|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
democrattotheend
![]() |
Sun Oct-12-08 09:05 AM Original message |
We don't do Obama any favors by denying the possibility of the dreaded "Bradley Effect" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Danger Mouse
![]() |
Sun Oct-12-08 09:06 AM Response to Original message |
1. It never existed in the first place. Can we stop pushing this garbage? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueJazz
![]() |
Sun Oct-12-08 10:16 AM Response to Reply #1 |
41. Sorry...but I believe that younger people and people from the North are.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Danger Mouse
![]() |
Sun Oct-12-08 07:17 PM Response to Reply #41 |
59. I may be younger and from the North, but we have plenty of rednecks here, too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Sun Oct-12-08 09:06 AM Response to Original message |
2. No, we work like hell but don't acknowledge a reason for the GOP to steal another election. eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dkf
![]() |
Sun Oct-12-08 09:09 AM Response to Original message |
3. I thought I heard that in some states it is an opposite Bradley effect |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whitewomenforobama
![]() |
Sun Oct-12-08 09:15 AM Response to Reply #3 |
19. I think the counterbradley effect will cancel out the bradley |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enrique
![]() |
Sun Oct-12-08 09:19 AM Response to Reply #3 |
21. I think that happened in the primaries |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tosh
![]() |
Sun Oct-12-08 09:33 AM Response to Reply #3 |
27. I believe in this - yes. Down here in the small towns I roam |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CJCRANE
![]() |
Sun Oct-12-08 09:09 AM Response to Original message |
4. What about the "erratic old man" effect? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ikojo
![]() |
Sun Oct-12-08 09:10 AM Response to Original message |
5. I've been thinking this for a long time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Danger Mouse
![]() |
Sun Oct-12-08 09:11 AM Response to Reply #5 |
8. I think I trust Obama's team to manage things. They've done an excellent job so far. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elkston
![]() |
Sun Oct-12-08 09:11 AM Response to Original message |
6. You seriously think Obama and his team aren't factoring this in? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Danger Mouse
![]() |
Sun Oct-12-08 09:12 AM Response to Reply #6 |
10. Fearmongering. Hand wringing. Chicken littles. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democrattotheend
![]() |
Sun Oct-12-08 09:12 AM Response to Reply #6 |
11. I absolutely think they are. I think we're not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fugop
![]() |
Sun Oct-12-08 09:11 AM Response to Original message |
7. Offset |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nevernose
![]() |
Sun Oct-12-08 09:12 AM Response to Original message |
9. Ain't shit we can do, & what about the McCain Effect? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RichardRay
![]() |
Sun Oct-12-08 09:13 AM Response to Original message |
12. Actually, it did exist, and, actually, there's no evidence of it anymore. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nevergiveup
![]() |
Sun Oct-12-08 09:13 AM Response to Original message |
13. I know several folks who are examples |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orangepeel
![]() |
Sun Oct-12-08 09:13 AM Response to Original message |
14. The "Bradley Effect" doesn't make much sense. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Demi_Babe
![]() |
Sun Oct-12-08 09:14 AM Response to Original message |
15. if the Bradley Effect was going to be relevant, we would have seen it in the primaries...IMO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FloridaGrl
![]() |
Sun Oct-12-08 09:14 AM Response to Original message |
16. It will be the Obama Effect |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phleshdef
![]() |
Sun Oct-12-08 09:14 AM Response to Original message |
17. We aren't doing him OR ourselves any favors by worrying about it either. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt
![]() |
Sun Oct-12-08 09:14 AM Response to Original message |
18. Bradley 1982, 26 years ago |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lerkfish
![]() |
Sun Oct-12-08 09:16 AM Response to Original message |
20. you do US no favors by catapulting this garbage BS propaganda, either. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democrattotheend
![]() |
Sun Oct-12-08 09:24 AM Response to Reply #20 |
25. If I remind people why they shouldn't get complacent, then I do |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lerkfish
![]() |
Sun Oct-12-08 09:33 AM Response to Reply #25 |
28. if you were telling us of the bradley effect for the first time, it would be valuable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
A-Schwarzenegger
![]() |
Sun Oct-12-08 09:48 AM Response to Reply #25 |
36. "Why is everyone so negative?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DCBob
![]() |
Sun Oct-12-08 09:20 AM Response to Original message |
22. More likely there will be a reverse Bradley effect. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Frumious B
![]() |
Sun Oct-12-08 09:21 AM Response to Original message |
23. There's absolutely no need to lie not voting for Obama. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one
![]() |
Sun Oct-12-08 09:24 AM Response to Original message |
24. The media, espeically CNN has been pushing this garbage as a way to say it is OK to be racist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NashVegas
![]() |
Sun Oct-12-08 09:24 AM Response to Original message |
26. Actually. Yeah. We Do |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Undercurrent
![]() |
Sun Oct-12-08 09:34 AM Response to Original message |
29. The Bradley Effect |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluenorthwest
![]() |
Sun Oct-12-08 09:34 AM Response to Original message |
30. The Bradley Effect is and always was bogus |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar
![]() |
Sun Oct-12-08 11:19 AM Response to Reply #30 |
55. True, it is amazing how reliably blue they are for the Presidential |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Sun Oct-12-08 09:40 AM Response to Original message |
31. You are always posting these fear-based OPs re: Obama's chances. Thanks for your deep concern. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DeepModem Mom
![]() |
Sun Oct-12-08 09:40 AM Response to Original message |
32. I strongly support the right to post on this subject. It's being discussed not only on CNN... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Sun Oct-12-08 09:44 AM Response to Reply #32 |
33. CNN is supposed to give legitimacy to this bogus OP? Heh. What's next? Quoting David Gergen? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DeepModem Mom
![]() |
Sun Oct-12-08 09:46 AM Response to Reply #33 |
35. My point was that it was not only CNN, which another poster referenced... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Sun Oct-12-08 09:53 AM Response to Reply #35 |
38. It's predictable media masturbation to discuss this - however, they ignore the facts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
casus belli
![]() |
Sun Oct-12-08 09:44 AM Response to Original message |
34. Racial Leakage? These are untested waters... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Essene
![]() |
Sun Oct-12-08 09:51 AM Response to Original message |
37. Research indicates reverse-Bradley is more real |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hansel
![]() |
Sun Oct-12-08 09:57 AM Response to Original message |
39. Why? What good does it do? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pdxmom
![]() |
Sun Oct-12-08 10:01 AM Response to Original message |
40. McPalin have given permission for people to be racist. Their casting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar
![]() |
Sun Oct-12-08 11:22 AM Response to Reply #40 |
56. Exactly. And to top it off, Phailin is a woman, so they can feel |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
barack the house
![]() |
Sun Oct-12-08 10:26 AM Response to Original message |
42. I think we can determine just from the financial crisis that there is no bradly effect. Besides I'd> |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ecstatic
![]() |
Sun Oct-12-08 10:27 AM Response to Original message |
43. Discussion of the BE gives a lot of comfort to Diebold, I'm sure nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DeepModem Mom
![]() |
Sun Oct-12-08 10:30 AM Response to Original message |
44. NYT, 10/11/08: Do Polls Lie About Race? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery
![]() |
Sun Oct-12-08 10:32 AM Response to Original message |
45. DOES. NOT. EXIST. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
barack the house
![]() |
Sun Oct-12-08 10:32 AM Response to Original message |
46. I think we would only have to worry about it if we had no critical thinking. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
realitythink
![]() |
Sun Oct-12-08 10:34 AM Response to Original message |
47. That was in 1982!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
On the Road
![]() |
Sun Oct-12-08 10:37 AM Response to Original message |
48. I Don't Think Some of the Posters Who Used Words Like "Garbage" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulk
![]() |
Sun Oct-12-08 10:48 AM Response to Original message |
49. the bradley effect is real, though I don't think it will be as |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
firedupdem
![]() |
Sun Oct-12-08 10:51 AM Response to Original message |
50. Why didn't we hear so much about this bradley effect during the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevietheman
![]() |
Sun Oct-12-08 10:53 AM Response to Original message |
51. I think we'll actually see a "McCain-Palin is unhinged" effect, and it's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond
![]() |
Sun Oct-12-08 10:55 AM Response to Original message |
52. ok, i have asked before. what is bradley effect. why called bradley |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Democrats_win
![]() |
Sun Oct-12-08 11:05 AM Response to Original message |
53. Happened in 2006 TN. Harold Ford. It's a concern. Polls are a problem anyway. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scheming daemons
![]() |
Sun Oct-12-08 07:34 PM Response to Reply #53 |
62. No... you have it exactly wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar
![]() |
Sun Oct-12-08 11:17 AM Response to Original message |
54. Quit worrying no one will stop working |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Turn CO Blue
![]() |
Sun Oct-12-08 11:28 AM Response to Original message |
57. We do Obama no favors by not factoring in the Student Effect. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DeepModem Mom
![]() |
Sun Oct-12-08 11:43 AM Response to Original message |
58. WP, 10/12/08: Pollsters Debate 'Bradley Effect' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scheming daemons
![]() |
Sun Oct-12-08 07:32 PM Response to Original message |
60. A) Acknowledging the BE gives them a reason to explain away a "theft" B) The BE is a myth |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bubbha Jo
![]() |
Sun Oct-12-08 07:33 PM Response to Original message |
61. I think it'll be balanced by the unknown "no cell phone polling" effect. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Sun Oct-12-08 07:36 PM Response to Original message |
63. This morning on WJ, Zogby said it's not happening. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Wed May 29th 2024, 10:01 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC