|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
![]() |
Tom Rinaldo
![]() |
Sat Jul-29-06 07:59 PM Original message |
Here's the New York Times Lamont Endorsement |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
panader0
![]() |
Sat Jul-29-06 08:03 PM Response to Original message |
1. Great editorial. It should be required reading in Conn. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
existentialist
![]() |
Sat Jul-29-06 08:04 PM Response to Original message |
2. Nice to see not only this endorsement, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gristy
![]() |
Sat Jul-29-06 08:18 PM Response to Original message |
3. Excellent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eric J in MN
![]() |
Sat Jul-29-06 08:20 PM Response to Original message |
4. To send a postcard to friends and relatvies in Connecticut... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eric J in MN
![]() |
Sat Jul-29-06 08:23 PM Response to Original message |
5. re opposing Bush "does not require shrillness " |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Senator
![]() |
Sat Jul-29-06 08:57 PM Response to Reply #5 |
11. Exactly, stopping neofascism DEMANDS both shrillness and absolutism |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eric J in MN
![]() |
Sat Jul-29-06 09:05 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. AAR: "White House Seeks Protection from War Crimes Act" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart
![]() |
Sun Jul-30-06 12:23 AM Response to Reply #11 |
21. What's "neo" about this fascism? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Senator
![]() |
Sun Jul-30-06 03:43 AM Response to Reply #21 |
23. They've managed to drop the goose-stepping |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
immoderate
![]() |
Sun Jul-30-06 02:52 PM Response to Reply #23 |
25. Mussolini style fascism, without the economic recovery! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
itzamirakul
![]() |
Sat Jul-29-06 08:33 PM Response to Original message |
6. K& R! I am delighted that the NYT is backing Lamont. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eric J in MN
![]() |
Sat Jul-29-06 08:34 PM Response to Original message |
7. The primary is "a referendum on his warped version of bipartisanship, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nutmegger
![]() |
Sat Jul-29-06 08:36 PM Response to Original message |
8. Good read. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eric J in MN
![]() |
Sat Jul-29-06 08:40 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. We have a chance, again. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kahuna
![]() |
Sat Jul-29-06 08:57 PM Response to Original message |
10. This editorial is smoking. It hits on all the problems with Lieberman... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
w4rma
![]() |
Sat Jul-29-06 09:13 PM Response to Original message |
13. Wow, that was actually accurate. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Truthiness Inspector
![]() |
Sat Jul-29-06 09:18 PM Response to Original message |
14. Cool |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ralps
![]() |
Sat Jul-29-06 09:27 PM Response to Original message |
15. Woohoo!!!! Great Article, I hope some of the undecided voters in CT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laurab
![]() |
Sat Jul-29-06 09:33 PM Response to Original message |
16. Very good editorial |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eric J in MN
![]() |
Sat Jul-29-06 09:49 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. There are parts where I would have gone further. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marlie
![]() |
Sat Jul-29-06 09:58 PM Response to Original message |
18. McLaughlin group tonight - all four panelists think Joe will win |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eric J in MN
![]() |
Sat Jul-29-06 10:00 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. The Bill Clinton edorsement of Lieberman will hurt us. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Olney Blue
![]() |
Sun Jul-30-06 07:55 PM Response to Reply #19 |
27. WaPo endorsed Lieberman today. Not surprised. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eric J in MN
![]() |
Sun Jul-30-06 10:23 PM Response to Reply #27 |
29. The Washigton Post praises Lieberman for bringing us the... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eric J in MN
![]() |
Sun Jul-30-06 12:00 AM Response to Original message |
20. kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha
![]() |
Sun Jul-30-06 01:10 AM Response to Original message |
22. I'm betting a lot |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Rinaldo
![]() |
Sun Jul-30-06 09:41 AM Response to Original message |
24. A kick for Sunday reading n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Count
![]() |
Sun Jul-30-06 06:15 PM Response to Original message |
26. "Terrorists didn't apologize - Rummy is better than OBL" Nice one, Joe! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eric J in MN
![]() |
Sun Jul-30-06 10:17 PM Response to Reply #26 |
28. What are the 2? Hartford Courant and ...? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sun Jun 16th 2024, 02:08 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC