|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform |
![]() |
KatieB
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-05 04:56 PM Original message |
Could this be Y DEMS who spoke in support of BOXER then voted "NO" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pacifist Patriot
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-05 04:58 PM Response to Original message |
1. Possibly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PROGRESSIVE1
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-05 04:59 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Byrd is a genious! He left that great big loop hole open for us! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eye_on_prize
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-05 06:06 PM Response to Reply #3 |
24. Yes. "ongoing investigations" operative phrase. Conyers made this point.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
k8conant
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-05 06:30 PM Response to Reply #3 |
32. He simply recognizes the loopholes we already know about n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lancdem
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-05 05:15 PM Response to Reply #1 |
11. That is a great sentence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreepFryer
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-05 04:58 PM Response to Original message |
2. Precisely! I'm glad I asked him to 'exercise his own judgment' re Conyers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Child_Of_Isis
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-05 04:59 PM Response to Original message |
4. But didn't Boxer vote yes? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SnoopDog
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-05 05:12 PM Response to Reply #4 |
9. Boxer indeed voted yes - she signed on with... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Child_Of_Isis
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-05 05:17 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. Well, if she could vote yes, then so could the others. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-05 06:25 PM Response to Reply #13 |
30. No, your wrong. Senator Boxer knew what she was doing, she suggested |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Child_Of_Isis
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-05 09:33 PM Response to Reply #30 |
37. What would be the reason? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-05 10:31 PM Response to Reply #37 |
41. They fear trying to usurp democracy and the will of the people. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Child_Of_Isis
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-05 10:52 PM Response to Reply #41 |
44. Well, this makes sense... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-05 10:55 PM Response to Reply #44 |
46. I see your point. But as Senator Byrd stated they had to act on the info |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SnoopDog
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-05 06:27 PM Response to Reply #13 |
31. You are right... I felt let down. Although there are behind.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spooked911
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-05 05:00 PM Response to Original message |
5. Yes-- that makes sense. Thank you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
buddysmellgood
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-05 05:06 PM Response to Original message |
6. That's fine, but there is plenty of evidence now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stpalm
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-05 05:07 PM Response to Original message |
7. Ah, Mr. Byrd |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Career Prole
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-05 05:15 PM Response to Reply #7 |
12. Senator Byrd has more democratic fire in him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Petrushka
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-05 05:33 PM Response to Reply #7 |
16. Byrd --- "...is such a dixiecrat..."? ? ? Thanks for the chuckle . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stpalm
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-05 05:43 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. I knew that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Career Prole
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-05 08:50 PM Response to Reply #18 |
35. He's renounced it, denounced it, and has |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Petrushka
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-05 09:58 PM Response to Reply #18 |
39. Yep! Some of today's oldsters were dumb shits when . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stpalm
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-05 11:08 PM Response to Reply #39 |
47. so I made a spelling error. so what? people are mean (reply to prole, too) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Petrushka
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-05 11:18 PM Response to Reply #47 |
48. Welcome to DU, stpalm, from a [cough-cough]"...more senior member...." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stpalm
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-05 11:20 PM Response to Reply #48 |
49. people seem high strung here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Career Prole
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 12:33 PM Response to Reply #47 |
57. Substituting an adjective for a noun isn't a spelling mistake. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-05 05:10 PM Response to Original message |
8. NO! NO! YOU DENY THE DLC'S ROLE IN ONE PARTY RULE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lancdem
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-05 05:13 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Helga Scow Stern
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-05 05:23 PM Response to Original message |
14. Did Byrd speak? Or just submit this to the record? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nmoliver
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-05 05:31 PM Response to Original message |
15. It's reasoned, but deeply flawed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carolab
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-05 05:35 PM Response to Original message |
17. Yes, and this is why Mark Dayton didn't object either |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
katinmn
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-05 05:46 PM Response to Reply #17 |
19. that is interesting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
loudsue
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-05 05:56 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. Dayton sounded like someone I would like to see replaced |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
katinmn
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-05 06:01 PM Response to Reply #20 |
22. he came out HARD on the admin on Iraq today |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nmoliver
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-05 06:04 PM Response to Reply #17 |
23. PRECEDENTS? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carolab
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-05 09:11 PM Response to Reply #23 |
36. Not if there are clean elections |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rumpel
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-05 05:59 PM Response to Original message |
21. That is also what Schumer commented, as I posted yesterday |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-05 06:13 PM Response to Reply #21 |
27. Too bad other Democrats like Dayton and Durbin didn't applaud... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-05 06:16 PM Response to Reply #27 |
28. IMO, it's a CYA statement |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shawcomm
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-05 06:09 PM Response to Original message |
25. It's bullshit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nashville_brook
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-05 06:10 PM Response to Original message |
26. holy crap -- that's the whole transcript... i've been looking for that! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-05 06:24 PM Response to Original message |
29. Yes. This is EXACTLY why. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stephanie
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-05 10:39 PM Response to Reply #29 |
42. I agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
k8conant
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-05 06:32 PM Response to Original message |
33. The Constitution says nothing at all about "the evidence at hand"... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bush_is_wacko
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-05 06:57 PM Response to Original message |
34. Yes, I caught this statement. That is why I'm still open to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peacetalksforall
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-05 09:39 PM Response to Reply #34 |
38. Yes and No. Re ethics; re running scared.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bush_is_wacko
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 01:46 AM Response to Reply #38 |
52. I heard the ethics rule changes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kitkat65
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 10:20 AM Response to Reply #52 |
54. It also makes me wonder about the timing of recent news stories |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bush_is_wacko
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 12:13 PM Response to Reply #54 |
56. I agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KatieB
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 12:12 PM Response to Reply #52 |
64. So it sounds like the Delay indictment effected Thursday event |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bush_is_wacko
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 09:30 PM Original message |
Yeah, that's the way I see it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bush_is_wacko
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 09:30 PM Response to Reply #64 |
69. Yeah, that's the way I see it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sunnystarr
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 01:08 PM Response to Reply #52 |
65. I just wanted to add that with 3 Dem and 3 Repug members on the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kitkat65
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-05 11:28 PM Response to Reply #34 |
51. Of course, they had warning. Half of them were reading their replies. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bush_is_wacko
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 01:50 AM Response to Reply #51 |
53. See post # 52 (? above) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Philly Buster
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 01:52 PM Response to Reply #34 |
67. No one is running scared |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Straight Shooter
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-05 10:08 PM Response to Original message |
40. "But the Senate should not prejudge the results of those investigations." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davidgmills
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-05 10:48 PM Response to Reply #40 |
43. What Byrd should realize is that proof of fraud |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bill MI
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-05 10:53 PM Response to Original message |
45. Don't get mad, get LOUD!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Democrat Dragon
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-05 11:22 PM Response to Original message |
50. But... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BamaBecky
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 07:52 PM Response to Reply #50 |
62. Good Point! eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ira
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 10:40 AM Response to Original message |
55. Republican votes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bush_is_wacko
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 09:38 PM Response to Reply #55 |
70. It was clear that MANY Republicans and Dem's wanted to steer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Last Lemming
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 12:49 PM Response to Original message |
58. Another point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClintCooper2003
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 12:55 PM Response to Original message |
59. Also, lots of Dems didn't even vote. Boxer's effort was defeated by only |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KatieB
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 07:37 PM Response to Original message |
60. I think we need to help push these investigations and also |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dancing_Dave
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 07:46 PM Response to Original message |
61. But there is plenty of evidence about Ohio already... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KatieB
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 12:08 PM Response to Reply #61 |
63. Fantastic compilation - thank you-wonder what standard of evidence was for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GetTheRightVote
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 01:28 PM Response to Original message |
66. looking for excuse for them now, oh please they are weak spineless |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
myschkin
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 02:33 PM Response to Original message |
68. kick! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Jun 22nd 2024, 08:27 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC