|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
usregimechange (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-31-09 01:09 PM Original message |
Tom Goldstein: Sotomayor isn't "driven in any respect by a broader pro-choice or pro-life ideology" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skooooo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-31-09 01:11 PM Response to Original message |
1. Which means she'll probably defer to the law.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
usregimechange (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-31-09 01:17 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. I would guess so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zynx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-31-09 01:29 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. That's what I got out of those rulings as well. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clio the Leo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-31-09 04:22 PM Response to Original message |
4. I think we're getting to the point where we realize that there's more to the law... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Honeycombe8 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-01-09 10:04 AM Response to Original message |
5. That's good. I WANT a Justice who is focused on the law and the facts. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
solstice (278 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-01-09 04:39 PM Response to Original message |
6. The fact that she voted to uphold the gag rule scares me to death. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-01-09 08:10 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. Would you be happy if conservative judges just ignored laws passed by Democrats? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Teaser (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-02-09 09:01 AM Response to Reply #6 |
9. post #73, and already an EPIC FAIL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-02-09 09:55 AM Response to Reply #6 |
11. "So the fuck WHAT if it was 'settled law'" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-02-09 05:35 AM Response to Original message |
8. The term is "anti-choice", not the RW "pro-life". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-02-09 09:54 AM Response to Original message |
10. So he's saying she respects the law and prior court decisions. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Oct 31st 2024, 06:51 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC