|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
cosmokramer
![]() |
Wed Jun-02-04 10:27 PM Original message |
Clark 1st, McCain 2nd, Edwards falls to 3rd--Week 11 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dolo amber
![]() |
Wed Jun-02-04 10:28 PM Response to Original message |
1. Would anyone like to take bets |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmokramer
![]() |
Wed Jun-02-04 10:31 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. I would be deeeeeeeelighted that such an |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scoopie
![]() |
Wed Jun-02-04 10:38 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. Well, all of Tennessee sat up and took |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmokramer
![]() |
Wed Jun-02-04 10:41 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. Likely so... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dolo amber
![]() |
Wed Jun-02-04 10:43 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. I think it's become |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WI_DEM
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-04 08:04 AM Response to Reply #4 |
19. I hate to say it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
troublemaker
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-04 09:04 AM Response to Reply #19 |
21. With sad disgust |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmokramer
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-04 12:05 PM Response to Reply #19 |
29. That isn't really your concern. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
surfermaw
![]() |
Mon Jun-07-04 05:09 PM Response to Reply #19 |
77. It's a done deal, it is Edwards........................................... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmokramer
![]() |
Mon Jun-07-04 10:27 PM Response to Reply #77 |
80. hahahahahaha |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kahuna
![]() |
Tue Jun-08-04 06:44 AM Response to Reply #19 |
82. Whatever... You didn't see US falling apart when Clark's campaign.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gloria
![]() |
Wed Jun-02-04 11:00 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. I didn't know about the 4 phone calls...but I surmised that a deal was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LandOLincoln
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-04 01:10 AM Response to Reply #3 |
16. Personally, I think it's been a done deal since the middle of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmokramer
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-04 08:54 PM Response to Reply #16 |
35. I would agree with you, as usual. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmokramer
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-04 09:40 PM Response to Reply #16 |
38. Clark 48 appearances on behalf of Kerry... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Voltaire99
![]() |
Wed Jun-02-04 11:01 PM Response to Original message |
7. Where's Lieberman on this list? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one
![]() |
Wed Jun-02-04 11:02 PM Response to Original message |
8. As much as I like general Clark, he is not the best choice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spazito
![]() |
Wed Jun-02-04 11:29 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. That has been proven to be a false claim,,, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
troublemaker
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-04 09:07 AM Response to Reply #8 |
22. Strongest possible non-vulgar disagreement |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-04 10:09 AM Response to Reply #8 |
23. You're wrong about that. Sorry. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-04 09:59 PM Response to Reply #23 |
39. Sigh... Jamie Rubin... Sigh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to
![]() |
Mon Jun-07-04 12:39 PM Response to Reply #39 |
71. Does Christiane Amanpour know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmokramer
![]() |
Tue Jun-08-04 09:10 AM Response to Reply #71 |
85. Adorable he is! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sundancekid
![]() |
Wed Jun-02-04 11:19 PM Response to Original message |
9. in this messy world, one heartbeat from the presidency -- let it be Clark |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmokramer
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-04 08:17 PM Response to Reply #9 |
33. No doubt about it...it is who I trust. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DjTj
![]() |
Wed Jun-02-04 11:34 PM Response to Original message |
11. Clark should win all internet polls... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JI7
![]() |
Wed Jun-02-04 11:40 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. you have a good point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
juajen
![]() |
Fri Jun-04-04 02:01 AM Response to Reply #12 |
43. I love that suit Kerry has on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sopianae
![]() |
Wed Jun-02-04 11:52 PM Response to Reply #11 |
13. More than 12,000 people voted in the MSNBC poll... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Darkamber
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-04 12:19 AM Response to Reply #13 |
14. I really hate to say this but... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sopianae
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-04 12:41 AM Response to Reply #14 |
15. Yeah, a few people might delete their cookies and vote several times |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmokramer
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-04 11:46 AM Response to Reply #14 |
26. You fail to take in to account... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kahuna
![]() |
Tue Jun-08-04 10:57 AM Response to Reply #14 |
86. So why do you think only Clark supporters would freep? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kahuna
![]() |
Tue Jun-08-04 06:47 AM Response to Reply #11 |
83. 6 entries on a post from April 16 when Clark was trailing Edwards is not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Claire Beth
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-04 07:33 AM Response to Original message |
17. I like Clark! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmokramer
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-04 10:58 PM Response to Reply #17 |
40. You have excellent, well-reasoned taste! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WI_DEM
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-04 08:00 AM Response to Original message |
18. where did people get the idea that just becuz you are a military man |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jai4WKC08
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-04 11:23 AM Response to Reply #18 |
25. That crack about Clark's resume... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmokramer
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-04 12:03 PM Response to Reply #18 |
28. Simple answer: Look at the data. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Padraig18
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-04 08:05 AM Response to Original message |
20. Amazing what happens in online polls... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmokramer
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-04 11:51 AM Response to Reply #20 |
27. Scientific polls said Dean should be the nominee... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jai4WKC08
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-04 01:17 PM Response to Reply #27 |
30. Actually, I haven't seen any |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmokramer
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-04 03:19 PM Response to Reply #30 |
32. The media reports what they want to report... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JI7
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-04 08:20 PM Response to Reply #27 |
34. no, scientific polls had Kerry ahead |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmokramer
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-04 11:29 PM Response to Reply #34 |
42. He wasn't ahead in any of the national polls until a few days |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Padraig18
![]() |
Fri Jun-04-04 05:26 AM Response to Reply #42 |
44. Since we elect the POTUS on a state-by-state basis, ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JI7
![]() |
Fri Jun-04-04 05:33 AM Response to Reply #44 |
45. right, Kerry was running a primary election |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Padraig18
![]() |
Fri Jun-04-04 07:44 AM Response to Reply #45 |
47. Precisely. National polls, ESPECIALLY online ones, mean squat! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmokramer
![]() |
Fri Jun-04-04 11:29 AM Response to Reply #44 |
48. Which was precisely my point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Padraig18
![]() |
Fri Jun-04-04 12:37 PM Response to Reply #48 |
49. Huh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri Jun-04-04 02:32 PM Response to Reply #49 |
50. Deleted message |
cosmokramer
![]() |
Fri Jun-04-04 03:15 PM Response to Reply #49 |
51. No. You made it for me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Padraig18
![]() |
Fri Jun-04-04 03:33 PM Response to Reply #51 |
52. I disagree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Auntie Bush
![]() |
Fri Jun-04-04 03:53 PM Response to Reply #52 |
53. Didn't the polls say Dean had the nomination locked up tight? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Padraig18
![]() |
Fri Jun-04-04 03:55 PM Response to Reply #53 |
54. None said anyone had the nomination 'locked up tight', that I recall. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmokramer
![]() |
Fri Jun-04-04 08:28 PM Response to Reply #54 |
55. Actually, almost ALL of the pundits said so... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Padraig18
![]() |
Fri Jun-04-04 08:31 PM Response to Reply #55 |
56. No, both are not valid. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JI7
![]() |
Fri Jun-04-04 08:49 PM Response to Reply #56 |
57. right, the polls showed that Kerry ahead at the time of the elections |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmokramer
![]() |
Sat Jun-05-04 12:02 AM Response to Reply #56 |
58. You don't call ahead by 10% nationally locked up? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JI7
![]() |
Sat Jun-05-04 12:12 AM Response to Reply #58 |
59. no, because the election was only in iowa where Kerry was ahead |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Padraig18
![]() |
Sat Jun-05-04 04:25 AM Response to Reply #59 |
61. You are correct, JI7. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Padraig18
![]() |
Sat Jun-05-04 04:24 AM Response to Reply #58 |
60. No, I do not consider that 'locked up'. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmokramer
![]() |
Sat Jun-05-04 08:22 PM Response to Reply #60 |
62. Yet national polls report it as so. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Padraig18
![]() |
Sat Jun-05-04 08:51 PM Response to Reply #62 |
63. No national poll reported that--- ever. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmokramer
![]() |
Sat Jun-05-04 08:57 PM Response to Reply #63 |
64. Good grief... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Padraig18
![]() |
Sat Jun-05-04 09:16 PM Response to Reply #64 |
65. No. I get it just fine. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmokramer
![]() |
Sat Jun-05-04 10:14 PM Response to Reply #65 |
66. No, you don't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Padraig18
![]() |
Sat Jun-05-04 10:33 PM Response to Reply #66 |
67. Yes, I do. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sun Jun-06-04 08:24 PM Response to Reply #67 |
68. Deleted message |
Name removed
![]() |
Mon Jun-07-04 12:50 PM Response to Reply #68 |
72. Deleted message |
Name removed
![]() |
Mon Jun-07-04 12:53 PM Response to Reply #72 |
73. Deleted message |
rasputin1952
![]() |
Mon Jun-07-04 02:51 PM Response to Reply #72 |
74. I appologize that this particular deletion came up as "moderator"... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Mon Jun-07-04 03:01 PM Response to Reply #74 |
75. Deleted message |
in_cog_ni_to
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-04 10:12 AM Response to Original message |
24. People are finally seeing the light! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Auntie Bush
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-04 01:21 PM Response to Original message |
31. Yes he does offer something. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmokramer
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-04 09:04 PM Response to Original message |
36. UPDATE UPDATE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to
![]() |
Fri Jun-04-04 07:11 AM Response to Reply #36 |
46. WOW! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MoonRiver
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-04 09:06 PM Response to Original message |
37. pleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleaseplease |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Auntie Bush
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-04 11:28 PM Response to Reply #37 |
41. I'll drink to that! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RaRa
![]() |
Sun Jun-06-04 09:22 PM Response to Original message |
69. Any truth to their dislike of each other? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jai4WKC08
![]() |
Mon Jun-07-04 06:46 AM Response to Reply #69 |
70. Not true about intern scandal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmokramer
![]() |
Mon Jun-07-04 04:33 PM Response to Reply #70 |
76. Exactly. It was NOT a Clark generated attack. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cuban_Liberal
![]() |
Mon Jun-07-04 06:51 PM Response to Original message |
78. Wow! Leading in an online poll? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmokramer
![]() |
Mon Jun-07-04 10:31 PM Response to Reply #78 |
81. Sure, much as it was on the Edwards blog. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kahuna
![]() |
Tue Jun-08-04 06:50 AM Response to Reply #81 |
84. There were six replies to an April post on that Clark blob that THEY'RE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly
![]() |
Mon Jun-07-04 07:29 PM Response to Original message |
79. I'll take the antiwar general. But, MCCAIN?! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Tue Jun 25th 2024, 07:39 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC