Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A Stronger America--An Empowerment Thread

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Democrats » John Kerry Group Donate to DU
 
ray of light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 07:32 AM
Original message
A Stronger America--An Empowerment Thread
:patriot: :patriot::patriot::patriot::patriot::patriot::patriot::patriot::patriot::patriot::patriot::patriot::patriot::patriot::patriot:

Let's create an "empowerment" thread. In that thread might be the following:

1. Links to great information about John Kerry. (Including a time line or record of his votes.) KISS--Keep it simple...

2. Easy Rebuttals for anyone to look up. Maybe even copy/paste into GD or other blogs.

3. Terrific articles or essays about his career--once again for easy copy paste responses.

4. A list of all the newspapers that endorsed him last year.

5. His very important investigation into BCCI and the Iran-Contra.

6. Every action he's taken this year alone. Every vote and every speech.

7. List of charities he or THK donate to that is made public knowledge.

8. List of everything Kerry recommended Bush do that Bush has indeed followed AFTER the election!

9. How Kerry is a "Shadow President" making Bush leave his cozy W.H. because Kerry himself has shown Bush the Presidential way to behave.

10....um.....well you fill in.


SO...keep this thread kicked and let's ask Skinner to "pin" it to the top.

So let's have at it!!!

:bounce: :popcorn: :bounce: :bounce: :bounce: :popcorn: :bounce:

:woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo:

:applause::applause::applause::applause::applause::applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ray of light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
1. Links to great information about Kerry
The Official Kerry Blog
http://www.johnkerry.com/

John Kerry Senate website
http://kerry.senate.gov/

Welcome page to the John Kerry Reference Library:
http://kerrylibrary.invisionzone.com/lofiversion/index.php/t291.html

The unofficial Kerry Blog
http://kerryblog.blogspot.com/

The National Political Observer
http://www.thenationalpoliticalobserver.com/archives/2005/01/john_kerry_2004.html

The Democratic Daily
http://blog.thedemocraticdaily.com/

Independents For Kerry--including a list of 100's of links to more sites.
http://www.independentsforkerry.org/info/index.php?category_id=1533
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ray of light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-05 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #1
11. Another Great Website.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Noisy Democrat Donating Member (799 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-05 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. A website on Kerry's Iraq views
This one needs to be updated to include recent speeches and statements, but hopefully will be soon. But it has lots of the background on Kerry's position on Iraq -- good for debunking claims that Kerry has been changing his story, or that he had been saying he would've invaded Iraq even though there were no WMDs, etc.

http://www.kerryoniraqwar.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ray of light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-05 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #12
23. That is an incredibly well done website!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ray of light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-09-06 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #23
38. truthout interview with Cam kerry
http://www.truthout.org/docs_05/011105W.shtml

William Rivers Pitt: What is the impression of the Kerry campaign on the events of last Thursday in Congress, with the Electoral College hearing and the challenge to the certification of the Ohio Electors?

Cameron Kerry: It was something that we welcomed. It put a spotlight on the issues of election reform. We have made some progress on that since 2000, but we still have a long way to go. This election, particularly in Ohio, showed that. I think the action the other day helped to highlight that, as John indicated in his statement. He was very much in sympathy with it, though he was not there in joining it.

Does it surprise you that Senator Boxer was the only Senator to vote against certification?

I think a lot of people are now looking at the issue, and a lot of people stood up and said there are ongoing problems. There were people also looking at it in terms of whether that would change the outcome, whether it would be looking backwards instead of looking forward. What Rep. Tubbs-Jones had to say was basically forward-looking. One of the reasons we need election reform is that what has been done on reform didn't prevent abuses. Despite all of the oversight and a lot of things that were stopped, we don't have the tools and the remedies for this watch.

There are a lot of people who don't understand why Senator Kerry chose not to be in the Senate for the Thursday challenge. A lot of people believe he should have been the one to stand up and be the challenger. There are a lot of political implications here, and I am wondering if you might explain the thinking on this.

I have talked to a number of the Congressional members involved. Many of them feel that it was better without John involved, that it put the focus on the issue and not on him. It took away the Republican argument that this was just about sour grapes. Had John led the protest, we would have heard that a hundred times.

You believe it would have torpedoed the boat before it ever got out of the dock?

I think that's absolutely right. I think this was a moving event that was focused on the issue, and at the end of it, it was forward-looking.

Senator Kerry filed what has been described as a "Me, too" motion in the Yost case in Ohio, the purpose of which is to preserve evidence and try to get depositions of the people involved. Are you aware of any movement or progress with that? Do you know when the judge is planning to rule?

No, I haven't heard. I have been in pretty regular touch with the Ohio lawyers, but I haven't talked to them in a week or so, so I haven't heard.

It was the issues and suspicions surrounding Triad Systems and their voting machines that motivated Senator Kerry to enter that matter?

Yes. That is one of the things that is highly suspect. Look, Kenneth Blackwell's conduct throughout this election, going back months beforehand and through the recount, has been disgraceful. What people have to recognize is that the election protection effort, with 3,300 Kerry/Edwards lawyers who were there on the ground, plus other lawyers, the voter protection project, and other efforts out there did a lot.

They dealt with this ridiculous business of the paper weight on the voter registration and put a stop to that. The Republican effort to mount challenges, they put a stop to it. The efforts to exclude reporters and exit pollers from the polls, they put a stop to that. The malfunctions in machines in Mahoning County, they put a stop to that. They put a lot of focus on the incredible amounts of time the students at Kent had to wait. There were people there to bring them food, and there were people there who offered those in line paper ballots. They didn't want paper ballots. They wanted to get in there and cast their votes the regular way.

One of the reasons we know about all these things is because there were people there observing and recording, and they prevented a lot of the large problems. Did they prevent everything? No. Were there people who were disenfranchised? Yes. Were there mistakes and irregularities and fraud? Yes. I think this was a closer election than 119,000 votes.

Ohio wasn't the only state where there were problems in this last election. There was also New Mexico.

I think New Mexico is a fascinating case. I think people there are doing a great job putting together data that shows some very convincing anomalies that could change the outcome. I think it's something that needs to go forward because it is really about counting the votes and not ultimately about the outcome of the election as a whole. My understand is essentially that if Governor Richardson gives the go-ahead for a partial recount, they can get started on that. It is a pretty convincing case, with serious anomalies in Native American and Hispanic voting areas.

Are they concerned in New Mexico about how this recount will proceed? I ask because the main problem with the recent Ohio recount was that it was supposed to be a random recount, but representatives from Triad, the company that had their voting machines in 41 Ohio counties, found out ahead of time which 'random' counties would be recounted. They went around to those counties and made sure that the machine count would match the hand count. This basically obviated the basic premise of the recount, that being the selection of random counties. Will the people in New Mexico be keeping an eye on things like this?

What I gather is that people have negotiated in New Mexico, and that Cobb and Badnarik will select the ten percent, something like ten percent or thereabouts, of the precincts to be recounted.

Cobb and Badnarik will be selecting these?

That is my understanding.

Given all this, are there any regrets on the part of Senator Kerry or anyone else from the campaign about that Wednesday morning concession?

At the end of the day, no. I think it was closer, but I am a lawyer, and I'm going to deal with evidence. I have to deal with what I think a court would do. That's the kind of judgments I make. That was a judgment I participated in. A lot of people who know how to count votes, how votes are counted, people who went through Florida in 2000 and have been through other recounts, have been through a lot of tough battles, would have loved nothing better than to do battle with Karl Rove and James Baker again, to take them on and give them their own back.

But we looked at it hard, and there just wasn't the kind of razor-thin margin that we had in Florida in 2000 to work with, or that Christine Gregoire was dealing with in Washington State. The three million vote margin nationally made it difficult, but there was enough of a margin in Ohio that I think we could have closed that margin but would still have been some tens of thousands of votes short.

There is an impressive coalition building around the need for election reform. There is Congressman Conyers, Rep. Tubbs-Jones, Senator Boxer, Reverend Jackson, Cobb and Badnarik of the Green and Libertarian parties, along with an activated base. There are a lot of people who feel very strongly that the time has come to fix the way we run elections in this country, and I am wondering where the Senator stands on that, and if he has any plans to join this group and this cause.

Absolutely. One of the earliest things he is going to work on is election reform. We've got to make the process transparent, whether it is the counting of votes or the code on the machines. That is basic to the electoral process. That is one of the great virtues of paper ballots. People can sit there and watch the counting. I've been through that in past elections, and it's a great ritual. We've got to strengthen the remedies that deal with voter suppression; challenges based on race ought to be prima facie violations of voting rights. There have to be standards for the allocation of voting machines.

Do you foresee a push for national standards for elections? One of the arguments put forward on this looks at Pennsylvania in this last election, and the fact that voters were casting their ballots on four different kinds of systems in that state. Had there been a challenge to the outcome there, it would have been bedlam. The different systems would have made the recount process a madhouse. Does the Senator have any thoughts on advocating for national standards on elections?

Yes. We've got a federal constitution guaranteeing the right to vote, and the 14th Amendment says Congress can enact laws to protect that right. The tools are there to do it. This is too important, and I think there will be ways to get it done.

Will Senator Kerry be speaking on these matters anytime soon?

I'm sure that he will be. I don't recall his timetable to get a proposal out there for election reform, but he is going to do that soon.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ray of light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-11-05 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. John Kerry's voting record:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #14
27. Lifetime voting record - Americans for Democratic Action
read about ADA here -- a liberal lobbying group

http://www.adaction.org/about.htm

Senate lifetime records off this page:

http://www.adaction.org/sen.htm

Kennedy 90
Kerry 92
Feingold 98
Boxer 96

McCain 9
Frist 3
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ray of light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-01-06 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #27
34. Kerry and helping the military vets...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ray of light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-12-05 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
17. Washington Post article during May 2004
in which most of the points Kerry said in it have been proven true. Although the media refused to investigate these issues prior to ll/02/04

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A60588-2004May27.html
Kerry Vows to Rebuild Alliances, Confront Terrorism

By Jim VandeHei
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, May 28, 2004; Page A09


SEATTLE, May 27 -- Sen. John F. Kerry accused President Bush on Thursday of undermining generations of U.S. leadership and pledged that as president he would restore the United States' alliances and aggressively confront potential terrorist threats.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ray of light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-12-05 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Truthout's great interview:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ray of light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-05 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ray of light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-16-05 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #22
26. Inside the 04 election
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ray of light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-05 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. _dynamicdems posted this in a different thread. Looked great for here...
_dynamicdems (295 posts) Sun Nov-13-05 07:25 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. VVAW was started a few years before Kerry joined.
They are still around, actually. They couldn't support Kerry last year because they aren't allowed to support a candidate, but they made a strong anti-Bush statement and several strong statements against the swifties.

http://www.vvaw.org /

They are a great resource for JK articles, by the way.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ray of light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. ProSense posted this great article:
This stuff counters the nonsense we hear about Kerry.

Kerry's Undeclared War
By MATT BAI

Published: October 10, 2004


snip...

In a series of combative speeches and statements, and in a crisp performance at the first head-to-head debate, Kerry has argued that Bush's war in Iraq is a disaster, that troops should be brought home before the end of the next presidential term and that the Iraq war is a ''profound diversion'' from the war on terror and the real showdown with Al Qaeda.


snip...

This last point was what Kerry seemed to be getting at with his mantra of ''effectiveness,'' and it was in fact the main thrust of his campaign pitch about terrorism. By infuriating allies and diminishing the country's international esteem, Kerry argued, Bush had made it impossible for America to achieve its goals abroad. By the simple act of changing presidents, the country would greatly increase its chances of success in the global war on terror. Both candidates, in fact, were suggesting that the main difference between them was one of leadership style and not policy; just as Bush had taken to arguing that Kerry was too inconstant to lead a nation at war, Kerry's critique centered on the idea that Bush had proved himself too stubborn and arrogant to represent America to the rest of the world.

snip...

This analogy struck me as remarkable, if only because it seemed to throw down a big orange marker between Kerry's philosophy and the president's. Kerry, a former prosecutor, was suggesting that the war, if one could call it that, was, if not winnable, then at least controllable. If mobsters could be chased into the back rooms of seedy clubs, then so, too, could terrorists be sent scurrying for their lives into remote caves where they wouldn't harm us. Bush had continually cast himself as the optimist in the race, asserting that he alone saw the liberating potential of American might, and yet his dark vision of unending war suddenly seemed far less hopeful than Kerry's notion that all of this horror -- planes flying into buildings, anxiety about suicide bombers and chemicals in the subway -- could somehow be made to recede until it was barely in our thoughts.

snip...

Kerry came to his worldview over the course of a Senate career that has been, by any legislative standard, a quiet affair. Beginning in the late 80's, Kerry's Subcommittee on Terrorism, Narcotics and International Operations investigated and exposed connections between Latin American drug dealers and BCCI, the international bank that was helping to launder drug money. That led to more investigations of arms dealers, money laundering and terrorist financing.

Kerry turned his work on the committee into a book on global crime, titled ''The New War,'' published in 1997. He readily admitted to me that the book ''wasn't exclusively on Al Qaeda''; in fact, it barely mentioned the rise of Islamic extremism. But when I spoke to Kerry in August, he said that many of the interdiction tactics that cripple drug lords, including governments working jointly to share intelligence, patrol borders and force banks to identify suspicious customers, can also be some of the most useful tools in the war on terror.


http://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/10/magazine/10KERRY.html...

I still have this magazine at home. Remember the spin that was clouding the air when this article came out? Bush is tough on terra. Yeah right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ray of light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #20
45. Thanks whoever made this picture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-07-06 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
37. Kerry's speech in Jan 2003 warning Bush against the war
Kerry speech on national security -- Georgetown University
Thursday, January 23, 2003


http://kerry.senate.gov/low/record.cfm?id=189831
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #1
42. Links provided by Kerry
Real Hardball
by John Kerry
Fri Jan 20, 2006 at 03:52:31 PM PDT

snip...

The evidence keeps mounting:

http://www.csmonitor.com/2004/1027/dailyUpdate.html

http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A62618-2002Apr16?language=printer

Among the people who say Osama Bin Laden escaped at Tora Bora:

Gary Schroen, former senior CIA agent, Author of First In: How seven CIA officers opened the war on terrorism in Afghanistan

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/ID/7761272

Gary Berntsen, former CIA operative in Afghanistan, requested additional U.S. troops for the assault on Tora Bora, author of Jawbreaker.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8853000/site/newsweek/

Peter Bergen, terrorism analyst and author of The Osama bin Laden I Know

http://www.vanityfair.com/commentary/content/articles/051226roco01?page=7

U.S. DOD, in a legal brief summarizing evidence against a suspect in U.S. custody at GTMO

http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/03/24/pentagon.binladen/

https://select.nytimes.com/commerce/jsp/signin.jsp?url=/commerce/jsp/register.jsp

more...


http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/1/20/175232/080

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TayTay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
2. Thisis a wonderful idea.
We have a lot of this information spread out among the various blogs by people who come here. (And if we don't we could write it up) I think it would be a good idea to have something like this 'pinned' to the top of the page. That way we always have the positives on top.

Excellent idea Ray, just excellent. I'm all for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ray of light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
3. Endorsements for John Kerry
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ray of light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-05 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. BCCI information
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ray of light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-12-05 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Kerry as Shadow President
Visits Europe and meets with other Heads of State before Bush even leaves the White House. (Gathering links.)

http://ifk-johnkerry.blogspot.com/2005/01/kerry-urges-repairing-us-europe-ties.html
Saturday, January 15, 2005
Kerry urges repairing US-Europe ties
Kerry is wrapping up his 2 week trip in the Middle East and Europe, where he's met with many foreign leaders to encourage better cooperation on Iraq, Middle East peace and the war on terror. His message was well received, but most Europeans are still skeptical with Bush at the wheel. (Can you blame them, with so much Bush damage to recover from, in the same week the CIA admits there are no WMD's.) (more at the link)

http://www.dotnews.com/kerryatjfklibrary.html
At Library, Kerry Turns the Page
March 3, 2005
By Brian Denitzio
Reporter Staff

Four months removed from his unsuccessful bid for the presidency, Sen. John F. Kerry appeared at the John F. Kennedy Library Monday evening to receive the Distinguished American Award. In the library dedicated to his political idol, Kerry accepted the award and took part in a forum moderated by Boston Globe columnist Thomas Oliphant.

The event featured remarks from Sen. Ted Kennedy, who spoke glowingly of his Senate colleague. Speaking via speakerphone from Washington D.C., Kennedy called Kerry a "visionary leader," adding that he couldn't wait for Kerry '08. "Not a bad bumper sticker," said Kennedy.
(more at the link)

(ok..some media lies about Bush's response in Europe:
The president's Europe trip
JIM LEHRER: David, the president's Europe trip. Generally speaking, he went over there to kind of start the healing process, particularly with the French and the Germans. How did he do?

http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/political_wrap/jan-june05/sb_2-25.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ray of light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-12-05 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Great Boston Globe article
Kerry leading Bush prior to Bush's Europe trip.


http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2005/02/06/weighing_defeat_kerry_sees_lessons_to_guide_future/

Weighing defeat, Kerry sees lessons to guide future
February 6, 2005

The following interview was conducted by Peter S. Canellos, Nina J. Easton, Michael Kranish, and Susan Milligan of the Globe staff. The article was written by Canellos.

WASHINGTON -- Pained but not bowed, Senator John F. Kerry promised in an interview with the Globe last week to apply the lessons of a presidential campaign that he portrayed as ''so much bigger and more complex than people think" to bolster a Democratic Party that he indicated he might seek to lead again.

''I'm not going to sit around, you know. I'm going to learn a lot of good lessons," he said.
(snip)
Kerry also said he hopes to sit down with President Bush to talk about foreign affairs before Bush's trip to Europe at the end of this month, in what would be the first meeting between the two since their final presidential debate.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ray of light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-12-05 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
16. Business endorsement
Why Kerry Has This Entrepreneur's Vote

There's a popular notion that business owners are natural Republicans. Not this one, who has weighed each man's policies and found the President's lacking
Lisa Bergson
I thought they'd never call. But, out of the blue last week, I received back-to-back messages on the home machine from "CEOs for Kerry" and "PA Business Leaders for Kerry." For their part, GOP operatives have been on my tail for months, calling at work with invitations to lunch locally with the President and, more recently, with Laura Bush, who was here to defend the ban on stem-cell research. "I took the liberty of declining," my savvy assistant reported.
http://www.businessweek.com/smallbiz/content/oct2004/sb2004105_7004_sb002.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. I think this is a great idea...but
we are just coming off of a major Kerry-bashing weekend.
I still have quite a hangover.
And the weekend is still pretty fresh in everyone's minds.

That said, I just read the pro-Clark thread, and was amazed at the difference in attitude towards Clark vs Kerry.

Maybe would could work on this in our little group, perfect it, wait a bit, and then present it to the DU world? Maybe we can wait for the next amazing thing Kerry does, and use that for the intro. Kerry seems to do something wonderful weekly, today is Tuesday, so it should be any day now. We're also going to need to be ready to deal with those that will not be kind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TayTay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I think, if I may, that was was intended for us
Not for GD. Permanently. (But I could be wrong.) This thread proposal was meant for 'weekends from hell' in this group to remind us of the positives at need.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Ray - for us or for all of DU?
If it's just for us - I say
Hell Ya!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ray of light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. I'm sorry...car trouble! Home now though.
Yes, it's for this group here.

Let GD fight their own issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #10
28. Speaking of that,
Edited on Sat Dec-17-05 01:09 PM by ProSense
all the talk about Feingold being more progressive, prompted me to do a little comparison. I found that the two just have different positions. I more in agreement with Kerry's position on the issues becuase I know where he's coming from; they make more sense to me and he's more consistent. Here is the comparison based on information from ontheissues.org:

Fiengold.....Kerry
YES..........YES..........on adding sexual orientation to definition of hate crimes. (Jun 2002)
NO...........YES..........on loosening restrictions on cell phone wiretapping. (Oct 2001)
YES..........YES..........on expanding hate crimes to include sexual orientation. (Jun 2000)
YES..........YES..........on setting aside 10% of highway funds for minorities & women. (Mar 1998)
NO...........NO...........on ending special funding for minority & women-owned business. (Oct 1997)
NO...........NO...........on prohibiting same-sex marriage. (Sep 1996)
YES..........YES..........on prohibiting job discrimination by sexual orientation. (Sep 1996)
NO...........NO...........on Amendment to prohibit flag burning. (Dec 1995)
NO...........NO...........on banning affirmative action hiring with federal funds. (Jul 1995)
YES..........YES..........on $1.15 billion per year to continue the COPS program. (May 1999)
NO...........NO...........on limiting death penalty appeals. (Apr 1996)
NO...........NO...........on limiting product liability punitive damage awards. (Mar 1996)
NO...........YES..........on restricting class-action lawsuits. (Dec 1995)
YES..........YES..........on repealing federal speed limits. (Jun 1995)
NO...........NO...........on mandatory prison terms for crimes involving firearms. (May 1994)
NO...........NO...........on rejecting racial statistics in death penalty appeals. (May 1994)
NO...........NO...........on Bush Administration Energy Policy. (Jul 2003)
YES..........YES..........on targeting 100,000 hydrogen-powered vehicles by 2010. (Jun 2003)
YES..........YES..........on removing consideration of drilling ANWR from budget bill. (Mar 2003)
NO...........NO...........on drilling ANWR on national security grounds. (Apr 2002)
YES..........NO...........on terminating CAFE standards within 15 months. (Mar 2002)
NO...........NO...........on preserving budget for ANWR oil drilling. (Apr 2000)
YES..........YES..........on ending discussion of CAFE fuel efficiency standards. (Sep 1999)
NO...........NO...........on defunding renewable and solar energy. (Jun 1999)
NO...........NO...........on approving a nuclear waste repository. (Apr 1997)
YES..........NO...........on do not require ethanol in gasoline. (Aug 1994)
YES..........NO...........on confirming Gale Norton as Secretary of Interior. (Jan 2001)
NO...........NO...........on more funding for forest roads and fish habitat. (Sep 1999)
YES..........NO...........on transportation demo projects. (Mar 1998)
YES..........YES..........on reducing funds for road-building in National Forests. (Sep 1997)
YES..........YES..........on continuing desert protection in California. (Oct 1994)
NO...........YES..........on requiring EPA risk assessments. (May 1994)
YES..........YES..........on enlarging NATO to include Eastern Europe. (May 2002)
NO...........YES..........on killing a bill for trade sanctions if China sells weapons. (Sep 2000)
NO...........NO...........on cap foreign aid at only $12.7 billion. (Oct 1999)
YES..........YES..........on limiting the President's power to impose economic sanctions. (Jul 1998)
NO...........NO...........on limiting NATO expansion to only Poland, Hungary & Czech. (Apr 1998)
NO...........YES..........on $17.9 billion to IMF. (Mar 1998)
NO...........NO...........on Strengthening of the trade embargo against Cuba. (Mar 1996)
NO...........YES..........on ending Vietnam embargo. (Jan 1994)
NO..........................on establishing a free trade agreement between US & Singapore. (Jul 2003)
NO..........................on establishing a free trade agreement between the US and Chile. (Jul 2003)
NO...........YES..........on extending free trade to Andean nations. (May 2002)
NO...........YES..........on granting normal trade relations status to Vietnam. (Oct 2001)
NO...........YES..........on removing common goods from national security export rules. (Sep 2001)
NO...........YES..........on permanent normal trade relations with China. (Sep 2000)
NO...........YES..........on expanding trade to the third world. (May 2000)
NO...........YES..........on renewing 'fast track' presidential trade authority. (Nov 1997)
YES..........YES..........on imposing trade sanctions on Japan for closed market. (May 1995)
YES..........YES..........on banning "soft money" contributions and restricting issue ads. (Mar 2002)
NO...........NO...........on require photo ID (not just signature) for voter registration. (Feb 2002)
YES..........YES..........on banning campaign donations from unions and corporations. (Apr 2001)
YES..........YES..........on continuing funding for the National Endowment for the Arts. (Aug 1999)
YES..........YES..........on favoring 1997 McCain-Feingold overhaul of campaign finance. (Oct 1997)
YES..........YES..........on Approving the presidential line-item veto. (Mar 1996)
NO...........NO...........on banning more types of Congressional gifts. (Jul 1995)
NO...........NO...........on banning lawsuits against gun manufacturers for gun violence. (Mar 2004)
YES..........YES..........on background checks at gun shows. (May 1999)
NO...........NO...........on more penalties for gun & drug violations. (May 1999)
NO...........NO...........on loosening license & background checks at gun shows. (May 1999)
NO...........NO...........on maintaining current law: guns sold without trigger locks. (Jul 1998)
YES.........................on $40 billion per year for limited Medicare prescription drug benefit. (Jun 2003)
YES..........YES..........on allowing importation of Rx drugs from Canada. (Jul 2002)
YES..........YES..........on allowing patients to sue HMOs & collect punitive damages. (Jun 2001)
NO...........NO...........on funding GOP version of Medicare prescription drug benefit. (Apr 2001)
YES..........YES..........on including prescription drugs under Medicare. (Jun 2000)
NO...........NO...........on limiting self-employment health deduction. (Jul 1999)
YES..........YES..........on increasing tobacco restrictions. (Jun 1998)
NO...........NO...........on banning human cloning. (Feb 1998)
YES..........YES..........on Medicare means-testing. (Jun 1997)
YES..........YES..........on medical savings acounts. (Apr 1996)
YES..........YES..........on adopting the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty. (Oct 1999)
YES..........YES..........on allowing another round of military base closures. (May 1999)
NO...........NO...........on cutting nuclear weapons below START levels. (May 1999)
YES..........YES..........on deploying National Missile Defense ASAP. (Mar 1999)
NO...........YES..........on military pay raise of 4.8%. (Feb 1999)
NO...........NO...........on deploying missile defense as soon as possible. (Sep 1998)
NO...........NO...........on prohibiting same-sex basic training. (Jun 1998)
NO...........NO...........on favoring 36 vetoed military projects. (Oct 1997)
YES..........YES..........on banning chemical weapons. (Apr 1997)
NO...........NO...........on considering deploying NMD, and amending ABM Treaty. (Jun 1996)
NO...........NO...........on 1996 Defense Appropriations. (Sep 1995)
NO...........NO...........on allowing more foreign workers into the U.S. for farm work. (Jul 1998)
NO...........NO...........on visas for skilled workers. (May 1998)
NO...........NO...........on limit welfare for immigrants. (Jun 1997)
NO...........NO...........on repealing Clinton's ergonomic rules on repetitive stress. (Mar 2001)
NO...........NO...........on killing an increase in the minimum wage. (Nov 1999)
NO...........NO...........on allowing workers to choose between overtime & comp-time. (May 1997)
NO...........NO...........on replacing farm price supports. (Feb 1996)
NO...........NO...........on Social Security Lockbox & limiting national debt. (Apr 1999)
NO...........NO...........on allowing Roth IRAs for retirees. (May 1998)
NO...........NO...........on allowing personal retirement accounts. (Apr 1998)
NO...........NO...........on deducting Social Security payments on income taxes. (May 1996)
NO...........NO...........on $350 billion in tax breaks over 11 years. (May 2003)
NO...........NO...........on cutting taxes by $1.35 trillion over 11 years. (May 2001)
YES..........YES..........on reducing marriage penalty instead of cutting top tax rates. (May 2001)
YES..........YES..........on increasing tax deductions for college tuition. (May 2001)
NO...........NO...........on eliminating the 'marriage penalty'. (Jul 2000)
NO...........NO...........on across-the-board spending cut. (Oct 1999)
NO...........NO...........on $792B tax cuts. (Jul 1999)
NO...........NO...........on requiring super-majority for raising taxes. (Apr 1998)
NO...........NO...........on FY99 tax cuts. (Apr 1998)
YES..........YES..........on disallowing FCC approval of larger media conglomerates. (Sep 2003)
YES..........YES..........on Internet sales tax moratorium. (Oct 1998)
NO..........................on telecomm deregulation. (Feb 1996)
YES..........NO...........on $86.5 billion for military operations in Iraq & Afghanistan. (Oct 2003)
NO...........YES..........on authorizing use of military force against Iraq. (Oct 2002)
YES..........NO...........on allowing all necessary forces and other means in Kosovo. (May 1999)
NO...........YES..........on authorizing air strikes in Kosovo. (Mar 1999)
YES..........NO...........on ending the Bosnian arms embargo. (Jul 1995)
YES..........YES..........on welfare block grants. (Aug 1996)
YES..........YES..........on eliminating block grants for food stamps. (Jul 1996)
NO...........NO...........on allowing state welfare waivers. (Jul 1996)
YES..........YES..........on welfare overhaul. (Sep 1995)

http://www.issues2000.org/Senate/John_Kerry.htm


Here's where they differ (these refer to Kerry's votes):


Voted YES on loosening restrictions on cell phone wiretapping.
Motion to table (kill) the amendment that would provide that in order to conduct roving surveillance, the person implementing the order must ascertain that the target of the surveillance is present in the house or is using the phone that has been tapped.
Bill S1510 ; vote number 2001-300 on Oct 11, 2001

http://www.issues2000.org/Domestic/John_Kerry_Civil_Rights.htm


Voted YES on restricting class-action lawsuits.
Restriction of class-action security lawsuits.
Status: Veto Overridden Y)68; N)30; P)1
Reference: H.R. 1058 passage over veto; Bill H.R. 1058 ; vote number 1995-612 on Dec 22, 1995

http://www.issues2000.org/Domestic/John_Kerry_Crime.htm


Voted NO on confirming Gale Norton as Secretary of Interior.
Vote to confirm the nomination of Gale Norton as Secretary of Interior.
Bill Confirmation vote ; vote number 2001-6 on Jan 30, 2001

Voted NO on transportation demo projects.
McCain amendment to the transportation reauthorization bill (S. 1173) would require that funding for demonstration projects be covered by their respective state allocations instead of being funded individually in the transportation bill.
Status: Amdt Agreed to Y)78; N)22
Reference: McCain Amdt #1726; Bill S. 1173 ; vote number 1998-29 on Mar 12, 1998

Voted YES on requiring EPA risk assessments.
Require risk assessments of new EPA regulations.
Status: Amdt Agreed to Y)90; N)8; NV)2
Reference: Safe Drinking Water Act Amdt.s of '94; Bill S. 2019 ; vote number 1994-117 on May 18, 1994

http://www.issues2000.org/Domestic/John_Kerry_Environment.htm



Voted NO on terminating CAFE standards within 15 months.
Levin Amendment No. 2997; To provide alternative provisions to better encourage increased use of alternative fueled and hybrid vehicles. Vote to pass an amendment that would remove the Corporate Average Fuel Economy standard (CAFE) and instead establish a new automobile efficiency standard in 15 months. Congress could veto any CAFE increase and would be allowed to increase the standard if no changes are made with 15 months. The bill would overhaul the nation's energy policies by restructuring the electricity system and providing for $16 billion in energy-related tax incentives.
Bill S.517 ; vote number 2002-47 on Mar 13, 2002

Voted NO on do not require ethanol in gasoline.
Funding a mandated percentage of market share for the use of ethanol in gasoline, to be funded b reducing NASA budget b $39 million..
Status: Table Motion Agreed to Y)50; N)50; VP decided YES
Reference: Departments of Veterans Affairs and Housing and Urban Development, and Independent Agencies Appropriations Act, 1995; Bill H.R. 4624 ; vote number 1994-255 on Aug 3, 1994

http://www.issues2000.org/International/John_Kerry_Energy_+_Oil.htm



Voted YES on killing a bill for trade sanctions if China sells weapons.
Vote to table an amendment that would require sanctions against China or other countries if they were found to be selling illicit weapons of mass destruction.
Bill HR.4444 ; vote number 2000-242 on Sep 13, 2000

Voted YES on $17.9 billion to IMF.
Would provide $17.9 billion for the International Monetary Fund.
Status: Amdt Agreed to Y)84; N)16
Reference: McConnell Amdt #2100; Bill S. 1768 ; vote number 1998-44 on Mar 26, 1998

Voted YES on ending Vietnam embargo.
Ending U.S. trade embargos on the country of Vietnam.
Status: Amdt Agreed to Y)62; N)38
Reference: For. Reltns. Auth. Act FY 94 & 95; Bill S. 1281 ; vote number 1994-5 on Jan 27, 1994

http://www.issues2000.org/International/John_Kerry_Foreign_Policy.htm


Voted YES on extending free trade to Andean nations.
HR3009 Fast Track Trade Authority bill: To extend the Andean Trade Preference Act, to grant additional trade benefits under that Act, and for other purposes. Vote to pass a bill that would enlarge duty-free status to particular products from Colombia, Bolivia, Peru, and Ecuador, renew the president's fast-track authority and reauthorize and increase a program to make accessible retraining and relocation assistance to U.S. workers hurt by trade agreements. It would also approve a five-year extension of Generalized System of Preferences and produce a refundable 70 percent tax credit for health insurance costs for displaced workers.
Bill HR.3009 ; vote number 2002-130 on May 23, 2002

Voted YES on granting normal trade relations status to Vietnam.
Vote to grant annual normal trade relations status to Vietnam. The resolution would allow Vietnamese imports to receive the same tariffs as those of other U.S. trading partners.
Bill HJRES51 ; vote number 2001-291 on Oct 3, 2001

Voted YES on removing common goods from national security export rules.
Vote to provide the president the authority to control the export of sensitive dual-use items for national security purposes. The bill would eliminate restrictions on the export of technology that is readily available in foreign markets.
Bill S149 ; vote number 2001-275 on Sep 6, 2001

Voted YES on permanent normal trade relations with China.
Vote to give permanent Normal Trade Relations status to China. Currently, NTR status for China is debated and voted on annually.
Bill HR.4444 ; vote number 2000-251 on Sep 19, 2000

Voted YES on expanding trade to the third world.
Vote to expand trade with more than 70 countries in Africa, Central America and the Caribbean. The countries would be required to meet certain eligibility requirements in protecting freedoms of expression and associatio
Bill HR.434 ; vote number 2000-98 on May 11, 2000

Voted YES on renewing 'fast track' presidential trade authority.
Vote to proceed to the bill which establishes negotiating objectives for trade agreements, and renews 'fast track' trade authority for the President, which allows Congress to adopt or to reject a proposed trade agreement, but not to amend it.
Bill S 1269 ; vote number 1997-294 on Nov 5, 1997

http://www.issues2000.org/International/John_Kerry_Free_Trade.htm



Voted YES on military pay raise of 4.8%.
Vote to pass a bill to authorize a military pay raise of 4.8% in 2000 and annual pay increases through 2006 of 0.5% above the inflation rate. The bill would also provide additional incentives to certain enlisted personnel who remain on active duty.
Bill S.4 ; vote number 1999-26 on Feb 24, 1999

http://www.issues2000.org/International/John_Kerry_Homeland_Security.htm



Voted NO on $86.5 billion for military operations in Iraq & Afghanistan.
Vote to pass a bill that would appropriate $86.5 billion in supplemental spending for military operations and reconstruction in Iraq and Afghanistan, in Fiscal 2004. The bill would provide $10.3 billion as a grant to rebuild Iraq. This includes:
$5.1 billion for security
$5.2 billion for reconstruction costs
$65.6 billion for military operations and maintenance
$1.3 billion for veterans medical care
$10 billion as a loan that would be converted to a grant if 90% of all bilateral debt incurred by the former Iraqi regime of Saddam Hussein, would have to be forgiven by other countries.
Reference: FY04 Emergency Supplemental for Iraq and Afghanistan; Bill S1689 ; vote number 2003-400 on Oct 17, 2003

Voted YES on authorizing use of military force against Iraq.
H.J.Res. 114; Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002. The administration would be required to report to Congress that diplomatic options have been exhausted before, or within 48 hours after military action has started. Every 60 days the president would also be required to submit a progress report to Congress.
Bill H.J.RES.114 ; vote number 2002-237 on Oct 11, 2002

Voted NO on allowing all necessary forces and other means in Kosovo.
Majority Leader Trent Lott motioned to kill the resolution that would have authorized the president to "use all necessary forces and other means," in cooperation with U.S. allies to accomplish objectives in Yugoslavia.
Status: Motion to Table Agreed to Y)78; N)22
Reference: Motion to table S. J. Res. 20; Bill S. J. Res. 20 ; vote number 1999-98 on May 4, 1999

Voted YES on authorizing air strikes in Kosovo.
Vote to adopt a resolution to authorize the President to conduct military air operations and missile strikes in cooperation with NATO against Yugoslavia (Serbia and Montenegro).
Bill S.Con.Res 21 ; vote number 1999-57 on Mar 23, 1999

Voted NO on ending the Bosnian arms embargo.
Ending the Bosnian arms embargo.
Status: Bill Passed Y)69; N)29; NV)2
Reference: Bosnia Herzegovina Self-Defense Act of '95; Bill S. 21 ; vote number 1995-331 on Jul 26, 1995

http://www.issues2000.org/International/John_Kerry_War_+_Peace.htm


I'm not as accomplished as some of you are at laying out the political implications, so all of you who can highlight the impact of these votes, I'd love the input for the sake of argument.

For example, here is a terrific assessment of the original Patriot Act vote by karynnj:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=273x59452#59591


Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Really don't have to wait
The Clark thread summarized Clark's good over his career. Kerry HAS done more this year than Clark - and it's not just that he's been a Senator. He has been out there on everything.

We've had threads that DO talk about what he has done - they're immediately bashed. We could list 100 good things Kerry did and they will say he didn't protect our votes or IWR or why is he stil for the war.

The difference between Clark and Kerry is that the LW freepers have either decided Clark is not a real threat or they support Clark as the true liberal he is (unlike that faker Kerry).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Clark has not put his whole persona on the table for all to see
as Kerry had to during the election.

There is nobody that would escape negativity if they had been under a microscope for 2 years.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-16-05 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
24. kick - to get back to top
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-16-05 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
25. How did I miss this great thread? Bravo! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #25
29. It was an old thread that we need to occasionally kick - because
Ray of light and others had the great idea to put lots of real information together.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerrygoddess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
30. Kerry Resources
One of the goals of the news Dem Daily Forum is to compile Kerry Resources. See the pinned thread on the top of the Kerry Resources Forum there - http://forum.thedemocraticdaily.com

We can pin anything that needs to be pinned and it won't get buried in with general conversation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ray of light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. It needs to be posted in the D.U. research forum for lurkers
Maybe we all can take turns working on that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerrygoddess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. Absolutely -- By all means
Lists of available resources should be in as many places as possible. The Kerry Resources Forum on the Dem Daily is actually going to be switched to a public forum and the Strategy Forum will remain a closed, private forum for those who are interested in participating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-01-06 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #31
35. Not just forum...also Demopedia and dkosopedia.
They are wiki's and a little better to organize info, I think. But I guess the Research forum is for folks who don't like wikis (?) so it's good to have it there too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ray of light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #35
39. I don't know what that is can you post it there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ray of light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-25-05 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
33. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-07-06 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #33
36. Kick n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ray of light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #36
40. Where's the picture of Dean and Kerry? Can you post it here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ray of light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #40
41. Posting more great threads...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ray of light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #36
43. never mind..found it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #43
44. Sorry. I didn't see your request. Thanks for posting. Here's another

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
46. Kick! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
_dynamicdems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
47. I've been busy so I missed this first time around. Great idea!
I'll have to read this more thoroughly when I get home from work.

I've been working on a DynamicDems ( www.dynamicdems.com ) site and have added a few things, but I'm only one person and my time is limited, so it is just in the beginning stages. Some of these links might be good to include. If anyone has any suggestions or links they think I should add, let me know. Any good links to McCain flip-flops would be greatly appreciated. Suggestions for new pages will also be appreciated.

I've also got the domain name and Web space alloted for kerrycrats.com, but I haven't done anything with it. If anyone is interested in working on a Kerrycrats site, let me know. It's already paid for, just needs to be created and filled with content. The more pro-Kerry sites we generate and link, the better.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
48. Kicky! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Jun 15th 2024, 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Democrats » John Kerry Group Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC