|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Austinitis (726 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-09-08 09:34 AM Original message |
Is it over? Not Quite Yet. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-09-08 09:36 AM Response to Original message |
1. Fucking stupid--Dems don't nominate by popular vote. It's delegates. And |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Austinitis (726 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-09-08 09:40 AM Response to Reply #1 |
4. If you're not going to reply to the substance of the article, you could just say "nuh-uh!" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-09-08 09:42 AM Response to Reply #4 |
6. I did reply to the substance of the article. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cd3dem (927 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-09-08 10:26 AM Response to Reply #6 |
15. GE's are won by electoral votes and BO loses there! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Austinitis (726 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-09-08 10:32 AM Response to Reply #15 |
17. I agree - you should take a look at these two maps |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-09-08 12:17 PM Response to Reply #15 |
20. Idiotic. You can't assume the primary results are applicable to the GE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Austinitis (726 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-09-08 01:10 PM Response to Reply #20 |
21. Those maps don't show primary results. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Avalux (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-09-08 09:36 AM Response to Original message |
2. It will STILL be over. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Austinitis (726 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-09-08 04:49 PM Response to Reply #2 |
22. We'll see. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PBS Poll-435 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-09-08 09:38 AM Response to Original message |
3. Good Article. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jersey Devil (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-09-08 09:40 AM Response to Original message |
5. Well, then she can be President of Puerto Rico |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tesha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-09-08 09:42 AM Response to Original message |
7. Nothing happens because Obama follows-up with a blowout in Oregon. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Austinitis (726 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-09-08 09:44 AM Original message |
I don't think I've seen any analysts predicting an Obama "blowout". He should get +~5% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tesha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-09-08 10:13 AM Response to Original message |
12. If 1.14% was a "game changing win" in Indiana, then 5% is a "blowout" in Oregon. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GodlessBiker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-09-08 09:44 AM Response to Reply #7 |
8. Yes, Oregon and Montana are conspicuously absent from the article as posted. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Austinitis (726 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-09-08 09:59 AM Response to Reply #8 |
9. He talks about Oregon |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raffi Ella (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-09-08 10:11 AM Response to Original message |
10. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Coexist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-09-08 10:12 AM Response to Original message |
11. WV only has 29 delegates - even a blowout won't change the math. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-09-08 10:16 AM Response to Original message |
13. WV has 29 delegates. That doesn't change the math. I understand not wanting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Austinitis (726 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-09-08 10:55 AM Response to Reply #13 |
18. If WV did anything it would have to be a popular vote thing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-09-08 10:20 AM Response to Original message |
14. Hillary could win 85% of the remaining contest and it would still be over |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Austinitis (726 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-09-08 11:36 AM Response to Reply #14 |
19. It would be over, but in her favor... n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cliffordu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-09-08 10:29 AM Response to Original message |
16. Jesus, I'm tired of this half baked shit. Insert your snark here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon Jun 10th 2024, 05:33 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC