2. She sure isn't.....she's bringing up POINT AFTER POINT
Edited on Thu Jan-06-05 06:54 PM by pbartch
about HOW, when and why the vote fraud took place.
We needed RANDI to speak today IN the Senate and House chambers instead of some of the spineless Dems that spoke today.
I'm not saying ALL the Democrats were chitty speakers....but they could have been more PASSIONATE and presented more information. Why didn't they present some of the info contained in Conyer's report?
THEY wouldn't have waffled. They'd have stood all together if it were them, and done WHATEVER was necessary--they'd have MADE THINGS UP, even. I'm SURE of it.
Democrats are TOO wishy-washy; too willing to compromise.
Republicans NEVER compromise. THE ENDS JUSTIFY THE MEANS. That's the Straussian model.
13. Yeah - wasn't it great to see? But how come the repugs
insisted on reading from biased editorials from repug-owned newspapers as if they were reading some sort of biblical truth? The only thing I could think was that they weren't expecting what happened today, and this was the best they could come up with at short notice - pathetic.
Their move was right out of KKKarl's playbook. The election fraud evidence is overwhelmingly damning. Their only choice, just like the run-up to Iraqi Freedom, was to substitute slanted opinion for cold, hard facts.
16. are you licensed to make clinical diagnosis of people's mental state or
hormonal imbalances? I am always fascinated when someone labels another human being like this. Under what authority do you speak? Your degree? Or do you just have trouble with "outspoken" radicals like Frances Farmer?
I watched her in action for two years when I used to work for the California Assembly and Senate, back when she was a state legislator. She was awesome then and still is.
What was the final House vote on certifying Ohio's electors? I was nauseated to hear so many Dems say this wasn't about questioning the outcome. It damn sure should've been! Please tell me that Maxine and a few other brave Dems cast the right votes. Giving lip service to investigating voting irregularities is good, but not enough.
11. I didn't hear that bit ... but she made a great speech today.
You're right, the cons do hang together no matter what - but I don't know if that's ever going to be possible with free-thinking liberals ... which is a blessing for freedom of thought and individuality, but also a hindrance in any form of 'party' political debates.
9. Both have guts and that is exactly what is needed to save the
country.
We have stone age leaders in Washington who just don't get it. The country must be saved and it won't be saved being afraid of liars and thieves and doing the job to make wealth for themselves.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.