|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
![]() |
undeterred
![]() |
Sat Sep-02-06 05:02 PM Original message |
Poll question: Could a September 11 type attack have happened on Clinton's watch? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KingFlorez
![]() |
Sat Sep-02-06 05:04 PM Response to Original message |
1. No, he would have paid more attention |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Monkeyman
![]() |
Sat Sep-02-06 05:05 PM Response to Original message |
2. Look who stopped the millenium attack |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Patchuli
![]() |
Mon Sep-04-06 01:54 AM Response to Reply #2 |
60. * was the "millenium attack!" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha
![]() |
Sat Sep-02-06 05:05 PM Response to Original message |
3. It wouldn't have happened on Gore's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
baldguy
![]() |
Sat Sep-02-06 05:08 PM Response to Original message |
4. They waited until Clinton left office. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gratuitous
![]() |
Sat Sep-02-06 11:53 PM Response to Reply #4 |
48. Yep, because the first time they tried it . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wapsie B
![]() |
Sat Sep-02-06 05:10 PM Response to Original message |
5. Clinton was much more vigilant with regards to intelligence. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Sat Sep-02-06 05:11 PM Response to Original message |
6. Clinton was more aware |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
haydukelives
![]() |
Sat Sep-02-06 05:11 PM Response to Original message |
7. I picked number two |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JI7
![]() |
Sat Sep-02-06 05:13 PM Response to Original message |
8. they stopped the plan to blow up the LAX |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iamjoy
![]() |
Sat Sep-02-06 05:45 PM Response to Reply #8 |
19. Limitations - Why I Said Other |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
C_U_L8R
![]() |
Sat Sep-02-06 05:13 PM Response to Original message |
9. It didn't - nuff said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BOSSHOG
![]() |
Sat Sep-02-06 05:14 PM Response to Original message |
10. Unlike bush, President Clinton did not need nor want an attack |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
never_get_over_it
![]() |
Sat Sep-02-06 05:16 PM Response to Original message |
11. Actually I think you need another option |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taxloss
![]() |
Sat Sep-02-06 05:19 PM Response to Original message |
12. Yes. It almost did - the first WTC bombing, 1993. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
11 Bravo
![]() |
Sat Sep-02-06 05:27 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. And where are THOSE perps? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wakeme2008
![]() |
Sat Sep-02-06 05:38 PM Response to Reply #13 |
17. But 11B it Could happened on Clinton's Watch |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
11 Bravo
![]() |
Sat Sep-02-06 08:11 PM Response to Reply #17 |
33. Good point! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
undeterred
![]() |
Sat Sep-02-06 11:30 PM Response to Reply #17 |
46. Yeah, because that really put the nation at risk |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar
![]() |
Sun Sep-03-06 11:46 AM Response to Reply #17 |
56. Hey if Bill had a good sex life |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yupster
![]() |
Sat Sep-02-06 09:40 PM Response to Reply #13 |
45. And the WTC hijackers are dead |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chat_noir
![]() |
Sat Sep-02-06 06:06 PM Response to Reply #12 |
21. responses to FReepers and their ilk |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taxloss
![]() |
Sat Sep-02-06 06:27 PM Response to Reply #21 |
23. Exactly. Even if the attack had been as bad as was intended, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar
![]() |
Sun Sep-03-06 11:45 AM Response to Reply #21 |
54. Exactly. Plus the fact that 911 started really gearing up in Jan. 2001 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZBlue
![]() |
Mon Sep-04-06 01:42 AM Response to Reply #12 |
59. Exactly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mabus
![]() |
Sat Sep-02-06 05:34 PM Response to Original message |
14. Other |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut
![]() |
Sat Sep-02-06 05:35 PM Response to Original message |
15. Who would want Clinton to be a "courageous wartime President"??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nobody
![]() |
Sat Sep-02-06 05:38 PM Response to Original message |
16. Already happened in 1993 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
physioex
![]() |
Sat Sep-02-06 05:42 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. Yea.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chat_noir
![]() |
Sat Sep-02-06 06:03 PM Response to Reply #18 |
20. counting down the minutes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mp3hound
![]() |
Sat Sep-02-06 08:37 PM Response to Reply #16 |
36. I agree with that. It still would have happened but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warpy
![]() |
Sat Sep-02-06 06:24 PM Response to Original message |
22. He'd have paid more attention to the warnings |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Straight Story
![]() |
Sat Sep-02-06 06:30 PM Response to Original message |
24. I voted Yes (Oklahoma City Bombing) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
U4ikLefty
![]() |
Sat Sep-02-06 06:48 PM Response to Reply #24 |
27. I don't recall the "McVeigh Determined to Attack the United States" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Straight Story
![]() |
Sat Sep-02-06 06:57 PM Response to Reply #27 |
28. Maybe cause the intelligence sucked? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
U4ikLefty
![]() |
Sat Sep-02-06 07:52 PM Response to Reply #28 |
29. But you voted yes, yet Bush was warned 50+ times by intelligence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Straight Story
![]() |
Sat Sep-02-06 08:14 PM Response to Reply #29 |
34. No further then to look then at cooperative research and 9/11 timeline |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ignacio Upton
![]() |
Sat Sep-02-06 06:35 PM Response to Original message |
25. It's hard to say |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laylah
![]() |
Sat Sep-02-06 06:39 PM Response to Original message |
26. I voted other because |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hogwyld
![]() |
Sat Sep-02-06 07:58 PM Response to Original message |
30. We all know * orchestrated 9/11 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SammyWinstonJack
![]() |
Sat Sep-02-06 08:17 PM Response to Reply #30 |
35. ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bucky
![]() |
Sat Sep-02-06 09:21 PM Response to Reply #30 |
42. Some of us "all" aren't quite so impressed w/Bush's organizational skills. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
undeterred
![]() |
Sat Sep-02-06 09:23 PM Response to Reply #42 |
44. He assigned it to his VP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bucky
![]() |
Sun Sep-03-06 11:45 AM Response to Reply #44 |
55. The same VP who organized the Iraq & WMD plans? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hogwyld
![]() |
Sun Sep-03-06 03:54 AM Response to Reply #42 |
49. Not by himself |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bucky
![]() |
Sun Sep-03-06 11:26 AM Response to Reply #49 |
51. Is this the same "warped genius" that planned Iraq, Katrina relief... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hogwyld
![]() |
Sun Sep-03-06 11:15 PM Response to Reply #51 |
58. You just don't get it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pitohui
![]() |
Sat Sep-02-06 08:08 PM Response to Original message |
31. we already know the answer -- nope, didn't happen on his watch |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron
![]() |
Sat Sep-02-06 08:09 PM Response to Original message |
32. It's hard to say, but the Katrina fiasco certainly wouldn't have happened |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JAbuchan08
![]() |
Sat Sep-02-06 08:41 PM Response to Original message |
37. No, because Al Queda needed Bush in power to achieve his |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
undeterred
![]() |
Sat Sep-02-06 09:04 PM Response to Reply #37 |
40. Exactly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wildbilln864
![]() |
Sat Sep-02-06 08:46 PM Response to Original message |
38. 911 happened ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mvd
![]() |
Sat Sep-02-06 08:49 PM Response to Original message |
39. Probably not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bucky
![]() |
Sat Sep-02-06 09:16 PM Response to Original message |
41. Border patrol stopped the Millenium plot cause Bill read his PDBs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MiniMe
![]() |
Sat Sep-02-06 09:21 PM Response to Original message |
43. Possibly could have happened, but he definitely would have paid... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Bacon
![]() |
Sat Sep-02-06 11:38 PM Response to Original message |
47. Clinton would have stopped it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CJCRANE
![]() |
Sun Sep-03-06 04:27 AM Response to Original message |
50. Other: The PNAC crew |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marr
![]() |
Sun Sep-03-06 11:41 AM Response to Original message |
52. I don't believe for a second that GW Bush orchestrated 9-11. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar
![]() |
Sun Sep-03-06 11:42 AM Response to Original message |
53. I think his Administration would have paid more attention to the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dansolo
![]() |
Sun Sep-03-06 12:02 PM Response to Original message |
57. With Louis Freeh as the head of the FBI, yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rainscents
![]() |
Mon Sep-04-06 02:07 AM Response to Original message |
61. No, definitely NOT! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pinto
![]() |
Mon Sep-04-06 02:11 AM Response to Original message |
62. To be honest, does it matter now? 5 years later? The pressing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Mon Jun 17th 2024, 10:02 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC