|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-12-08 10:50 AM Original message |
Poll question: Will Senator Clinton say and do anything to get elected? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
journalist3072 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-12-08 10:54 AM Response to Original message |
1. I call bullshit on you. After all, you are supporting a guy who admitted that in 2004, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-12-08 10:56 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. As of this post 92% of the people don't agree with you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-12-08 10:58 AM Response to Reply #2 |
3. You think polls on DU are reliable? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GarbagemanLB (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-12-08 10:59 AM Response to Reply #3 |
4. Apparently Hillary supporters think AOL polls are reliable. What's the difference? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-12-08 11:03 AM Response to Reply #3 |
7. DUers are better informed than the general public |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-12-08 11:36 AM Response to Reply #7 |
27. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-12-08 11:42 AM Response to Reply #27 |
34. What's your point? I already explained the difference between |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
journalist3072 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-12-08 11:02 AM Response to Reply #2 |
6. How pathetic of a response from you....I see you conveniently failed to address Obama's admission |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-12-08 11:05 AM Response to Reply #6 |
10. I example that requires some serious spin to put it in a gray ethical area |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-12-08 11:04 AM Response to Reply #1 |
8. Obama consciously modified his comments to "I don't know how I would have voted" to support THE TEAM |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-12-08 11:05 AM Response to Reply #1 |
9. Grain of truth: We shouldn't accuse Clinton of havng consideration |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MH1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-12-08 11:18 AM Response to Reply #1 |
15. "Tailoring" and LYING are quite different. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
baldguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-12-08 11:37 AM Response to Reply #1 |
28. OMG! You're saying Obama, as a loyal Dem, supported the Dem candidate in 2004! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
journalist3072 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-12-08 11:41 AM Response to Reply #28 |
31. So you think it's OK that he didn't stand on principle and say how he really felt about Iraq? His |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-12-08 11:48 AM Response to Reply #1 |
37. I feel for you... cuz I love you "Chaka Khan, Sh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eric Condon (761 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-12-08 11:54 AM Response to Reply #1 |
39. You miss the point - he did that to HELP Kerry. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ericgtr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-12-08 10:59 AM Response to Original message |
5. "No- She is a very ethical and principled person" LMAO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-12-08 11:13 AM Response to Reply #5 |
12. 1 vote- It's telling that even her supporters can't vote for that one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tinrobot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-12-08 11:08 AM Response to Original message |
11. There's a few things she wouldn't say... like the truth. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Frank Booth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-12-08 11:16 AM Response to Original message |
13. Here are her latest comments: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-12-08 11:18 AM Response to Reply #13 |
16. There is a certain intellectual dishonesty when you become |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-12-08 03:23 PM Response to Reply #13 |
46. It was that sniper fire in Bosnia.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-12-08 04:00 PM Response to Reply #13 |
48. You forgot the summer cottage in Scranton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Frank Booth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-12-08 05:55 PM Response to Reply #48 |
50. Don't forget the mosquitoes! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-12-08 05:57 PM Response to Reply #13 |
51. Hillary's so out of touch it's frightening n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-12-08 11:16 AM Response to Original message |
14. Your candidate seems to think so - he's said it quite often |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-12-08 11:21 AM Response to Reply #14 |
17. Why didn't you vote? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-12-08 11:28 AM Response to Reply #17 |
21. because these polls are meaningless |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-12-08 11:35 AM Response to Reply #21 |
26. The problem with this one is it exceeds the 80% bias |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-12-08 11:38 AM Response to Reply #26 |
30. As I said, most Hillary supporters don't participate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-12-08 11:41 AM Response to Reply #30 |
32. What an odd way to show support for your candidate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
susankh4 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-12-08 11:22 AM Response to Original message |
18. Come November I sure hope we have a nominee |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-12-08 11:26 AM Response to Reply #18 |
19. So a candidate shouldn't have ethical constraints |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
susankh4 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-12-08 11:29 AM Response to Reply #19 |
22. If our candidate doesn't win.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-12-08 11:33 AM Response to Reply #22 |
24. If our candidate lacks ethics, it will be a hollow victory |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
susankh4 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-12-08 11:35 AM Response to Reply #24 |
25. Allright. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-12-08 11:38 AM Response to Reply #25 |
29. That is only true if you believe only an unethical candidate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
susankh4 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-12-08 11:42 AM Response to Reply #29 |
33. None of our candidates are "unethical" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-12-08 11:46 AM Response to Reply #33 |
36. "do what it takes" implies a lack of ethical constraint |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
susankh4 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-12-08 11:50 AM Response to Reply #36 |
38. In your mind it does? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-12-08 12:12 PM Response to Reply #38 |
41. Then why would you make that statement in a thread about ethics |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
susankh4 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-12-08 01:44 PM Response to Reply #41 |
43. The title of the thread had nothing to do with ethics. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-13-08 05:15 AM Response to Reply #43 |
53. The Poll certainly clarified that this thread is all about ethics |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
susankh4 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-13-08 06:14 AM Response to Reply #53 |
55. There is a category "other" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BklnDem75 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-12-08 11:44 AM Response to Reply #25 |
35. Wow... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-12-08 11:26 AM Response to Reply #18 |
20. we will- Senator Obama is the odds on favorite |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillYourVoteBCounted (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-12-08 11:31 AM Response to Original message |
23. absolutely. Kicked and recommended so we can get more voting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-12-08 12:01 PM Response to Original message |
40. who ruined it by voting that she's ethical?!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nebula (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-12-08 12:37 PM Response to Original message |
42. 96 to 1? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bensthename (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-12-08 01:46 PM Response to Original message |
44. you are spot on. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jillan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-12-08 02:13 PM Response to Original message |
45. You forgot to add - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-12-08 03:56 PM Response to Original message |
47. OMG so far only one vote for Clinton being ethical |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CADEMOCRAT7 (557 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-12-08 04:53 PM Response to Reply #47 |
49. Disappointing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-12-08 08:35 PM Response to Original message |
52. 128 to 2 those are shocking results |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Perry Logan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-13-08 05:35 AM Response to Original message |
54. Besides being bullshit, this is a barefaced insult to millions of Democrats. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun Sep 22nd 2024, 07:45 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC