swamp Rat
![]() |
Fri Nov-10-06 02:59 PM Response to Reply #42 |
140. yep |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hosnon
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 07:59 PM Response to Original message |
44. Read the poll. If he lied they want Congress to CONSIDER impeachment. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
YankmeCrankme
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 08:16 PM Response to Reply #44 |
62. If you want someone to consider something... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hosnon
![]() |
Fri Nov-10-06 01:19 AM Response to Reply #62 |
106. I see a distinction when the consideration is based on a condition. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
YankmeCrankme
![]() |
Fri Nov-10-06 06:45 AM Response to Reply #106 |
113. It doesn't matter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hosnon
![]() |
Fri Nov-10-06 09:12 AM Response to Reply #113 |
119. I'm not trying to spin anything. I simply see a distinction when the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
YankmeCrankme
![]() |
Fri Nov-10-06 06:07 PM Response to Reply #119 |
151. I think you just changed the subject... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hosnon
![]() |
Sat Nov-11-06 09:34 AM Response to Reply #151 |
153. Of course I did. It was obvious from my original response. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 08:22 PM Response to Reply #44 |
66. "Majority of Americans Support Impeaching Bush for Wiretapping"!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hosnon
![]() |
Fri Nov-10-06 01:13 AM Response to Reply #66 |
104. I did. Direct quotes from the articles you posted: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rman
![]() |
Fri Nov-10-06 05:40 AM Response to Reply #44 |
112. yeah, meaning Americans don't really want impeachment, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hosnon
![]() |
Fri Nov-10-06 09:09 AM Response to Reply #112 |
117. Well it means that only a slim majority thinks we should even consider impeaching |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rman
![]() |
Fri Nov-10-06 09:45 AM Response to Reply #117 |
124. so you're saying some people want congress only to consider impeachment, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hosnon
![]() |
Fri Nov-10-06 09:52 AM Response to Reply #124 |
126. I think tossing in "consider" is a way to allow people to be less committed to impeachment but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rman
![]() |
Fri Nov-10-06 10:02 AM Response to Reply #126 |
128. I think the number is closer to 100% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 08:02 PM Response to Original message |
47. But...but..Rush would say mean things about us! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 08:03 PM Response to Reply #47 |
49. This |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 08:06 PM Response to Reply #47 |
51. (lol!) There must be a factory in China somewhere ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hubert Flottz
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 08:08 PM Response to Reply #47 |
53. Do you think the tutucrats missed the message sent to Joe Lie... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 08:12 PM Response to Reply #53 |
57. "TutuCrats". An apt discriptive term for the timid wing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 09:02 PM Response to Reply #53 |
70. "Tutucrat" ... an EXCELLENT neologism! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftchick
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 09:04 PM Response to Reply #53 |
72. ROFL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Old and In the Way
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 08:03 PM Response to Original message |
48. Kick for the 3000 Americans who died on 9/11 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AIJ Alom
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 08:05 PM Response to Original message |
50. Time to gather up all the info we have on why we went into Iraq. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Major Hogwash
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 08:07 PM Response to Original message |
52. Kick for the 2839 dead American soldiers and sailors who were killed in Iraq. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zhade
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 08:09 PM Response to Original message |
55. Well, there you go. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 08:14 PM Response to Reply #55 |
61. They keep on trying, though. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Individualist
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 08:11 PM Response to Original message |
56. kick for justice and integrity! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cameron27
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 08:13 PM Response to Original message |
59. Wow that's an amazing poll. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clarkie1
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 08:13 PM Response to Original message |
60. There need to be investigations that do not tie up our POSITIVE legislative agenda. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
baby_mouse
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 08:19 PM Original message |
Excellent. Now the NEXT step... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brentspeak
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 08:19 PM Response to Original message |
64. I was never polled on that question. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slipslidingaway
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 08:20 PM Response to Original message |
65. K&R! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Individualist
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 08:27 PM Response to Original message |
67. kick in the face for neocon enablers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Individualist
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 08:40 PM Response to Original message |
68. kick for all who mourn the deaths of those killed by the Bush Admin. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 09:00 PM Response to Original message |
69. In the interest of "reality-based" discussion: Kick. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nikki Stone1
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 09:05 PM Response to Original message |
73. kicked, Recommended |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 09:06 PM Response to Original message |
74. Well, IF a Majority still rules in this country |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tom_paine
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 09:17 PM Response to Original message |
76. The point is DSM PROVES he lied. PROVES! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 10:00 PM Response to Reply #76 |
83. There's so much proof, one has to make an effort to avoid it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ReadTomPaine
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 10:05 PM Response to Reply #83 |
85. Well said - you have look hard *not* to find malfeasance at this point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pinniped
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 09:20 PM Response to Original message |
77. I think the question of "if" has been settled long ago. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
YankmeCrankme
![]() |
Fri Nov-10-06 06:49 AM Response to Reply #77 |
114. Still... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stinky The Clown
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 09:21 PM Response to Original message |
78. This is an excellent start |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wiggs
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 09:21 PM Response to Original message |
79. Beautiful. Forward to Olbermann and maybe Scarborough since he's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 09:29 PM Response to Reply #79 |
80. Good idea. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nikki Stone1
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 09:36 PM Response to Original message |
81. kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobbolink
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 10:06 PM Response to Original message |
86. This whole impeachment kerfluffle has accomplished one really good thing.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 10:37 PM Response to Reply #86 |
89. H2O Man is a treasure. Rarely has anyone impressed me more online. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobbolink
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 10:44 PM Response to Reply #89 |
90. Where's That Planet?!! I'm moving there! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jcrowley
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 10:07 PM Response to Original message |
87. K & R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
femrap
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 10:48 PM Response to Original message |
91. The voters want * fired, axed, pink-slipped.....OUT! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Individualist
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 11:10 PM Response to Original message |
92. K for more R's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jeffersons Ghost
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 11:20 PM Response to Original message |
96. K&R GREAT OP! and the text boxes are a neat color... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 11:26 PM Response to Reply #96 |
98. (grin) Thanks ... and, here ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L0oniX
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 11:24 PM Response to Original message |
97. Water board the chimp bitch and his cronies then impeach the ass carrot |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brentspeak
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 11:31 PM Response to Original message |
99. Checking the link out, I found that the OP is not being completely honest |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
philly_bob
![]() |
Thu Nov-09-06 11:50 PM Response to Original message |
100. Just start investigating. Say 'oversight' not 'impeachment.' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut
![]() |
Fri Nov-10-06 12:42 AM Response to Original message |
101. Impeach. Indict. Imprison. (Rinse. Repeat.) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoSheep
![]() |
Fri Nov-10-06 12:44 AM Response to Original message |
102. Yes.Yes. Yes. And please....can we stop this war? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut
![]() |
Fri Nov-10-06 01:15 AM Response to Reply #102 |
105. In my firm personal opinion, we'd be able to end our occupation of Iraq |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eridani
![]() |
Fri Nov-10-06 01:10 AM Response to Original message |
103. 50-54% is NOT a huge majority |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut
![]() |
Fri Nov-10-06 02:42 AM Response to Reply #103 |
108. I think it's huge when one considers ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rman
![]() |
Fri Nov-10-06 05:38 AM Response to Reply #103 |
111. I'm pretty sure impeachment involves investigation, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eridani
![]() |
Fri Nov-10-06 07:49 AM Response to Reply #111 |
115. Fixing the Constitution has to come before impeachment also |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
upi402
![]() |
Fri Nov-10-06 01:21 AM Response to Original message |
107. of course! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rainscents
![]() |
Fri Nov-10-06 02:50 AM Response to Original message |
109. Lets send this to our new speaker of the house ASAP!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
klook
![]() |
Fri Nov-10-06 09:33 AM Response to Original message |
120. It depends on what the meaning of "war" is. (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lars39
![]() |
Fri Nov-10-06 09:37 AM Response to Original message |
121. Lay all the facts out there with investigations and *they are toast*! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
In Truth We Trust
![]() |
Fri Nov-10-06 09:42 AM Response to Original message |
122. Rule of Law! Principle! Justice! Integrity! The Constitution! Impeach and Prosecute! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot
![]() |
Fri Nov-10-06 11:38 AM Response to Original message |
130. kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ItsTheMediaStupid
![]() |
Fri Nov-10-06 11:47 AM Response to Original message |
131. Clinton's impeachment was an act of revenge based on manufactured scandals |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nolabels
![]() |
Fri Nov-10-06 12:12 PM Response to Reply #131 |
134. The best thing is the guilty will probably embroil themselves in their own mess. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nam78_two
![]() |
Fri Nov-10-06 12:00 PM Response to Original message |
133. K&R-great post! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Senator
![]() |
Fri Nov-10-06 02:06 PM Response to Original message |
135. And "Lied" is just a Euphemism -- They Terrorized the Nation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GOTV
![]() |
Fri Nov-10-06 02:34 PM Response to Original message |
136. Wake me up when they support imp. WITHOUT a conditional... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bernardo de La Paz
![]() |
Fri Nov-10-06 02:44 PM Response to Original message |
137. Investigate!! 50% is not a proper majority and it is fragile. Don't squander it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut
![]() |
Fri Nov-10-06 04:50 PM Response to Reply #137 |
145. Here's a refresher for you ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bernardo de La Paz
![]() |
Fri Nov-10-06 05:30 PM Response to Reply #145 |
149. Your point? My point: Prosecutors don't prosecute cases they don't think they can win. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kay1864
![]() |
Fri Nov-10-06 02:57 PM Response to Original message |
138. EVERYONE READING THIS THREAD: PLEASE LOOK AT THE DATES |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jemmons
![]() |
Fri Nov-10-06 02:59 PM Response to Original message |
139. Just asking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ComerPerro
![]() |
Fri Nov-10-06 03:01 PM Response to Original message |
141. that is meaningless |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hasssan1
![]() |
Fri Nov-10-06 03:16 PM Response to Original message |
142. DEMS/AMERICAN MUST IMPEACH THIS FUCKER |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krkaufman
![]() |
Fri Nov-10-06 04:18 PM Response to Original message |
143. And what if he knowingly used torture-extracted statements ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut
![]() |
Fri Nov-10-06 04:52 PM Response to Reply #143 |
146. Three words: John. Walker. Lindh. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
novalib
![]() |
Fri Nov-10-06 04:23 PM Response to Original message |
144. IMPEACH!! INDICT!!! CONVICT!! IMPRISON!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Individualist
![]() |
Fri Nov-10-06 05:16 PM Response to Original message |
147. kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Swamp Rat
![]() |
Fri Nov-10-06 05:28 PM Response to Original message |
148. IMPEEEEP!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
happydreams
![]() |
Fri Nov-10-06 05:46 PM Response to Original message |
150. kick. This needs to stay at the top. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut
![]() |
Fri Nov-10-06 10:44 PM Response to Reply #150 |
152. Indeed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thu Jun 20th 2024, 09:51 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC