|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform |
![]() |
Shalom
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 02:06 PM Original message |
iT'S ON-LINE: Curtis Affadavit: SIGNED, SEALED, DELIVERED !! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
noclonyofthechimp
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 02:07 PM Response to Original message |
1. wahoo! thanks! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IAMREALITY
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 02:07 PM Response to Original message |
2. WooooHooooo!! Thanks for the Post! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shalom
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 02:11 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. Curtis takes names and numbers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 02:11 PM Response to Original message |
3. Boom. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stand and Fight
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 03:43 PM Response to Reply #3 |
99. Notary Public |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GingerSnaps
![]() |
Tue Dec-07-04 12:11 AM Response to Reply #99 |
328. I'm a Notary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stand and Fight
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 03:46 PM Response to Reply #3 |
104. Affidavits |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FogerRox
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 07:07 PM Response to Reply #104 |
270. Affy davids |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
understandinglife
![]() |
Tue Dec-07-04 02:29 AM Response to Reply #104 |
341. Curtis affidavit submitted to House.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
noclonyofthechimp
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 02:11 PM Response to Original message |
4. should we present to oberman? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
keepthemhonest
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 02:19 PM Response to Reply #4 |
11. i think oberman reads these blogs himself |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mccoyn
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 02:31 PM Response to Reply #11 |
29. I think it is a color scan. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueDog2u
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 02:31 PM Response to Reply #11 |
31. Good observation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
keepthemhonest
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 02:34 PM Response to Reply #31 |
33. i hope you two guys are right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kralizec
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 03:42 PM Response to Reply #11 |
98. This is not a blog. I hate that generalization. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
keepthemhonest
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 04:10 PM Response to Reply #98 |
129. these are not weblogs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stand and Fight
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 03:47 PM Response to Reply #11 |
105. Olbermann |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
steve2470
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 04:25 PM Response to Reply #105 |
142. great avatar ! lol nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pepper32
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 05:54 PM Response to Reply #11 |
216. I don't think he reads these blogs, a lot of members here email him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 05:02 PM Response to Reply #4 |
170. of course--pass to KO--any and all of us--so what if he gets a 100+ copies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pepper32
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 05:57 PM Response to Reply #170 |
220. Yep, it's time to start accidentally dropping copies of this affidavit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OKthatsIT
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 02:13 PM Response to Original message |
6. YES! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
understandinglife
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 02:13 PM Response to Original message |
7. Brad Blog: whistleblower affidavit story and link |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
caligirl
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 03:51 PM Response to Reply #7 |
111. tried to connect but Too Many Users was what came up. MSM?n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
understandinglife
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 04:52 PM Response to Reply #111 |
161. Brad's site is definitely getting hammered; 'slashdot' or 'dos'?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BradBlog
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 07:49 PM Response to Reply #161 |
281. I'm just getting hammered... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kitty1
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 06:17 PM Response to Reply #7 |
235. bradblog story copied at buzzflash.com as well n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ahyums
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 02:14 PM Response to Original message |
8. does this only apply to Florida? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ET Awful
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 02:15 PM Response to Original message |
9. Why is the last page a different color? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
keepthemhonest
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 02:20 PM Response to Reply #9 |
12. yeah I noticed it is in a different type too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ohio_liberal
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 02:20 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. I wondered that too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BR_Parkway
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 02:21 PM Response to Reply #9 |
17. And why is it dated today? Why would someone (Madsen) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClintCooper2003
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 02:27 PM Response to Reply #17 |
23. He probably had been in contact with Curtis before and... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
keepthemhonest
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 02:28 PM Response to Reply #17 |
26. something seems fishy about the paper |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pointsoflight
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 03:31 PM Response to Reply #26 |
85. Black and white vs. color scanning. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fasttense
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 04:37 PM Response to Reply #85 |
148. I use to do Notary work |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AmyCrat
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 02:38 PM Response to Reply #17 |
42. agree... inconsistencies like this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IAMREALITY
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 02:46 PM Response to Reply #42 |
46. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pepper32
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 05:51 PM Response to Reply #42 |
213. Yeah, I really wish it scanned more true to the document |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AmyCrat
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 05:51 PM Response to Reply #213 |
214. another reasonable and good idea n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pepper32
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 06:10 PM Response to Reply #214 |
230. Thanks, hopefully they will do this and SOON n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pointsoflight
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 03:30 PM Response to Reply #17 |
84. Two different affadavits. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 08:13 PM Response to Reply #84 |
292. yes, signed Dec 6, 2004 (per pdf document) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BradBlog
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 02:35 PM Response to Reply #9 |
36. It was Auto-Scanned that way... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pointsoflight
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 03:32 PM Response to Reply #36 |
87. Thanks for your work on this! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
keepthemhonest
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 03:48 PM Response to Reply #36 |
106. ok n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberty Belle
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 04:36 PM Response to Reply #36 |
147. Who are you giving this to? Which authorities/media? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BradBlog
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 07:54 PM Response to Reply #147 |
283. Let your Congressman (and Media!) Know... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Emillereid
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 07:56 PM Response to Reply #36 |
284. So the auto-scanning makes the font look like different sizes?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mccoyn
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 02:35 PM Response to Reply #9 |
37. I think it is a color scan. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NVMojo
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 03:37 PM Response to Reply #37 |
93. this can easily happen as someone scans individual pages and forgets to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mdb
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 03:27 PM Response to Reply #9 |
77. This appears to be the difference in how the pages were scanned. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jwmealy
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 08:57 PM Response to Reply #9 |
302. Well, duhhh. . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gregorian
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 02:19 PM Response to Original message |
10. This part jumped out at me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mister K
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 02:30 PM Response to Reply #10 |
28. It looks like the first three pages were scanned in... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bj2110
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 02:20 PM Response to Original message |
14. Great news! This is the first item that could be considered... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whistle
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 02:20 PM Response to Original message |
15. How much smoke does this document produce...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stand and Fight
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 03:53 PM Response to Reply #15 |
113. Smoke... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scout1071
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 02:21 PM Response to Original message |
16. Simply put |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burythehatchet
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 02:23 PM Response to Original message |
18. have a look at some history |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClintCooper2003
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 02:25 PM Response to Reply #18 |
20. I couldn't find it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burythehatchet
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 02:31 PM Response to Reply #20 |
30. its buried pretty deep |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donailin
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 11:46 PM Response to Reply #30 |
325. And I would agree with you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClintCooper2003
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 02:24 PM Response to Original message |
19. Holy, holy, holy! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Florida_Geek
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 02:26 PM Response to Original message |
21. FYI Tom Feeney is a clone for Tom Delay |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rawstory
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 02:26 PM Response to Original message |
22. DETAILS ON STORY |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shalom
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 02:29 PM Response to Reply #22 |
27. THANKS to Raw Story & Bradblog for busting this wide open...n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mackdaddy
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 11:51 PM Response to Reply #22 |
327. Please Re-scan with a fixed setup and re-post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Broken Acorn
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 02:28 PM Response to Original message |
24. This is bogus |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IAMREALITY
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 02:33 PM Response to Reply #24 |
32. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BradBlog
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 02:37 PM Response to Reply #24 |
40. Sorry, you're wrong Acorn |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emcguffie
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 05:33 PM Response to Reply #40 |
193. real casolaro's death in 1991 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
countmyvote4real
![]() |
Tue Dec-07-04 01:14 AM Response to Reply #193 |
336. I don't know WTF you're talking about. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emcguffie
![]() |
Tue Dec-07-04 03:26 PM Response to Reply #336 |
361. madsen and casolaro |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NVMojo
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 03:43 PM Response to Reply #24 |
101. there is nothing unusual about the fourth page being scanned in color |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueDog2u
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 04:00 PM Response to Reply #24 |
121. I am quite open to the possibility that the document is not genuine |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mostly_lurking
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 02:28 PM Response to Original message |
25. This isn't credible (sorry) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IAMREALITY
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 02:34 PM Response to Reply #25 |
34. You're Right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shalom
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 02:36 PM Response to Reply #34 |
39. INCREDIBLE REALITY FROM IAMREALITY, REALLY !!! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eowyn_of_rohan
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 04:29 PM Response to Reply #34 |
144. Is this a dream? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shalom
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 02:35 PM Response to Reply #25 |
35. I Disagree...It Is Credible |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Broken Acorn
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 02:36 PM Response to Reply #35 |
38. No disrespect Shalom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mostly_lurking
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 02:45 PM Response to Reply #35 |
45. My degree is an MSEE in Computer Engineering |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skids
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 03:29 PM Response to Reply #45 |
81. My degree is also. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mostly_lurking
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 03:33 PM Response to Reply #81 |
89. Excellent post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueDog2u
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 04:06 PM Response to Reply #81 |
125. Thanks for the clarification |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skids
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 08:02 PM Response to Reply #125 |
286. In fact, it is pretty much stated to be another program |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jwmealy
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 09:17 PM Response to Reply #286 |
311. The language about Feeney is a little ambiguous, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
milkyway
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 04:14 PM Response to Reply #81 |
131. Thanks to both of you for providing reasoned, intelligent analysis. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pointsoflight
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 04:35 PM Response to Reply #131 |
146. But he wouldn't have known how it was to be committed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phantom power
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 04:22 PM Response to Reply #45 |
139. When it comes to software design, EEs are legends... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mostly_lurking
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 04:28 PM Response to Reply #139 |
143. Stanford's Computer Engineering program |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 05:03 PM Response to Reply #139 |
171. Deleted message |
NVMojo
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 03:46 PM Response to Reply #35 |
103. I agree, Shalom, and I know lots of self taught programmers who |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mister K
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 02:38 PM Response to Reply #25 |
41. What I found interesting is that it ties into the GEMS system |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Broken Acorn
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 02:42 PM Response to Reply #41 |
44. ALL Databases use serial numbers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Viktor Runeberg
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 02:55 PM Response to Reply #44 |
54. Your point? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IAMREALITY
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 02:59 PM Response to Reply #54 |
58. Well Said Viktor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
keepthemhonest
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 03:41 PM Response to Reply #41 |
96. so if this is for real then |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laura PourMeADrink
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 06:53 PM Response to Reply #41 |
263. Mr K - I remember reading a story about ballots in affiliated |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iconoclastNYC
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 02:51 PM Response to Reply #25 |
51. How many thousands of people do programming without a degree? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mostly_lurking
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 03:01 PM Response to Reply #51 |
62. Perhaps, but... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Viktor Runeberg
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 03:10 PM Response to Reply #62 |
67. As someone else has pointed out ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mostly_lurking
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 03:24 PM Response to Reply #67 |
76. That's completely wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NVMojo
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 03:52 PM Response to Reply #76 |
112. for what it is worth, our county clerk had the database from the recent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
electropop
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 03:10 PM Response to Reply #62 |
68. Voting machines are PCs, not embedded systems |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mostly_lurking
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 03:29 PM Response to Reply #68 |
79. I already addressed this in my earlier post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NVMojo
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 03:53 PM Response to Reply #79 |
114. gee, I remember when I was looking my ballot choices on the Sequoia |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wrate
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 03:31 PM Response to Reply #68 |
86. Exactly, plus since the OS is Windows, you need only the Windows API's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mostly_lurking
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 03:36 PM Response to Reply #86 |
92. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
electropop
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 03:50 PM Response to Reply #92 |
110. It's irrelevant anyway |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pointsoflight
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 04:01 PM Response to Reply #68 |
123. Yes, it IS windows software. You can download the software here.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pointsoflight
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 03:45 PM Response to Reply #62 |
102. This is all irrelevant. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pepper32
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 03:49 PM Response to Reply #62 |
109. Maybe my point is simple but he was obviously qualified enough to be hired |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mccoyn
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 02:57 PM Response to Reply #25 |
56. It doesn't sound like he was good at his job. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Viktor Runeberg
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 03:18 PM Response to Reply #56 |
71. Or else ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mccoyn
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 03:29 PM Response to Reply #71 |
82. Agreed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
badc0der
![]() |
Tue Dec-07-04 12:44 AM Response to Reply #82 |
334. This guy is a vb programmer... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
crispini
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 03:00 PM Response to Reply #25 |
59. Well, it's INTERESTING. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
high density
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 03:01 PM Response to Reply #25 |
61. I have to agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sparkle
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 04:08 PM Response to Reply #61 |
126. But the thing is, it proves that they (Feeney and the Repukes) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
life_long_dem
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 05:17 PM Response to Reply #126 |
182. I believe a person can be charged with "attempted crime". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
electropop
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 03:04 PM Response to Reply #25 |
64. I'm only a lowly BSEE (1984) but... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Viktor Runeberg
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 03:07 PM Response to Reply #25 |
66. Don't know where you work but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mostly_lurking
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 03:20 PM Response to Reply #66 |
73. I agree there are many talented programmers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Boredtodeath
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 04:17 PM Response to Reply #73 |
134. 2 MAJOR things |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donailin
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 11:49 PM Response to Reply #66 |
326. This is very true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pointsoflight
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 03:38 PM Response to Reply #25 |
94. Your logic is flawed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pepper32
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 03:57 PM Response to Reply #94 |
118. exactly n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NVMojo
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 04:03 PM Original message |
yeah, and Feeney may have just been using him through an "inquiry" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davidlynch
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 04:44 PM Response to Reply #25 |
153. Not Credible |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 04:48 PM Response to Reply #153 |
156. Deleted message |
Pepper32
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 08:07 PM Response to Reply #156 |
289. Yes, what would we have done? The thought is frightening. Good thing we |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Qutzupalotl
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 07:47 PM Response to Reply #153 |
280. Superscripting could only have been done on a 1973 IBM Executive. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jfern
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 05:45 PM Response to Reply #25 |
202. BS in CS is over-rated |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bj2110
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 02:42 PM Response to Original message |
43. So, the way I'm reading this is.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shalom
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 02:53 PM Response to Reply #43 |
52. Other Possibility: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bj2110
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 02:57 PM Response to Reply #52 |
55. Makes even more sense. Embed it everywhere and... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shalom
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 03:39 PM Response to Reply #55 |
95. Need Computer Whiz Thread on Scams, and Other Ideas |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wiggs
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 02:58 PM Response to Reply #43 |
57. Affadavit doesn't say what was actually used..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bj2110
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 03:01 PM Response to Reply #57 |
60. I sure hope Bev, Madsen, & Conyers are all talking... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proudtobeadem
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 03:43 PM Response to Reply #60 |
100. I hope they're all talking...to Kerry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nmoliver
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 03:15 PM Response to Reply #57 |
70. what it does prove ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wiggs
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 03:28 PM Response to Reply #70 |
78. Right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
danostuporstar
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 03:36 PM Response to Reply #57 |
91. good thoughts, wiggs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mccoyn
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 03:42 PM Response to Reply #57 |
97. Affidavit suggests it wasn't this program. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pointsoflight
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 03:55 PM Response to Reply #97 |
115. Yes, and he recreates the program here: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tjdee
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 05:47 PM Response to Reply #115 |
205. Crap-- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pointsoflight
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 03:48 PM Response to Reply #57 |
107. Exactly, good post. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
googly
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 05:45 PM Response to Reply #57 |
203. Exactly!!! If they very devious enough to use vote hacking code, they |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zan_of_Texas
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 06:52 PM Response to Reply #43 |
262. Some stuff for you geeks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zan_of_Texas
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 06:59 PM Response to Reply #262 |
266. Actual hack test of Diebold touchscreen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zan_of_Texas
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 07:05 PM Response to Reply #266 |
269. One more thing -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zan_of_Texas
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 07:18 PM Response to Reply #269 |
274. okay, one more - re qui tam |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
From the south
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 02:46 PM Response to Original message |
47. Why are the first 3 pages |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
crispini
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 02:48 PM Response to Reply #47 |
48. Read the thread. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jcollins35
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 02:50 PM Response to Original message |
49. No Raymond Lemme in Google search |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Metatron
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 03:03 PM Response to Reply #49 |
63. Here is a google link (about Lemme, not his death) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AmyCrat
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 03:04 PM Response to Reply #49 |
65. Raymond Lemme is mentioned here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qanda
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 04:57 PM Response to Reply #49 |
164. I found a document from google |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eek
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 05:56 PM Response to Reply #49 |
219. I found a few things on Ray Lemme |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MarkusQ
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 02:50 PM Response to Original message |
50. Feeny's rebuttal -- issued two years ago??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mostly_lurking
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 02:54 PM Response to Reply #50 |
53. Link doesn't work... n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Quakerfriend
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 03:11 PM Response to Reply #53 |
69. THis is awsome!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Broken Acorn
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 03:18 PM Response to Reply #69 |
72. It's fake |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IAMREALITY
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 03:20 PM Response to Reply #72 |
74. Here we go again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
George W. Hayduke
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 06:12 PM Response to Reply #74 |
233. that is so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bj2110
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 03:21 PM Response to Reply #72 |
75. I haven't seen anything that proves its fake.... Please direct me to... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
faithfull
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 03:30 PM Response to Reply #72 |
83. Its not working. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueDog2u
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 03:58 PM Response to Reply #83 |
120. That's a very persuasive argument you're making.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SueZhope
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 03:34 PM Response to Reply #72 |
90. If you say its a fake and since you are 100% sure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Broken Acorn
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 03:49 PM Response to Reply #90 |
108. IF this was true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IAMREALITY
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 04:03 PM Response to Reply #108 |
124. Broken Acorn |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 04:15 PM Response to Reply #124 |
132. Deleted message |
IAMREALITY
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 04:18 PM Response to Reply #132 |
135. No Ass Here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merh
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 07:23 PM Response to Reply #108 |
275. The sky really isn't falling - we really didn't hit an iceberg . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
coreystone
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 08:05 PM Response to Reply #90 |
287. YES! Who created it, or rather, who did such a "sloppy" inconsistant... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stirringstill
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 03:57 PM Response to Reply #72 |
119. It's fake because I said so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueDog2u
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 04:20 PM Response to Reply #72 |
136. This affidavit isn't real people. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IAMREALITY
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 04:24 PM Response to Reply #136 |
140. LOL Blue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dolphyn
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 08:23 PM Response to Reply #72 |
294. Compare page 3 at 89% to page 4 at full-size ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabra
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 03:55 PM Response to Reply #53 |
116. Updated Link |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NVMojo
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 04:10 PM Response to Reply #116 |
128. been there, done that....this is typically how corporations or the feds |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wiggs
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 04:14 PM Response to Reply #116 |
130. Typical |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
milkyway
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 05:09 PM Response to Reply #116 |
179. Good find, but Feeney doesn't say anything. It's just empty words telling |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donailin
![]() |
Tue Dec-07-04 12:17 AM Response to Reply #116 |
329. Right and two weeks ago during the Merck hearings |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merh
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 06:51 PM Response to Reply #50 |
260. Your link doesn't work! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rawstory
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 07:14 PM Response to Reply #50 |
271. INFORMATION ON DOCUMENT DISCREPANCIES |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Turn CO Blue
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 08:16 PM Response to Reply #50 |
293. More cache'd Feeney hits on google: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DTinAZ
![]() |
Tue Dec-07-04 10:23 AM Response to Reply #293 |
352. article to which Feeney was responding... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sparkle
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 03:29 PM Response to Original message |
80. This isn't news until Drudgie says it's news. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donailin
![]() |
Tue Dec-07-04 12:20 AM Response to Reply #80 |
330. I stopped reading drudge a month ago. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
danostuporstar
![]() |
Tue Dec-07-04 09:27 AM Response to Reply #80 |
346. i dunno it's made it to MetaFilter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
izzy12
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 03:32 PM Response to Original message |
88. Raymond Lemme |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CabalPowered
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 04:01 PM Response to Reply #88 |
122. More on Raymond Lemme.. He did work for Fl. IG |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donailin
![]() |
Tue Dec-07-04 12:23 AM Response to Reply #88 |
331. say, it's not a very good idea to post someones SSN |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wiggs
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 03:56 PM Response to Original message |
117. Was there a "pi" symbol on the bottom of the voter screen? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
libmeayer
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 04:08 PM Response to Original message |
127. This guy is going to jail. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qanda
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 04:16 PM Response to Original message |
133. I found this through google |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qanda
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 04:20 PM Response to Reply #133 |
137. And this... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DTinAZ
![]() |
Tue Dec-07-04 10:17 AM Response to Reply #137 |
351. archived version of this URL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DTinAZ
![]() |
Tue Dec-07-04 10:15 AM Response to Reply #133 |
350. archived version of this URL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mdb
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 04:20 PM Response to Original message |
138. Question... how does this tie in to the technicians at polling places? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eowyn_of_rohan
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 04:24 PM Response to Original message |
141. Great respect for Clinton Curtis. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shraby
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 04:31 PM Response to Reply #141 |
145. I believe there were news reports about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eowyn_of_rohan
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 04:44 PM Response to Reply #145 |
151. I've been reading about his death today--very sad. Another hero -nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberty Belle
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 04:41 PM Response to Original message |
149. I sent it to Olbermann. What else should we do? kick! kick! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shraby
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 04:42 PM Response to Reply #149 |
150. Kick!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Peace Patriot
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 04:44 PM Response to Original message |
152. To the Naysayers: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davidlynch
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 04:47 PM Response to Reply #152 |
155. Disagree--Obvious Fake |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davidlynch
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 04:46 PM Response to Original message |
154. ITS FAKE--SORRY |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
reality_bites
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 04:50 PM Response to Reply #154 |
157. Agreed n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sparkle
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 04:50 PM Response to Reply #154 |
158. It's is? Thanks for letting me know. I really appreciate that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IAMREALITY
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 04:52 PM Response to Reply #158 |
160. Sparkle |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sparkle
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 05:12 PM Response to Reply #160 |
180. Yes, I was being sarcastic. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pepper32
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 05:41 PM Response to Reply #180 |
199. Every time, I see "move on", I get even more determined NOT to move on... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ibegurpard
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 04:51 PM Response to Reply #154 |
159. Okay, I always view things with skepticism |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IAMREALITY
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 04:52 PM Response to Reply #159 |
162. Oh Don't Worry ibegurpard |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qanda
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 05:01 PM Response to Reply #162 |
168. And why do all the people who try to discredit this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AmyCrat
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 05:06 PM Response to Reply #168 |
176. You say go away, I saw no. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AmyCrat
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 04:57 PM Response to Reply #159 |
163. Being skeptical makes sense |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IAMREALITY
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 05:00 PM Response to Reply #163 |
167. AmyCrat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ibegurpard
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 05:02 PM Response to Reply #163 |
169. You didn't address my question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IAMREALITY
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 05:04 PM Response to Reply #169 |
172. Hey, Do Not Talk To AmyCrat That Way |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AmyCrat
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 05:05 PM Response to Reply #169 |
173. maybe you're right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ibegurpard
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 05:21 PM Response to Reply #173 |
184. Oh, I will |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pointsoflight
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 05:05 PM Response to Reply #163 |
174. Looks to me... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AmyCrat
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 05:07 PM Response to Reply #174 |
178. that's a very good idea. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SueZhope
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 05:25 PM Response to Reply #163 |
187. Amycrat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IAMREALITY
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 05:28 PM Response to Reply #187 |
190. Woooohoooooo Amy!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AmyCrat
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 05:42 PM Response to Reply #190 |
200. hehe thanks n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AmyCrat
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 05:31 PM Response to Reply #187 |
192. ack! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IAMREALITY
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 05:35 PM Response to Reply #192 |
195. Kinda Makes Ya Realize |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AmyCrat
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 05:44 PM Response to Reply #195 |
201. I hear ya... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pointsoflight
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 04:58 PM Response to Reply #154 |
165. Looks to me like it's about scanner settings. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davidlynch
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 05:00 PM Response to Reply #165 |
166. The Last Page Is Real--Rest Is Fake |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pointsoflight
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 05:07 PM Response to Reply #166 |
177. And you think Madsen's is fake, too, and that he's risking a libel suit? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davidlynch
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 05:45 PM Response to Reply #177 |
204. Believe Me--I Hate Bush--But This Is Fake |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pointsoflight
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 06:44 PM Response to Reply #204 |
254. And what about Madsen's affadavit? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wiggs
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 05:16 PM Response to Reply #166 |
181. If you are right... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shraby
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 05:06 PM Response to Reply #165 |
175. I don't think anyone would sign an affidavit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
intelle
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 07:17 PM Response to Reply #154 |
273. What I am noticing is that the nay-sayers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Razorback_Democrat
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 08:36 PM Response to Reply #154 |
298. Okay, can you go back to FreeRepublic now? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jsamuel
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 05:18 PM Response to Original message |
183. The document is being hit hard by posters with less than 150 posts... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ibegurpard
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 05:23 PM Response to Reply #183 |
186. Not necessarily |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
prof_science
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 05:27 PM Response to Reply #183 |
189. Me > 200 posts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jsamuel
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 05:29 PM Response to Reply #189 |
191. You have that right, and we do need to be sure, but just SHOUTING |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
prof_science
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 05:34 PM Response to Reply #191 |
194. Who's shouting? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AmyCrat
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 05:38 PM Response to Reply #194 |
197. I think we should all be careful who we point fingers at... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sparkle
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 05:49 PM Response to Reply #197 |
210. Hi Amycrat! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AmyCrat
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 05:50 PM Response to Reply #210 |
211. sparkle... yes, someone just let me know a few posts up^ -- thanks :) n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pepper32
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 08:33 PM Response to Reply #211 |
297. Amycrat you are a DU star now... hehe Congrats :) n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mirrera
![]() |
Tue Dec-07-04 08:23 AM Response to Reply #197 |
344. Thank You |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mccoyn
![]() |
Tue Dec-07-04 10:01 AM Response to Reply #197 |
349. Thank you, this is a big problem on this forum. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
buddysmellgood
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 05:22 PM Response to Original message |
185. The first and third letters of every tenth word are fake, the rest are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cronus Protagonist
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 05:26 PM Response to Original message |
188. Section 14 regarding Hai Lin Nee is partially verified here (USA Today) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
raipoli
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 05:39 PM Response to Reply #188 |
198. The Affidavit Is Real |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davidlynch
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 05:47 PM Response to Reply #198 |
206. Then Why Is the Font Different? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pointsoflight
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 05:52 PM Response to Reply #206 |
215. It's not different. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pepper32
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 09:09 PM Response to Reply #215 |
308. Also... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donailin
![]() |
Tue Dec-07-04 12:47 AM Response to Reply #308 |
335. I just had an affadavit notarized last week at my local bank |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ET Awful
![]() |
Tue Dec-07-04 09:44 AM Response to Reply #335 |
348. When a Notary notarizes a document, all they are doing is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueDog2u
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 05:48 PM Response to Reply #198 |
207. Thanks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cronus Protagonist
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 05:48 PM Response to Reply #198 |
208. Fine, but since we don't know you, do you mind if we verify? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SueZhope
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 05:49 PM Response to Reply #198 |
209. That sounds great |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sparkle
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 05:50 PM Response to Reply #198 |
212. And who might you be? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donailin
![]() |
Tue Dec-07-04 12:38 AM Response to Reply #198 |
332. You mean Maryland. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shalom
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 05:37 PM Response to Original message |
196. Jeb Bush Called FL Congressman Feeney a "LOOSE CANNON" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wiggs
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 06:16 PM Response to Reply #196 |
234. Loose cannons are needed in the BA to implement unwritten policy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shalom
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 06:35 PM Response to Reply #234 |
245. Good Point: Loose Cannons Give BA Distance & Deniability.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Broken Acorn
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 05:54 PM Response to Original message |
217. I love the reasoning |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mamalone
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 06:01 PM Response to Reply #217 |
224. The thing is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Broken Acorn
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 06:30 PM Response to Reply #224 |
241. Agreed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shalom
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 06:02 PM Response to Reply #217 |
225. Let's Not Bust "Broken Acorns" Nuts.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Broken Acorn
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 06:37 PM Response to Reply #225 |
247. I hope you are right Shalom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pepper32
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 09:30 PM Response to Reply #225 |
316. Exactly... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mikelewis
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 05:56 PM Response to Original message |
218. document not fraudelent - the scan was done different on the last page |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shopaholic
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 06:00 PM Response to Reply #218 |
222. Remember what happened to Rather and the fake documents |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mikelewis
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 06:04 PM Response to Reply #222 |
226. This is different, the question is on the content not the doc. The doc |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueDog2u
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 06:48 PM Response to Reply #226 |
257. Right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pointsoflight
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 06:07 PM Response to Reply #222 |
227. But also keep in mind the full story. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pepper32
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 06:34 PM Response to Reply #227 |
243. Exactly, why would they risk a libel suit? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
coreystone
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 05:59 PM Response to Original message |
221. I am no expert, but, just on the last page, in the remainder of.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pointsoflight
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 06:01 PM Response to Reply #221 |
223. The first three pages have been enlarged. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
coreystone
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 06:09 PM Response to Reply #223 |
229. The fourth page which finishes Para. #13, it looks different! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mikelewis
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 06:07 PM Response to Reply #221 |
228. That's because when you convert to B/W you loose greyscale shading |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lthuedk
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 06:21 PM Response to Reply #228 |
236. Agreed. The total bit depth of the B & W will be divided three ways |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KeireG
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 06:48 PM Response to Reply #221 |
256. The Affidavit is REAL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mostly_lurking
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 06:10 PM Response to Original message |
231. OK, all the professionals who have chimed in here... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
coreystone
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 06:11 PM Response to Reply #231 |
232. I just don't want to get "Dan Rathered"! :-) n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jsamuel
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 06:23 PM Response to Reply #231 |
238. This program is a simple Visual program... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Karmadillo
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 06:28 PM Response to Reply #231 |
240. Since you found this, maybe you'd like the honor of starting a new thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mostly_lurking
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 06:40 PM Response to Reply #240 |
250. Already one going |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Karmadillo
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 06:51 PM Response to Reply #250 |
261. Thanks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shalom
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 06:49 PM Response to Reply #240 |
258. I Think a New Thread Makes Sense - Can You Propose a Title ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mikelewis
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 06:21 PM Response to Original message |
237. This is Clint Curtis' consulting firm Ask him if this affidavit is real. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberty Belle
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 06:25 PM Response to Reply #237 |
239. Surely he's gone into hiding for his own protection? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mikelewis
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 06:33 PM Response to Reply #239 |
242. The last update to his site was on Jul 4, 2004. Anyone have any idea what |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
coreystone
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 06:37 PM Response to Reply #237 |
246. Go to the site, go to the 4th page! then, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mostly_lurking
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 06:39 PM Response to Reply #237 |
248. Wrong "Curtis" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EndElectoral
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 06:35 PM Response to Original message |
244. Smoking gun "IF" we can get Yang to confirm! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jsamuel
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 06:41 PM Response to Reply #244 |
251. or Mrs. Yang |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smartvoter
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 06:40 PM Response to Original message |
249. Can we get a uniform scan to end the authenticity controversy? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueDog2u
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 06:41 PM Response to Reply #249 |
252. Good idea/ eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Broken Acorn
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 06:44 PM Response to Reply #249 |
253. Yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IAMREALITY
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 06:45 PM Response to Reply #253 |
255. Woooooohoooooo Go BradBlog!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cronus Protagonist
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 06:54 PM Response to Reply #253 |
265. Hey, Broken Record |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Broken Acorn
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 08:08 PM Response to Reply #265 |
290. No problem with promotion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cronus Protagonist
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 08:10 PM Response to Reply #290 |
291. Well, it does pay to be cautious |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merh
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 07:03 PM Response to Reply #249 |
268. It's really not causing grief, let the doubters do a dan rather |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wiggs
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 06:50 PM Response to Original message |
259. No headline on cnn, yahoo, or msnbc on affidavit yet. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 06:53 PM Response to Original message |
264. holy fooking crap! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Digit
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 07:02 PM Response to Original message |
267. W*O*W |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mr Grieves
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 07:16 PM Response to Original message |
272. South Florida, Berkely Study Connection |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lthuedk
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 07:36 PM Response to Reply #272 |
278. Peterson was convicted on circumstantial evidence. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
senseandsensibility
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 08:57 PM Response to Reply #272 |
301. Welcome to DU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mr Grieves
![]() |
Tue Dec-07-04 01:16 AM Response to Reply #301 |
337. Thanks! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Turn CO Blue
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 07:29 PM Response to Original message |
276. Okay - one point in the affidavit that seems to check out: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 07:34 PM Response to Original message |
277. Isn't it weird that Feeney was so forthright with Curtis |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueDog2u
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 09:32 PM Response to Reply #277 |
317. It does seem odd |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blackspade
![]() |
Tue Dec-07-04 03:23 PM Response to Reply #317 |
360. nobody said that criminals were smart |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davidlynch
![]() |
Tue Dec-07-04 02:59 AM Response to Reply #277 |
343. Exactly, That's Just Unbelievable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FULL_METAL_HAT
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 07:42 PM Response to Original message |
279. I wish it mentioned SOME detail of the programming |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pointsoflight
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 09:12 PM Response to Reply #279 |
309. But he wasn't working on a program for the target system. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ExCiber
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 09:21 PM Response to Reply #309 |
312. I'm missing something |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blitzburgh55
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 07:53 PM Response to Original message |
282. wow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Quakerfriend
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 09:03 PM Response to Reply #282 |
305. It does seem hard to believe Feeney would be so upfront |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sperk
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 08:01 PM Response to Original message |
285. ya know what's so weird.....I just saw a re-run on Unsolved Mysteries |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IAMREALITY
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 08:07 PM Response to Original message |
288. Just Wanted To Let All Of You Know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mikelewis
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 08:25 PM Response to Original message |
295. Just so you can see why this is not a fraud doc I did the b&w convert |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueDog2u
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 09:27 PM Response to Reply #295 |
314. Thanks Mike |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Rinaldo
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 08:30 PM Response to Original message |
296. If such a program was written once |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Broken Acorn
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 08:37 PM Response to Original message |
299. Arguments aside regarding the authenticity of the affidavit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IAMREALITY
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 08:38 PM Response to Reply #299 |
300. Wow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shalom
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 09:05 PM Response to Reply #300 |
306. IAMREALITY IS REALITY - DON'T GET SUCKER PUNCHED |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wiggs
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 09:21 PM Response to Reply #306 |
313. Correct. Let's get on with the good stuff. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shalom
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 09:01 PM Response to Reply #299 |
303. You Hate the Messenger (Curtis): His message is BEAUTIFUL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Broken Acorn
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 09:07 PM Response to Reply #303 |
307. I will eat humble pie if I am wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jwmealy
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 09:02 PM Response to Reply #299 |
304. First time authors do have this thing. . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pointsoflight
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 09:15 PM Response to Reply #299 |
310. Generate interest at the expense of being sued? I don't think so. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wiggs
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 09:29 PM Response to Original message |
315. Ask Mr. Feeney |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueOhio
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 09:44 PM Response to Original message |
318. OMG Check out the period on page 3, middle on the right side, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IAMREALITY
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 09:45 PM Response to Reply #318 |
319. Ohhhhhhhhh That'sss What That Was! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
buzzard
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 10:05 PM Response to Reply #319 |
321. Why was his dog killed today?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
coreystone
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 09:51 PM Response to Reply #318 |
320. Which one? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Twist_U_Up
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 10:24 PM Response to Original message |
322. Wanted to get this out in case someone missed it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Unforgiven
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 11:05 PM Response to Reply #322 |
324. I Know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rdmccur
![]() |
Tue Dec-07-04 01:16 AM Response to Reply #322 |
338. Send this info to Madsen and Conyers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Unforgiven
![]() |
Tue Dec-07-04 10:06 PM Response to Reply #338 |
371. Is It |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kahuna
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 10:28 PM Response to Original message |
323. Tom Feeney!!! I knew he had something to do with the theft... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance
![]() |
Tue Dec-07-04 12:39 AM Response to Reply #323 |
333. nothing on the news about it--not even a dismissal. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
George W. Hayduke
![]() |
Tue Dec-07-04 01:57 AM Response to Original message |
339. CURTS DOG FOUND DEAD! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
George W. Hayduke
![]() |
Tue Dec-07-04 01:58 AM Response to Reply #339 |
340. CLINT CURTIS'S DOG FOUND DEAD! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davidlynch
![]() |
Tue Dec-07-04 02:55 AM Response to Original message |
342. This Smells Like Nonsense |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AmyCrat
![]() |
Tue Dec-07-04 09:05 AM Response to Reply #342 |
345. There are things that bother me about it also |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hamoth
![]() |
Tue Dec-07-04 09:43 AM Response to Reply #345 |
347. And he has a book out. See if he promotes it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Minnesota_Lib
![]() |
Tue Dec-07-04 10:28 AM Response to Reply #342 |
353. I may be missing something, but you seem to be implying .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davidlynch
![]() |
Tue Dec-07-04 01:40 PM Response to Reply #353 |
359. Yes, Curtis Faked It |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blackspade
![]() |
Tue Dec-07-04 03:41 PM Response to Reply #359 |
362. what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IAMREALITY
![]() |
Tue Dec-07-04 03:44 PM Response to Reply #362 |
363. blackspade LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jack Rabbit
![]() |
Tue Dec-07-04 12:21 PM Response to Reply #342 |
355. That deserves a response |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueDog2u
![]() |
Tue Dec-07-04 01:14 PM Response to Reply #342 |
358. Thanks for the very careful analysis |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jwmealy
![]() |
Tue Dec-07-04 08:12 PM Response to Reply #342 |
366. I don't think you're thinking this through deeply enough. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davidlynch
![]() |
Tue Dec-07-04 09:16 PM Response to Reply #366 |
369. Disagree--But Respect Your Views |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jwmealy
![]() |
Tue Dec-07-04 10:10 PM Response to Reply #369 |
372. Nope. . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jack Rabbit
![]() |
Tue Dec-07-04 11:53 AM Response to Original message |
354. 'Very interesting,' said the computer programmer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FogerRox
![]() |
Tue Dec-07-04 12:33 PM Response to Reply #354 |
356. low posters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nederland
![]() |
Tue Dec-07-04 04:00 PM Response to Reply #354 |
365. Wow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jack Rabbit
![]() |
Tue Dec-07-04 09:56 PM Response to Reply #365 |
370. Hi, Nederland. It's been a while |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peabody71
![]() |
Tue Dec-07-04 01:07 PM Response to Original message |
357. kick. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dancing_Dave
![]() |
Tue Dec-07-04 03:54 PM Response to Original message |
364. Wow. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Must_B_Free
![]() |
Tue Dec-07-04 08:42 PM Response to Original message |
367. Am I the only one point out the most obvious point of fraud? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jwmealy
![]() |
Tue Dec-07-04 08:59 PM Response to Reply #367 |
368. Good point--which leads to another! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thu Jun 20th 2024, 03:23 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC