Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

“Phoenix man rejoins NRA and ACLU” interesting solution to protect ALL civil liberties.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Civil Liberties Donate to DU
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 01:26 PM
Original message
“Phoenix man rejoins NRA and ACLU” interesting solution to protect ALL civil liberties.
“Phoenix man rejoins NRA and ACLU”
To protect my rights under the Second Amendment as well as the First, I have recently rejoined the NRA and have renewed my membership in the ACLU.

Despite a recent Supreme Court decision, the Obama administration seems bent on restricting gun owners' rights and abusing the state-secrets privilege in civil litigation to hide governmental wrongdoing.

The civil-court system in Maricopa County is especially harmful because it routinely rejects the pleas of minority litigants as nuisances, leaving us with the unacceptable options of silence or violence.

* * * * * * * * * * * *

Without the NRA and the ACLU to protect everyone's rights, all of us will be in trouble. –

Richard Gayer,Phoenix
Refresh | +1 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. 'us with the unacceptable options of silence or violence. ' WTF?!?
This person is admitting that he's considering violence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
PavePusher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 12:29 AM
Response to Reply #1
11. Umm, you do realise that in the historical context the Second Amendment...
was written in, that is the whole point?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Euromutt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-30-09 01:25 AM
Response to Reply #1
16. If you had to live in the same county as Sheriff Joe Arpaio...
...and his merry band of brownshirts, violent resistance to the government might start looking like a viable option to you too. Especially if you were--or looked--Hispanic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
FLAprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
sybylla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. I guess this might work if you believed
Edited on Tue May-05-09 02:44 PM by sybylla
that the NRA protected anything but the gun companies rights to sell whatever the hell they want to anyone they want.

And before anyone thinks I'm some anti-gun nut, I own several, have carried my own gun into the woods every year to hunt since I was 12 and let my NRA membership lapse about 10 years ago when it became clear the organization had been taken over by people with addictions to blueing and a fiendish hankering for "cop killers."
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Interesting perspective and the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence is wasting money distributing
its report "The NRA: A Criminal's Best Friend — How The National Rifle Association Has Handcuffed Federal Gun Law Enforcement".

The Violence Policy Center is also wasting resources distributing such reports as "Guns for Felons: How the NRA Works to Rearm Criminals ".

Personally, I wish ACLU would honor its mission statement "The ACLU is our nation's guardian of liberty, working daily in courts, legislatures and communities to defend and preserve the individual rights and liberties that the Constitution and laws of the United States guarantee everyone in this country" and not exclude the Second Amendment as it does.

If ACLU protected the Second Amendment as it should because it covers a pre-existing right just like the First and Fourth, then it could be a viable alternative for those who support all civil liberties and not just a single right like NRA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Caliman73 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 02:00 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. I agree
It would allow the NRA to return to its original purpose of teaching firearms safety and marksmanship instead of acting as a lobby populated mainly by conservatives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
gorfle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Why?
It would allow the NRA to return to its original purpose of teaching firearms safety and marksmanship instead of acting as a lobby populated mainly by conservatives.

The primary function of the NRA these days is to protect our Constitutional right to keep and bear arms. Firearms safety and marksmanship don't mean much if you can't exercise that right.

Liberals can be pro-firearm, too, you know. The NRA is pretty apolitical. Both of my Democratic representatives in Congress last election were well-scored by the NRA. Yes, there are, unfortunately, more conservatives in the NRA and the NRA endorses more conservatives than liberals. This would change easily if more liberals would embrace the second amendment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
eqfan592 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. It's funny to me...
...that progressives complain about the NRA endorsing more conservatives than progressives, when the simple, and sad fact, is that more conservatives are pro-2a than progressives. If you want the NRA to endorse more progressives, then we should start putting forward more pro-2a progressives in elections. Otherwise, there's no point in complaining about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
benEzra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. WTF is a "cop killer"?
And before anyone thinks I'm some anti-gun nut, I own several, have carried my own gun into the woods every year to hunt since I was 12 and let my NRA membership lapse about 10 years ago when it became clear the organization had been taken over by people with addictions to blueing and a fiendish hankering for "cop killers."

WTF is a "cop killer"?

If you're talking about Kevlar-piercing handgun ammunition, that was banned 23 years ago by a law the NRA helped write.

the gun companies rights to sell whatever the hell they want to anyone they want.

How about the right of mentally competent adults with clean records to purchase and possess non-automatic, non-sound-suppressed NFA Title 1 civilian firearms under .51 caliber, plus over-.50 shotguns? Because that's what the gun control issue is about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
PavePusher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 12:33 AM
Response to Reply #3
12. "...sell whatever the hell they want to anyone they want."
Can you explain to me how that works? Lots of stuff is restricted. What are you concerned is sold that shouldn't be?

"addictions to blueing" I don't understand what you are trying to say here either. ?

'a fiendish hankering for "cop killers."' Are you claiming the NRA is promoting criminals and their actions? 'Cause I've never seen any proof of this. Cite?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Treo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #3
14. Question
That the NRA protected anything but the gun companies rights to sell whatever the hell they want to anyone they want.

Does that not also mean that the NRA protects the right of the average citizen to buy whatever the Hell they want from whoever the Hell they want?

IOW unrestricted freedom of both RKBA and free enterprise? Why is that bad?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
kilo729 Donating Member (6 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-10-09 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
8. Not a good plan to join the ACLU if you believe in gun rights...
seeing as they're against individual ownership of weapons.


http://www.aclu.org/crimjustice/gen/35904res20020304.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
benEzra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. They're coming around.
Their Jerry-Falwell-esque reasoning on the 2ndA isn't consistent with their view of the other Amendments. A number of the state chapters are vocally pro-2ndA, and the national ACLU has gradually been softening its prohibitionist line. There is hope, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
harvey007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
13. He should have joined a Liberal Gun Club

NRA lost its credibility in the last election. Fortunately, there are liberal alternatives.

Lest there be confusion -- the club below is not the gun club in Liberal, Kansas.

http://www.theliberalgunclub.com/

http://www.gunlovingliberal.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Treo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. The Liberal Gun Club
Supports:

Registration
The AWB
Banning concealed carry
waiting periods
Magazine capacity bans

Why do I want to support them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 24th 2024, 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Civil Liberties Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC