Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hillary Found Guilty of Dirty Campaign Tricks in Court of Public Opinion: Please List the Charges

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 11:06 PM
Original message
Hillary Found Guilty of Dirty Campaign Tricks in Court of Public Opinion: Please List the Charges
I am being serious here. I have not seen one comprehensive thread or list anywhere that covers the whole campaign starting from January 2007.I would like to offer this opportunity for anyone---Hillary's critics, neutral parties, Republicans, people from other countries---to remind us of the specific campaign dirty tricks which either Hillary Clinton or someone employed by her campaign used in the primary election. It would help to be as detailed as possible and provide links. Also, try to mention whom the target of the attack was and what happened as a result of the attack if possible.

Please no generic "she is such a cheater" or "there are too many to mention".

One charge per post would be helpful.

I want to hear the entire list of charges. Please do not duplicate charges, but if you think that someone did not explain something correctly or you feel that some details need to be added, please add them under the original post.

If I feel that a charge is too vague or not specific enough ---i.e "race baiting"--I might ask for details.

This is a chance for everyone who has been saying that she has been running a Rovian or a Nixonian campaign to make a list . The most important thing is to be thorough and accurate. Adjectives and hyperbole will not be as impressive as demonstrating a pattern.

Keep in mind that there will be people reading this and critiquing the posts. I am not going to offer comments in this thread, besides asking clarifying questions. I want more information about the specific instances people are talking about when they speak of "dirty tricks". However, there will be other people posting at DU who will comment and they will disagree so expect some arguments.

The purpose here is not to incite anger. Rather, I would like to see what the real issues are that need to be addressed and apologized for. Eventually, the candidates are going to have to make up and campaign for the winner (who will probably be Obama) if the Democrats are going to win this fall. It will help a lot if we know exactly what everyone needs to apologize for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DUyellow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. Suggest Obama can be the VP when she is lossing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 11:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. Voting for the Iraq War Resolution BECAUSE she planned to run for pResident. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 11:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. Her last ad in pennsylvania would be a plcae to start.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. Going on the record stating that MI should not count, signing a pledge that stated MI wouldn't count
then, when it became convenient for her, saying that MI should count and taking "moral highground" acting like she is somehow the only one interested in "fairness" - when her name was the only name on the ballot.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Trying to change the rules in Nevada
After agreeing to them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aloha Spirit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #5
114. Bill Clinton quote
"Get on your television station and say, 'I don't care about the home mortgage crisis; all I care about is making sure that some voters have it easier than others ... and when they do vote ... their vote should count five times as much as others."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
6. Promoting John McCain as a more qualified candidate than a Democratic candidate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. Everything pales in comparison to this one. Nearly unforgivable, IMO. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDoorbellRang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
7. Saying that Barack was one preventing revote in FL and MI n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 11:15 PM
Response to Original message
8. Lying point blank to the American electorate, multiple times, i.e. character claims such as Bosnia
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 11:15 PM
Response to Original message
9. I guess he's a Christian..... ...... ....... ....... ...... ....... ....... ..... as far as I know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dchill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:20 AM
Response to Reply #9
83. I'll take him at his word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
10. Called Obama an out of touch elitist when she knew it was a lie.
Edited on Wed Apr-23-08 11:18 PM by FrenchieCat
Acts like she doesn't know Rev. Wright who sat next to her at her and Bill's Monica prayer breakfast.

Threw Farrakhan at Obama's face at 2 different debates when she knew that there is no direct relations between the two.......and she omitted that the PA governor who endorsed her was sitting in church glorifying Rev. Farrakahn.

Lied about NAFTA and Obama.

She lied when she said that what her pollster said about Brown people not wanting to vote for Black people. She said that was an historical fact, when it wasn't.

Excused Obama's speeches as "just words" when her husband earned 51 million dollars giving speeches.

When she praised McCain as being ready to be Commander in chief along with her, but that Obama only had a speech.

There is so much more, but this will do for now.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
11. What's this lawsuit against the Clintons in California, Paul v Clinton?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
12. Using OBL in a campaign ad to scare people. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:11 AM
Response to Reply #12
94. Don't forget the stock market crash and explosions.
Exploiting fears just like Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
13. Saying pledged delegates don't matter, when they are in fact the quantitative criteria
for choosing a nominee
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. And then Setting up a Site To STEAL Delegates (if they aren't important why try to steal them)
www.delegatehub.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
15. Self-delete
Edited on Wed Apr-23-08 11:20 PM by boppers
note-up thread already
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
16. Clinton mocking ordinary people who support Obama, incinuating that they are delusional
or morons. Saying Obama can be reduced to a speech he made in 2002. Mocking his campaign sloans, mocking his message, mocking people who support him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 11:42 PM
Response to Reply #16
66. This is going to be hard to google, except maybe for the speech part.
Since mocking is a subjective thing. Can you link or quote specific things which she said?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #66
69. Okay that's a fair point - start for example with the video of her rally where she said
the skies will open...voice from the heaven's will come down... etc. It was during the Texas primary, and particularly during that time she was really on this kick of being the anti-hope candidate.

This one:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/02/24/hillary-clinton-mocks-bar_n_88194.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 08:04 AM
Response to Reply #69
107. Voters *love* to be mocked, insulted and ridiculed by a Presidential candidate,
especially when she's in your own party. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
datopbanana Donating Member (938 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:14 AM
Response to Reply #16
98. it also happened during the 1st of the texas debates
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruby slippers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
17. this YouTube out of context statement about Michelle.....see link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 11:39 PM
Response to Reply #17
57. Cam you find me a link in which Hillary or a campaign worker says it was about Hillary?
I know that the press tried to defame Michelle Obama, but I am looking for something that the Clinton camp put out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
18. OH FAWK McCamy! Where to BEGIN? NAFTAGate, Farakhan, Ferraro and Bill's Racist b.s.,
The Debacle of the ABC Debate in which she so gleefully piled on. If you have been missing all this, then you really haven't been paying attention to the election. Maybe that's because you spend all your attention on writing 10-page diatribes that say absolutely nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aloha Spirit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #18
118. Not only did Clinton continue to lie about Goolsbee after the Canadian government made a statement
disproving the accusations, but guess what?
The original press meeting with Brodie revealed that the CLINTON campaign contacted the Canadian government with reassurances:
" said someone from (Hillary) Clinton's campaign is telling the embassy to take it with a grain of salt. ... That someone called us and told us not to worry."

Guess who was in Canada the weekend before this story broke?

Bill Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goletian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #18
145. hillarys racist shit too
not just bill. she downplayed louisiana because of the black electorate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pisces Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
20. Saying John McCain and herself had passed commander in chief threshold
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
21. Claiming Obama is substanceless when his policy proposals are near identical and as robust as hers.
Note that claiming he lacks experience is not the same as calling him an empty suit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
22. SINCE WHEN DOES A DEMOCRAT ATTACK ANOTHER DEMOCRAT!
(insert angry gesticulations here)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. "All he has is a speech" eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pisces Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
23. Jumping on the Ayers bandwagon and claiming she didn't know anything about
Bill pardoning 2 underground weathermen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pisces Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Mark Penn acting as lobbying in Columbia and she doesn't fire him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pisces Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. Saying she would "OBLITERATE" Iran to feed into fear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pisces Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. Jumping on the Rev Wright BS when she was being hit with Snipergate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #27
34. That's not a dirty trick though... that was attempted suicide
Used to be the easiest way to lose the support of the liberals was to talk about nuking someone. She got lucky. This campaign has done funny things to people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
26. Lied about nonexistent sniper fire, presumably to appear tough.
Video's all over the internet, probably already linked in this thread.

Same with her lie that she opposed NAFTA.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
28. Clinton finance official Annie Totah passed along
a critical essay by Ed Lasky, a conservative blogger whose own anti-Obama e-mails have circulated in the U.S. Jewish community. Totah wrote: "Please read the attached important and very disturbing article on Barak Obama. Please vote wisely in the Primaries."


...I've obtained a copy of an e-mail from Annie Totah, a Washington society figure and Armenian-American activist who's also a member of Clinton's finance committee. The e-mail, titled "Barack Obama's Poor Record on Israel," went to a list that includes Anne Ayalon, wife of the former Israeli ambassador.

"Please read the attached important and very disturbing article on Barak Obama. Please vote wisely in the Primaries," the e-mail read, attaching a long piece from the American Thinker blog that's become central to the sub-rosa anti-Obama chatter.

The American Thinker calls speculation that Obama is actually a Muslim "overheated" (!) and "unfair," and never crosses the line into the more outlandish stuff you can find elsewhere on the Web. But it does go well beyond anything the Clinton campaign has touched (and more obvious elements of Obama's position, like his words and votes), and draws together a long litany of items from his church (which it says Obama joined out of expedience) to the fact that former Knick Allan Houston raised money for him to make the case that he's a "disquieting" candidate when it comes to Israel...
http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0208/Pushing_the_Israel_angle.html#comments

http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:SNRU3_87xbkJ:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/02/10/is_clinton_campaign_stirring_u/+Clinton+finance+official+Annie+Totah+passed+along&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=4&gl=us


Daphna Ziman, a Hillary Clinton bundler does the same here:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=132&topic_id=5592032
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
29. Claiming today that she leads the in popular vote. Lie.
Even if you count Fl, she doesn't lead in the popular vote. Even if you count MI and give her vote to her and the uncommitted vote to Obama - whose name did not appear on the ballot - she doesn't lead in the popular vote. Only if you award Obama ZERO votes in Michigan and her ALL of her votes does she "lead" in any measurement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #29
128. Still not true.
She completely leaves out caucus voters in her "totals."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
30. "Ready from day one"
Implying (not so subtly) that others are not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
32. Pandering to the conservative right on forieng policy "massive retaliation" "obliterate"
confirmed that she was referring to nuclear options in response to a nuclear strike on another ME country. Even aside form that, she promised a "massive" committment of US forces even in a non-nuclear scenario if Israel is attacked, and her comments leave it unclear whether that applies to an attack on any ME country. It is a position as hawkish as McCain.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
33. Complaining that debates should be on her schedule, and implying that doing otherwise...
Is done out of fear, or cowardice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
35. I think I've posted about ten things now... enough to prove that we have real complaints.
Not just generalities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
36. Pandering to blood and circuses.
Using word choices about "fight" and "combat", rather than "debate" and "compromise".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
37. Let's not forget BILL RICHARDSON IS JUDAS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
38. Tearing up, on camera, about how wonderful a person she is.
Oddly enough, I wouldn't hold this against her in terms of tactical moves, I think she really believes in herself. To a bizarre, weird, degree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #38
40. "It'll be over on Super Tuesday"
A gambit to crush 50-state campaigning, which failed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #38
129. Bill C dozing in MLK's Church as MLK's son was speaking


At first I thought it may have been jet lag but since seeing his other stunts,,,,,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
39. Saying McCain was qualified but Obama only had a speech.
Bubba saying there were two candidates (Hill and McCain) that loved America.

Pushing scurrilous questions about Obama's drug use as teenager.

Saying Obama was a Christian "as far as I know."

Lying about Obama's position on NAFTA.

Lying about Obama's opposition to the Iraq war. Lying that she had opposed the war before Obama.

http://thinkonthesethings.wordpress.com/2008/03/25/bill-and-hillary-clintons-top-5-lies-to-voters-on-the-campaign-trail/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quantass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
41. Saying FL and MI should count, but Obama's PDs shouldnt be obligated, disenfranchising voters
Edited on Wed Apr-23-08 11:33 PM by quantass
of other states
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
42. Wow, your stalker's not here yet.
I'm getting worried.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
43. Geraldine Ferraro: waiting, waiting, waiting until comments had fully sunk into the media before
weakly "rejecting" them. That's opposed to several examples where the Obama campaign reacted the same day to correct a mistake of the surrogate.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
44. Poutrage over "pimping".
Yes, Hillary, you are pimping your daughter. What was your line? "If she can't take the heat"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quantass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 11:36 PM
Response to Original message
45. "They think they have a sense of entitlement to the presidency." ~ Bill Richardson
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
expada Donating Member (32 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 11:36 PM
Original message
Public opinion said Gore was a liar. Public opinion gave us the Iraq war
Be yourself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 11:36 PM
Response to Original message
46. Her last ad is dispicable. It is a collage of all the thing people feared in the past and what they
still fear now.
She must have know the "Bitter" controversy was coming as it was planted a week after it happened. Her campaign was ready and waiting to that this and run with it. This bitter nonsense was nothing but RW spin. She should not be using Republicans to get elected or to help her in dividing the party.
Her husband and operatives have been playing the race card. Starting a wispering campaign that went public in which they suggest people of color can't get elected and them going so far as to suggest that Senator Obama was nothing more than a Jesse Jackson.

I could go on, but you get the point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mkultra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 11:36 PM
Response to Original message
47. Taking Obamas 2000 IWR words out of context by chopping the end of a sentence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mkultra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 11:36 PM
Response to Original message
48. Taking Obamas 2000 IWR words out of context by chopping the end of a sentence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mkultra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 11:37 PM
Response to Original message
49. claiming only older voters have the savvy to choose
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mkultra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 11:37 PM
Response to Original message
50. saying LBJ was responsible for the civil rights act.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quantass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 11:37 PM
Response to Original message
51. Saying Bill Richardson's endorsement was worthless because the Texas primary was done
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mkultra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 11:38 PM
Response to Original message
52. The photo leaked by HRC staffer to drudge
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
expada Donating Member (32 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:07 AM
Response to Reply #52
91. Do you have evidence of that, other than Drudge said so? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 08:06 AM
Response to Reply #91
108. When directly asked about it, Clinton campaign has not denied it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dailykoff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 11:38 PM
Response to Original message
53. Handshakegate, gangbang gate, bittergate, Wrightgate, Rezkogate, bowling gate,
ironmyshirtgate, and the rest of her bad PR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #53
71. Gangbang gate? I dont know that one. Can you tell me about it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dailykoff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #71
113. Google Marcia Pappas.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mkultra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 11:38 PM
Response to Original message
54. claiming speech plagarism whie stealing from Obama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mkultra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 11:38 PM
Response to Original message
55. claiming speech plagarism whie stealing from Obama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mkultra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
56. Bill Clintons AMAZINGLY obvious lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #56
70. You will have to list them for me please. I wont be able to google them I am afraid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mkultra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #70
72. "The bosnia statment was made once and late at night"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue State Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:01 AM
Response to Reply #72
89. Didn't she just admit she flat out lied about Bosnia?
"...on a couple of occasions in the last, uh, weeks, um, I just, said some things that weren't in keeping with what I knew to be the case..."

http://youtube.com/watch?v=GhCxcjon19A
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #89
144. No. As with all Clinton things, she head fakes toward admission, then justifies it
I was tired... it was an accident.... etc. etc. That's not true. It was a frequently repeated, with precise wording, calculated lie. No justification possible. When she continues to defend herself on it, that's not admission. Saying I said some things that weren't in keeping with what I knew to be the case....then saying BUT I have excuses for doing that, sort of negates an admission.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue State Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #144
151. But her follow was "I'm embarassed....I hope you can look over"
as in past her past discretion. The closest she came to giving an excuse is when she said she may need a little more sleep later in the snip.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #151
155. That's exactly what I'm talking about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mkultra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #70
73. "I never said they used the race card on me"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mkultra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 11:52 PM
Response to Reply #70
75. calling BO constant stance against IWR a fairy tale
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mkultra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 11:52 PM
Response to Reply #70
76. claiming obama said only republicas have had any good ideas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:22 AM
Response to Reply #76
102. And Hillary pretending that Obama was praising Reagan's policies.
Edwards did that too and either way it was bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mkultra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
58. Claiming experience by being married to someone who was in charge
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:21 AM
Response to Reply #58
101. Not taking responsibility for Bill's actions while taking credit for experience as first lady.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mkultra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 11:40 PM
Original message
claiming to be an activist while she sat on the board of WAL-MART
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
59. Poutrage over "bitter", and mischaracterizing Obama's remarks. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
60. I volunteered for the NV caucus back in January.
On the day of the caucus, I personally encountered undecided voters who were told by Clinton volunteers that they had to mark "uncommitted" on their card for the first round of voting. This was not true and all campaigns were made clear what the caucus rules were. No voting was to be done before noon. But these people were told at 11:30 that they had to mark their cards.

The Clinton people tried to shut the doors to the caucus at 11:30, to not allow anyone in, despite CLEAR state party rules that the doors were to stay open until noon. The caucus chair (an Edwards supporter who was scrupulously fair and well-versed in the rules) threatened to call the cops because the Clinton precinct chair and a staffer from California were so obnoxious.

I personally saw the memo that was distributed to Clinton staffers and volunteers that said, and I quote, IT'S NOT ILLEGAL UNLESS THEY TELL YOU IT IS!!

The man whose house we were staying in received a robocall from the Clinton campaign stating that Obama wanted to dump waste at Yucca Mountain (not true) and that he said Republicans were the "party of ideas". He saved it and played it for us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
61. sabre rattling with the doctrine of MAD mutually assured distruction
In the long history of partisan campaigning there has been an unspoken rule - do not try and gin up the debate by bringing in Thermonuclear Warfare into a campaign. There have been traditional conventions that both parties have used to make sure that when running for office you don't get specific and worsen international tensions by unnecssarily bringing in nuclear weapons into the heat of the debate.

When asked what you would do if a neighbor was attacked the answer would be something like:

"As your President I would consider it as a serious attack on the vital interests of the United States and we would make an appropriate response."

When asked about nuclear weapons in particular a typical answer would be "I am not going to take anything off the table"


This is her statement

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4u1nmGmtD18


VIOLATES CLINTON LAW OF HOPE AND FEAR


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HoqVNJ1622U

Senator Clinton has dramatically escalated the rhetoric of thermonuclear warfare in a way that Nixon/Kennedy did not do even when they quibbled about Quemoy and Matsu in 1960. She used fear in her rhetoric and her commercials.



The reaction around the world was swift and damning.



They used words like Impudent, Bellicose, Bush III, Madhouse, Ozone Destroying, Cold War Mentality, warrior like, hawkish in these following excerpts from England, Arab News, Israel, France and American Iranians.




http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5jEp2ukq1nzsx5QXn7Khdn7AqDPmg
British minister says Clinton's 'obliterate' Iran tone imprudent

11 hours ago

LONDON (AFP) — A British foreign minister said Wednesday that US Democratic presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton's threat to "totally obliterate" Iran if it attacked Israel with nuclear weapons was imprudent.

Lord Mark Malloch-Brown, a former United Nations deputy secretary-general and the foreign office minister responsible for Asia, questioned the comments by the New York senator, made in an interview broadcast Tuesday.

"While it is reasonable to warn Iran of the consequence of it continuing to develop nuclear weapons and what those real consequences bring to its security, it is not probably prudent... in today's world to threaten to obliterate any other country and in many cases civilians resident in such a country," he said.

The British government wanted a Middle East -- including Israel -- free of nuclear weapons, he said, responding to a question in the House of Lords, Britain's unelected upper chamber of parliament.

In response to a question on what she would do if the Islamic republic were to attack US ally Israel, Clinton told ABC News: "I want the Iranians to know that if I'm the president, we will attack Iran.

"In the next 10 years, during which they might foolishly consider launching an attack on Israel, we would be able to totally obliterate them."

Clinton said her remark was an attempt to lay out a rationale for a Cold War-style system of deterrence with Tehran.



Hillary Clinton, in her most bellicose comments since the presidential race began, today threatened to obliterate Iran if it launched a nuclear strike against Israel.

Speaking as voters went to the polls in the potentially crucial Pennsylvania primary, the New York senator said: "I want the Iranians to know that if I'm the president, we will attack Iran (if it attacks Israel)."

Barack Obama immediately accused her of "sabre-rattling", saying this was the kind of language that had been used by the Bush administration over the last few years and was not helpful.

http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1208422654274&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull
54. Regional nuclear war could destroy ozone layer
Recent research suggests a regional nuclear war could destroy the ozone layer and with it, life on Earth. We need to eliminate nuclear weapons around the world, not threaten to use them!
Julie Phillips - USA (04/22/2008 20:14)




http://www.arabnews.com/?page=7§ion=0&article=109267&d=24&m=4&y=2008
If there were any doubt that if she made it to the Oval Office, Hillary Clinton’s term would be George Bush Mark III, the lady made it plain on the eve of Tuesday’s Pennsylvania primary.

Her campaign had already run TV advertisements featuring pictures of Osama Bin Laden and asking voters who they would really trust as their commander-in-chief, Clinton or Obama. Then Monday night, Clinton drove home her “toughness” by threatening to “obliterate” Iran if it launched an attack on Israel. Given the kind of foreign policy advisers she has (the same as those who paved the way for Iraq war), she may not wait for Iran to “attack” Israel. It can be a pre-emptive “obliteration.”

This is the foreign politics of the madhouse. It demonstrates the same doltish ignorance that has distinguished Bush’s foreign relations. It offers only violence where there should be negotiations and war where there could be peace. At a stroke, Clinton demonstrated to everyone in this region that if she were the next occupant of the White House, Iraq-like death and destruction would be the order of the da


http://www.campaigniran.org/casmii/index.php?q=node/4712
NIAC denounces Clinton’s war rhetoric: "Obliterate" Iran
Washington DC - The National Iranian American Council (NIAC) denounces Senator Hillary Clinton's escalating war rhetoric on Iran. In an interview with Good Morning America, Senator Clinton promised Tuesday to "obliterate" Iran should Tehran develop a nuclear weapon and use it against Israel.

"I want the Iranians to know that if I'm the President, we will attack Iran," Clinton said. "In the next 10 years, during which they might foolishly consider launching an attack on Israel, we would be able to totally obliterate them."

NIAC regrets that at a time when America needs a new foreign policy - one centered on resolving regional and global conflict through diplomacy in cooperation with US allies - Senator Clinton has chosen a policy that would prolong conflict. Her rhetoric suggests that she would resort to Cold War tactics instead of recognizing the ability to resolve the US-Iran stalemate through diplomacy.

"Senator Clinton's statement reflects a mindset of perpetual conflict that has guided our Iran policy for the last seven years," Trita Parsi, NIAC President, said. "This is disastrous for US national interest, since we are in desperate need of a new and fresh Iran policy aimed at resolving the conflict rather than prolonging it."

Senator Clinton's remarks were made in the context of her proposal to provide a nuclear umbrella to Arab states in the Middle East against Iran. The New York Senator rejected on MSNBC Monday evening the idea that the government in Tehran cannot be deterred.

"Fixation on deterrence, sanctions and threats of war have all failed to advance US national interest and change Iran's nuclear policy," Parsi said. "What we need now is not nuclear deterrence, but nuclear diplomacy."



http://www.richardsilverstein.com/tikun_olam/2008/04/22/clinton-to-iran-we-will-obliterate-you/
Tikun Olam-תקון עולם: Make the World a Better Place
Hillary Clinton must think she’s auditioning for the role of Curtis LeMay in a Hollywood film. That’s the only reason (other than a looming PA. primary in which she’s desperate to sound tough as nails) I can figure she’s sounding more like a Gen. Buck Turgidsen in Dr. Stangelove than a presidential candidate. ABC News reports that on this morning’s Good Morning America she will threaten to obliterate Iran if they attack Israel:

…In an interview airing on “Good Morning America” Tuesday. ABC News’ Chris Cuomo asked Clinton what she would do if Iran attacked Israel with nuclear weapons.

“I want the Iranians to know that if I’m the president, we will attack Iran,” Clinton said. “In the next 10 years, during which they might foolishly consider launching an attack on Israel, we would be able to totally obliterate them.”

Is this truly how Hillary thinks she’s going to salvage her primary campaign and eke out a win over Obama?? This is precisely the Hillary that so many Democrats have been turned off by–the candidate who thinks she has to out-gun and out-man every other candidate to show she’s tough on defense. The Party doesn’t need another Henry Jackson, Hillary. We need a candidate more like your husband was in 1992–more like…Barack Obama. A candidate appealing to the “better angels of our nature” rather than the warrior within us.


http://www.france24.com/en/20080422-clinton-threatens-obliterate-iran-israel-attacked
AFP - French associated press:


Democratic presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton threatened to "totally obliterate" Iran if the Islamic Republic was ever "reckless" enough to launch a nuclear attack on Israel.

She later said her remark was an attempt to lay out a rationale for a Cold War-style system of deterrence with Iran, but her rival Barack Obama accused her of saber-rattling, as Pennsylvania held its crucial presidential primary.

Clinton took her hawkish line in an interview with ABC television, when she was asked what she would do as president if the Islamic Republic were to launch a nuclear strike on Israel.

"I want the Iranians to know that if I'm the president, we will attack Iran," Clinton said.

"In the next 10 years, during which they might foolishly consider launching an attack on Israel, we would be able to totally obliterate them."

Later, Clinton told reporters at a polling station in Conshohocken, outside Philadelphia, that Iran must be made aware of the "high price" it would have to pay for any nuclear strike.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mkultra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
62. suggesting Obama drug use
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dailykoff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
63. "you're likable enough" gate, "periodically" gate
Edited on Wed Apr-23-08 11:42 PM by dailykoff
to name two more bogus Hillbot injuries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
64. NH Mailer Sent By Clinton Campaign Claiming Obama wouldn't "stand up and protect" a women's right to
choose because he had voted "present" -- but not yes -- on a few abortion-related bills in the Illinois legislature when Obama's actions were actually part of a strategy to stymie anti-abortion legislation:


Sen. Barack Obama faced a barrage of criticism on the campaign trail and in mailboxes yesterday, with his rivals criticizing his support of nuclear power and accusing him of taking an ambiguous position on abortion rights. Members of one advocacy group supporting Sen. Hillary Clinton called on its leader to stop a negative ad campaign against Obama

~snip~

• A Clinton campaign flyer criticizing Obama's stance on abortion rights landed in New Hampshire mailboxes yesterday, accusing the Illinois senator of being "unwilling to take a stand on choice." On one side the flyer says, "a woman's right to choose . . .," with the backside displaying side-by-side comparisons of Clinton's and Obama's efforts to support abortion rights.

The mailer says Obama had seven opportunities in the Illinois state Senate to "stand up against Republican anti-choice legislation," but seven times he voted "present," instead of "yes" or "no."

"Being there is not enough to protect choice," the flyer says. In bold letters at the bottom it reads, "On January 8 you have a choice."

Obama campaign spokesman Reid Cherlin said the claim was false and already backfired once when Clinton tried to make it in Iowa. The campaign also provided a prepared statement from Lorna Barrett, the president of the Chicago chapter of the National Organization for Women. Brett called the mailer a "red herring."

"Barack Obama is and always has been there for the choice community. I know - I was there with him in the trenches," she said.

"This is offensive. I am pro-choice, pro-truth, pro-Hillary - in that order. And questioning the latter. I am very disgusted by this tactic being used by the Clinton campaign."

A story in the New York Times last month described Obama's "present" votes and quoted a spokeswoman for Illinois Planned Parenthood saying that the votes were actually part of a strategy to stymie anti-abortion legislation.
http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080106/NEWS01/801060396&template=single
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:18 AM
Response to Reply #64
99. That was a really ugly one and completely dishonest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mkultra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
65. appearing on the ballot in MI
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quantass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
67. Telling supporters not to use Wright--but later she uses it on MSM to redirect focus
from her on-going troubles that the media were focusing on of her Sniper-fire lies, Colombia trade fiasco lies.

The thought that she would not want to use Wright as a tool of divisiveness seemed like she was taking the high-road of integrity on this but it only took a week before she began using this as a tool of attack so as to inject race and redirect her problems and make the MSM media forget.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quantass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 11:46 PM
Response to Original message
68. Having Bill pardon the Peurto-Rican terroists as a way to win Hispanic votes when she would run for
office
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
74. Mentioning Farrakhan anytime she gets a chance.
Boogyman's gonna get you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
77. Lawsuit in Nevada..
and those emails sent out by her campaign workers "Barack Obama is a Muslim who plans on "destroying the U.S. from the inside out.""Let us all remain alert concerning Obama's expected presidential Candidacy,"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveAmerica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #77
117. I'm surprised the e-mail about Obama being Muslim shows up so far down the thread
This one has been the most Repubicanesque and achieved the same objective the Republicans would have gone for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quantass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:06 AM
Response to Original message
78. Hillary's disturbing thing she did to that Teenage rape victim
Edited on Thu Apr-24-08 12:08 AM by quantass
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:10 AM
Response to Original message
79. Meeting with Scaife
And his paper endorsing her

Do I actually have to provide a link for that one?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aloha Spirit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #79
115. You mean this Scaife? Who wants homosexuality a crime, punishable with death?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Mellon_Scaife#Political_donations

Bill Clinton accepted a meeting with Scaife last summer....
The reasons for the Pittsburgh Tribune Review endorsement had nothing to do with "substance."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 09:02 AM
Response to Reply #115
143. That's the one
yup.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:12 AM
Response to Original message
80. Bill declares "class war" accuses Obama campaign of hostility towards working class voters

Class War!

Andrew Sullivan 23 Apr 2008

Bill Clinton directly accuses the Obama campaign of hostility to working class voters. When you see the brutal politics the Clintons are still eagerly deploying, you have to believe this will go to the convention. The Clintons are prepared to use any argument, any Republican tactic, and any social or cultural division to stay in the game. By tactically morphing into Rove Republicans, they are deliberately pivoting off a myth about Obama to make him unelectable. I think the idea that they will withdraw when Obama reaches the actual number of delegates required for the nomination is a myth. They will insist on having their say at the convention and changing the votes of pledged delegates if they need to. This is their party, in their minds. Obama has no right to lead it. Until he waits his turn and the Clintons give their blessing.

To stay in the game, the level and suicidal quality of their attacks on Obama require a similar form of tactic in response. But Obama will not and should not go there. The one profound difference between him and the Clintons is that he will actually not do some things for the sake of power. God knows the Clontons have brought him to the verge of that - but pure cynicism would rebut his core message and destroy his candidacy as surely as the Clintons are trying to do. And to say what needs to be said about the Clintons - the truth about their character and their shared pathologies - would be a horribly divisive and brutal move. It would render the Clintons even more unelectable than they already are, undermine the Obama message and give the White House to the GOP. What's striking to me about this race is that it is the young insurgent who is still acting as the responsible party elder; and the former president who is behaving like a man who will destroy his own party in order to soothe his own sense of entitlement and ego.

After this presidency, after eight years of war and debt and torture and deceit and cynicism, to see the Democratic party self-destruct is really something. They were given a chance to remake the country and regain their soul; and the Clintons could not bear it if they were not the vehicles for such a shift. I don't believe anyone in the Democratic party can or will stop them. This is a kamikaze mission.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:16 AM
Response to Original message
81. Clinton Went On Limbaugh Show the day of the Texas primary

http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2008/03/clinton-went-on.html">Clinton Went On Limbaugh?

Andrew Sullivan 10 Mar 2008 10:34 am

You may have missed it - almost everyone missed it - but Bill Clinton was on Rush Limbaugh's show the day of the Texas primary. You can hear the radio here. Limbaugh himself was sick that day, apparently, but he had already urged Republicans to cross over to keep Hillary Clinton in the race. Bill saw an opening - and went there.

Now just wrap your mind around this: the Clintons were happy to support a cynical, partisan Republican campaign to wound the Democratic front-runner, and they were brazen enough to go on the Limbaugh show to do so.

There also seems little doubt that Republican mischief played a real role in affecting the results. And they call Obama's call for them to release their tax returns a tactic worthy of Ken Starr. I repeat: the chutzpah and the cynicism just leave you speechless. And as you find it impossible to do much but splutter, the Clintons plow on with new self-serving lies.

You know how I realized this? I saw first hand the way they dealt with gay issues in their first term. They didn't just wimp out on our push for marriage equality, they actively pivoted off homophobia to get a few points (ask Dick Morris; it's one of the things he's actually ashamed of in retrospect). The Clintons even put anti-gay ads on Christianist radio stations in the South to build support for the 1996 re-election. And they continue to show up at gay events claiming to be avatars for our civil rights. And the stupid gays still believe them!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:18 AM
Response to Original message
82. Bill Clinton: "Next, We'll See Him Run an Ad Saying: Vote For Me, I Don't Steal Cars."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:22 AM
Response to Original message
84. Hillary again endorses McCain over Obama, in 3 more TV appearances

Hillary again endorses McCain over Obama, in 3 more TV appearances

by John Aravosis (DC) · 3/05/2008

She said it three more times in the past day. Why the hell is she saying that the Republican candidate is more qualified to be president than our own presumptive nominee? And what the hell does our party plan to do on stopping this train wreck? She can't win, it's over, she doesn't have the delegates and can't get the delegates. She's hoping she can destroy Obama and step in after he's toast. And if she's wrong, she'll simply leave Obama destroyed for the general election campaign against McCain, the guy she has now said four times is more qualified to be president than our presumptive nominee. Here is the first time she endorsed McCain over Obama, and watch her three additional TV appearances below.

...here's the video

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dchill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:27 AM
Response to Original message
85. False radio ads "Campaign News Update:"
In the last couple days before the Ohio Primary, ads claiming to be "Campaign News Updates" (and sounding like it) accused the Obama Campaign of approaching the Canadians with the "nod & wink" about NAFTA re-negotiation being political rhetoric, nothing to worry about. It turned out to be something the Clinton Campaign had already done - and then, they did it again.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Diane R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:30 AM
Response to Original message
86. Boasting of a 10% win when she only got 9.1%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Diane R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:31 AM
Response to Original message
87. Claiming she won 'Florida, Michigan and Texas' when she didn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Diane R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:31 AM
Response to Reply #87
88. Claiming "Barack Obama doesn't want you to get to vote".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveAmerica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #88
121. I was just looking this one up too, does it count as fearmongering?
http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/04/01/clinton.obama/
"There are some folks saying we ought to stop these elections," she said in Indianapolis, Indiana, on March 29 -- the audience booed the notion.

"I don't think we believe that in America," she said. "The more people that have a chance to vote, the better it is for our democracy."

"My take on it is a lot of Sen. Obama's supporters want to end this race because they don't want people to keep voting," she told KTVQ in Billings, Montana. "That's just the opposite of what I believe. We want people to vote. I want the people of Montana to vote, don't you?"

Bill says Obama's supporters want to disenfranchise voters

The former president has charged that Obama's supporters want to end the race and stifle voters because his wife has the late momentum.

"I know Hillary's gaining on them when they say, 'Oh, let's shut this down now; we don't want to be divided," Clinton said in West Virginia last month. "Let's just disenfranchise several of the million people who could vote."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue State Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:06 AM
Response to Original message
90. "It took a Clinton to clean up after the first Bush....." By stopping
Edited on Thu Apr-24-08 01:07 AM by ingin
all investigations into the Iran/Contra and BCCI scandals!

So when she says "...and it will take another Clinton to clean up after the second Bush.", does this mean that she will stop investigations into the crimes of the second Bush administration?

Think about it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
datopbanana Donating Member (938 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:08 AM
Response to Original message
92. Falsely claiming BO doesn't want NC to vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kdpeters Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:10 AM
Response to Original message
93. Bill Clinton: "This whole thing is a fairy tale"
In my own personal opinion, that is the point where it started to get really nasty and that's who started it. It was demeaning, belittling, dismissing and all around VERY unbecoming of a former president. I'm taking you at your word on face value that you are asking this question in good faith. That incident is one of the things that offended me that I offer back to you in good faith. I don't consider it a "dirty trick", just ugly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #93
127. Jesse Jackson comparison by Bill Clinton
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:13 AM
Response to Original message
95. Questioned the right of Iowa students to vote at their campus address
You know, where they live most of the year and have a legal right to vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aloha Spirit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #95
116. providing link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:14 AM
Response to Original message
96. Based her entire Ohio campaign on lying about her early support for NAFTA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:14 AM
Response to Reply #96
97. Crying "Shame on you!" when Obama told the truth about her support for NAFTA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aloha Spirit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 08:44 AM
Response to Reply #97
112. and crying "shame on you" at a politically opportune moment, when the truth is...
those flyers had been out for weeks.
It was completely staged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mystieus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:19 AM
Response to Original message
100. Trustworthiness
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:23 AM
Response to Original message
103. Delaying the release of her tax returns and then complaining that Obama didn't release his old ones
from before entering public office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:25 AM
Response to Original message
104. "That's change you can xerox"
Give me a fucking break. That whole line of attack was a joke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlyingSquirrel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:47 AM
Response to Original message
105. Saying "The pledged delegates aren't really pledged, they can vote for whoever they want."
Edited on Thu Apr-24-08 02:55 AM by FlyingSquirrel
While technically true, it makes a mockery of the system and is a slap in the face to the voters who expect their wishes (and votes) to be translated into a fair representation of the way the people voted.

Suggesting that the Superdelegates should overturn the winner of the delegate count, when they are only intended to do so in extreme situations (Florida and Michigan choosing not to abide by the DNC's rules does not qualify, especially since she alone chose to remain on the ballot in MI for some unfathomable reason.) Neither does the fact that the opposing candidate is black. Code words aside.

Calling caucuses undemocratic, again a slap in the face of the voters.

It's a pattern of refusing to live within the rules of the system, which

(a) doesn't bode well for having respect for ANY system including the Constitution if it doesn't suit her purposes;

(b) is a step toward dissolution of our system and possibly revolution, because that's what happens when the governed no longer consent to being governed because they don't feel they have a fair say in how they're being governed (for example, that their vote is meaningless or ignored).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 07:36 AM
Response to Original message
106. Kicking this so people can see Clinton's Campaign Crimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
109. Claiming that Obama is linked to terrorists
Edited on Thu Apr-24-08 08:31 AM by ProSense
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aloha Spirit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
110. voters see us from afar... and they vote, and that is... part of the process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aloha Spirit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
111. Pretending she is not aware of her husband's pardons and commutations...
among them Linda Sue Evans, Susan Rosenberg, William Borders... coincidence that Alcee Hastings was there at her Florida victory speech?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aloha Spirit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #111
126. Also the pardons for her brothers' associates. She said flat out to Tim Russert that she had no
knowledge of those pardons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourguide Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
119. Trying to link Obama to Hamas at the last debate via rev wright
that was trash.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #119
120. that's just a lie that you can't prove
Edited on Thu Apr-24-08 09:25 AM by bigtree
keep saying it though. maybe you can make it a greatest hit among your fellow smearmongers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourguide Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #120
122. I HEARD IT
GO BACK AND WATCH THE DEBATE KNUCKLEHEAD...

I can easily prove it, perhaps you can do your homework instead.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourguide Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #120
130. Here you go...
http://roadkillrefugee.wordpress.com/2008/04/17/abcs-horrible-obama-clinton-debate/

"Hillary, of course, ratcheted up the rhetoric by attempting to conflate Wright with 9/11, Farrakhan and Hamas (and worse, she did so in a vague way that almost seem to be implying Obama had such associations)."

Perhaps I will try and find the transcript for you later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #130
133. Hillary's statement from the debate is actually worse:
SENATOR CLINTON: Well, I think, in addition to the questions about Reverend Wright and what he said and when he said it, and for whatever reason he might have said these things, there were so many different variations on the explanations that we heard. And it is something that I think deserves further exploration, because clearly what we've got to figure out is how we're going to bring people together in a way that overcomes the anger, overcomes the divisiveness and whatever bitterness there may be out there.

It is clear that, as leaders, we have a choice who we associate with and who we apparently give some kind of seal of approval to. And I think that it wasn't only the specific remarks, but some of the relationships with Reverend Farrakhan, with giving the church bulletin over to the leader of Hamas to put a message in. You know, these are problems, and they raise questions in people's minds.

And so this is a legitimate area, as everything is when we run for office, for people to be exploring and trying to find answers.

link


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourguide Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #133
134. Thanks much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourguide Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #120
132. still waiting bigtree...for your apology.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #120
137. She did, bigtree. Neither Gibson nor Stephanopoulos mentioned or asked about Hamas
It was Hillary who made the leap. She spring-boarded from the moderators' questions, using it as a perfect segue, to input Hamas and Farrakhan in the minds of viewers. She knew exactly what she was doing:

...It is clear that, as leaders, we have a choice who we associate with and who we apparently give some kind of seal of approval to. And I think that it wasn't only the specific remarks, but some of the relationships with Reverend Farrakhan, with giving the church bulletin over to the leader of Hamas to put a message in. You know, these are problems, and they raise questions in people's minds.

And so this is a legitimate area, as everything is when we run for office, for people to be exploring and trying to find answers. ...


http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/16/us/politics/16text-debate.html?pagewanted=8

And, she said it after she was given an opportunity to move on:

~snip~

MR. STEPHANOPOULOS: But you do believe he's as patriotic as you are?

SENATOR OBAMA: This is somebody who's a former Marine. And so I have -- I believe that he loves this country, but I also believe that he's somebody who, because of the experiences he's had over the course of a lifetime, is also angry about the injustices that he's seen.

MR. GIBSON: I'm getting a little out of balance here. Do you want to take a few seconds, or do you want to go to the next question?

SENATOR CLINTON: Well, I think, in addition to the questions about Reverend Wright and what he said and when he said it, and for whatever reason he might have said these things, there were so many different variations on the explanations that we heard. And it is something that I think deserves further exploration, because clearly what we've got to figure out is how we're going to bring people together in a way that overcomes the anger, overcomes the divisiveness and whatever bitterness there may be out there.

It is clear that, as leaders, we have a choice who we associate with and who we apparently give some kind of seal of approval to. And I think that it wasn't only the specific remarks, but some of the relationships with Reverend Farrakhan, with giving the church bulletin over to the leader of Hamas to put a message in. You know, these are problems, and they raise questions in people's minds.

And so this is a legitimate area, as everything is when we run for office, for people to be exploring and trying to find answers.

~snip~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
123. Participating enthusiastically in ABC's ambush "debate"
The event was put together solely to smear Obama and slander the Democratic Party as a whole. She not only didn't say anything to defend her fellow Democrat, she added to the smearing with that Hamas lie, among other things.

She should have spoken up. She should have chided Gibson and Stephenopoulos for their lines of questioning and said "My opponent and I would like to have a debate on the issues please," but she didn't. She knew what the event was, and she participated enthusiastically.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveAmerica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
124. Thank you SO much for starting this, I'm bookmarking it, most helpful
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mckeown1128 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
125. Here is the meat of a post I did wwwaaayyy back in February:
A lesson in history: Hillary's ATTACK mailers!!! and robocalls.

1. This is one where Hillary attacks Obama using Republican fear mongering on taxes. Obama has said that as a possible solution to the SS problem. Of course the mailer says it will be a trillion dollar tax increase on working Americans. That leave the impression of the middle class, but in reality Obama has said that if we raise the SS cap, that he would make sure there is a donut protecting "hard working families." Something along the line of only people earning more than 200,000 would have to pay more. Hmm... sounds kinda... progressive to me. Of course Hillary leaves out the details in the hope of scaring up votes.

On Eve Of Primary, Hillary Drops Negative Mailer Hitting Obama On Taxes

here in New Hampshire http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmem...
and here in Nevada http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/010...


2. You may ask "what if right wing talking points on SS don't work?" Well, AFSCME on Hillary's behalf sent out this wonderful mailer in an attempt to scare voters into voting for Hillary.

"A Prime Minister is on the phone: They've lost a warhead," says the fictional memo on the front of the mailing.

The solution?

"Send in the right woman for the job."

http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/010...

This disgusting tactic lead to some members of AFCSME to right this letter. Where they say they are "shocked and appalled" at the deceptive tactics.

http://thepage.time.com/letter-to-afscme-p... /


3. And another mailer attacking Obama on "possibly" raising the cap on SS for those over 200,000.

http://marcambinder.theatlantic.com/archiv...


4. If this still didn't seem enough for the Hillary campaign. They could always LIE by implying that Obama isn't pro-choice.

Barrack Obama. Unwilling to take a stand on a woman's right to choose.

http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmem...

Only problem is that... Obama voted present on those few Illinois state senate issues because Planned Parenthood asked him to vote present as part of Planned Parenthood's strategy. Ohh... and Obama has a 100% rating from Planned Parenthood and NARAL. More on this here:

http://thecapitolfaxblog.com/2007/12/04/ab... /


5. Just to mix it up here is another Hillary attack on Obama's SS this time a robocall that also wrongly accuses him of wanting to cut benefits. (Which, falls under his statements that everything is on the table. Even though he said it isn't a serious consideration.)

http://hotlineblog.nationaljournal.com/arc...

6. We all know that Hillary said MI (and thought the same logic fl) "doesn't count for anything" and now she says it should count based on Obama running national ads. Remember all the faux outrage about Obama advertising in FL by default. Well, Hillary did have her "supporters" run a robocall and GOTV operation. And while this robocall isn't a direct attack on Obama, it does show the absurdity of that big spectacle Hillary's campaign made of FL based on Obama running ads nationally on CNN and MSNBC.

http://hotlineblog.nationaljournal.com/arc...

7. In SC Hillary's campaign didn't even try to spin a lie. They just flat out lied. This time claiming that Obama would "dismantle the minimum wage."

here:http://www.observer.com/2008/obama-creates...
and here: http://hotlineblog.nationaljournal.com/arc...

8. I guess lying about Obama's policies wasn't enough. Hillary's campaign apparently decided that to appeal to religious bigots and racists. This robocall seemed to serve no purpose with the exception of emphasizing Obama's middle name of Hussein, mentioning it 4 times. I like the last line of "You just can't take a CHANCE on Barrack HUSSEIN Obama." (Clinton loyalists will be quick to say that "there is nothing wrong with his middle name" of course that is bullshit.. These candidates have experts to poor over EVERY single word to make sure the word frames give the correct impression at all times. Also, how many robocalls will a campaign put out that say the name of the opposing candidate 4 times)

http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/010...

9. Of course here is where we get the hypocritical BS from Hillary herself. She says that Obama attacked her health care plan unfairly. (I personally think there is nothing wrong with criticizing someone else's positions.) Hillary of course forgets that she has been attacking Obama's health care plan too. This attack is over the lack of a mandate. Hillary shows a diverse group of people and the mailer asks "Which of these people doesn't deserve health care?". Of course that is misleading. Hillary's attack is that Obama's health care plan will prevent 15 million people from getting health care, but that doesn't match up with what the difference is. Hillary's logic is that 15 million people won't choose to get insured... that is a big difference from people being "left" out of the plan(as she is implying.)

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/... /



the links aren't working because I cut and pasted from my journal... go their and click on the links if you want see the articles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aloha Spirit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
131. You know what else is a dirty trick? Hillary has absolutely not made it clear what exactly her
husband will be doing in the White House if she's elected. Even long-time Clinton endorser Elaine Kamarck agrees:
http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2008/04/11/husbands_legacy_poses_a_dilemma_for_clinton/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mkultra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
135. is that enough McCamy?
And why are you gathering?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dailykoff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #135
136. I think her spinning wheel finally gave up the ghost.
Shame. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
138. Yes, this is plenty. I will use this for an upcoming journal. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aloha Spirit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #138
146. Thank *you* for what seems like a genuine bridge-building effort.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dailykoff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 05:38 AM
Response to Original message
139. Nope, nothing substantial here.
Oh, and "I'm leaving this thread open" for another day.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Asgaya Dihi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 05:46 AM
Response to Original message
140. Some of my favorites are
Stating that she knew the States wouldn't count, then when it's convenient to think otherwise decided that now they should count. Taking onto her campaign people who actually did deal with the States then penalize them and having those same people then get people to believe it's Obama disenfranchising them. Arguing that it's wrong to disenfranchise two States but it's fine to override the will of the voters in all of them with Super delegates and pledged delegates don't have to abide by the will of the voters either, and by the way remember it's Obama disenfranchising someone. And people believe it somehow.

Use of what I'll politely call inappropriate tactics when dealing with issues such as Wright. She spent enough time dealing with personality attacks and they argued themselves against the politics of personal destruction, if you just think back to what they said themselves you already know what's wrong with the tactics used here. They did too at one point.

Similar tactics attempted with Ayers, though karma had teeth this time when it turned out she knew some people too.

The whole package this campaign has been real raw, and if judged by their own standards at one time wrong as hell. The politics of personal destruction has been what much of the campaign was about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Youphemism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 05:47 AM
Response to Original message
141. Refers to Barack Obama as "B.O."

Okay, I don't know that for a fact. But it seems like a good guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dailykoff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 05:52 AM
Response to Original message
142. Breaking into Obama's campaign offices and stealing data.
Oh wait, that was crack addicts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
147. Dubiously connecting Obama to Weather Underground members when Bill pardoned other members. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goletian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #147
149. also said people died in some cases where they were involved...
Edited on Fri Apr-25-08 11:47 AM by goletian
neglected to mention the only people who died were actually members of the group whose bombs went off too early...

Clinton said "people died" in 1970s bombings by a radical group of which an Obama acquaintance was a member. In fact, the deaths were of three members of the Weather Underground itself, who died when their own bombs accidentally exploded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juajen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #149
152. Are you ware that the two women weather underground members
that Clinton pardoned had already served 16 and 17 years respectively, and that Ayers served no time at all. He got off because of his well connected father.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #152
154. Document or retract. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goletian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #152
156. that doesnt really change anything. even if ayers served time the smear wouldve been the same.
you have no point to make with that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
148. Claiming that Obama is not a muslim "as far as I know". n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
toys4kitty Donating Member (49 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
150. Boutique states anyone?
How about the complete disregard for states that she did poorly in?
Latte drinking, Prius driving, trust fund babies.....

The slamming of entire states and their populations is what really started the :wtf: and :puke: thoughts toward her and her campaign. Up until then, I was able to try to rationalize some of the stuff being thrown around.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemsUnited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
153. latest push poll to develop push poll in NC.
As per ABC's Jake Tapper

Audio: Clinton Camp Testing Attacks on Obama

http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/04/audio-clinton-c.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
157. completely disingenuous
you are nothing if not dishonest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Jun 09th 2024, 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC