|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
![]() |
B2G
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 10:15 AM Original message |
Reuters admits altering Beirut photo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 10:22 AM Response to Original message |
1. Take everything from most media sources with a grain of salt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kagemusha
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 10:22 AM Response to Original message |
2. Let me guess, the dead kids were cloned images too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
B2G
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 10:25 AM Response to Reply #2 |
3. I'm certainly not suggesting that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
insane_cratic_gal
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 12:08 PM Response to Reply #3 |
89. Have you been listening to Limbaugh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cushla_machree
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 02:48 PM Response to Reply #3 |
130. thats the whole point of media today |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 10:54 AM Response to Reply #2 |
30. Deleted sub-thread |
izzie
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 11:45 AM Response to Reply #2 |
71. Maybe it is like the DOD and the 'same vase' thing? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
midnight
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 12:52 PM Response to Reply #71 |
107. We deem any group that goes against Halliburton's wishes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
izzie
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 09:40 PM Response to Reply #107 |
190. By two guys with those name. I bet both ex-army big wigs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dogday
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 10:27 AM Response to Original message |
4. It amazes me what people take issue with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClassWarrior
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 10:32 AM Response to Reply #4 |
10. It amazes me that some people... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dogday
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 10:44 AM Response to Reply #10 |
15. What are you talking about? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClassWarrior
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 10:51 AM Response to Reply #15 |
23. So because there are deaths, we can't hold the media accountable?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dogday
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 10:58 AM Response to Reply #23 |
33. Sometimes one can be quick to judge and in this case you are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClassWarrior
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 11:03 AM Response to Reply #33 |
37. You "never said a thing about the OP"?? Then who are the "people"... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dogday
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 11:04 AM Response to Reply #37 |
39. I was referring to the article itself |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 11:24 AM Response to Reply #4 |
54. Maybe that's exagerated too? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dogday
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 11:40 AM Response to Reply #54 |
69. 1 death is too many |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 11:46 AM Response to Reply #69 |
72. So the number of lies told are irrelevant |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dogday
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 12:03 PM Response to Reply #72 |
83. The number of people dying on each side |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 12:08 PM Response to Reply #83 |
90. Wow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dogday
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 12:10 PM Response to Reply #90 |
93. I don't know what is so bold about wanting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 12:13 PM Response to Reply #93 |
96. I understand that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dogday
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 12:15 PM Response to Reply #96 |
97. Not with this Government |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
barb162
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 03:49 PM Response to Reply #96 |
146. Reuters should be unbiased in this; glad they are admitting it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truedelphi
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 12:34 PM Response to Reply #4 |
101. I agree with your sentiments; However |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 06:57 PM Response to Reply #4 |
182. We know the deaths are real but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CJCRANE
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 10:28 AM Response to Original message |
5. Seems counter-productive |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oasis
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 12:53 PM Response to Reply #5 |
108. "Memogate" or "Rathergate" smells like it. (eom) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemonFighterLives
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 06:45 PM Response to Reply #108 |
179. I was thinking the same exact thing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ReadTomPaine
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 10:29 AM Response to Original message |
6. Here's a quote from the article: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scurrilous
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 10:36 AM Response to Reply #6 |
12. Littlegreenfootballs (LGF)... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 11:26 AM Response to Reply #12 |
57. I had heard earlier in the week that the righties were looking at |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Midlodemocrat
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 10:53 AM Response to Reply #6 |
24. LGF is a right wing site. Like FR. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_Tires
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 12:05 PM Response to Reply #6 |
85. that tells me all i need to know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truedelphi
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 12:38 PM Response to Reply #6 |
103. Oooh, Phew, the stench of the Ministry of Propaganda is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truedelphi
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 12:51 PM Response to Reply #103 |
105. Here's a recent URL leading to Fisk |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Webster Green
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 10:29 AM Response to Original message |
7. That is some really crappy Photoshop editing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poll_Blind
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 10:31 AM Response to Reply #7 |
9. Yes, who is this photographer and what are their real motives? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 11:11 AM Response to Reply #9 |
42. Makes you wonder |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bperci108
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 11:59 AM Response to Reply #42 |
81. I would call it a pre-emptive strike. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ContraBass Black
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 03:58 PM Response to Reply #7 |
147. The print editor must have been working with eyes closed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poll_Blind
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 10:31 AM Response to Original message |
8. SEE Manipulated and Unmanipuled images HERE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ReadTomPaine
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 10:33 AM Response to Reply #8 |
11. Thanks for these, I was trying to find shots of sufficient size.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Yossarian Joad
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 10:36 AM Response to Reply #8 |
13. Crappy use of the clone stamp... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lerkfish
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 10:43 AM Response to Reply #8 |
14. looks more to me that the photog was trying to stretch the depth of the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mayberry Machiavelli
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 10:46 AM Response to Reply #14 |
17. That's the funny thing, not sure what this photoshop was actually supposed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 10:54 AM Response to Reply #17 |
29. What it adds is a second bomb impact |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lerkfish
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 11:01 AM Response to Reply #29 |
35. er...I don't see that at all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 11:15 AM Response to Reply #35 |
46. Really? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 11:35 AM Response to Reply #29 |
65. No, it doesn't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mayberry Machiavelli
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 09:00 PM Response to Reply #29 |
187. I can't say it looks much like that to my untrained eyes. Even if it did, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cessna Invesco Palin
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 10:45 AM Response to Reply #8 |
16. A PHOTOGRAPHER did that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
derby378
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 10:54 AM Response to Reply #16 |
28. How much IS that schmuch being paid, anyway? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 11:30 AM Response to Reply #28 |
60. You can clearly see the repeating of buildings. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 10:48 AM Response to Reply #8 |
18. Why, it's almost like the photographer WANTED to discredit... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poll_Blind
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 11:48 AM Response to Reply #18 |
75. Arguable point from the extremely amateurish nature of the forgery. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 11:51 AM Response to Reply #75 |
78. It's following the same trajectory as Rathergate... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
QuestionAll...
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 11:51 AM Response to Reply #18 |
77. so now whenever a bona fide pic of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blonndee
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 11:56 AM Response to Reply #77 |
80. It seems to be "the program" right here on this thread! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poll_Blind
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 12:04 PM Response to Reply #80 |
84. Yep, I'm noticing the profile of that starting to form too. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cocoa
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 10:50 AM Response to Reply #8 |
21. where did you get those? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poll_Blind
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 11:07 AM Response to Reply #21 |
41. (See inside) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cocoa
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 11:14 AM Response to Reply #41 |
45. regarding the "picture kill" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poll_Blind
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 11:31 AM Response to Reply #45 |
61. The one I grabbed was definitely from a larger version of the... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cocoa
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 11:38 AM Response to Reply #61 |
67. thanks for those links |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MsMagnificent
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 04:27 PM Response to Reply #41 |
149. On the one you posted link to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
B2G
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 04:39 PM Response to Reply #149 |
152. It has been |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MsMagnificent
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 04:47 PM Response to Reply #152 |
154. If you're referring to 185 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
B2G
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 04:54 PM Response to Reply #154 |
156. It';s the yahoo imaging site |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maddezmom
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 05:34 PM Response to Reply #154 |
172. reuters has a link up now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occulus
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 11:15 AM Response to Reply #8 |
47. What was THAT trying to accomplish? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Schema Thing
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 11:17 AM Response to Reply #8 |
49. It's obvious the manipulator was trying toconjur up a Black Panther |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mr_Spock
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 11:39 AM Response to Reply #8 |
68. The original looks real |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bling bling
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 04:10 PM Response to Reply #8 |
148. I just "manipulated" the original on my computer & got similar results. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Up2Late
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 04:32 PM Response to Reply #8 |
150. I smell a RAT! This is too poorly done for anyone to have seriously... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CJCRANE
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 10:48 AM Response to Original message |
19. This is probably a Dan Rather Memogate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cocoa
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 10:49 AM Response to Original message |
20. I don't accept THIS story as fact |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mayberry Machiavelli
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 10:50 AM Response to Reply #20 |
22. I certainly never heard of "ynetnews.com" until this moment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 11:17 AM Response to Reply #22 |
48. Never heard of YNetNews? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
B2G
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 10:54 AM Response to Reply #20 |
27. From Reuters PR person |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeachBuckeye
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 11:12 AM Response to Reply #27 |
44. What an idiotic assertion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
B2G
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 11:18 AM Response to Reply #44 |
50. Excuse me, but are you talking to me? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 11:23 AM Response to Reply #44 |
53. *shrug* don't forget the "baby milk factory" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeachBuckeye
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 11:50 AM Response to Reply #53 |
76. I remember it well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
B2G
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 11:54 AM Response to Reply #76 |
79. I haven't seen anyone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richard Steele
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 11:21 AM Response to Reply #20 |
52. Nor can I. The Reuters site itself seems to have no mention of it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maddezmom
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 05:06 PM Response to Reply #52 |
165. Reuter's link here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richard Steele
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 02:25 AM Response to Reply #165 |
200. Thanks MM! I owe you (another) one. nm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MissWaverly
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 10:53 AM Response to Original message |
25. I wish we worried more about the images of those dead kids |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 10:55 AM Response to Reply #25 |
32. Deleted sub-thread |
asthmaticeog
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 10:53 AM Response to Original message |
26. That is, without a doubt, one of the shittiest P-Shop jobs I've ever seen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poll_Blind
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 11:33 AM Response to Reply #26 |
63. You got that right. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poll_Blind
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 10:55 AM Response to Original message |
31. This photoshop is so incredibly bad as to arguably raise questions... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Truthiness Inspector
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 11:03 AM Response to Reply #31 |
38. Good question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wakeme2008
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 11:00 AM Response to Original message |
34. Here is a good web page with the dup buildings and smoke |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poll_Blind
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 11:24 AM Response to Reply #34 |
56. Ah thanks! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Stranger
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 11:01 AM Response to Original message |
36. But still no question IDF was bombing the shit out of innocents, right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 11:05 AM Response to Reply #36 |
40. Right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solo_in_MD
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 11:12 AM Response to Original message |
43. No wonder the M$M is in a death spiral |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 11:21 AM Response to Original message |
51. Fucking liars |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
w4rma
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 11:24 AM Response to Original message |
55. Oh, I thought this was a photo that mattered. Smoke vs. less smoke. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poll_Blind
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 11:26 AM Response to Reply #55 |
58. Pretty much. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 11:48 AM Response to Reply #58 |
74. I looked at both pix a long time....couldn't see what the big deal is, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
B2G
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 11:29 AM Response to Reply #55 |
59. Who gets to decide |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 11:33 AM Response to Reply #59 |
64. There was interest in another Qana picture. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
B2G
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 11:38 AM Response to Reply #64 |
66. I believe it was the same photographer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 11:43 AM Response to Reply #66 |
70. I agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 12:11 PM Response to Reply #66 |
94. Yes, there are no Dead Children and Elderly ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
w4rma
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 12:19 PM Response to Reply #66 |
99. Except with that picture photographers from the AP, AFP and Reuters were |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
theHandpuppet
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 11:32 AM Response to Original message |
62. No integrity and no excuse! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poll_Blind
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 11:46 AM Response to Reply #62 |
73. SELF-DELETE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
B2G
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 12:03 PM Response to Original message |
82. Here's another photo by the same guy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poll_Blind
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 12:06 PM Response to Reply #82 |
87. What about the smoke? Load up MSPaint, circle in red what you... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
B2G
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 12:10 PM Response to Reply #87 |
92. Or I could save myself a bunch of time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 12:06 PM Response to Original message |
86. Deleted message |
Poll_Blind
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 12:07 PM Response to Reply #86 |
88. SELF-DELETE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 12:08 PM Response to Reply #88 |
91. Deleted sub-thread |
SPKrazy
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 12:52 PM Response to Reply #86 |
106. Now That Is A Great Conspiracy Theory |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MissWaverly
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 12:57 PM Response to Reply #106 |
109. well, let's not bash them over the head |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 01:02 PM Response to Reply #106 |
110. Deleted sub-thread |
Junkdrawer
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 12:11 PM Response to Original message |
95. OMG! Clearly that "photo" was done with MS Word and NOT... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 12:19 PM Response to Reply #95 |
98. Great minds think alike ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seafan
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 12:30 PM Response to Original message |
100. What strikes me is that the whole object of this manipulated photograph |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
breakaleg
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 12:36 PM Response to Original message |
102. based on the 2 photos shown here, there's hardly any difference |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
insane_cratic_gal
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 12:41 PM Response to Original message |
104. These other photos he took are fine |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poll_Blind
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 01:20 PM Response to Reply #104 |
112. His name is Adnan Hajj (the photographer) and I agree with you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mogster
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 01:18 PM Response to Original message |
111. If they photoshop it, why not try to do it convincingly? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poll_Blind
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 01:24 PM Response to Reply #111 |
113. The photographer is Adnan Hajj and he took some of the pictures... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mogster
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 01:41 PM Response to Reply #113 |
115. This is an infowar, alright |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ConsAreLiars
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 01:36 PM Response to Original message |
114. Your heading is deceptive. Reuters admitted no such thing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MissWaverly
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 01:44 PM Response to Reply #114 |
116. Thanks for the post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
B2G
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 02:16 PM Response to Reply #114 |
120. How is the "headline" misleading? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ConsAreLiars
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 02:31 PM Response to Reply #120 |
122. Where does Reuters "admit altering" the photo. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
B2G
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 02:35 PM Response to Reply #122 |
123. Thanks for the lecture, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ConsAreLiars
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 02:47 PM Response to Reply #123 |
129. The statement was not supported by the "facts" that were alleged in the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
B2G
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 02:49 PM Response to Reply #129 |
131. Jesus |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ConsAreLiars
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 02:56 PM Response to Reply #131 |
133. No, It was posting false information that got my attention. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
B2G
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 02:58 PM Response to Reply #133 |
135. Are you always this illogical |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ConsAreLiars
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 03:07 PM Response to Reply #135 |
137. Do you now admit that the heading of your post was false? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
B2G
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 03:12 PM Response to Reply #137 |
138. God, you are like a dog with a bone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greyl
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 03:42 PM Response to Reply #138 |
144. I think your post is the bone, B2G. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
struggle4progress
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 01:51 PM Response to Original message |
117. Apparently misleading headline. Strange, largely unconfirmed story. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 01:54 PM Response to Reply #117 |
118. Deleted message |
Name removed
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 02:27 PM Response to Reply #118 |
121. Deleted message |
struggle4progress
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 02:56 PM Response to Reply #118 |
132. In a way, I'd really rather not express any opinion: the noise machine .. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poll_Blind
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 02:14 PM Response to Original message |
119. Thread opened in the Propaganda Debunking forum for those... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marie26
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 11:14 PM Response to Reply #119 |
193. I don't get it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poll_Blind
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 02:37 PM Response to Original message |
124. In doing some simple research for the Propaganda Debunking thread... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
B2G
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 02:40 PM Response to Reply #124 |
125. If Hajj didn't alter the photo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poll_Blind
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 02:45 PM Response to Reply #125 |
127. The number of points at which the image could haev been altered... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poll_Blind
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 02:41 PM Response to Original message |
126. Also, Reuters does not appear to have admitted anything about the... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
B2G
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 02:45 PM Response to Reply #126 |
128. This is all I can find |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poll_Blind
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 03:00 PM Response to Reply #128 |
136. That's not perfect, but still pretty good. Thanks. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maddezmom
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 05:03 PM Response to Reply #136 |
161. Reuter's link here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poll_Blind
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 02:57 PM Response to Original message |
134. Who wrote the copy "Reuters admits altering Beirut photo"? Yaakov Lappin? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poll_Blind
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 03:15 PM Response to Reply #134 |
139. According to Google News "Reuters admits" was first used.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
B2G
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 03:23 PM Response to Reply #139 |
140. I understand your quest here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poll_Blind
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 03:32 PM Response to Reply #140 |
142. Reuters is pulling the picture they apparently distributed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
k_jerome
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 03:32 PM Response to Original message |
141. thank you posting this... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrPrax
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 03:38 PM Response to Original message |
143. In googling... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OKNancy
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 03:45 PM Response to Original message |
145. kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MsMagnificent
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 04:39 PM Response to Original message |
151. WE'RE BEING TAKEN FOR A RIDE, FOLKS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
B2G
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 04:43 PM Response to Reply #151 |
153. No, you're not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MsMagnificent
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 04:52 PM Response to Reply #153 |
155. No? I'm still waiting for you to tell us who d.yimg.com is... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
B2G
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 04:58 PM Response to Reply #155 |
159. And I answered you upthread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MsMagnificent
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 05:06 PM Response to Reply #159 |
164. Which states: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jazz2006
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 05:08 PM Response to Reply #164 |
167. Psst, see Reuters link |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MsMagnificent
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 05:25 PM Response to Reply #167 |
170. ty, I will :) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
twenty4blackbirds
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 05:06 PM Response to Reply #155 |
163. There was one doctored smoke photo. But the kids were real :-( |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jazz2006
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 04:55 PM Response to Reply #151 |
157. It was published as a Reuters photo - later "corrected" - link: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maddezmom
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 05:02 PM Response to Reply #151 |
160. Reuter's link up now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
B2G
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 05:09 PM Response to Reply #160 |
168. Thank you very much |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MsMagnificent
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 06:25 PM Response to Reply #160 |
177. Well OK then |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bling bling
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 04:56 PM Response to Original message |
158. Connection between this and Qana photos? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poll_Blind
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 08:43 PM Response to Reply #158 |
185. Yep, I noticed that too. They'd like you to believe that this guy... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poll_Blind
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 05:04 PM Response to Original message |
162. Reuters drops freelance Lebanese photographer over image |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mogster
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 05:26 PM Response to Reply #162 |
171. "Removing dust marks", lol |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poll_Blind
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 05:40 PM Response to Reply #171 |
173. No, I didn't mean to imply that anyone at Reuters set him up. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mogster
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 06:51 PM Response to Reply #173 |
181. Come on, PB |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poll_Blind
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 08:36 PM Response to Reply #181 |
183. I think you misread something in my reply #162. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mogster
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 05:11 AM Response to Reply #183 |
202. Awright, PB |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Up2Late
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 12:24 PM Response to Reply #202 |
203. What are they saying about the photos you posted? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mogster
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 01:59 PM Response to Reply #203 |
204. It was a combination of two photos |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Up2Late
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 02:18 PM Response to Reply #204 |
205. Whoever is saying the two photos were combined is wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
twenty4blackbirds
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 05:07 PM Response to Original message |
166. This heading is sooo misleading. Reuters didn't, the photographer did it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
B2G
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 05:12 PM Response to Reply #166 |
169. Jesus H Christ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
twenty4blackbirds
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 05:52 PM Response to Reply #169 |
174. I am me, I am not DU. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poll_Blind
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 06:03 PM Response to Reply #169 |
175. Almost 25% of your posts at DU are contained in this single thread. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gatorboy
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 06:13 PM Response to Original message |
176. Little Green Footballs is credited for catching this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rex
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 06:27 PM Response to Original message |
178. That is the worst 'cloning' I've ever seen. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Balbus
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 06:48 PM Response to Original message |
180. Fuck Reuters. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poll_Blind
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 08:41 PM Response to Reply #180 |
184. Oh, what evidence do you have that Reuters intentionally misled anyone? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Balbus
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 12:49 AM Response to Reply #184 |
195. They printed a bullshit, doctored photo. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crabby Appleton
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 08:54 PM Response to Original message |
186. Here is a thread of sports photographers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poll_Blind
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 09:15 PM Response to Reply #186 |
188. Already posted here. Curious how such an obscure forum thread... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 09:20 PM Response to Original message |
189. Can Someone Tell Me The Point In This? I'm Missing Something. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 10:15 PM Response to Reply #189 |
191. I said the same thing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poll_Blind
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 01:10 AM Response to Reply #191 |
197. Indeed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gatorboy
![]() |
Sun Aug-06-06 11:13 PM Response to Reply #189 |
192. That the original photo is out there, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtice
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 12:16 AM Response to Reply #192 |
194. There's a lot of conspiracy theory going on here... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poll_Blind
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 01:07 AM Response to Reply #194 |
196. "At what point are we encouraging such behavior by reacting to incidents.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtice
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 01:23 AM Response to Reply #196 |
198. It should sway any educated person |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 01:32 AM Response to Original message |
199. Anybody who is familiar with Photoshop and the clone tool |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maalak
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 03:42 AM Response to Original message |
201. why were my posts in this thread deleted? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Fri Jun 21st 2024, 03:47 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC