Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senate Hearings on Torture Bill (Kennedy & Rockefeller Amends) -- THREAD 5

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 12:55 PM
Original message
Senate Hearings on Torture Bill (Kennedy & Rockefeller Amends) -- THREAD 5
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. Although this might be useless if they break for lunch....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Are they going through with the quorum call?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'm reposting the text of Kennedy's Amendment here
SA 5084. Mr. KENNEDY submitted an amendment intended to be proposed to amendment SA 5036 proposed by Mr. FRIST to the bill H.R. 6061, to establish operational control over the international land and maritime borders of the United States; which was ordered to lie on the table; as follows:


On page 83, between lines 8 and 9, insert the following:

(2) PROTECTION OF UNITED STATES PERSONS.--The Secretary of State shall notify other parties to the Geneva Conventions that--

(A) the United States has historically interpreted the law of war and the Geneva Conventions, including in particular common Article 3, to prohibit a wide variety of cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment of members of the United States Armed Forces and United States persons;

(B) during and following previous armed conflicts, the United States Government has prosecuted persons for engaging in cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment, including the use of waterboarding techniques, stress positions, including prolonged standing, the use of extreme temperatures, beatings, sleep deprivation, and other similar acts;

(C) this Act and the amendments made by this Act preserve the capacity of the United States to prosecute nationals of enemy powers for engaging in acts against members of the United States Armed Forces and United States persons that have been prosecuted by the United States as war crimes in the past; and

(D) should any United States person be subjected to the following acts, without limitation, under circumstances in which the Geneva Conventions are applicable, the United States would consider such acts to constitute punishable offenses under common Article 3 and would act accordingly: forcing the person to be naked, perform sexual acts, or pose in a sexual manner; applying beatings, electric shocks, burns, or other forms of physical pain to the person; waterboarding the person; using dogs on the person; inducing hypothermia or heat injury in the person; conducting a mock execution of the person; and depriving the person of necessary food, water, or medical care.

Link to all the amendments
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/C?r109:./temp/~r109HchwTZ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. good idea
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:06 PM
Original message
Thanks, Mr. C....
Let`s see where the Rethugs stand on this one. A brilliant move by Senator Kennedy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. quorum call
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
6. Kennedy up again!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. He took 4 more minutes
His amendment is really excellent -- it takes exactly what is being done and force feeds back down their throats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Outlining why his amendment is necessary...
the bill is vague as to what is prohibited. Kennedy's amendment clarifies what is prohibited.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
9. oh please do not give this jerk of a president more power please
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Kennedy's amendment is AWESOME...and the pukes are gonna have a hell
of a time explaining why they voted against the troops!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Damn straight about that
Nothing that they say will surprise me though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
10. Specter amendment vote results are in
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Snowe didn't vote...
i'm not even gonna type the name i'm thinking that fits her today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. again this vote was on party lines
1 dem Nelson from Neb. voting with repigs

and my senators chafee and reed both voted yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. Senate votes grouped by states (copy/paste from link)
Grouped by Home State
Alabama: Sessions (R-AL), Nay Shelby (R-AL), Nay

Alaska: Murkowski (R-AK), Nay Stevens (R-AK), Nay

Arizona: Kyl (R-AZ), Nay McCain (R-AZ), Nay

Arkansas: Lincoln (D-AR), Yea Pryor (D-AR), Yea

California: Boxer (D-CA), Yea Feinstein (D-CA), Yea

Colorado: Allard (R-CO), Nay Salazar (D-CO), Yea

Connecticut: Dodd (D-CT), Yea Lieberman (D-CT), Yea

Delaware: Biden (D-DE), Yea Carper (D-DE), Yea

Florida: Martinez (R-FL), Nay Nelson (D-FL), Yea

Georgia: Chambliss (R-GA), Nay Isakson (R-GA), Nay

Hawaii: Akaka (D-HI), Yea Inouye (D-HI), Yea

Idaho: Craig (R-ID), Nay Crapo (R-ID), Nay

Illinois: Durbin (D-IL), Yea Obama (D-IL), Yea

Indiana: Bayh (D-IN), Yea Lugar (R-IN), Nay

Iowa: Grassley (R-IA), Nay Harkin (D-IA), Yea

Kansas: Brownback (R-KS), Nay Roberts (R-KS), Nay

Kentucky: Bunning (R-KY), Nay McConnell (R-KY), Nay

Louisiana: Landrieu (D-LA), Yea Vitter (R-LA), Nay

Maine: Collins (R-ME), Nay Snowe (R-ME), Not Voting

Maryland: Mikulski (D-MD), Yea Sarbanes (D-MD), Yea

Massachusetts: Kennedy (D-MA), Yea Kerry (D-MA), Yea

Michigan: Levin (D-MI), Yea Stabenow (D-MI), Yea

Minnesota: Coleman (R-MN), Nay Dayton (D-MN), Yea

Mississippi: Cochran (R-MS), Nay Lott (R-MS), Nay

Missouri: Bond (R-MO), Nay Talent (R-MO), Nay

Montana: Baucus (D-MT), Yea Burns (R-MT), Nay

Nebraska: Hagel (R-NE), Nay Nelson (D-NE), Nay

Nevada: Ensign (R-NV), Nay Reid (D-NV), Yea

New Hampshire: Gregg (R-NH), Nay Sununu (R-NH), Yea

New Jersey: Lautenberg (D-NJ), Yea Menendez (D-NJ), Yea

New Mexico: Bingaman (D-NM), Yea Domenici (R-NM), Nay

New York: Clinton (D-NY), Yea Schumer (D-NY), Yea

North Carolina: Burr (R-NC), Nay Dole (R-NC), Nay

North Dakota: Conrad (D-ND), Yea Dorgan (D-ND), Yea

Ohio: DeWine (R-OH), Nay Voinovich (R-OH), Nay

Oklahoma: Coburn (R-OK), Nay Inhofe (R-OK), Nay

Oregon: Smith (R-OR), Yea Wyden (D-OR), Yea

Pennsylvania: Santorum (R-PA), Nay Specter (R-PA), Yea

Rhode Island: Chafee (R-RI), Yea Reed (D-RI), Yea

South Carolina: DeMint (R-SC), Nay Graham (R-SC), Nay

South Dakota: Johnson (D-SD), Yea Thune (R-SD), Nay

Tennessee: Alexander (R-TN), Nay Frist (R-TN), Nay

Texas: Cornyn (R-TX), Nay Hutchison (R-TX), Nay

Utah: Bennett (R-UT), Nay Hatch (R-UT), Nay

Vermont: Jeffords (I-VT), Yea Leahy (D-VT), Yea

Virginia: Allen (R-VA), Nay Warner (R-VA), Nay

Washington: Cantwell (D-WA), Yea Murray (D-WA), Yea

West Virginia: Byrd (D-WV), Yea Rockefeller (D-WV), Yea

Wisconsin: Feingold (D-WI), Yea Kohl (D-WI), Yea

Wyoming: Enzi (R-WY), Nay Thomas (R-WY), Nay
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #10
23. They voted against habeas corpus?
Edited on Thu Sep-28-06 01:12 PM by Marie26
They need to turn in their "democratic representative" credentials right now, then. And why are McCain, Graham, and Warner voting against this amendment? Weren't they worried about removing the writ of habeas corpus, or was that all for show?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #10
28. Knock me over with a feather: Sununu votes yea? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
12. The Virginia Senator must really need to go tinkle -- another quorum call
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. he's hungry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
18. I thought I saw them bring a chair up for Byrd.
Edited on Thu Sep-28-06 01:08 PM by acmejack
OK, let's see what the man has to pull out of his bag of tricks.

And I do see that gas bag Cornyn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Byrd is introducing another amendment
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BelgianMadCow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #19
24. Levin / Specter / Kennedy / Byrd - that means this is the last one
Warner said discussion on 4 amandments yesterday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #24
30. Kennedy/Rockefeller/Byrd are on the floor
Edited on Thu Sep-28-06 01:12 PM by MrCoffee
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. self-delete
Edited on Thu Sep-28-06 01:12 PM by CornField
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. I fixed mine...my bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
20. Bobby Byrd introducing his amendment.
Edited on Thu Sep-28-06 01:10 PM by Lasher
This should be good. This is a sunset clause 5 years down the road. Looks like an attempt at damage control.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
21. Sen. Byrd -- setting aside Kennedy Amendment so he present his
This is the sunset amendment
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Byrd is putting a 5 year sunset amendment on the floor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. I love to listen to Byrd speak -- colorful, good use of discriptives
"Feverish Politics"

"Legislation pushed as a means of showboating -- we all know what that is"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
26. I really like Robert Byrd's style on the Senate floor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #26
31. LOL -- I just posted the same. He deserves the "distinguished" title
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #26
36. Byrd: "Thank God for the Supreme Court"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
never cry wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
27. Kennedy's amendment is really brilliant!
Defining torture as it applies to potential US victims. If passed it will undercut what the main bill says and provide a precedence to torture definitions. If the pukes vote against it, they are voting against foreign entities torturing our troops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. briiiiiiiiiliant!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BelgianMadCow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #27
33. and it mirrors the known Abu Ghraib abuses
good thinking indeed. Use of dogs was a giveaway as is sexual degradation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #27
35. nice.
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BelgianMadCow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #27
38. BAD, BAD bills
:-) with a pointing finger too. Go Byrd!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
37. Byrd: "Thank God for separation of powers. Thank God for SCOTUS"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #37
39. "We are again confronted with slap-happy legislation which is changing by
the minute" LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #37
40. "We are confronted by slap-happy legislation" - Byrd
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BelgianMadCow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #40
42. IN such a frenzied, frenetic state, who knows the true nature of the beast
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
41. Reading "My Senator And Me" To My Students This Afternoon
During their milk break, the littole darlins'.:) :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
43. Byrd is doing an absolutely dynamite job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
44. "Prescribe for ourselves an antidote for any self-inflicted wounds"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
45. Byrd: "if ever a piece of legislation cried out to be reviewed with the
benefit of hindsight, it is the current bill"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #45
52. Enjoy it while you can.
He is a window to the most eloquent and honorable of the Greatest Generation. Neither he, nor the rest of them who still survive, will be around forever.

I hope he'll be able to redeem himself with those of us here who got upset when he voted to confirm Alito.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
46. HA!!! Warner: "This legislature has a high degree of vigilance in
overseeing the executive branch."

It must be lunch time because they've brought out the afternoon entertainment!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #46
47. Did he take a fistful of downers before he got up to speak?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BelgianMadCow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #46
49. Counter that with the generals saying Rummy doesn NOT listen at all
and purges dissent, while ther is no congressional oversight.

You have to seriously deluded or very hypocritical to be able to say what he said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BelgianMadCow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #49
54. A sunset clause inhibits the president to exercise the powers granted him
in this bill. That is a very silly argument. I honestly don't see what argument can be made against a sunset clause.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerry-is-my-prez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #46
53. Scary that we have people like this in charge - completely off his rocker.
I'm drawing up a petition right now to have this guy committed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerry-is-my-prez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
48. "I find that we've all been very good about overlooking the exec branch.
This from John Warner. I'd like to know what he's been smoking because I need ME some of it. Then I can live in my own little happy happy wrold pretending that everything is all A-OK.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
50. John Warner is whoring himself for an idiot president
but he's doing it ever so politely. These people have no shame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #50
59. He can't go bezerk on Byrd -- Byrd is too distinguished & respected
It's called tact and it is interesting because we've seen so little of it from the Republican members of Congress lately. Frankly, I don't agree with what Warner is saying, but he has garnered more respect from me because of his use of quiet tact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #59
60. He gets zero respect from me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #60
65. Politics is a game
Yes, a game with very high stakes, but it is still a game. I have no problem acknowledging good players on either side while I continue to root for my home team.

For what Warner has done -- respectfully disagreed with another member of Congress -- he does deserve acknowledgement. Now we'll see Byrd return to the floor to respectfully disagree with Warner and he deserves acknowledgement for that as well.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #65
69. I know what you mean and you're right...
I'm just angry today. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
51. Warner (VA) - "This bill will mete out a measure of justice as we..
understand it"

I think he means vengence, not justice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BelgianMadCow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #51
57. "mete" - he means meat, as in slightly pulped fingers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ralps Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
55. One of the callers on Thom Hartmann's show said that there will Not be
a cloture vote on this bill!!! :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #55
56. i think that's a good thing...cloture is how you stop a filibuster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #56
66. But are you sure it's being set up to work that way?
Failure to pass a cloture vote is generally equivalent to a filibuster, isn't it? Maybe an absence of the cloture vote will result in an automatic limit to debate. I can't believe Catkiller and his Senate majority cohorts would have otherwise arranged this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #55
58. Good. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #55
61. hes doesnt know what hes talking about
Edited on Thu Sep-28-06 01:34 PM by LSK
A cloture vote is mandatory and procedure.

Unless the GOP pulls it, but it doesnt look like that will happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #61
63. I bow to your superior Senate Procedure geekiness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BelgianMadCow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #63
64. that's two
:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #63
67. would you believe Ive been watching the Senate for only 2 years?
Yes I am a total nerd because I love these CSPAN threads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BelgianMadCow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #67
68. You're in good company! Randi is an addict as well...
and yes, I believe that... two years is a loong time. You're probably the resident expert.
Yay for C-span threads!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #68
70. I always scroll through them when I have to be away from important debates
they are what makes DU the best.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ND Pendie Donating Member (17 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #61
90. Mandatory Cloture?
I believe you're mistaken.

Cloture is a vote to limit debate, designed to stymie a filibuster.

It is not at all mandatory, and though it has been used on several occasions, it it not used universally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BelgianMadCow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
62. Byrd : I respect you Warner, but I am ABHORRED
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
71. I believe there is genuine respect between these 2 Senators
I miss that sentiment for a mostly bygone time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
72. I'm getting a big Senate chubby right now...
Warner and Byrd going toe-to-toe on the Senate floor.

This is fucking governing, people!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buddhamama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #72
73. Byrd is exciting to watch
i get chills from the man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #73
79. This is great theater. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BelgianMadCow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #79
82. yes he is acting great - the succesion of words is perfect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #72
74. 'I'm almost speechless"
maybe they'll get all ugly like in the House of Commons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BelgianMadCow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #74
80. Warner is not making any sense whatsoever - "this bill is intended as
Edited on Thu Sep-28-06 01:48 PM by BelgianMadCow
a message"?? "And we don't want to send the message it can expire."

Why, would that not conform to the basic principles of the eternal totalitarian state?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
75. Byrd is almost speechless
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
76. Byrd..I'm speechless
He looks stunned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
77. Warner is lying. Plain and simple.
America is a war crime nation already...and this bill just codifies those war crimes.

America is not living up to those treaties of 1949.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #77
85. Making no sense at all
Edited on Thu Sep-28-06 01:51 PM by Marie26
Trying to say the sunset provision will make the world think we don't live up to our treatises? For sunseting a bill that violates the Geneva Convention? :crazy: I'm speechless too. It's surreal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spuddonna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
78. GET HIM BYRD!
Warner trying to say that if his bill is passed it'll mess with our International Treaties...

I don't get cable TV past the local channels. Is this being broadcast on CNN or anywhere else? Just interested...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #78
81. You can stream it over the net -- cspan.org
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spuddonna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #81
87. Thanks!
I am watching it on the internet, but I was just interested if any other news outlets (CNN?ha!) were broadcasting this. It's such an important piece of legislation, I can't believe that it is being ignored!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #78
83. C-SPAN feed link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #78
86. CSPAN2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
84. Byrd is now 'flabberghasted' -- yielding 3 minutes to Levin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BelgianMadCow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #84
89. Levin : he (Byrd), in his presence in this body, is THE safeguard
on the constitution. Asks to be added as cosponsor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BelgianMadCow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #89
96. Obama up, makes excellent point
namely this bill is related to the war on terror, but there will be no emperor to concede defeat in this war. So who knows when it ends ? Therefore, a need for sunset just like in this Patriot Act.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BelgianMadCow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:56 PM
Original message
In the 5 years passed, not ONE terrorist tried. And SC said unconstitutio
nal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #84
91. Levin: "We are the body that must protect the Constitution" he co-sponsors
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
88. Levin is standing up to back Sen. Byrd
"We are the body that must protect the Constitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
92. Obama up for 5 minutes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #92
95. Obama - "Congress has abrogated it's oversight responsibility"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
93. Sen. Barack Obama -- amendment co-sponsor -- up now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
94. Barack Obama!
I saw him speak in October 04.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #94
97. Tee-Hee -- he's reminding them that Bush's days are numbered
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #94
98. he is calling them out on this being fuel for attack ads
:bounce: :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #98
101. HRC did the same thing earlier.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #94
99. "What we are doing here today should be bigger than politics." Obama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #94
102. The more I see of Obama the more I like him.
I'm starting to wonder if he would be a good Democratic presidential nominee in '08. We would lose the bigot vote but most of them are already voting Republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #102
103. He was absolutely stunning last night after the debate on the Specter
amendment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
100. Obama "I am dissapointed, because a debate over fundamental
human rights should be above politics"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
104. How can they turn down a sunset?
The GOP is insane
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BelgianMadCow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #104
107. They plan to stay in power forever? Otherwise, it makes no sense indeed
Edited on Thu Sep-28-06 01:57 PM by BelgianMadCow
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Voltaire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #107
113. You are correct
They NEVER intend to leave. And everything we do in response to this madness should be done with that salient point in mind, they NEVER intend to leave. We are all the way through the looking glass with these people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #104
111. delete-posted in the wrong place oops
Edited on Thu Sep-28-06 02:05 PM by acmejack
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #104
112. Yes ma'am, they are!
Neat new picture there. If it is not that new, you'll have to excuse me, I've going insane(r) at the events of the last few days. I have undoubtedly pissed off some of my contemporaries here to the extent that there will soon be a knock on my door and it will be a "punch in the nose-a-gram"! Ouch!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
105. WTF..
Warner only allows him 1 minute instead of 2 because of time constraints!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #105
109. Well, it is his time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
106. ~*~*~*~ THREAD 6 ~*~*~*~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #106
108. thanks for the new threads Cornfield
I did that once for a debate in December.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
110. Protecting America means protecting her laws
it means not doing the horrible - especially in the worst of time...of eroding those laws.

by changing our laws government is saying to us...America only works in the best of time but when faced with a crisis, America resorts to the thinking of tyrants and that screams America doesn't really work



The nature of our laws are to protect the innocent by giving the suspected guilty full and complete due process....even when that means the guilty walk free...because we believe it is better for a guilty person to walk than it is for a single innocent person to ever hang for something they didn't do




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Jun 01st 2024, 08:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC