Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Talking of alledged killings of civilians in Irag now on cspan WJournal.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-01-06 06:59 AM
Original message
Talking of alledged killings of civilians in Irag now on cspan WJournal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-01-06 07:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. a woman called, crying--they are just trying to stay alive she said, I did
not catch if she was a mother of one of the troops who just got sent to that area in March.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-01-06 07:02 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. another man called--basically saying this is war-Why is this even being
investigated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-01-06 07:03 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. saying Reporters are given a day long class on the rules.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-01-06 07:17 AM
Response to Reply #2
11. The war was over in a day or so.
Iraq has since been a country which is occupied , allegedly by liberators, and that's why it's being discussed.

Caller was obviously a muppet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-01-06 07:03 AM
Response to Original message
3. alledged...?
aren't we past that point already?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-01-06 07:05 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. the troops involved deserve a trial before saying are guilty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-01-06 07:28 AM
Response to Reply #5
13. in that case- so does every person in the bush administration...
but how often does it happen around here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-01-06 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #5
19. Oh yeah, that little matter? I thought we were at war?
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-01-06 07:08 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. "alleged killings"?!
Is it debatable that a multitude of Iraqi civilians are dead?
Is it debatable that they didn't die of natural causes or by suicide?
Is it debatable that our American military used deadly force against said Iraqi civilians, not in self-defense of themselves or a third party?

I want trials in the Hague for war crimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Philosoraptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-01-06 07:32 AM
Response to Reply #7
15. Lawyer Talk.
The old innocent until proven guilty thingy.

Alleged is such a quaint and antiquated word, like torture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-01-06 08:37 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. No such thing as being "conditionally dead". Screw lawyer talk n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeffersons Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-01-06 08:08 AM
Response to Reply #7
16. no it's "alleged killings" because they may not be dead or...
maybe they're not REAL people, just Iraqis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-01-06 07:08 AM
Response to Original message
6. Julian Barnes, LATimes is the guest: He just said that any time civilians
are killed 'in cold blood", it deserves an investigation. He was responding to a caller who did not think an investigation was necessary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpevahouse Donating Member (33 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-01-06 07:10 AM
Response to Original message
8. Same old story
From what I've seen on TV the media spin has begun to shift the focus of sympathy from the victims of this massacre to the troops. Before they ever get to trial which will be many months the media spin masters will have us teary eyed over the poor troops "under pressure". The problem I have with that excuse is it doesn't work in our legal system. If you or I were under extreme personal stress, killed a lot of people in a violent fit of rage we'd end up at least in prison for life, if not get the death penalty. We couldn't even get out of a speeding ticket with that excuse much less something really illegal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-01-06 08:40 AM
Response to Reply #8
20. Right! And it doesn't work for John Muhammed or Timothy McVeigh
Oh, but then they killed AMERICANS! That's different.

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-01-06 07:10 AM
Response to Original message
9. bush supporter-"set up w/ terrorists"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Philosoraptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-01-06 07:10 AM
Response to Original message
10. Perhaps the whole thing was faked by the terrorists...oh god she's stupid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-01-06 07:28 AM
Response to Original message
12. I hope the retired marines realized that our intent is not to crucify
..the marines...rather -to hold their leaders accountable for sending these burnt-out troops back multiple times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Philosoraptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-01-06 07:30 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. To imprison them for life, and not the C. in Chief would be UNFAIR.
Or I should say, it WILL be unfair, but that's exactly how it will go down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ugarte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-01-06 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
17. To many Americans, Iraqis=alleged human beings
Major part of the problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalmuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-01-06 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
21. I can't watch that show...
Either there are an inordinate number of crackpots that call into WJ, or America is experiencing a massive moral breakdown. It simply baffles my mind how anyone could attempt to justify an 'alleged' massacre. I think any decent human being must agree that the 'alleged' massacre of civilians, including women and their babies should be thoroughly investigated. That people are trying to make excuses for this type of behavior, or demonize the victims while criticizing holding the 'alleged' perpetrators accountable for their actions is very disturbing. I'm horrified at what has happened to this country under the Bush cabal rule. I had this view of Americans as benevolent, but after 2000, I've been losing my faith in my fellow Americans and am having a hard time wrapping my mind around what we've become (collectively), which is basically a facist, totalitarian dictatorship that is a real threat to other nations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Oct 31st 2024, 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC