|
LONG list of serious rebuttals. HERE: -----> http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/eletters/326/7398/1057Rapid Responses published: Need for clarification on competing interest Martin McKee (15 May 2003)
Flawed study from the outset Jayant S Vaidya (16 May 2003)
Risks for passive smoking are likely to be underestimated. Trevor LP Watts (16 May 2003)
Re: Second-hand smokescreens Brian David Porter, Healthy Communities, LN5 7JH (16 May 2003)
Irresponsible journalism Dominic C Horne (16 May 2003)
Agreeing the limits of conflict of interest richard horton (17 May 2003)
Editorial responsibility to publish sound science Trish A Fraser (17 May 2003)
Evidence Based Medicine? Stephen Novick (17 May 2003)
The letter BMJ failed to write Pascal A. Diethelm (17 May 2003)
ETS - Interpretation of the wider evidence Julia A Critchley (17 May 2003)
Seondhand Smoke Study is Seriously Flawed Marty Eckrem (17 May 2003)
Lies, Damned Lies and Statistics Richard EK Russell (17 May 2003)
Timing of publication Jephat Chifamba (17 May 2003)
Irresponsible public health message Sabina Fatima Hussain (17 May 2003)
Give them enough rope Daniel F. Hass (17 May 2003)
Re: Irresponsible journalism Ellen C G Grant (17 May 2003)
what does this add? Paul M Jones (17 May 2003)
Swimming with sharks Paul S McDonald (17 May 2003)
Unproven health impact of environmental smoke: A study with low statistical power Parthasarathy K S (17 May 2003)
Biggest impact on developing countries Judith M Mackay (17 May 2003)
some thoughts martin heilweil, PhD (17 May 2003)
Study Objective Flawed--Fatally Stephen J. Jay (17 May 2003)
Re: Need for clarification on competing interest Geoffrey C Kabat (17 May 2003)
Nothing new from the antismoking front Wiel M Maessen (17 May 2003)
Re: Agreeing the limits of conflict of interest Clive D Bates (17 May 2003)
Reply to Bates Tony Delamothe (17 May 2003)
From hero to pariah in one easy jump Richard Smith (18 May 2003)
Children are not exposed to parental smoke??!! Andrew J Fall (18 May 2003)
What in the world were you thinking? Sera Kirk (18 May 2003)
Re: Nothing new from the antismoking front David F. Copeland (18 May 2003)
FINALLY !! Truth Comes Out of the Closet. Stephen Hartwell (18 May 2003)
Funding by EPA,, CDC, WHO equally "tainted" Natalie P.R. Sirkin (18 May 2003)
When conflict of interest becomes unacceptable Deborah Arnott (18 May 2003)
Did non-smokers REALLY avoid Simon Chapman (18 May 2003)
Whither epidemiologic reporting? Gio B. Gori (18 May 2003)
Consistency - science for sale? John R. Polito (18 May 2003)
Tobacco Toxicity Ken B. Jones (18 May 2003)
BMJ-comic or respectable journal? Raj Thakkar (18 May 2003)
WHAT THE HELL HAVE THESE PEOPLE BEEN SMOKIN'? Errol E. POVAH (19 May 2003)
4 Questions, 2 comments tOM Trottier, None (19 May 2003)
RESPONSE TO PAPER ON PASSIVE SMOKING Christopher W IDE (19 May 2003)
A "passive smoke" observation Robert I. Rudolph, M.D., FACP (19 May 2003)
Remember "Frank Statement to Smokers"? Joanne L. Addison (19 May 2003)
Bully for the BMJ Bryce C. Peterson, M.D. (19 May 2003)
Six Key Issues Ronald M. Davis (19 May 2003)
The bottom line Andrew S Furber (19 May 2003)
What killer? Let’s call things with their name. Gian L. Turci (19 May 2003)
environmental tobacco smoke paper requires further benefits from critical appraisal Rosemary Fox, Gwendolyn L. Lowe, Hugo van Woerden (19 May 2003)
BMJ, Impact Factor and Irresponsible Journalism: A 'nasty' nexus? Zubair Kabir (19 May 2003)
Adequacy of age-adjustment? Eugene Milne (19 May 2003)
Response to Simon Chapman Michael J Thun (19 May 2003)
Why The Double Standard? Dave Hitt (19 May 2003)
Pots calling kettles black GH Hall (19 May 2003)
SARS causes no harm Jonathan P. Krueger (20 May 2003)
Reply to ASH - please be more careful in future James A Delphi (20 May 2003)
Inverse effect can be explained Wiel Maessen (20 May 2003)
Freedom Crystal L Pherson (20 May 2003)
A very interesting coincidence ELIF DAGLI (20 May 2003)
Confirmation: Secondhand smoke does cause respiratory disease Anthony J Hedley, Tai-Hing Lam, Sarah M. McGhee, Gabriel M. Leung, and Megan Pow (20 May 2003)
Re: Adequacy of age-adjustment - a hypothesis Eugene Milne (20 May 2003)
BMA Turns Tabloid Dale Jackaman (20 May 2003)
California-smoky offices, windows open at home most of the year .... HS Roberts (20 May 2003)
Re: Re: Nothing new from the antismoking front Wiel M Maessen (20 May 2003)
Another "competing interest" of James Enstrom Robert S. Broughton (20 May 2003)
More details on competing interests Martin McKee, Pascal Diethelm (20 May 2003)
Tobacco cartel wants to create a "controversy" Joseph Cherner (20 May 2003)
An American Cancer Society Perspective Michael J. Thun (20 May 2003)
Defining a set of difficult issues richard horton (20 May 2003)
Science as PR Gene Borio (20 May 2003)
Read peer review comments Kamran Abbasi (20 May 2003)
The Correlation of Smoking and Deep Breathing Bernard X. Bovasso, none (21 May 2003)
Reviewers' comments Martin McKee (21 May 2003)
Apology Requested William T Godshall (21 May 2003)
Jumping out of a 3rd storey window "may not kill" either... Peter J Flegg (21 May 2003)
Re: Read peer review comments Kamran Abbasi (21 May 2003)
Re: Defining a set of difficult issues Zubair Kabir (21 May 2003)
Old habits new diseases? Teresa Ramos (22 May 2003)
Re: Science as PR....Bravo, Gene! Errol E. POVAH (22 May 2003)
Re: Inverse effect can be explained Adam Jacobs (22 May 2003)
Why am I dying from lung cancer caused by second-hand smoke? Heather S. Crowe (22 May 2003)
Flawed Study on Passive Smoking Michael J. Martin (22 May 2003)
PUT YOUR LUNGS WHERE YOUR MOUTH IS Emanuel Goldman (22 May 2003)
Re: Why The Double Standard? M. L. Herrin (22 May 2003)
"Serious misclassification of exposure" Pascal A. Diethelm (22 May 2003)
It's not always easy James W Austin (22 May 2003)
Judging Research freda lee nason (22 May 2003)
Re: Six Key Issues Emma L Dickinson (23 May 2003)
Lost Credibility Christopher Lovelidge, http://www.you-are-the-target.com/ (23 May 2003)
Response to McKee and Diethelm Geoffrey C Kabat (23 May 2003)
The 'overwhelming evidence' for the links between ETS and lung cancer and heart disease Wiel M Maessen (23 May 2003)
Re: Why am I dying from lung cancer caused by second-hand smoke? Wiel Maessen (23 May 2003)
Re: Judging Research Nigel R Winterbottom (23 May 2003)
Re: Re: Inverse effect can be explained Wiel M Maessen (23 May 2003)
What are the tobacco manufacturers saying? Andrew S Furber (23 May 2003)
Response to James Austin Simon Chapman (23 May 2003)
Smoke: Cancer ingredients or not George F Sedlacek (24 May 2003)
The Confounding Urban Factor David W. Kuneman (24 May 2003)
Misleading the public about secondhand smoke ... Again Lisa A Bero, Michael Cummings, Stanton Glantz (24 May 2003)
Response to Simon Chapman James W Austin (25 May 2003)
Re: Misleading the public about secondhand smoke ... Again B.J. Allen (25 May 2003)
Wrong conclusion William Carey (25 May 2003)
Do any of the "non-smokers" smoke? John H. Glaser (26 May 2003)
Research Bias and Science Michael J. McFadden (26 May 2003)
Re: Misleading the public about secondhand smoke ... Again Wiel M Maessen (27 May 2003)
Re: Response to McKee and Diethelm Malcolm X. McGarrity (27 May 2003)
Re: An American Cancer Society Perspective Daniel Forrest (29 May 2003)
Re: Do any of the "non-smokers" smoke? John H. Glaser (29 May 2003)
Re: Re: Re: Inverse effect can be explained Adam Jacobs (29 May 2003)
Re: Defining a set of difficult issues Beverly A. HARRIS (29 May 2003)
Cohort bias in the analysis of Californian passive smoking Eugene Milne (29 May 2003)
Why the study? Joshua E. Muscat (30 May 2003)
Passive smoking: Why all the fuss? Jeffrey J Johnstone (30 May 2003)
Environmental tobacco smoke and lung cancer Allan Hackshaw, Please see the end of the letter (30 May 2003)
CONTEXT & COMMON SENSE--or: "2nd-HAND POISON'S OK. REALLY!..." Rick Bernardo (30 May 2003)
'Fac Ut Gaudeam' : By Dr Joseph Obi Joseph .C. Obi (1 June 2003)
On the objectivism of science Kurt J. Zuckermann (2 June 2003)
Re: On the objectivism of science John H. Glaser (3 June 2003)
health as a confounding factor? Elliot S Jerud (3 June 2003)
Anachronism Matti A Keski-Korpela (4 June 2003)
Congratulations! Ken S. Honbo (5 June 2003)
Article Response and Response to Comments Scott J. Leischow (5 June 2003)
Lung Cancer Without Secondhand Smoke Exposure Sheldon B. Ungar (5 June 2003)
Science: Talking the talk, or walking the walk? Rick Bernardo (10 June 2003)
Editorial U-Turn on Secondhand Smoke "Controversy"? Gene Gene (11 June 2003)
Re: Science: Talking the talk, or walking the walk? Stuart Goldbarg (12 June 2003)
The anti-smokers lie about smoking and health Carol AS Thompson (12 June 2003)
A final thought.... Michael J. McFadden (16 June 2003)
Publication in BMJ of Tobacco-funded "research" Stan R Blecher (20 June 2003)
What do we learn from this research? Ralf Krumkamp (21 June 2003)
Gori replies to Leishow about Enstrom, Kabat, and beyond Gio B. Gori (25 June 2003)
Requesting Media Information from Interested Readers… Sheldon Ungar, Dennis Bray, Sociologist, GKSS Research Center (25 June 2003)
Secondhand Smoke Exposure and Disease: No Doubt Remains Terry F. Pechacek, Stephen Babb (10 July 2003)
Tobacco : what about Belgium Christophe De Brouwer, Raphael Lagasse. (11 July 2003)
The Case of the Footnote Wagging the Article Phillip S. Gardiner, Charles L. Gruder, Francisco Buchting (19 August 2003)
Thank you Mark W. Volovar (9 September 2003)
Second-Hand Smokescreen Hugh McGrath Jr. (16 September 2003)
Family history? yogi sehgal (25 September 2003)
Smoking and lung cancer: dose-response and combined exposure i.e. asbestos John H. Lange (29 September 2003)
Re: Re: Re: Inverse effect can be explained Wiel Maessen (30 November 2003)
Public Health Advocacy and its Five Ps Niyi Awofeso (3 December 2003)
A question... C.A. Caldwell (11 December 2003)
Re: A question... Adam Jacobs (13 December 2003)
Re: Re: A question... Pete Petrakis, Ph.D., M.P.H. (14 December 2003)
Re: Re: Re: A question... Adam Jacobs (15 December 2003)
Re: Re: Re: Re: A question... Pete Petrakis, Ph.D., M.P.H. (16 December 2003)
Re: Re: Re: Re: A question... C.A. Caldwell (16 December 2003)
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: A question... Pete Petrakis, Ph.D., M.P.H. (17 December 2003)
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: A question... C.A. Caldwell (24 December 2003)
Re: Re: Re: Re: A question... Wiel M Maessen (15 January 2004)
Re. Re. Re. Re..... Gio B. Gori (21 January 2004)
Re: Why am I dying from lung cancer caused by second-hand smoke? lynda duguay (3 July 2004)
A Sociological Study of the Responses to Enstrom & Kabat Sheldon B. Ungar, Dennis Bray, GKSS, Geesthacht, Germany (17 December 2004)
Environmental tobacco smoke: formulating public health policy for environmental carcinogens Morris Greenberg (30 August 2005)
Re: Six Key Issues Belinda Cunnison (5 December 2005)
Updated Meta-Analysis on ETS and CHD Mortality in the US James E Enstrom, Geoffrey C Kabat, New Rochelle, NY 10804 (24 January 2006)
Enstrom & Kabat's Exposure Assessment Flawed James L. Repace (25 January 2006)
Re: Enstrom & Kabat's Exposure Assessment Flawed Walt Cody (18 March 2006)
Is the goal of TC to reduce mortality, or to protect the consensus view Kevin M. Mulvina (15 August 2006)
Professor Sir Richard Peto and the House of Lords James E Enstrom (26 August 2006)
Defending Legitimate Epidemiologic Research James E. Enstrom (27 September 2006)
Risk and Cotinine: A reply to Mr. Cody James L. Repace (29 September 2006)
|