Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I'm very disturbed by the campaign to vilify us on the "far left" for criticizing Obama

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
rudy23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 01:53 PM
Original message
I'm very disturbed by the campaign to vilify us on the "far left" for criticizing Obama
For one, it seems pretty orchestrated. That's disturbing enough. It's very disturbing to see the name calling towards those that are simply advocating transparency, and adherence to the law. Reasoned debate has its place with this issue, but the name calling seems orchestrated and desperate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
incapsulated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. I had no idea I was "far left" really
I guess disagreeing with the President *does* make you a commie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomThoughts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. I actually get the commie label alot.
Edited on Fri May-15-09 01:59 PM by RandomThoughts
Because I point out the flaws in the capitalist system that can be reformed, something communism also did. However I believe in much of the capitalist system if moderated.

If I was in an extream system like a communist country I would try and pull them to the right, because either extream has more flaws then a mix.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
45. I know. its so freeper to do that. I am a dem because I can think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. My Father is on the Barely Moderate Rightie Dem and wants them released
I would tell him he's a Far Left Commie Pinko, but he might have a stroke, so I won't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SIMPLYB1980 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
3. When the far left attacks Obama viscously don't expect to just get a pass.
When I stop seeing leftist calling Democrats and Obama a Fascist on this site I will stop calling them out for acting as bad as the republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. Isn't "never ever criticize a President of your own party" kinda Republican, too?
Edited on Fri May-15-09 02:12 PM by villager
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SIMPLYB1980 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. I didn't say don't criticize, I said don't call him or Democrats fascist.
Edited on Fri May-15-09 02:06 PM by SIMPLYB1980
That's not criticizing that's just name calling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. The Republicans aren't much on saying that right now.
Rather, they're in favor of criticizing the President for anything and everything no matter how valid the criticism is.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. So those of us on Obama's side of the fence should be smashed into silence?
Edited on Fri May-15-09 02:12 PM by villager
Because Republicans are hypocrites?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. What is with the recurring belief that any challenge to an argument is an attempt to silence?
Are you that unused to being disagreed with?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. Quit twisting my words. And what is it with the belief that any challenge to this administration
Edited on Fri May-15-09 02:18 PM by villager
or its policies is automatically "far left," or indicative of "Obama hatred," or some such, rather than a principled disagreement with the Executive branch?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #23
28. I'm not sure how else to interpret your suggestion that I wish you "smashed into silence."
Edited on Fri May-15-09 02:37 PM by Occam Bandage
I don't think any challenge to this administration is automatically "far left." Obviously the challenges from Glenn Beck and Sean Hannity are not, though I suppose they are often similar in tone (and occasionally in content) to challenges from the left. I think that it is certainly true that most challenges to the administration on this site come from the left, and I do not see anything wrong with identifying criticism from the left as being such.

As for the term "far left?" It's value-neutral, just like "moderate," "centrist," and "DLC" are. And just like those three terms, "far left" can be used as a means of discrediting a messenger: of course you believe that, you're obviously (on the far left/a centrist/a DLCer). And just like "right-wing" is here, it's often misused as a means of exaggerating minor differences between people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #28
32. Not you personally. But there've been posts here using "far left"
as a way of discrediting the validity of any criticism of the Obama Administration, including over the decision whether to release the torture photos or not.

Now, while I myself am probably to the left of many on DU, and knew Obama would -- and could -- never be my "ideal" President, given the restraints (corporate, perceptual, etc.) he has to operate under, that doesn't mean I dislike.

But nor does generally liking him mean I'm gonna sit on my virtual hands when he signs off on wolf-killing, say, or suddenly hesitates to keep his pledge about transparency in government, etc.

Nor does any of that make me -- or anyone else looking to disagree with Executive policy - automatically like Glenn Beck. Unless we can throw around analogies and say anyone refusing to allow any critique of their party's President from their own side is like a Freeper?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zodiak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #3
17. Did you ever consider that when people call Obama a fascist, it isn't personal?
After all, he is a public figure with a strong, smart wife to defend him as well as the Secret Service and the entire US military.

But when you attack other fellow DUers it IS personal because they are right here and are NOT public figures.

Of course I can see this as a confusing thing if you have so much emotional investment in Obama that you see any attack on him as personal towards you, but that says more about you than it does those you attack if that is the case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SIMPLYB1980 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #17
25. Yeah calling someone a Fascist isn't personal.
In bizzaro world. I don't see this as a personal attack on me, but a reason as to why the far left is taken about as seriously as the far right. Which is why it's so hard to tilt the county further to the left because stupid people let the perfect be the enemy of the good, but if you don't care to get anything done and just want to bash Democrats and their supporters as Fascists then by all means go ahead and see how far that gets you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #25
53. Post of the Day! (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zodiak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-16-09 06:25 AM
Response to Reply #25
62. I do not believe you can find any post of mine calling Obama a fascist
So you are barking up the wrong tree there.

As far as the far right and far left being taken seriously, just look around you. This country takes the far right seriously, or we would not be in our predicament. The centrists take the far right seriously while completely ignoring the left, and that has been what led to this country's downfall.

There IS no far left in this country any more. You are shadow-boxing with a dead concept. American liberals are way more moderate than you seem to imply. As a progressive populist, long ago I used to be considered fairly moderate. There were plenty of representatives in Congress who held exactly my views...heck, some were even Republican.

This country moved so far to the right that being "moderate" now means giving away the farm to the corporations without strings attached.

Perhaps calling American liberals "far left" is a matter of relativity. "Centrists" are so far right that American liberals only look far left from way over there, but the Maoists and Trotskyites have long left the American body politic, I assure you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
21. Or when they use M$M spin and lies to do it.
That's another thing that needs to stop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dgibby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
46. Could you provide some links, please.
I'm not doubting you, just haven't seen that here and would like to read some of those remarks. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-16-09 12:00 AM
Response to Reply #46
58. that would be calling out other members which is not allowed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wednesdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-16-09 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #3
69. When one attacks viscously
Things get rather sticky in a hurry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
4. The banks want their money so they are propagandizing against us.
Edited on Fri May-15-09 01:58 PM by w4rma
The banksters would tell you not to take it personally, it's just business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
6. I've not seen so much of this. Certainly Obama critics have been going on at a fever pitch
criticizing him since the day after the election on DU. The Greatest Page is, on many days, full of posts critical of the administration, yet almost every day I see posts like this one saying that Obama critics on DU are being villified or made unwelcome. I think Obama opponents on DU get there message out loud and clear here every day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
7. Far Left, Far Right....who gives a shit.....
When information is taking out of context and quoted as facts, that makes those doing it guilty of propaganda, regardless of their ideological stance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asjr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Amen!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #9
54. +2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #7
49. I use to not understand how the
far left were such extremists..now I do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
11. I've very disturbed by people assuming
that any disagreement with them is an "orchestrated" "campaign" designed to silence. It's paranoid, to say the least.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zodiak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #11
20. It probably has something to do with the fact that it is always the same characters doing it
They post on every thread, high-five each other constantly, and basically amplify their voices here four-fold. It is never enough to type one's opinion once or twice on a thread....but to post 20 times or more, often with one-liners that are nothing but eye-rolling and attacks on other DUers. There is also the "throw the commentator who disagrees with Obama" exercise we get to see pretty much every time one from the left dares to offer a criticism on television.

That will definitely get people starting to think about orchestration.

I do not subscribe to that premise, myself, but then again I have been a mod here and know that some people just post an awful lot, get nasty regularly, and many of them run in the same groups together.

I wouldn't call it coordination or orchestration, but cliquishness.....yes, definitely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. Perceiving orchestration seems like paranoia.
I've seen the same kind of behavior on threads of all kinds.

All I figure is a few like-minded people are on one thread. No cliques or coordination required.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zodiak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-16-09 06:00 AM
Response to Reply #24
59. Cliques exist, as I said before
Edited on Sat May-16-09 06:32 AM by Zodiak
As for coordination, I said that I do not subscribe to such notions but know what observations lead some to that conclusion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #20
27. You know what's kind of interesting about that post?
Edited on Fri May-15-09 02:22 PM by Occam Bandage
I can't tell whether you're talking about the handful of people that loudly and vociferously attack Obama, or the handful of people that loudly and vociferously defend Obama. I also cannot see anything in that post that would support a belief in "orchestration;" I would think the obvious cause of what we see would be a combination of strongly held beliefs and of approval of others who hold the same beliefs. That is not conspiracy, and I find the eagerness some have to leap to claims of conspiracy to be mildly imbalanced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zodiak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-16-09 06:13 AM
Response to Reply #27
61. Anyone on this site who loudly and vociferously does anything
Is suspect. I suspect them of not having the ability to LISTEN to another's argument. I personally do not understand what motivates a person to post over and over again, multiple times in every thread on the same subject, one-lining to agree with every poster on the thread who agrees with them, and a one-liner insult to everyone who doesn't agree. There is some sort of level of obsessiveness to it, especially when a lot of said activity is devoted to insulting fellow DUers and actively adding negativity to this community.

As I said before (and had to explain three times, now), I do not subscribe to the orchestration hypothesis, but I understand where such a hypothesis comes from.

As far as cliquishness is concerned, let's just say that "approval of others" who hold the same belief somehow repeats itself over and over again...the same few posters high-fiving each other from thread to thread. You would think that stating such approval and seeking out like-minded DUers would only have to take place once or twice. After 5+ times a day between the same two posters, it is simply high-fiving. And, yes, I think it is a rhetorical device.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #20
55. Project much? I've read some of your posts, and your having been a mod explains
a lot lately, which is why I've chosen to no longer donate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zodiak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-16-09 06:03 AM
Response to Reply #55
60. You clearly did not comprehend what I wrote
Edited on Sat May-16-09 07:02 AM by Zodiak
I said I do not subscribe to such notions, but understand where such notions come from.

As for your desire to donate...that is your decision. Don't put your lack of funds or unwillingness to donate funds on me. Now THAT'S projection.

ON EDIT: since this post, someone donated in my name....so I guess DU got its money, after all. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-16-09 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #60
70. Since the election, DU has made it quite clear that all the anti-Obama
people can post whatever they want, whenever they want, with no regard for the people who continued to support this place when they all stormed off in a huff. I'm glad they're back now so that those of us who still support this president can post our views on their dime.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rudy23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #11
35. Not just any campaign, but this one in particular.
There are signs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rudy23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #11
39. And actually, a couple of posters here have admitted to being part of orchestrated efforts
in the past.

I was offered a job by a large, well known movie studio to be a paid blogger and be a part of their orchestrated publicity campaigns. Paid bloggers exist, and they exist here. That's just my Occam's Razor take on things--the name-calling here resembles past efforts I've been validated in calling out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. No doubt guerrilla marketers exist.
I don't think that means that people who disagree with you on DU are disagreeing with you because they're paid to do so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rudy23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #41
43. I'm not saying "people who disagree with me" are paid to do so
I'm saying the people trying to out and out vilify those who want the pictures released---those particular efforts seem orchestrated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
13. In A Climate, Sir, Where People Are Calling Speaker Pelosi a War Criminal, There Will Be Conflict
Why you should claim defense and counter-attack in support of elected officials of the Democratic Party is 'orchestrated' escapes me. Would you be willing to make the same claim regarding the assaults from the left on President Obama and Speaker Pelosi? If not, why not? After all, a number of persons engage in them, they use the same lines of attack, often enough employing similar, even virtually identical, language in doing so. There is certainly a good deal of personal vilification employed from the left, both against the Democratic Party leaders assailed, and against those who defend them. Very little of the assault on President Obama and Speaker Pelosi from the left just now meets any standard of reasoned debate known to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #13
51. +10! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
invictus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
15. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azmouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
16. Get over yourself.
If you come here to voice an opinion expect those who don't agree with it to argue back.

That's not suppression. It's called dialog and it's what happens on a message board.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rudy23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #16
40. I didn't call it suppression. I called it orchestrated name calling.
I'm just adding that observation to the dialogue. This also happens on message boards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
22. A lot of Democrats still have a strong, innate fear of Republicans
They think that ANY criticism of a Democrat will lead to a Republican takeover. Remember how progressive critics of Clinton got the blame for Repug wins in 1994? After all, it couldn't possibly be Clinton's lame-ass, pro-corporate policies that kept people away from the polls. It was the "critics" of his lame-ass, pro-corporate policies who were at fault.

Even now, with the GOP on the verge of becoming an historical curiosity, people are still afraid of pursuing a legitimate gripe with an elected Democrat. The end result is that our incipient progressive resurgence is being sacrificed, once again, to perceived political expediency.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
26. So another group of individuals are upset at Obama - big surprise
Obama is pissing off people on the right and left - maybe that means he really is doing something right. :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HamdenRice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
29. What campaign?
This sounds like paranoia.

Are you saying any disagreement with the "impeach Obama right NOW" crowd is a campaign?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
30. Yes who in the world could imagine that in a progressive Democratic discussion board
that there would be people who are committed to defending a progressive Democratic President.


Must be a conspiracy.


The blue finch flies in a southerly direction

repeating for our friends in Peoria

The blue finch flies in a southerly direction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Tiger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
31. Works both ways. Nobody is a victim here.
Those who disagree with those who criticize Obama are equally open to seemingly "orchestrated...name calling."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #31
56. "apologist"; "loyalist"; and now "orchestrated namecaller"....just to name a few. Anyone who
defends the president is summarily dismissed by those who have it in for him. Works both ways doesn't it?

I never imagined that a newly elected progressive Democratic president would be villified to such a degree, this early into his first term. We already knew the right was going to attack, but the attacks coming from the left seem pretty "orchestrated" as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-16-09 08:34 AM
Response to Reply #56
66. you keep calling him progressive
but deal with the fact that for many of us, he is very backward thinking. He opposes equal rights for all citizens of the country. He has appointed a party chairman who is even more conservative on human rights issues than he is. Kaine opposes even civil unions. They both wish to keep some Americans without rights because of their religion. They want me to live their faith, which they certainly do not do themselves.
That is not progressive. Sorry, but it is relgionist bigotry just as it was from Bush. Don't like it? Tell the man who needs to change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU GrovelBot  Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
33. ## PLEASE DONATE TO DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND! ##



This week is our second quarter 2009 fund drive.
Donate and you'll be automatically entered into our daily contest.
New prizes daily!



No purchase or donation necessary. Void where prohibited. Click here for more information.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
debbierlus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
34. Obama has treated the progressives with far less tolerance & respect as he does the Republicans

That should tell you all you need to know...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
36. And whatever happened to the pledge to "hold Democratic officials feet to the fire"
or is the president "exempt"? I have seen folks called everything under the sun for daring to question the methodology of the bailout or questioning the declared lack of priority of DADT or FOCA.
I like some of what the President has done and some I don't like but certainly folks shouldn't be "labeled" for expressing discontent! That is what we are supposed to do as Americans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
37. yes, yes. I'm sure you're a perfect martyr to the TRUTH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mkultra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
38. im very disturbed by the campaign to vilify Obama by claiming the "far left"
For one, it seems pretty orchestrated. That's disturbing enough. It's very disturbing to see the name calling towards those that are simply advocating transparency, and adherence to the law. Reasoned debate has its place with this issue, but the name calling seems orchestrated and desperate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
creeksneakers2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-16-09 06:40 AM
Response to Reply #38
63. I'm not orchestrated
I use the term "far left" on my own. I don't tell people who disagree with me they have no right to speak. I haven't even seen it done.

I don't use the term "far left" over somebody who disagrees with Obama or gets angry over, for example, his decision not to release torture photos. I expect people to complain that a campaign promise was broken.

An example of something I don't like is that there are far more tirades against Nancy Pelosi than there are tirades about the recent revelations that Cheney's office wanted torture used on an individual who wasn't linked to terrorism. Cheney wanted the torture to produce a false answer that he could use for propaganda purposes.

Of course, the media is going after Pelosi instead of Cheney, even though at most all Pelosi did was fail to stop criminals. Outright criminal acts are ignored. Cheney's defenders are going after Pelosi to distract attention away from Cheney. The far left, by going after Pelosi and ignoring Cheney, furthers the GOP strategy.

All that bothers me but it doesn't mean I want people to be silenced. I want them to think about what I'm telling them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
42. Yeah...Obama critics never call names
What a bunch of crybaby paranoia!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
44. Oh noes!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
47. You poor victims...I don't care if you complain
your heads off but there will be no equating Prez Obama to bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
48. There sure have been alot of this type of thread today.
If I didn't know better I'd be sure we have some sort of campaign going on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
50. It's seems to be the usual suspects doing the vilifying
Edited on Fri May-15-09 09:48 PM by brentspeak
Strangely enough, they seem to be around 24/7, posting the same insults/non-responses who dares hold Saint Obama's feet to the fire. It's like they punch-out at 5 pm, then hand the job over to the night crew, who then takes over their DU handle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LooseWilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
52. I, for one, am unconcerned about being villified.
If anyone wants to villify me for my views, that is fine. I'm perfectly comfortable as a villain.

On the other hand, there is something to be learned by the qualitative quantity of villification one finds oneself subjected to... the more I am villified for my vews, the more I simply realize that my views are far, further, or even further yet from the mainstream... even the mainstream of DU thought.

The next time you find yourself under villification-siege, you might consider trying to use the villification volume as a possible measure of how far out of the mainstream you might be on the issue. After all, there's nothing wrong with being wrong... but it does help to know when you're "wrong".

(In a "Democratic" country, right and wrong is subject to a vote, right? I know it is here in CA...)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheMachineWins Donating Member (155 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 11:51 PM
Response to Original message
57. I got accused of "far left wing rubbernecking"
for wanting the torture photos released. I think you are correct in your assumption since it is happening to a lot of other posters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zodiak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-16-09 07:11 AM
Response to Reply #57
64. Such an accusation is laughable on its surface
And so you should laugh. Goes a long way to stop it from happening to other DUers.

Those more zealous defenders of Obama's torture photo decision also tried the "your a pedohile sicko" angle, too. Seriously, those accusations are only there to insult you and get you riled. Riled DUers sometimes post things that get them tombstoned. The less this sort of behavior is tolerated across the board, the less good DUers get the pizza from saying something impolitic in the heat of debate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kdillard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-16-09 07:22 AM
Response to Original message
65. Stop playing victim and the name calling goes both ways.
Edited on Sat May-16-09 07:31 AM by Kdillard
Someone not agreeing with you doesn't mean you are being silenced or supressed or that there is a conspiracy going on. The bigger problem seems to be that people can't take a difference of opinion and only want to have people agree with them. Echo chamber much. It seems you can't point out that an article may be misleading or that Obama is being unfairly attacked for having a position that he never held without being accused of being an apologist or some other nonesense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nichomachus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-16-09 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
67. There are quite a few disinformation specialists on DU these days
Unfortunately, they are on the left. whether paid, volunteer, or a mixture isn't clear.

But you can spot them clearly by their use of the talking point code words of the day.

"Ideological purist" is one of them. I thought it was strange to see that term coming up repeatedly, and then I saw Obama use it the other day in a video clip. So, you know that came from the White House -- and it's used quite a bit by the apologists on DU.

There are other terms.

It's Rovian tactics all over again and it's very disturbing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-16-09 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
68. DU is just a reflection of the general population. It has it share of bullies
Edited on Sat May-16-09 09:40 AM by Mass
on all sides. It is not going to change.

Certainly, there are some people here who think that Obama should NEVER be criticized and will attack everybody who disagree with them with every insult they can find. Just ignore them. They just think that Obama is another American Idol and play this way.


Thankfully, it is just a small minority that I have decided to ignore. No constructive dialogue will come with them because, even if they believe in something, tomorrow they will change their view and tell you this thing is wrong if Obama says so (I have seen the same phenomena with people supporting other Dems throughout the years, to be honest). These people do not care about ideas. They have made a man their hero.

The vast majority of DUers is able to think by themselves though, thankfully, whether they agree or disagree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Oct 31st 2024, 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC