I stand with Robertson. No more excuses--its past time to spend that political capital on this "matter of fundamental human and civil rights".
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/05/07/AR2009050703055.htmlMIA On Gay Marriage
<**front page headline: Robinson: When Will Obama Stand Tall for Gays? >
By Eugene Robinson
Friday, May 8, 2009
.............Obama sensibly advocates the repeal of "don't ask, don't tell." He should press the case by publicly reminding opponents of letting gays serve openly in the military that their arguments -- it would hurt morale, damage cohesion and readiness, discourage reenlistment -- are often the same, almost word for word, as the arguments made 60 years ago against racial integration in the armed forces. It was bigotry then, and it's bigotry now.
Obama should also make the obvious case that forcibly discharging capable, fully trained servicemen and servicewomen for being gay, at a time when our overstretched military is fighting two big wars, can only be described as insane.
What the president shouldn't do is stay away from the marriage debate on the grounds that it's not a matter for the federal government. For one thing, he's on record as favoring repeal of the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act -- a law that blocked federal recognition of same-sex marriages and relieved states of any obligation to recognize out-of-state gay marriages.
Does Obama's stance in favor of repeal mean that he believes the federal government should recognize same-sex marriages? Does he also believe that, say, the state of Alabama should recognize a gay marriage performed in Iowa? If so, what is the practical difference between this position and just saying in plain language that gay marriages ought to be legal and recognized in all 50 states?
....................
[email protected] http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/05/07/AR2009050703055.html