|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Guy Fawkes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 12:24 PM Original message |
I DO support the Green Party! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 12:27 PM Response to Original message |
1. Prepare yourself, the flames are coming |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 02:44 PM Response to Reply #1 |
79. Great for someone who supports Rick Santorum |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TechBear_Seattle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 12:30 PM Response to Original message |
2. Careful, they ban people for speaking out like that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flyarm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 12:33 PM Response to Original message |
3. They don't back down on environmental or privacy issues. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guy Fawkes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 12:37 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. If people were more supportive of third-parties... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flyarm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 01:01 PM Response to Reply #6 |
14. no ..at this point in our history Third parties only split our votes.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guy Fawkes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 01:22 PM Response to Reply #14 |
29. First: this isn't a one party system |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gully (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 01:40 PM Response to Reply #29 |
49. But this IS a ONE PARTY discussion board. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guy Fawkes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 01:44 PM Response to Reply #49 |
54. 1.) Nader != end all of Green Party politicians. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gully (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 01:48 PM Response to Reply #54 |
55. 1. This board is for Democrats and other progressives who SUPPORT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cgrindley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-02-06 08:46 AM Response to Reply #49 |
183. Thanks for defining the party so perfectly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flyarm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 01:50 PM Response to Reply #29 |
56. EXCUSE ME...THIS IS A ONE PARTY GOVERNMENT RIGHT NOW.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guy Fawkes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 02:02 PM Response to Reply #56 |
62. This isn't facism... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flyarm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 02:28 PM Response to Reply #62 |
72. how do you know many aren't speaking up??..by our media?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krkaufman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 06:16 PM Response to Reply #72 |
130. Exactly. Where are all the Green Party candidates on the nightly news? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vssmith (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 02:46 PM Response to Reply #56 |
80. One could be a little more polite! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flyarm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 04:09 PM Original message |
i am out of polite.. the well is dry since this is one of several threads |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 04:46 PM Response to Original message |
101. I am so on your team!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gully (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 05:33 PM Response to Original message |
123. "i am out of polite" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vssmith (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 08:46 PM Response to Original message |
161. You mention "The Rules" -- check rule 3. Civility |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flyarm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 09:01 PM Response to Reply #161 |
162. i see you are new here...welcome to du.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flyarm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 04:09 PM Original message |
self delete du stuck on me!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flyarm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 04:09 PM Response to Reply #80 |
100. self delete dupe ..it multiple posted!! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 03:09 PM Response to Reply #56 |
81. Clearlly so now that republicans are buying Green candidates |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mike_c (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 12:35 PM Response to Original message |
4. K&R-- great post-- I too support the green party, and generally... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aint_no_life_nowhere (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 12:35 PM Response to Original message |
5. I agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bvar22 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 01:02 PM Response to Reply #5 |
15. The MAJORITY of Democrats voted AGAINST the IWR!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Perky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 12:39 PM Response to Original message |
7. The Green Party would be more effective if |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guy Fawkes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 12:42 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. That's a whole other beast, entirely... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meganmonkey (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 12:53 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jonnyblitz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 12:58 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. i know, that cracks me up. it also cracks me up that they are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meganmonkey (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 01:10 PM Response to Reply #12 |
21. Well, just like most Dem party leadership |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krkaufman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 06:25 PM Response to Reply #12 |
133. What reasons? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mrspeeker (671 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 01:09 PM Response to Reply #7 |
19. well actually it is pretty effective |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warpy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 12:50 PM Response to Original message |
9. When both parties are running putrid candidates |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
patcox2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 12:55 PM Response to Original message |
11. Then go be irrelevant on GreenUnderground. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guy Fawkes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 12:58 PM Response to Reply #11 |
13. This is a place for liberals and progressives. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frylock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 01:29 PM Response to Reply #13 |
42. i've gone straight ticket for the last three elections.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flyarm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 01:11 PM Response to Reply #11 |
22. there is a place here for all points of view..but and i say with a caveat. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mrspeeker (671 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 01:13 PM Response to Reply #11 |
23. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
patcox2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 02:14 PM Response to Reply #23 |
69. Think so? I am a Democrat. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
warrens (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 01:02 PM Response to Original message |
16. Absolutely not true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guy Fawkes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 01:09 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. I concede the point: 3.9% of the vote.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
warrens (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 01:24 PM Response to Reply #18 |
33. It wouldn't have been easy to rig it in NH |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ron Green (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 01:04 PM Response to Original message |
17. I'll never forget the "debates" of 2000, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gully (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 01:21 PM Response to Reply #17 |
28. Consider that over 200 people ran for office in 2004 alone. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ron Green (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 01:26 PM Response to Reply #28 |
36. If Nader was capable of spoiling the deal, as many think he did, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gully (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 01:28 PM Response to Reply #36 |
39. At the expense of humanity huh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ron Green (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 01:55 PM Response to Reply #39 |
59. That's beside the point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gully (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 01:59 PM Response to Reply #59 |
61. We have as many ideas as we do people in this country. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ron Green (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 02:38 PM Response to Reply #61 |
77. And we have 4 or 5 or 6 different ways to group these ideas together, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gully (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 03:25 PM Response to Reply #77 |
85. Actually we have about 200 different ways to group these ideas together. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krkaufman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 06:43 PM Response to Reply #59 |
138. Here's step number one, then .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krkaufman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 06:38 PM Response to Reply #17 |
136. Wholly agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 01:09 PM Response to Original message |
20. in some states the margin was so narrow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mrspeeker (671 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 01:19 PM Response to Reply #20 |
26. BUSH versus GORE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gully (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 01:22 PM Response to Reply #26 |
31. Nader assisted in the rigging. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guy Fawkes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 01:24 PM Response to Reply #31 |
32. Do you have any proof of that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gully (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 01:25 PM Response to Reply #32 |
34. Yes, it's in my post above. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flyarm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 01:27 PM Response to Reply #32 |
37. HERE START READING HERE1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guy Fawkes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 01:30 PM Response to Reply #37 |
43. RALPH NADER HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH THE GREENS IN 2004! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gully (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 01:32 PM Response to Reply #43 |
44. The Greens wouldn't have him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flyarm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 02:02 PM Response to Reply #43 |
63. he did when he started running..then he was dismissed...so you are not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mrspeeker (671 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 01:38 PM Response to Reply #31 |
48. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gully (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 01:42 PM Response to Reply #48 |
51. You keep on putting words in peoples mouths and laugh all you want. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mrspeeker (671 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 02:05 PM Response to Reply #51 |
64. You said but present no facts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gully (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 02:18 PM Response to Reply #64 |
71. I presented the facts above. If you wish to absolve Nader of any |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krkaufman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 07:09 PM Response to Reply #64 |
147. I think the term "rigged" is over-the-top relative to Nader |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krkaufman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 06:55 PM Response to Reply #48 |
141. One thing does not negate the other. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krkaufman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 06:52 PM Response to Reply #26 |
140. Nader, election fraud, less-than-optimal campaigning, ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krkaufman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 06:48 PM Response to Reply #20 |
139. Please don't forget that it wasn't just the vote totals |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Redneck Socialist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 01:18 PM Response to Original message |
24. Well, NH and Florida would beg to differ with you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guy Fawkes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 01:26 PM Response to Reply #24 |
35. Okay, Florida was so obviously bogus... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flyarm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 01:29 PM Response to Reply #35 |
41. 90,000 votes nader took in fla in 2000... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guy Fawkes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 01:33 PM Response to Reply #41 |
46. 97,488 votes. And about 500-600 would've changed everything? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flyarm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 01:42 PM Response to Reply #46 |
50. oh pleaseeeeeeeeeeeee... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 04:51 PM Response to Reply #35 |
104. nice of you to skip over the NH vote in 2000 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gully (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 01:19 PM Response to Original message |
25. I have a salute of my own for Mr. Nader. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zalinda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 01:21 PM Response to Original message |
27. Then go support them some place else |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guy Fawkes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 01:29 PM Response to Reply #27 |
40. Oy, I'm not "bashing dems"... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Karenca (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 03:28 PM Response to Reply #40 |
88. No, The US would be alot better |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flyarm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 01:32 PM Response to Reply #27 |
45. thank you zalinda i couldn't say it better!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gully (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 01:43 PM Response to Reply #27 |
53. Bravo! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 01:22 PM Response to Original message |
30. We need a second party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mrspeeker (671 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 01:28 PM Response to Original message |
38. Folks us urging the rigged elections is ridiculous |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flyarm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 01:35 PM Response to Reply #38 |
47. i disagree..without nader in 2000 taking 90,000+ votes in fla |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mrspeeker (671 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 01:51 PM Response to Reply #47 |
57. hummm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flyarm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 02:05 PM Response to Reply #57 |
65. Mrspeeker..wha??????lol..n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lindacooks (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 06:28 PM Response to Reply #57 |
134. Ever heard of spellcheck? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CrispyQ (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 01:43 PM Response to Original message |
52. We need a party that will address corporate power. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mrspeeker (671 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 02:15 PM Response to Reply #52 |
70. the GOP paid for this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 02:37 PM Response to Reply #52 |
76. Yeah I'm supporting a party paid for by Republican money |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 01:52 PM Response to Original message |
58. The GOP supports the Green Party too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gully (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 01:56 PM Response to Reply #58 |
60. Huh, that's curious. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guy Fawkes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 02:07 PM Response to Reply #58 |
66. Here is how that works... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 02:12 PM Response to Reply #66 |
67. More accurately, the GOP are Green Party enablers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 02:39 PM Response to Reply #67 |
78. Give it up AK - they don't want to acknowledge they want Santorum to win |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
theanarch (523 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 03:25 PM Response to Reply #78 |
86. okay...let's see... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 03:52 PM Response to Reply #86 |
95. Deleted message |
theanarch (523 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 03:57 PM Response to Reply #95 |
96. i have edited my post... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 04:02 PM Response to Reply #96 |
98. YOu can eliminate about all of it but the choice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 04:49 PM Response to Reply #86 |
103. Oh btw, Caseys have been some of the biggest pro-environment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 02:36 PM Response to Reply #66 |
74. Get a fricking clue and your head out of your ass |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flyarm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 03:58 PM Response to Reply #74 |
97. hmmm there have been several threads here today... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seaglass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 02:14 PM Response to Original message |
68. Of course they aren't afraid to voice their opinions because |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 02:34 PM Response to Original message |
73. So you'd vote for a Green Party Candidate paid for by Rick Santorum |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guy Fawkes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 03:18 PM Response to Reply #73 |
83. So you enjoy putting words in my mouth? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 03:47 PM Response to Reply #83 |
93. Just as pathetic as how blind Greens are! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 02:37 PM Response to Original message |
75. I agree with them a helluva lot more than the "good cop" wing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Karenca (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 03:16 PM Response to Original message |
82. I do like the Green Party, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 03:18 PM Response to Original message |
84. well you can thank nader and crew to where we are today |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guy Fawkes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 03:28 PM Response to Reply #84 |
87. "Blame nader!" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 03:30 PM Response to Reply #87 |
91. BS, he knew how close it was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Meshuga (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 04:58 PM Response to Reply #91 |
109. I also resent Nader |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 05:41 PM Response to Reply #109 |
126. you and I are on the same page |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greguganus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 03:28 PM Response to Original message |
89. I agree! I'm voting Whig next election n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Karenca (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 03:29 PM Response to Original message |
90. This is a Democratic forum and I think this topic should be locked. EOM!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guy Fawkes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 03:37 PM Response to Reply #90 |
92. This is a Democratic forum, and as a Democrat, I resent free speech EOM!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Meshuga (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 04:54 PM Response to Reply #92 |
107. By your logic... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flyarm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 04:59 PM Original message |
read du rules ...this is a democratic forum .. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Meshuga (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 05:01 PM Response to Original message |
113. flyarm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flyarm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 05:09 PM Response to Reply #113 |
116. yeah sorry i realized that after i posted..having proibs with du right now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Meshuga (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 05:34 PM Response to Reply #116 |
125. No problem! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flyarm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 04:55 PM Response to Reply #92 |
108. yes this is a democratic forum and the rules state we support democratic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 03:49 PM Response to Reply #90 |
94. They're Green Supporters - They want to be indignant to anyone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Karenca (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 07:14 PM Response to Reply #94 |
150. 100% Agreed! ... EOM |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
557188 (494 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 04:06 PM Response to Original message |
99. I voted for Nader in 2000 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 04:49 PM Response to Original message |
102. Hooray for Republican dirty tricks!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 04:53 PM Response to Reply #102 |
106. My god these people won't even look at the proof - such idiots |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 04:59 PM Response to Reply #106 |
110. I'm damn tired of greens and libertarians ratfucking this forum |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
citizen snips (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 05:21 PM Response to Reply #110 |
120. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 05:25 PM Response to Reply #120 |
122. Or brazen dishonesty...as Santorum and his green chum are proving. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 05:33 PM Response to Reply #106 |
124. Cool. The lines are being drawn. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 06:59 PM Response to Reply #124 |
142. Wow, something we can agree upon |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 07:00 PM Response to Reply #142 |
143. There you go. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
citizen snips (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 04:52 PM Response to Original message |
105. go ahead and throw your vote right down the toilet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 05:00 PM Response to Reply #105 |
111. You know what's funny - I wouldn't have cared before today what they vote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flyarm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 05:06 PM Response to Reply #111 |
115. nader did the same damn thing ..and the greens sent him packing.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
citizen snips (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 05:14 PM Response to Reply #111 |
117. I agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 05:25 PM Response to Reply #117 |
121. Then you both are guilty of alienating progressives over the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flyarm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 06:08 PM Response to Reply #121 |
128. hardly one.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BooScout (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 05:00 PM Response to Original message |
112. Then you shouldn't be here... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 05:18 PM Response to Reply #112 |
118. Read it again, Boo, The rules say, you can support any party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flyarm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 06:36 PM Response to Reply #118 |
135. and what helps them cheat?? getting the race closer than it would have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 05:05 PM Response to Original message |
114. Fuck The Green Party And Those That Vote For Them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Codeblue (466 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 05:20 PM Response to Original message |
119. Interesting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 05:42 PM Response to Original message |
127. thanks for that New Hampshire vote in 2000 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krkaufman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 06:12 PM Response to Original message |
129. I support the Green Party and other third parties, too. I *love* them ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 07:10 PM Response to Reply #129 |
148. That's simply untrue. What they used to steal it was what they always |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krkaufman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 09:29 PM Response to Reply #148 |
165. "simply bull" -- well, not really. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-02-06 03:14 AM Response to Reply #165 |
176. For shame yourself for spreading disinformation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krkaufman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-02-06 01:13 PM Response to Reply #176 |
188. You have the right to your opinion, but not to misleading on the facts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AnOhioan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 09:17 PM Response to Reply #129 |
164. Thank you for one a the few intelligent posts on this thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krkaufman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 09:39 PM Response to Reply #164 |
167. Very welcome. Thanks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krkaufman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 06:24 PM Response to Original message |
131. Ok, for this thread to be this long without a single IRV-related comment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MaggieSwanson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 06:25 PM Response to Original message |
132. Dennis Kucinich voted against the PATRIOT Act |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guy Fawkes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 06:40 PM Response to Reply #132 |
137. What I should've said: Only 1 nay vote in the Senate... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gully (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 07:08 PM Response to Reply #137 |
146. So ONE independent and ONE Democrat - ZERO Greens. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 07:50 PM Response to Reply #146 |
154. That's "hindsight" n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gully (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 07:54 PM Response to Reply #154 |
155. Ah yes, so it is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MaggieSwanson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 07:27 PM Response to Reply #137 |
151. Much better. :) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 07:03 PM Response to Original message |
144. As far as I'm concerned, green party candidates are simply.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNN0LHI (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 10:06 PM Response to Reply #144 |
170. I am with you n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gully (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 07:06 PM Response to Original message |
145. "The GP isn't afraid to voice it's support of choice or gay marriage?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guy Fawkes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 07:13 PM Response to Reply #145 |
149. Nader is not the voice of the Green Party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gully (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 07:56 PM Response to Reply #149 |
156. And Clinton isn't the voice of the Democratic Party. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 07:43 PM Response to Reply #145 |
153. LOL! Ralph isn't a Green. Next? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gully (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 08:01 PM Response to Reply #153 |
157. common cause my ass. Nader isn't a green, true. But he was their |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 08:04 PM Response to Reply #157 |
158. It never occured to me that you don't know your ass from |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
roody (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 07:30 PM Response to Original message |
152. I hope that those who are intolerant |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mainegreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 09:01 PM Response to Reply #152 |
163. Ha! good point! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Duncan Grant (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 08:35 PM Response to Original message |
159. Those fucking Greens ruin everything! (cries, pouts and stamps foot) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 09:38 PM Response to Reply #159 |
166. So you suport a Green Candidate financed by the Republicans? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guy Fawkes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 09:55 PM Response to Reply #166 |
168. Okay, seriously... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Duncan Grant (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 11:08 PM Response to Reply #166 |
171. No LynneSin, I do not support a Green candidacy financed by Republicans. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
upi402 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 08:37 PM Response to Original message |
160. ME TOO! I lost my Democratic party somewhere in the cashpile |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GAPeace (314 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 09:57 PM Response to Original message |
169. I think we should support them at a local level, BUILD them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eridani (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 11:49 PM Response to Original message |
172. 59% of Dems in the legislative branch voted against the Iraq war |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fujiyama (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-02-06 12:32 AM Response to Original message |
173. The Green Party... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
w4rma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-02-06 12:45 AM Response to Original message |
174. That's too bad. The Green Party will always be used to keep liberals |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cynatnite (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-02-06 12:53 AM Response to Original message |
175. Then tell the Green Party to quit letting the repukes use them! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
adwon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-02-06 04:48 AM Response to Original message |
177. Third parties are generally useless |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-02-06 05:41 AM Response to Reply #177 |
178. Which must be why the Democrats had to bring in Bill Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
adwon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-02-06 06:52 AM Response to Reply #178 |
179. Exceptions always exist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-02-06 07:46 AM Response to Reply #179 |
180. I think that particular candidate is exceptional, in the best sense. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
adwon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-02-06 09:36 AM Response to Reply #180 |
186. Always an exception to the rule |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WilliamPitt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-02-06 07:50 AM Response to Original message |
181. Rick Santorum thanks you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-02-06 09:31 AM Response to Reply #181 |
185. Every party has its scum. And taking money from SANTORUM |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-02-06 08:43 AM Response to Original message |
182. I agree, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IronLionZion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-02-06 09:25 AM Response to Original message |
184. Greenish Underground! EOM |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
personman (959 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-02-06 09:50 AM Response to Original message |
187. A compromise? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat Jun 15th 2024, 03:54 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC